Human immunodeficiency virus infection


Introduction

The burden of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection remains a global public health issue, with an estimated 1.8 million new infections and almost 800,000 acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)–related deaths in 2018. Around 38 million people are currently living with HIV worldwide (including 8 million patients not aware of their seropositive status), corresponding to a ∼50% increase over the past two decades that reflects both the continuous dissemination of the virus and a striking improvement of life expectancy in patients with sustained viral replication under combination antiretroviral therapies (cARTs). Indeed, since their advent in 1996, dramatic progresses in the efficacy and safety of cART schemes have converted HIV infection from a rapidly fatal disease to a chronic condition requiring long-term care. Though access to cART remains a major challenge in low-income countries and certain sociologic clusters in middle- and high-income regions, roughly two-thirds of the global seropositive population are now receiving these drugs. This proportion is growing steadily, which translates into a continuous decrease in the incidence of opportunistic infections (OIs) and other AIDS-related events compared with the early years of the HIV pandemic. , Meanwhile, lifelong residual viral replication and/or cART-related toxicities may result in HIV-associated non-AIDS (HANA) conditions, especially chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), atherosclerosis, renal dysfunction, certain neoplasms, and liver diseases.

HIV-infected patients are at high risk for critical illness because of the occurrence of severe OI in those with advanced immunosuppression, a marked susceptibility to bacterial sepsis and tuberculosis at every stage of HIV infection, and a rising prevalence of HANA conditions in patients aging under cART. Along with a steady decline in AIDS-related admissions and an opposite trend in those for exacerbated comorbidities, several patterns of intensive care have changed in this population over the late cART era, notably the emergence of new mechanisms of immunosuppression not directly resulting from AIDS (e.g., antineoplastic chemotherapy or solid organ transplantation [SOT]), the management of cART at the acute phase of critical illness, and a dramatic enhancement in short-term survival that mainly ensues from general advances in ICU practices. ,

Here, we seek to provide a comprehensive overview of intensive care in HIV-infected patients, including current epidemiologic features, reasons for intensive care unit (ICU) admission, use of life-sustaining therapies, and determinants of short-term outcome. We also summarize the available evidence regarding the management of cART in the ICU, with a focus on severe adverse events, administration issues, and timing of initiation in patients admitted for AIDS-related OI.

The continuum of HIV infection: Impact on clinical presentation at ICU admission

Acute HIV infection

Acute HIV infection is characterized by a rapid rise in plasma HIV RNA levels and may trigger a myriad of nonspecific clinical signs such as fever, myalgia, disseminated lymphadenopathy, and rash that mimic mononucleosis syndrome. Yet severe forms with acute encephalitis, myocarditis, or multiple organ failure caused by hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) have been reported occasionally and may require ICU admission.

Progression to AIDS

After 3–4 weeks, the viremia level plateaus because of the appearance of HIV-specific antibodies. The disease then becomes chronic, with a gradual decline in CD4 + T lymphocytes (hereafter referred to as CD4 cells) resulting in the occurrence of AIDS-defining conditions within 2–20 years after seroconversion. Of note, both innate and humoral immune alterations occur upon early HIV infection, explaining the high risk of bacterial infection and tuberculosis at this stage. Without cART, HIV infection nearly always progresses to end-stage AIDS with wasting, recurrent OIs, and other ultimately fatal complications (e.g., HIV encephalitis).

Late-stage HIV infection remains a common reason for ICU admission in settings or sociologic clusters with limited access to diagnosis, cART, and specialized aftercare—migrants, homeless people, and other individuals without adequate health insurance coverage are particularly affected in high-income countries. These patients primarily present with severe AIDS-related OIs against a background of poor nutritional status and advanced immunosuppression, similarly to the early years of the HIV pandemic (1980–1995). Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP), cerebral toxoplasmosis, and tuberculosis are the leading diagnoses, especially for inaugural admissions. , Such patients account for 10%–30% of all ICU admissions of HIV-infected individuals ( Table 120.1 ), though this proportion appears to be dwindling over the past decade. Of note, severely immunosuppressed hosts—that is, those with CD4 cells <100/μL—may have two or more concurrent OIs accounting for clinical presentation at ICU admission.

TABLE 120.1
Critically Ill HIV-Positive Patients in the cART Era: Selected Recent Cohort Studies
Setting and Period (reference) Patients, Number Age, y a Prior cART Inaugural Admission OI b IMV RRT Vasopressors Mortality
Spain, single ICU, 1997–2003 49 40 (33–47) 31% 31% 81% NA NA NA 54% (hospital)
USA, single ICU, 2000–2004 306 44 (24–72) 33% NA 21% 68% NA NA 21% (hospital)
UK, single ICU, 1999–2005 102 39 (32–44) 37% 30% 67% 62% 19% NA 24% (ICU) 34% (hospital)
France, single ICU, 1999–2006 284 42 (36–49) 53% 20% 25% 44% 11% 23% 14% (ICU)
Mexico, single ICU, 1996–2006 53 38 ± 10 28% 26% 77% 83% NA 26% 43% (ICU)
Brazil, single ICU, 1996–2006 278 40 ± 10 45% 38% 81% 55% NA NA 55% (ICU) 69% (6 months)
UK, single ICU, 2001–2006 43 44 (40–60) 56% 0 (0%) 44% 62% 27% 56% 32% (ICU)
The Netherlands, single ICU, 1996–2008 80 43 (23–76) 36% 11% 50% 76% NA NA 31% (ICU) 45% (hospital) 53% (1 year) 68% (5 years)
France, single ICU, 1997–2008 98 43 ± 11 44% 8% 25% 59% 15% 51% 37% (ICU) 53% (hospital) 55% (1 year)
Brazil, single ICU, 2006–2008 88 40 (31–47) 45% 28% 70% 60% 18% 24% 49% (hospital)
Taiwan, single ICU, 2001–2010 135 39 (31–50) 36% 44% NA 78% 8% 36% 37% (ICU) 49% (ICU)
USA, 8 ICUs, 2002–2010 539 54 (48–59) 71% NA 13% 17% NA NA 19% (day 30)
France, 41 ICUs, 2005–2010 2884 46 (40–52) NA NA 25% 52% 15% 27% 16% (ICU) 25% (H)
China, single ICU, 2009–2013 122 43 (20–76) 39% 64% 48% 80% 8% 30% 64% (ICU) 66% (ICU)
Uganda, single ICU, 2009–2014 101 38 ± 16 55% 10% 72% 57% NA 27% 57% (ICU)
cART, Combination antiretroviral therapy; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; NA, not available; OI, opportunistic infection; RRT, renal replacement therapy; VP, vasopressors.

a Median (interquartile range) or mean ± standard deviation, as reported in the original publications.

b Main or secondary reason for ICU admission.

Severe AIDS-defining conditions may also occur in patients with uncontrolled viral replication despite cART. However, the contemporary therapeutic armamentarium enables achieving viral suppression and immunologic restoration within 6 months in more than 90% of cases—even those involving resistant strains—with maintenance of OI prophylaxis (e.g., sulfamethoxazole plus trimethoprim [SXT] for PCP) until a protective CD4 cell threshold is achieved. , Beside compliance flaws, virologic failure in 2020 is mainly linked with procurement issues (i.e., stock-outs, defective supply, or lack of financial resources) in low- and middle-income countries, as in other environments with restricted access to cART.

Immune recovery and aging under cART

cART initiation is mandatory in patients with acute infection or established AIDS; however, these drugs are beneficial and now recommended upon the early stage of asymptomatic HIV infection. In patients with sustained treatment adherence, cART rapidly controls HIV replication, thereby elevating the CD4 cell count (ideally above 500/μL), although substantial interindividual variations exist regarding the pace and magnitude of recovery. Table 120.2 indicates the expected rise in CD4 cells after treatment introduction in cART-naïve patients.

TABLE 120.2
Expected Rise in CD4 Cell Count After cART Initiation
Time Frame CD4 Cell Count
First month Increase by 50–75 cells/μL after initiation of cART
Each ensuing year 50–100 cells/μL per year
After several years >500 cells/μL provided HIV replication remains suppressed (undetectable viral load)
cART, Combination antiretroviral therapy.

Importantly, compared with age- and gender-matched seronegative individuals, cART-treated patients aging with sustained viral control are at increased risk for a broad spectrum of chronic HANA conditions that predispose to life-threatening complications, including COPD, atherosclerosis (e.g., coronary heart disease or cerebrovascular disease), non–AIDS-defining cancers (especially lung, liver, and anal carcinoma), and renal or liver impairment. Lifetime low-level inflammation caused by silent HIV replication in sanctuary sites, coinfections (e.g., cytomegalovirus [CMV], Epstein-Barr virus [EBV] or hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus [HBV/HCV]), habitus (e.g., tobacco or intravenous drug use), sequelae of past infectious processes, and long-term toxicity of certain antiretroviral medications may be implicated to varying degrees in the pathogenesis of these conditions. , A role for intestinal dysbiosis has also been suggested by recent metagenomics-based studies in cART-treated patients. Overall, chronic HANA diseases now account for over 75% of deaths in HIV-positive patients living in high-income countries.

Up to 70% of HIV-infected patients nowadays managed in the ICU are receiving long-term cART (see Table 120.1 ). , , , , This epidemiologic shift translates into a continuous rise in non–AIDS-related ICU admissions—mostly for bacterial sepsis or exacerbated HANA conditions—which broadly exceeded those for severe OIs in the most recent cohorts. Furthermore, on the basis of encouraging outcomes, HIV infection is no longer a definite contraindication for SOT in patients with chronic kidney, liver, or heart failure, thereby enlarging the scope of critical illnesses in this population.

Convergence of clinical presentation and outcomes in critically ill HIV-infected and seronegative patients

As a result of easier access to cART and sequential improvements in intensive care practices, critically ill HIV-infected individuals now share several similarities with the general population of ICU patients. First, the reasons for ICU admission are evenly distributed between seropositive and HIV-uninfected patients, with acute respiratory failure (ARF, 40%–60% of all admissions), bacterial sepsis (10%–20%, mostly resulting from respiratory, intraabdominal, and bloodstream infections), and impaired consciousness (10%–20%) being the main clinical vignettes in both subgroups. , , , Admissions for acute kidney injury (AKI), gastrointestinal bleeding, acute-on-chronic liver failure, or scheduled postoperative management become more regular over time, which merely reflects the increasing prevalence of at-risk comorbidities in HIV-infected individuals—for instance, HIV/HCV-coinfected patients are more prone to developing AKI.

More than two-thirds of current admissions are not directly related to AIDS, , a proportion that is expected to amplify in the years to come. For a given reason of ICU admission, the etiologic spectrum is increasingly analogous to what is observed in HIV-uninfected subjects. Indeed, bacterial pneumonia, COPD exacerbation, complicated lung cancer, and pulmonary edema caused by congestive heart failure have become major causes of ARF, and stroke or Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis are overtaking classic OIs of the central nervous system (CNS) in patients admitted for life-threatening neurologic disorders. , Again, chronic HIV infection stands out as an independent risk factor for most of these AIDS-unrelated conditions.

Notwithstanding a manifest propensity to these diseases, the clinical presentation of common community-acquired infections does not differ between HIV-infected patients with mild-to-moderate immunosuppression and their seronegative counterparts. This is notably shown for pneumonia caused by S. pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila, , severe COVID-19, , or bacterial meningitis. Excepting those with profound immune deficiency, , HIV-infected patients with sepsis exhibit no discrepancies in terms of plasma levels of host response biomarkers, disease severity, and survival when compared with HIV-uninfected controls. , Therefore the diagnostic workflow and initial management of HIV-infected patients with a protective CD4 cell count for usual OIs (i.e., above 200–250/μL) has no relevant particularities and should follow standard procedures and guidelines.

The spectacular improvement of life expectancy in cART-treated patients offers long-term perspectives that justify maximizing the level of supportive care when indicated. Invasive mechanical ventilation (MV, 40%–50% of all admissions), vasopressors (15%–30%), and renal replacement therapy for AKI (8%–15%) are now used as frequently in seropositive individuals as in the general ICU population (see Table 120.1 ), , , , , , with comparable prognoses, including in patients at high risk of death, such as those admitted after cardiac arrest or with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). , Last-resort venovenous or venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can be discussed in selected patients, with promising results in available reports. ,

Strikingly, overall in-hospital mortality rates have fallen from more than 80% in the early 1980s to 20%–40% in the most recent Western cohorts, a shift that likely reflects general improvement in intensive care such as direct admission from the emergency department, prompt antibiotic initiation and hemodynamic interventions in patients with sepsis, or protective MV settings for ARDS. , , Short-term outcomes of critically ill HIV-infected patients tend to equal those of seronegative subjects with similar demographics, chronic health status, and underlying diseases (e.g., HCV or malignancy), reason for admission, and extent of organ dysfunction. CD4 cell count, HIV viral load, prior cART use, and an admission for an AIDS-related event (versus other diagnoses) are no longer associated with hospital survival. , ,

Diagnostic workflow and therapeutic approaches in critically ill HIV-infected patients

In HIV-positive patients, the CD4 cell count, which is the most readily available surrogate marker of immune deficiency, is essential to guide the etiologic work-up, notably in patients with ARF or neurologic disorders ( Fig. 120.1 ). , , Except tuberculosis, severe OIs occur almost exclusively in patients with CD4 cells below 200/μL. Some rare conditions, such as severe CMV infection or invasive aspergillosis, may occur at counts below 50/μL. Because a transient drop in CD4 cells is usual at the acute phase of sepsis, diagnostic algorithms should be based on a recent steady-state count, when available, rather than on the count measured at admission. Other baseline features to consider include a prior history of OI at risk for recurrence (e.g., tuberculosis), a geographic origin that predisposes to specific imported OIs (e.g., histoplasmosis), adherence to cART and anti-PCP prophylaxis when prescribed, and comorbidities.

Fig. 120.1, Admission of HIV-Infected Patients for Acute Respiratory Failure or Acute Neurologic Impairment: Etiologic Panel According to Immune Status.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here