Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posterior cervical stabilization using wires was first described by Hadra in 1891 as a means to address instability secondary to fracture and Pott disease. Subsequently, Rogers described the treatment of traumatic cervical instability by using interspinous wiring in 1942. Relatively minor modifications to wiring techniques have been made over the decades, but the general concept remains similar.
Although these techniques are generally referred to as wiring techniques, wires or cables may be considered. Braided cables offer the potential merit of flexibility, strength, and improved fatigue properties. However, these cables may not be readily available, they require specific tools, and they have a tendency to return to a circular shape if loosening occurs. Interspinous wiring provides good support in flexion, but it offers much less in extension and rotation because only the midline spinous processes are stabilized.
Posterior cervical stabilization has many indications, including, but not limited to, traumatic cervical spine injuries, sagittal deformity, and instability resulting from congenital anomalies or inflammatory arthritis, infection, neoplasms, or anterior nonunion. The goals of internal fixation are stabilization, maintenance of alignment, enhancement of fusion, and alleviation of pain.
Interspinous wiring is contraindicated when the spinous processes are fractured or when the laminae are fractured or removed by laminectomy resulting from decompression. In these cases, facet wiring, briefly described later, can be performed. Alternatively, the vertebrae can be stabilized with wires extending from the segment above the level of spinous process fracture to the level below it.
For many applications, newer methods such as lateral mass screws and pedicle screws have replaced wiring techniques in current clinical practice because of their flexibility and ability to be placed despite removal of posterior vertebral elements. Nonetheless, interspinous wiring remains a useful technique as a result of its “low cost, decreased risk of neurologic or vascular injury and relative technical ease of instrumentation placement.” This is a good tool to maintain in the armamentarium of cervical stabilization techniques.
Of the applications for which interspinous wiring is considered, the one that is currently most common is for provisional reduction and stabilization of traumatic injuries. By facilitating reduction with the interspinous wire, the alignment of the spine can be improved before placement of lateral mass fixation. The wire is then often left or can even be considered for removal before completing the stabilization construct.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here