Key Abbreviations

Abdominal circumference AC
Absent end-diastolic velocity AEDV
α-fetoprotein AFP
Amniotic fluid index AFI
Amniotic fluid volume AFV
Average for gestational age AGA
Biophysical profile BPP
Biparietal diameter BPD
Cerebroplacental Doppler ratio CPR
Computerized cardiotocography cCTG
Contraction stress test CST
Ductus venosus DV
Estimated date of confinement EDC
Femur length FL
Fetal activity count FAC
Fetal growth restriction FGR
Fetal heart rate FHR
Head circumference HC
Human chorionic gonadotropin hCG
Intraventricular hemorrhage IVH
Low birthweight LBW
Multiples of the median MoM
Necrotizing enterocolitis NEC
Neonatal intensive care unit NICU
Nonstress test NST
Nucleated red blood cell NRBC
Placental growth factor PlGF
Polymerase chain reaction PCR
Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A PAPP-A
Respiratory distress syndrome RDS
Reversed end-diastolic velocity REDV
Selective fetal growth restriction sFGR
Small for gestational age SGA
Sonographically estimated fetal weight SEFW
Systolic/diastolic S/D
Transcerebellar diameter TCD

Pregnancies in which adverse intrauterine conditions result in failure of the fetus to reach its growth potential constitute a high-risk group in whom perinatal handicap can be prevented by prenatal identification. Next to prematurity, intrauterine fetal growth restriction (FGR) is the second leading cause of perinatal mortality. Compared with appropriately grown counterparts, perinatal mortality rates in growth-restricted neonates are 6 to 10 times greater. Perinatal mortality rates as high as 120 per 1000 for all cases of FGR and 80 per 1000 after exclusion of anomalous infants have been reported. As many as 53% of preterm stillbirths and 26% of term stillbirths have FGR. In survivors, the incidence of intrapartum asphyxia may be as high as 50%. Prevention of some perinatal complications that lead to adverse outcomes in FGR is possible with appropriate prenatal identification and management. This chapter reviews normal and abnormal fetal growth, the impact of FGR, and the incorporation of this knowledge into screening, diagnosis, and management of these high-risk pregnancies. Intrauterine growth restriction , fetal growth restriction (FGR), and small for gestational age (SGA) are terms frequently used interchangeably when describing the small fetus; in this chapter we use FGR.

Regulation of Fetal Growth

The essential steps in early placental development that lead to the successful establishment of the placenta are summarized in Chapter 1 . Fetal growth is regulated at multiple levels and requires successful development of the placental interface between maternal and fetal compartments. By 16 weeks’ gestation, the maternal microvillous and fetal basal layers in the placenta are only 4 µm apart, posing little resistance to passive diffusion. Elaboration of active transport mechanisms for three major nutrient classes—glucose, amino acids, and free fatty acids—and an increase in the villous surface area raise the capacity and efficiency of active transplacental transport. Vascular throughput across the placenta also increases in the maternal and fetal compartments. Extravillous cytotrophoblast invasion of the maternal spiral arteries results in progressive loss of the musculoelastic media, a process paralleled on the fetal side by continuous villous vascular branching. This results in significant reduction of blood flow resistance in the uterine and umbilical vessels, which converts both circulations into low-resistance, high-capacitance vascular beds. Owing to these developments, as much as 600 mL/min of maternal cardiac output reaches a placental exchange area of up to 12 m 2 at term. In the fetal compartment, this is matched with a blood flow volume of 200 to 300 mL/kg per minute throughout gestation. This magnitude of maternal blood flow is necessary to ensure maintenance of placental function that is energy intensive and consumes as much as 40% of the oxygen and 70% of the glucose supplied. Optimal fetal growth and development depends on a magnitude of maternal nutrient and oxygen delivery to the uterus that leaves sufficient surplus for fetal substrate utilization.

Of the actively transported primary nutrients, glucose is the predominant oxidative fuel, whereas amino acids are major contributors to protein synthesis and muscle bulk. Glucose and, to a lesser extent, amino acids drive the insulin-like growth factors axis and therefore stimulate longitudinal fetal growth.

Concurrent development and maturation of the fetal circulation as a conduit for nutrient and waste delivery allows preferential partitioning of nutrients in the fetus. Nutrient- and oxygen-rich blood from the primitive villous circulation enters the fetus via the umbilical vein. The ductus venosus (DV) is the first vascular shunt encountered which modulates the proportion of umbilical venous blood that is distributed to the liver and heart. These proportions change across gestation. Near term, 18% to 25% of umbilical venous flow shunts through the DV to reach the right atrium in this high-velocity stream; 55% reaches the dominant left hepatic lobe, and 20% reaches the right liver lobes ( Fig. 30.1 ). The direction and velocity of DV blood entering the right atrium ensures preferential streaming of nutrient-rich blood to the left ventricle, myocardium, and brain, while low-nutrient venous return is distributed to the placenta for reoxygenation and waste exchange. In addition to this overall distribution of left- and right-sided cardiac output, several organs can modify local blood flow to meet oxygen and nutrient demands by autoregulation.

Fig. 30.1, Fetal Umbilical and Hepatic Venous Circulation.

When the milestones in maternal, placental, and fetal development are met, placental and fetal growth progress normally. The metabolic and vascular maternal adaptations promote a steady and enhanced nutrient delivery to the uterus, and placental transport mechanisms allow for efficient bidirectional exchange of nutrients and waste. Placental and fetal growth across the three trimesters are characterized by sequential cellular hyperplasia, hyperplasia plus hypertrophy, and, lastly, hypertrophy alone. Placental growth follows a sigmoid curve that plateaus in midgestation preceding exponential third-trimester growth of the fetus. During this exponential fetal growth phase of 1.5% per day, initial weight gain is due to longitudinal growth and muscle bulk and therefore correlates with glucose and amino acid transport. Eighty percent of fetal fat gain is accrued after 28 weeks’ gestation, providing essential body stores in preparation for extrauterine life. From 32 weeks onward, fat stores increase from 3.2% of fetal body weight to 16%, which accounts for the significant reduction in body water content.

Several possible mechanisms may challenge compensatory capacity of the maternal-placental-fetal unit to such an extent that failure to reach the growth potential may be the end result.

Definition and Patterns of Fetal Growth Restriction

Normal fetal growth involves hyperplasia and hypertrophy on a cellular level. Disturbance of fetal growth dynamics can lead to a reduced cell number, cell size, or both, ultimately resulting in abnormal weight, body mass, or body proportion at birth. The classification of abnormal growth at the time of birth has evolved significantly over the last century from absolute weight to percentile cutoffs which may be further modified for constitutional factors of the parents to describe the individualized growth potential. With the advent of ultrasound, the recognition and study of fetal growth abnormalities extended into the prenatal period. It is important to note that several definitions that describe abnormal growth are used interchangeably in the obstetric and pediatric literature, but they do not necessarily describe the same population.

From the 1960s, growth has been classified by the absolute birthweight value as low birthweight (LBW; <2500 g), very low birthweight (VLBW; <1500 g), extremely low birthweight (ELBW; <1000 g), or macrosomia (>4000 g). Subsequently, studies by Lubchenco, Usher, Battaglia, and others demonstrated that only the comparison of the actual birthweight to the expected weight in a population at the same gestational age identified small neonates at risk for adverse outcome. Adopting this concept of “light” and “heavy” for gestational age served as an introduction of population-based reference ranges for birthweight in the 1970s and allowed classification of growth by the birthweight percentile. This resulted in the currently accepted classification of birthweight as very small for gestational age (VSGA; <3rd percentile), small for gestational age (SGA; <10th percentile), average for gestational age (AGA; 10th to 90th percentile), or large for gestational age (LGA; >90th percentile). Although birthweight percentiles are superior in identifying the small neonate, they fail to account for proportionality of growth and the growth potential of the individual. Therefore neonates with a normal birthweight percentile, but abnormal body proportion as a result of differential growth delay may be missed. Similarly, birthweight percentiles do not distinguish between the small neonate normally grown given his or her genetic potential and the neonate that is growth restricted because of a disease process.

The detection of abnormal body mass or proportions is based on anthropometric measurements and ratios that are relatively independent of sex and race and, to a certain extent, gestational age and therefore also the traditional birthweight percentiles. The ponderal index ([birthweight in grams/crown heel length] 3 × 100) has a high accuracy for the identification of SGA and macrosomia. The ponderal index correlates more closely with perinatal morbidity and mortality than traditional birthweight percentiles, but it may miss the proportionally small and lean growth-restricted neonate. Studies that have been conducted to determine the most appropriate statistical methods to calculate the personalized growth potential across ethnicities have not yet reached conclusive consensus about the best approach.

The classification of abnormal growth during fetal life marks a significant advance because it opens the possibility of prenatal detection, prevention, or therapeutic management. The concept of percentiles has been adapted to the ultrasound biometry of the fetus. Accordingly, parameters of head, abdominal, and skeletal growth are related to population-based reference ranges. The prenatal diagnosis of FGR based on ultrasound biometry is described in detail later.

In addition to the detection of smaller individual measurements and lower weight, two principal patterns of disturbed fetal growth have been described: asymmetric and symmetric. In the asymmetric growth pattern, somatic growth (e.g., the abdominal circumference [AC] and lower body) shows a significant delay, whereas there is relative or absolute sparing of head growth. In the symmetric growth pattern, body and head growth are similarly affected. Asymmetric growth patterns result from two processes. First, liver volume is reduced because of lack of deposition and depletion of glycogen stores as the result of limited nutrient supply, which leads to a decrease in AC. Second, elevations in placental blood flow resistance increase right cardiac afterload and promote diversion of the cardiac output toward the left ventricle because of the parallel arrangement of the fetal circulation and the presence of central shunts. This increases blood and nutrient supply to vital structures in the upper part of the body, presumably resulting in relative “head sparing.” Symmetrically restricted fetal growth typically results when interference with the growth process results in decreased cell numbers and cell size, typically resulting from a first-trimester insult. As a result, all parts of the body are equally affected, which produces uniformly small growth.

The pattern of fetal growth depends on the underlying cause of growth delay and on the timing and duration of the insult. Uteroplacental insufficiency is typically associated with asymmetric fetal growth delay at its onset owing to the aforementioned mechanisms. Aneuploidy, nonaneuploid (genetic) syndromes, and viral infections either disrupt the regulation of growth processes or interfere with growth at the stage of cell hyperplasia. This typically results in a symmetric growth delay. Specific conditions such as skeletal dysplasia may produce distinct growth patterns by their differential impacts on axial and peripheral skeletal growth. Because growth is dynamic, the pattern of growth restriction may evolve over the course of gestation. Placental disease may initially present with relative head sparing but eventually progresses to symmetric growth delay as placental insufficiency worsens. Alternatively, the acute course of a fetal viral illness may temporarily result in arrested growth with subsequent resumption of a normal growth pattern.

Small fetal and neonatal sizes have to be considered as a physical sign rather than a specific disease that warrants further investigation of underlying causes. Given that the term SGA simply identifies a fetus below a specific weight cutoff without identifying any underlying cause, the SGA designation will be used in this chapter when no underlying cause is evident. The term FGR implies that some pathologic process has prohibited attainment of genetic growth potential with a focus on underlying placental pathology. From the perspective of the managing obstetrician, prenatal identification of FGR is most relevant because it allows appropriate prospective fetal management. Conversely, prenatal identification of the constitutionally small fetus will allow the obstetrician to reassure the patient. To formulate a uniform approach to prenatal detection and perinatal management, an understanding of the maternal and fetal impact of placental insufficiency is essential.

Etiologies of Intrauterine Growth Restriction

The precise mechanisms by which various conditions interfere with normal placentation and culminate in either pregnancy loss or FGR are of great importance. Conditions that result in FGR broadly consist of maternal, uterine, placental, and fetal disorders. These conditions result in growth delay by affecting nutrient and oxygen delivery to the placenta (maternal causes), nutrient and oxygen transfer across the placenta (placental causes), and fetal nutrient uptake or regulation of growth processes (fetal causes). In clinical practice, considerable overlap may occur between the conditions that determine manifestation, progression, and outcome.

Maternal causes of FGR include vascular disease such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, diabetic vasculopathy, collagen vascular disease, thrombophilia, and chronic renal disease. Abnormalities of the fetus and/or placenta can also result in FGR. Chromosomal abnormalities, congenital malformations, and genetic syndromes have been associated with less than 10% of cases of FGR. Similarly, although long recognized as a cause of growth restriction, intrauterine infection also accounts for less than 10% of all cases. However, genetic and infectious etiologies are of special importance because perinatal and long-term outcomes are ultimately determined by the underlying condition, with little potential impact through perinatal interventions.

Growth restriction has been observed in 53% of cases of trisomy 13 and in 64% of cases of trisomy 18 and may be evident as early as the first trimester. Other conditions that may present with FGR include skeletal dysplasia and Cornelia de Lange syndrome. The online database of inheritance in humans lists more than 100 genetic syndromes that may be associated with FGR. Of the infectious agents, herpes, cytomegalovirus, rubella, and Toxoplasma gondii are well-documented causes of symmetric FGR.

The common causes of FGR are listed in Box 30.1 . Recognition of these is important in planning the diagnostic work-up for specific underlying conditions.

Box 30.1
Etiologies and Risk Factors for Intrauterine Growth Restriction

Maternal

  • Hypertensive disease

  • Pregestational diabetes

  • Cyanotic cardiac disease

  • Autoimmune disease

  • Restrictive pulmonary disease

  • High altitude (>10,000 feet)

  • Tobacco/substance abuse

  • Malabsorptive disease/malnutrition

  • Multiple gestation

Fetal

  • Teratogenic exposure

  • Fetal infection

  • Genetic disorders

  • Structural abnormalities

Placental

  • Primary placental disease

  • Placental abruption and infarction

  • Placenta previa

  • Placental mosaicism

Although it is beyond the scope of this chapter to discuss the spectrum of clinical consequences, it needs to be recognized that the diagnosis and prognosis of FGR in twin pregnancies is determined by the chorionicity (see Chapter 39 ). Selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) is a specific term applied to FGR that occurs in monochorionic twins. The prognosis and risk profile can be determined based on the umbilical artery (UA) flow pattern.

Maternal and Fetal Manifestations of Fetal Growth Restriction

The impact and clinical manifestations of placental insufficiency depend on the gestational age at onset and the severity and type of the placental disease. Early interference with normal placentation affects all levels of placental and fetal development and culminates in the most severe clinical picture, which may result in miscarriage or early stillbirth. If sufficient supply to the placental mass can be established, further placental differentiation may be possible, but suboptimal maternal adaptation to pregnancy and deficient nutrient delivery pose limitations. If adaptive mechanisms permit ongoing fetal survival, early-onset growth restriction with its many fetal manifestations develops. If placental disease is mild or successful compensation has occurred, the consequences of nutrient shortage may remain largely subclinical, only to be unmasked through their restrictive effect on exponential fetal growth in the second to third trimester. In these cases, late-onset growth delay, a decrease in adipose tissue, or abnormal body proportions at birth may be the consequence.

Maternal Impacts

Placental dysfunction affects several aspects of maternal adaptation to pregnancy. Associations between poor placentation with suboptimal maternal volume expansion, increased vascular reactivity, and a “flat” curve on the glucose tolerance test have been described. Abnormalities of placental vascular development are of special interest because they can be detected by Doppler ultrasound of the uterine arteries and frequently predate clinical disease ( Fig. 30.2 ). When trophoblast invasion remains confined to the decidual portion of the myometrium, maternal spiral and radial arteries fail to undergo the physiologic transformation into low-resistance vessels, which is generally expected by 22 to 24 weeks. Maternal placental floor infarcts, fetal villous obliteration, and fibrosis each increase placental blood flow resistance, producing a maternal-fetal placental perfusion mismatch that decreases the effective exchange area. With progressive vascular occlusion, fetoplacental flow resistance is increased throughout the vascular bed, and eventually, metabolically active placental mass is reduced. The diagnostic and screening utility of ultrasound findings suggestive of such pathology are discussed later.

Fig. 30.2, Uterine Artery Flow-Velocity Waveforms.

Fetal Impacts

When placental dysfunction compromises nutrient delivery and triggers fetal mobilization of hepatic glycogen stores, physical manifestation of growth delay becomes clinically apparent. In addition to the cardinal sign of FGR, metabolic, endocrine, hematologic, cardiovascular, and behavioral manifestations of placental insufficiency have been described that relate to the severity and duration of placental dysfunction. Of these, cardiovascular and central nervous system (CNS) responses are best studied because their noninvasive assessment is readily achieved by multivessel Doppler, gray-scale ultrasonography, and fetal heart rate (FHR) analysis and can therefore be used for fetal surveillance. Appreciating the variety of fetal manifestations helps to understand the potential limitations of antenatal surveillance and provides a basis on which to appreciate the possible short- and long-term impacts of placental insufficiency.

Metabolic manifestations occur early in growth-restricted fetuses. This is because with mild to moderate decline in uterine nutrient delivery, fetal supply is compromised first, whereas placental nutrition is preferentially maintained. With progression of placental insufficiency, nutrient deficits become universal and result in decreased fetal and placental size. Accordingly, with mild restrictions in oxygen and glucose supply, fetal demands are still met by increased fractional extraction. When uterine oxygen delivery falls below a critical value (0.6 mmol/min per kilogram fetal body weight in sheep), fetal oxygenation begins to fall and is eventually accompanied by fetal hypoglycemia. The initial mild hypoglycemia results in a blunted fetal pancreatic insulin response that promotes gluconeogenesis from hepatic glycogen stores. The minimal hepatic glycogen stores in the fetus are quickly depleted as glucose and lactate are preferentially diverted to the placenta. An increasing nutrient deficit leads to worsening fetal hypoglycemia, which decreases the maintenance of fetal oxidative metabolism and placental nutrition. With a more significant limitation of oxidative metabolism associated with downregulation of placental transport mechanisms and intensifying hypoglycemia, the use of other fetal energy sources becomes necessary, and more widespread metabolic consequences ensue. Limitation of amino acid transfer and breakdown of endogenous muscle protein to obtain gluconeogenic amino acids depletes branched-chain and other essential amino acids. Simultaneously, lactate accumulates because of the limited capacity for oxidative metabolism. Placental transfer of fatty acids loses its selectivity, particularly for essential fatty acids. Reduced utilization leads to increased fetal free fatty acid and triglyceride levels with a subsequent failure to accumulate adipose stores. In this setting of advancing malnutrition, cerebral and cardiac metabolism of lactate and ketones is upregulated to remove these accumulating products of anaerobic metabolism. Acid-base balance can be maintained as long as acid production is met by sufficient buffering capacity of fetal hemoglobin and an equal disposition by the various organs. Thus metabolic compromise progresses from simple hypoglycemia, hypoxemia, and decreased levels of essential amino acids to overt hypoaminoacidemia, hypercapnia, hypertriglyceridemia, and hyperlacticemia. The lactate production is exponentially correlated to the degree of acidemia that generally results from this metabolic state. A summary of metabolic responses is provided in Table 30.1 .

TABLE 30.1
Summary of Metabolic Responses to Placental Insufficiency
Substrate Change
Glucose Decreased proportional to the degree of fetal hypoxemia
Amino acids Significant decrease in branched-chain amino acids (valine, leucine, isoleucine), as well as lysine and serine; in contrast, hydroxyproline is elevated. The decrease in essential amino acids is proportional to the degree of hypoxemia.
Elevated amniotic fluid glycine to valine ratio
Elevations in amniotic fluid ammonia with a significant positive correlation with the fetal ponderal index
Fatty acids and triglycerides Decrease in long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (docosahexaenoic and arachidonic acids), decrease in overall fatty acid transfer only with significant loss of placental substance
Hypertriglyceridemia due to decreased utilization
Lower cholesterol esters
Oxygen and carbon dioxide Degree of hypoxemia proportional to villous damage; correlates significantly with hypercapnia, acidemia and hypoglycemia, and hyperlacticemia

Fetal endocrine manifestations of placental insufficiency are relevant because they are responsible for the downregulation of growth and developmental processes. Decreases in fetal glucose and amino acids indirectly downregulate insulin and insulin-like growth factors I and II as the principal endocrine regulators of longitudinal growth. Leptin-coordinated deposition of fat stores is similarly affected. In addition, pancreatic cellular dysfunction leads to decreased insulin/glucose ratio and impaired fetal glucose tolerance. Significant elevations of corticotropin-releasing hormone, adrenocorticotropic hormone, and cortisol and a decline in active vitamin D and osteocalcin are proportional to the severity of placental dysfunction. These hormonal imbalances are believed to have additional negative impacts on linear and growth, bone mineralization, and the potential for postpartum catch-up growth.

In growth-restricted fetuses, declining function at all levels of the thyroid axis correlates to the degree of hypoxemia. Thyroid gland dysfunction may develop as indicated by low levels of thyroxine and triiodothyronine despite elevated thyroid-stimulating hormone levels. In other instances, central production of thyroid-stimulating hormone may be responsible for fetal hypothyroidism. Finally, downregulation of thyroid hormone receptors may limit the biologic activity of circulating thyroid hormones in specific target tissues such as the developing brain.

Elevations in serum glucagon, adrenaline, and noradrenaline and stimulation of the fetal glucocorticoid axis have immediate effects that promote the mobilization of hepatic glycogen stores and peripheral gluconeogenesis. However, persistent alterations of these hormones may have a causative relationship with the development of diabetes and vascular complications in adult life.

Fetal hematologic responses to placental insufficiency are important because they initially provide a compensatory mechanism for hypoxemia and acidemia but eventually become contributory to the escalation of placental vascular dysfunction. Fetal hypoxemia is a trigger for erythropoietin release and stimulation of red blood cell (RBC) production through both medullary and extramedullary sites, which results in polycythemia. Oxygen carrying and the buffering capacity are increased through the elevation in hemoglobin count. If extramedullary hematopoiesis is increasingly induced by prolonged tissue hypoxemia and/or acidosis, the nucleated red blood cell (NRBC) count rises owing to the escape of these cells from these sites. Thus elevated NRBC counts correlate with metabolic and cardiovascular status and are independent markers for poor perinatal outcome. In advanced placental insufficiency, more complex hematologic abnormalities supervene that may result from dysfunctional erythropoiesis, placental consumption of platelets, and vitamin and iron deficiency. Subsequently, fetal anemia and thrombocytopenia are observed, particularly in fetuses with marked elevation of placental blood flow resistance and evidence of intraplacental thrombosis, which suggests a causative relationship. Increase in whole blood viscosity, decrease in RBC membrane fluidity, and platelet aggregation may be important precursors in the acceleration of placental vascular occlusion and dysfunction and therefore the rate of clinical progression.

Growth-restricted fetuses also show evidence of immune dysfunction at the cellular and humoral level. Decreases in immunoglobulin, absolute B-cell counts, total white blood cell counts, and neutrophil, monocyte, and lymphocyte subpopulations—as well as selective suppression of T-helper and cytotoxic T cells—are proportional to the degree of acidemia. These immune deficiencies explain the higher susceptibility of growth-restricted neonates to infection after delivery.

Fetal cardiovascular responses to placental insufficiency can be subdivided into early and late, based on the degree of deterioration of cardiovascular status and the associated derangement of fetal acid-base balance (see later). Early responses are typically adaptive in nature and result in preferential nutrient streaming to essential organs. The combination of elevated placental blood flow resistance and impaired transplacental gas transfer has several effects on the fetal circulation. Normally, nutrient-rich oxygenated blood enters the fetus via the umbilical vein and reaches the liver as the first major organ. One of the earliest cardiovascular signs of placental insufficiency is a decrease in the magnitude of umbilical venous flow volume. In response to these changes in umbilical venous nutrition content and blood flow volume, the proportion of umbilical venous blood diverted through the DV toward the fetal heart increases. This change in venous shunting across the DV increases the proportion of nutrient-rich umbilical venous blood that bypasses the liver and reaches the left side of the heart through the foramen ovale. The presence of central shunts at the foramen ovale and ductus arteriosus allows changes in downstream blood flow resistance to affect the proportion of cardiac output that are delivered through each ventricle ( Fig. 30.3 ). Elevation of blood flow resistance in the pulmonary vascular bed and subdiaphragmatic circulation (lower body and placenta) increase right ventricular afterload. A drop in cerebral blood flow resistance decreases left ventricular afterload. As a consequence, shunting of nutrient-rich blood from the DV through the foramen ovale to the left side of the heart increases, and left ventricular output rises in relation to the right cardiac output. At the aortic isthmus, blood coming from the right ventricle through the ductus arteriosus is diverted toward the aortic arch, thereby supplementing this central shift in cardiac output from right to left. This relative shift in cardiac output toward the left ventricle that results in increased blood flow to the myocardium and brachiocephalic circulation has been termed redistribution, which indicates a compensatory mechanism in response to placental insufficiency.

Fig. 30.3, Schematic Presentation of the Fetal Circulation.

Late circulatory responses are associated with deterioration of cardiovascular status and are predominantly observed in early-onset growth delay, which requires delivery prior to 34 weeks. Redistribution is effective only as long as adequate forward cardiac function is maintained. Marked elevations in placental blood flow resistance and progressive placental insufficiency can lead to an impairment of cardiac function. When this occurs, several aspects of cardiovascular homeostasis can be affected. Ineffective preload handling and elevation in central venous pressure may result from ineffective redistribution, a measurable decline in cardiac output, and a decline in cardiac forward function. The hallmark of this advancing deterioration in cardiovascular state is loss of diastolic forward flow in the umbilical circulation and a marked decline of forward flow in the venous system. Finally, myocardial dysfunction and cardiac dilatation may result in holosystolic tricuspid insufficiency and spontaneous FHR decelerations, followed by fetal demise.

Fetal organs also have the ability to regulate their individual blood flow through autoregulation. Such autoregulatory mechanisms have been identified in the myocardium, adrenal glands, spleen, liver, celiac axis, mesenteric vessels, and kidneys. These autoregulatory mechanisms are evoked at different levels of compromise, and their effect is typically complementary to central blood flow redistribution by enhancing perfusion of vital organs as long as cardiovascular homeostasis is maintained. A summary of Doppler findings and their physiologic significance in the context of placental insufficiency is provided in Table 30.2 .

TABLE 30.2
Arterial and Venous Doppler Indices
Index Calculation
Arterial Doppler Indices
Systolic/diastolic (S/D) ratio
Resistance index (RI)
Pulsatility index (PI)
Venous Doppler Indices
Inferior vena cava preload index
Ductus venosus preload index
Inferior vena cava and ductus venosus pulsatility index for veins (PIV)
Inferior vena cava and ductus venosus peak velocity index for veins (PVIV)
Percentage reverse flow

Fetal behavioral responses to placental insufficiency and characteristics of the FHR reflect developmental status and undergo significant changes with advancing gestation. Progressive sophistication of fetal behavior and increasing variation of the FHR reflect differentiation of central regulatory centers and expansion of central processing capability. Normally, behavioral milestones progress from the initiation of gross body movements and fetal breathing in the first trimester to coupling of fetal behavior (e.g., heart rate reactivity) and integration of rest-activity cycles into stable behavioral states (states 1F through 4F) by 28 to 32 weeks’ gestation (see Chapter 11 ). A steady decrease in baseline heart rate that reflects increasing vagal tone accompanies these developments. In addition, short- and long-term variability and variation, as well as the amplitude of accelerations, increase with advancing gestation, which reflects increased central processing. With the completion of these milestones, heart rate reactivity by traditional criteria is present in 80% of fetuses by 32 weeks’ gestation. Differences in maturational state and behavioral state, disruption of neural pathways, and declining oxygen tension may all modulate or even abolish fetal behavior or heart rate characteristics.

Because variations of fetal behavior and the FHR may be due to several factors, observation of several variables over a sufficient length of time is necessary to separate physiologic from pathologic variation. Biophysical profile (BPP) scoring quantifies fetal behavior by assessing tone, movement, breathing activity, and FHR reactivity in an observation period of at least 30 minutes (see Chapter 27 ). Amniotic fluid volume (AFV) assessment has traditionally been a part of the BPP. From the second trimester onward, AFV is primarily related to fetal urine production and therefore renal perfusion (see Chapter 28 ). Thus AFV assessment provides an indirect assessment of renal/vascular status and constitutes the main longitudinal monitoring component of the BPP (see later). Visual FHR analysis is associated with interobserver and intraobserver variability. These are circumvented by computerized cardiotocography (cCTG) analysis of the FHR. The cCTG assesses short-term, long-term, and mean minute variation and periods of high variation in addition to traditional FHR parameters that also allow longitudinal observations.

In growth-restricted fetuses with chronic hypoxemia and mild placental dysfunction, the primary CNS response is a delay in all aspects of CNS maturation. With the help of computerized research tools, a delay in behavioral development has been documented under such circumstances. The combination of delayed central integration of FHR control, decreased fetal activity, and chronic hypoxemia results in a higher baseline heart rate with lower short- and long-term variation (on computerized analysis) and delayed development of heart rate reactivity. These maturational differences in FHR parameters are particularly evident between 28 and 32 weeks.

Despite the maturational delay of some aspects of CNS function, several centrally regulated responses to acid-base status are still preserved. Therefore the growth-restricted fetus still maintains behavioral responses to a decline in acid-base status independently of the cardiovascular status. In contrast, the declining AFV that commonly accompanies the sequential loss of biophysical variables appears to be related to renal blood flow and the degree of vascular redistribution .

With worsening fetal hypoxemia, a decline in global fetal activity initiates the cascade of late behavioral responses characteristic of placental insufficiency. With further deepening hypoxemia, fetal breathing movement ceases.

Gross body movements and tone decrease further until they are no longer observed in the traditional examination period. Traditional FHR variables are frequently abnormal by this time. Reduction of global fetal activity and loss of fetal coupling (absence of heart rate reactivity and fetal breathing movements) are typically observed at a mean pH between 7.10 and 7.20. Loss of tone and movement is characteristic as the pH drops further. Late decelerations of the FHR may develop because of a relative drop in oxygen tension that exceeds 8 torr (see Chapter 15 ). Spontaneous decelerations as a result of direct depression of cardiac contractility or “cardiac” late decelerations typically herald fetal demise.

Diagnostic Tools in Fetal Growth Restriction

FGR is a syndrome marked by failure of the fetus to reach its growth potential with consequences related to the underlying disorder and the severity of fetal disease. Because FGR may be the consequence of many underlying etiologies, the differential diagnosis always includes maternal disease, placental insufficiency, aneuploidy, nonaneuploid syndromes, and viral infection. For appropriate patient counseling and choice of management options, comprehensive prenatal evaluation must go beyond the assessment of fetal size, using a diagnostic approach aimed at identifying the underlying causes. After confirming small fetal size, stratification into three patient groups is of particular importance. The first group consists of constitutionally small but otherwise normal fetuses (e.g., SGA). These will not usually require any intervention and therefore do not need antenatal surveillance. The second group consists of fetuses with aneuploidy, nonaneuploid syndromes, or viral infection. In these conditions, prognosis relates to the underlying disease, with little potential for impact by perinatal interventions. Sensitive and knowledgeable counseling of the parents about the likely prognosis in these conditions is especially important. The third group consists of fetuses with placental disease in which progressive deterioration of the fetal condition worsens the prognosis. This subset of patients is most likely to benefit from fetal surveillance and subsequent intervention. Although gray-scale ultrasonography provides important clues to the presence of FGR, the liability of preterm delivery and iatrogenic complications is great if the diagnosis is based solely on biometry. Although maternal disease is readily apparent through a history and physical examination, the accurate evaluation of a possible fetal disorder and stratification of risk requires the integration of several diagnostic modalities that evaluate fetal, placental, and amniotic fluid characteristics.

Fetal Biometry

Ultrasound criteria have emerged as the diagnostic standard used in the identification of FGR. For this purpose, sonographic measurements of fetal bony and soft structures are related to reference ranges for gestation. The primary measurements used to evaluate fetal growth include those of the fetal head, AC, and long bones. The most important calculated ultrasound variable of fetal growth is the sonographically estimated fetal weight (SEFW), and numerous investigators have identified distinct fetal ultrasound parameters that are useful in the calculation of the SEFW. All of the techniques incorporate an index of abdominal size as a variable contributing to the estimation of fetal weight. Population-specific formulae generate reference limits that generally have 95% confidence limits that deviate approximately 15% around the actual value.

Accurate estimation of fetal growth from these fetal measurements requires knowledge of the gestational age as a reference point to calculate percentile ranks. An estimated date of confinement (EDC) should be based on the last menstrual period when the sonographic estimate of gestational age is within the predictive error (7 days in the first, 14 days in the second, and 21 days in the third trimester). Once the EDC is set by this method or by a first-trimester ultrasound, it should not be changed because such practice interferes with the ability to diagnose FGR.

Measurement of the biparietal diameter (BPD) alone is a poor tool for the detection of FGR. The physiologic variation in size inherent with advancing gestation is high. The majority of growth-restricted fetuses who present with asymmetric growth restriction and delayed flattening of the cranial growth curve would be detected relatively late. Factors that interfere with a technically adequate measurement of the BPD include alterations of the cranial shape by external forces (oligohydramnios, breech presentation) and direct anteroposterior position of the fetal head.

The head circumference (HC) is not subject to the same extrinsic variability as the BPD. The measurement technique is important because calculated HC measurements are systematically smaller than those directly measured; thus the nomogram selected should be based on measurements obtained using the same methodology. As a screening tool for FGR, the HC poses a similar problem as the BPD in that two-thirds of FGR fetuses with asymmetric growth pattern would be detected late. The transcerebellar diameter (TCD) is one of the few soft tissue measurements that correlate well with gestational age, being relatively spared from the effects of mild to moderate uteroplacental dysfunction.

The AC is the single best measurement for the detection of FGR . The most accurate AC is the smallest directly measured circumference obtained in a perpendicular plane of the upper abdomen at the level of the hepatic vein between fetal respirations. The AC percentile has both the highest sensitivity and negative predictive value for the sonographic diagnosis of FGR whether defined postnatally by birthweight percentile or ponderal index. Using the 10th percentiles as cutoffs, the AC has a higher sensitivity (98% vs. 85%) but lower positive predictive value (PPV) than the SEFW (36% vs. 51%). Its sensitivity is further enhanced by serial measurements at least 14 days apart. Because of its high sensitivity, some type of abdominal measurement should be part of every sonographic growth evaluation. Calculation of the ratio between the head and abdominal circumference (HC/AC ratio) has been proposed as a tool to increase detection of the fetus with asymmetric growth restriction ( Figs. 30.4 and 30.5 ). In the normally growing fetus, the HC/AC ratio exceeds 1.0 before 32 weeks’ gestation, is approximately 1.0 at 32 to 34 weeks’ gestation, and falls below 1.0 after 34 weeks’ gestation. In fetuses with asymmetric growth restriction, the HC remains larger than that of the body and results in an elevated HC/AC ratio, whereas the ratio remains normal in symmetric FGR, in which both direct measurements are equally affected (see Figs. 30.4 and 30.5 ). Using the HC/AC ratio, 70% to 85% of growth-restricted fetuses are detected, with a reduction in false-negative diagnoses. Thus, even when determined in the latter part of pregnancy, a single set of measurements can be very helpful in evaluating the status of fetal growth. However, both the sensitivity and the PPV of the HC/AC ratio for growth restriction does not equal either the AC percentile or the SEFW.

Fig. 30.4, Growth Chart in a Case of Asymmetric Intrauterine Growth Restriction.

Fig. 30.5, Growth Chart in a Case of Symmetric Intrauterine Growth Restriction.

When measurement of the HC is difficult because of fetal position, comparisons can be made of the femur length (FL)—which is relatively spared in asymmetric FGR—to the AC. The FL/AC ratio is 22 at all gestational ages from 21 weeks to term; therefore this ratio can be applied without knowledge of the gestational age. An FL/AC ratio greater than 23.5 suggests FGR.

Several formulae have been devised to calculate the SEFW. Using a multifactorial equation and a measurement of abdominal size, a weight can be predicted and related to gestational age. Formulae that incorporate the FL may increase the accuracy of in utero weight estimation for the fetus with FGR. Because the SEFW cannot be measured directly but is calculated from a combination of directly measured parameters, the error in the estimate is increased. The accuracy of most formulae (±2 standard deviations [SDs]) is ± 10%, and none has proven superior to the first devised by Warsof and reported by Sheppard. As noted earlier, the SEFW has a lower sensitivity but higher PPV than the AC and does not add to the AC percentile for the diagnosis of FGR. However, an SEFW less than the 10th percentile provides a graphic image that makes it easy for both patient and referring physician to conceptualize. Therefore use of the estimated fetal weight (EFW) has become the most common method for characterizing fetal size and thereby growth abnormalities.

Reference Ranges That Define Fetal Growth

The importance in identifying the FGR fetus at risk for adverse outcome lies in the requirement for surveillance and active management of these pregnancies. An absolute threshold to define FGR can be applied to any of the fetal biometric parameters. These criteria have been statistically defined, rather than outcome based, and use either a threshold percentile ranking (nonnormative data) or a number of SDs below the mean (normative data) as cutoffs. SGA is defined as a birthweight below the population 10th percentile corrected for gestational age. This definition has also been extended into the prenatal period by using an SEFW less than the 10th percentile as an indicator of FGR. Because such an approach is purely based on a weight threshold, it can only serve as a screen for the identification of the small fetus at risk for adverse outcomes. Approximately 70% of infants with a birthweight below the 10th percentile are normally grown (i.e., constitutionally small) and are not at risk for adverse outcomes because they present one end of the normal spectrum for neonatal size. The remaining 30% consist of infants who are truly growth restricted and are at risk for increased perinatal morbidity and mortality. When the cutoff for an abnormal birthweight is adjusted to the third percentile, the proportion of true growth-restricted infants identified increases, whereas some with milder forms of FGR will be missed. The principal advantage of a lower percentile cutoff is the identification of fetuses at greatest need for antenatal surveillance. The overall arbitrary nature of percentile cutoffs is further emphasized by the increased mortality for birthweights through the 15th percentile with an odds ratio of 1.9 for mortality in newborns with birthweights between the 10th and 15th percentiles. Because the percentile cutoffs to define abnormal growth continue to be a matter of debate, risk assessment based on weight alone is further hampered by discrepancies between the SEFW and the actual birthweight. Live birthweight criteria do not appropriately describe SEFWs, and a significant association of preterm birth with FGR is apparent. The weights of preterm infants are not normally distributed as they are at term, which produces a significant discrepancy between birthweight-defined growth curves and SEFW-defined growth curves in preterm gestation. SEFW growth curves are generated from patient samples that represent the entire obstetric population at any gestational age. In contrast, preterm live birth normative data tables reflect only those individuals who have delivered under abnormal circumstances. Thus the SEFW growth curves consistently demonstrate higher fetal weights over the range of preterm gestation than do birthweight-generated growth curves. Therefore use of an SEFW cutoff less than the 10th percentile captures most fetuses at greater perinatal risk. For the AC, a cutoff of the 2.5 percentile is appropriate because reference ranges are based on a cross-section of small, appropriately grown preterm and term newborns. However, because reference limits are based on healthy women delivering appropriately nourished neonates at term, less than the 10th percentile cutoff is consistent with FGR.

Because of the limitation of population-based reference ranges to assess fetal growth , individualized growth models have been proposed by several investigators. The obvious advantage is the lack of dependency on population-based normative data and the ability to detect a true, singularly defined growth restriction even with EFWs greater than the 10th percentile for the population. Some of these models require three sequential sonograms. This includes baseline biometry in the second trimester, a second sonogram to establish growth potential for an individual morphometric parameter, and a third scan to identify a growth abnormality. Because this approach is cumbersome in clinical practice, other models have been developed that account for variables that contribute the majority of the variance to newborn size. These include early pregnancy weight, maternal height, ethnic group, parity, and sex. Using these variables and fetal growth patterns, the estimated size of a fetus of a given mother can be projected at term and estimated at any specific point in gestation. Deviations from this projected growth pattern can then be recognized. Overall, the diagnostic advantages of these individualized growth models have been questioned when compared with the sequential comparison of the percentile ranking of individual or composite growth parameters to population-based growth curves.

Fetal growth, as opposed to fetal size, is a dynamic process that requires more than a single evaluation for its estimation. The appropriate observation interval for the evaluation of fetal growth has been based on the assumptions that growth is continuous, rather than sporadic, and that the identification of growth is limited by the technical capability of the ultrasound equipment used to measure the fetus. The recommended interval between ultrasound evaluations of fetal growth is 3 weeks because shorter intervals increase the likelihood of a false-positive diagnosis.

In summary, the ability to correctly identify growth-restricted fetuses at risk for adverse outcome by weight estimates alone is limited. Individualized or sequential growth assessment performs better than a single measurement of fetal size. Improved stratification of risk requires the integration of additional diagnostic tests.

Fetal Anatomic Survey

The sonographic survey of fetal anatomy may provide a clue to the underlying etiology of FGR. The anatomic survey should focus on markers of aneuploidy, nonaneuploid syndromes, and fetal infection, as well as structural malformations. The relationship between aneuploidy and fetal anomalies such as omphalocele, diaphragmatic hernia, congenital heart defects, and sonographic markers such as echogenic bowel, nuchal thickening, and abnormal hand positioning are discussed in Chapter 9 . Abnormalities of skull contour, thoracic shape, or disproportional shortening of the long bones may be suggestive of a skeletal dysplasia. Markers for viral infection may be nonspecific but include echogenicity and calcification in organs such as the brain and liver. Identification of any of these abnormalities on ultrasound may help to establish a differential diagnosis and can identify underlying conditions that impact the prognosis.

Amniotic Fluid Assessment

From the second trimester onward, regulation of AFV is primarily dependent on fetal urine output, production of pulmonary fluid, and fetal swallowing (see Chapter 28 ). Placental dysfunction and fetal hypoxemia both may result in decreased perfusion of the fetal kidneys with subsequent oliguria and decreasing AFV. Two techniques of AFV assessment can provide important diagnostic and prognostic information (see Chapter 28 ). A 2-cm vertical pocket was considered normal, 1 to 2 cm was marginal, and less than 1 cm was decreased. Alternatively, AFV may be assessed by the sum of vertical pockets from the four quadrants of the uterine cavity. This four-quadrant amniotic fluid index (AFI) nomogram (see Fig. 28.4 ) is compared with gestational reference ranges. Despite the availability of these methods for estimating the AFV, an overall clinical impression of reduced amniotic fluid may be most important. Ultrasound criteria for a subjectively reduced AFV include a maximum vertical pocket less than 3 cm, the fetus in a flexion attitude with limited room for movement, a small or empty bladder and stomach, and molding of the uterus around the fetal body. In addition, movement of the transducer frequently generates uterine contractions, which may be associated with variable decelerations.

Overall, estimation of AFV in itself is a poor screening method for FGR or fetal acidemia. However, in clinical practice, it is an important diagnostic and prognostic tool. Oligohydramnios may be the first sign of FGR detected on ultrasonography preceding an assessment for lagging fetal growth. If gestational age is known, ultrasound assessment of fetal growth based on the HC, AC, FL, and SEFW can be performed. If gestational age is unknown, measurements of the FL/AC ratio and a single amniotic fluid pocket have to be used because they are independent of gestational age. Up to 96% of fetuses with fluid pockets less than 1 cm may be growth restricted. When growth delay is already suspected, assessments of AFV can help with a differential diagnosis. In the setting of small fetal size, abundant AFV suggests aneuploidy or fetal infection, whereas normal or decreased amniotic fluid is compatible with placental insufficiency. The volume of amniotic fluid also has prognostic significance for the course of labor. Groome and colleagues demonstrated that oligohydramnios associated with fetal oliguria is associated with a higher rate of intrapartum complications that may be attributed to reduced placental reserve.

Doppler Velocimetry

Similar to the assessment of AFV, the role of Doppler velocimetry in the management of FGR is unique because it serves as a diagnostic, as well as a monitoring, tool. Doppler flow-velocity waveforms may be obtained from arterial and venous vascular beds in the fetus. Arterial Doppler waveforms provide information on downstream vascular resistance, which may be altered because of structural changes in the vasculature or regulatory changes in vascular tone. The systolic/diastolic (S/D) ratio, the resistance index, and the pulsatility index (PI) are the three Doppler indices most widely used to analyze arterial blood flow resistance (see Table 30.2 ). An increase in blood flow resistance manifests with a relative decrease in end-diastolic velocity (EDV) increasing all three Doppler indices. Of these, the PI has the smallest measurement error and narrower reference limits. With extreme increases in blood flow resistance, end-diastolic forward flow velocity may be absent or reversed, referred to as absent end-diastolic velocity (AEDV) or reversed end-diastolic velocity (REDV; Fig. 30.6 ).

Fig. 30.6, Umbilical Artery Flow-Velocity Waveforms.

Venous Doppler parameters complement evaluation of fetal cardiovascular status by providing an assessment of cardiac forward function. Forward blood flow in the venous system is determined by cardiac compliance, contractility, and afterload and is characterized by a triphasic flow pattern that reflects pressure volume changes in the atria throughout the cardiac cycle. The descent of the AV ring during ventricular systole and passive diastolic ventricular filling generates the systolic and diastolic peaks respectively (the S-wave and the D-wave). The sudden increase in right atrial pressure with atrial contraction in late diastole causes a variable amount of reverse flow that produces a second trough after the D-wave (the a-wave; Fig. 30.7 ). The magnitude of forward flow during the atrial systole varies considerably in individual veins, and reversal may be physiologic in the inferior vena cava and hepatic veins but is always abnormal in the DV. Multiple venous Doppler indices have been described to characterize this complex waveform without any clear advantages of individual indices (see Table 30.2 ).

Fig. 30.7, Venous Flow-Velocity Waveform.

The vessels that are of primary importance in the differential diagnosis of placental dysfunction are the UA and the middle cerebral artery (MCA). Randomized trials and meta-analyses confirm that the combined use of fetal biometry and UA Doppler significantly reduces perinatal mortality and iatrogenic intervention because documentation of placental vascular insufficiency effectively separates growth-restricted fetuses that require surveillance and possible intervention from constitutionally small fetuses.

A free umbilical cord loop is examined with continuous or pulsed Doppler ultrasound far from the fetal and placental insertions. Most current ultrasound equipment allows concurrent use of color and pulsed Doppler with improved reproducibility of measurements. Vascular damage that affects approximately 30% of the placenta produces elevations in the UA Doppler index, whereas more marked abnormalities result in AEDV or REDV. Milder forms of placental vascular dysfunction, especially near term, may not produce elevation of UA blood flow resistance sufficient to be detectable by traditional Doppler methods. If placental gas exchange is significantly impaired, resulting in fetal hypoxemia, a decrease in MCA Doppler resistance may occur ( Fig. 30.8 ). Another Doppler index frequently used clinically to detect this condition is the ratio between UA pulsatility as an index of vasoconstriction in the placenta and MCA pulsatility as an index of vasodilation in the fetal brain. In milder forms of placental disease with near minimal increase in UA blood flow resistance, the cerebroplacental Doppler ratio (CPR) may decrease. Grammellini and coworkers demonstrated that a value less than 1.08 identified small fetuses at risk for adverse outcome. Subsequently, Bahado-Singh and coworkers indicated that the predictive accuracy of the CPR decreased after 34 weeks’ gestation. This is presumably attributable to an increasing number of growth-restricted fetuses who may have normal UA blood flow resistance near term but demonstrate isolated “brain sparing” as the only sign of placental insufficiency of oxygen transfer. These fetuses are at risk for adverse outcomes .

Fig. 30.8, Middle Cerebral Artery Flow-Velocity Waveform.

Because of the variable presentation of FGR across gestation, comprehensive Doppler assessment of placental function should include the umbilical and MCAs. For the UA, an abnormal test result is defined as a Doppler index measurement of greater than 2 SDs above the gestational age mean and/or a loss of EDV. As with growth curves, it is best to use nomograms developed from a local or comparable population. For the CPR and also for the MCA, a greater than 2-SD decrease of the index is considered abnormal. In a setting of small fetal size, these findings identify those fetuses at greatest risk for adverse outcome ( Figs. 30.9 to 30.12 ).

Fig. 30.9, Umbilical Artery (UA) Pulsatility Index With Advancing Gestational Age.

Fig. 30.10, Middle cerebral artery (MCA) pulsatility index with advancing gestational age. The graph shows the mean and 95% confidence intervals.

Fig. 30.11, Cerebroplacental Doppler Ratio With Advancing Gestational Age.

Fig. 30.12, Ductus Venosus (DV) Pulsatility Index for Veins With Advancing Gestational Age.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here