Acknowledgments

The authors thank Teresa K. Woodruff, PhD, Kristin Smith for laying strong foundations with the first editions of this book chapter, and Mahmoud Salama for his assistance updating the fertility preservation reference tables. They also thank Stacey C. Tobin, PhD, for editorial assistance.

  • Treatment strategies for oncologic and nononcologic conditions may threaten fertility.

  • Genetic conditions and physiologic reproductive aging may also impact fertility potential.

  • Specific fertility preservation options exist for men, women, and children and vary depending on patient-specific variables.

  • The continuum of fertility preservation options is constantly being developed and expanded.

  • All patients whose fertility may be threatened by their condition or treatment should be referred to a specialist and thoroughly counseled about their fertility preservation options.

Introduction

Over the past two decades, there has been an increased awareness of potential threats to fertility and a corresponding emphasis on developing fertility preservation strategies. Populations at risk for infertility include individuals facing fertility-threatening treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer or other medical conditions, surgical treatments for the management of conditions including cancer or cancer prevention, and gender-affirming therapies. In addition, fertility preservation methods might be offered for a variety of genetic and endocrine conditions associated with gonadal failure and infertility. In females, reproductive aging is the single most common threat to fertility and has become the most frequent indication for fertility preservation.

Much of the focus of fertility preservation has centered around oncofertility, a term developed to reflect a new discipline that merges the fields of oncology and reproductive medicine. Oncofertility is viewed as a critical component of cancer care and oncofertility programs have become standard in many institutions. The necessity of oncofertility, and its progress, has accelerated in parallel to the many advances in oncologic care, including earlier diagnostics and the emergence of targeted biologic therapeutics, methods to reduce radiation dose and field, and localized surgical procedures. With these advances, patients with cancer are surviving their disease in increasing numbers and converting what was once a mortal diagnosis to a chronic illness and, in some cases, a curable disease. The data are particularly compelling for pediatric cancer survivors; a patient treated for cancer between the years 1975 and 1979 had a 55% likelihood of surviving five years. , More recently, that number has risen to 83% , and approximately 1 in 530 young adults in the United States is a survivor of childhood cancer. Although these statistics are encouraging, they now also raise tangible concerns about the health of cancer survivors as they age. These concerns are largely related to the off-target effects of the cancer treatments themselves. Cancer survivors are at a significantly increased risk of second neoplasias, cardiovascular disease, and death at an early age. , A major complication of cancer treatment is compromised reproductive function, which ranges from the destruction of gametes to the loss of pituitary and gonadal hormone production. It is in this setting that the field of oncofertility focuses on the iatrogenic effects of drugs on reproductive organs and the development of strategies that will preserve and restore biological function for cancer survivors.

The oncofertility field, and the broader field of fertility preservation, are continuously improving and expanding the options available to men, women, and children in need. Since the topic of fertility preservation was first included in the 7th edition of this textbook, the field has witnessed major advances and new populations and communities that can benefit from fertility preservation have been identified and engaged. These include younger and younger individuals with cancer, those with nononcologic conditions whose disease or treatment may also threaten fertility, individuals with differences in sex determination, transgender individuals, and aging women.

From a clinical perspective, techniques that were once perhaps considered an impossibility are now a reality. For example, in the United States, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) removed the “experimental” label from mature oocyte cryopreservation in 2013; their statement in 2019 indicates that ovarian tissue cryopreservation should also be considered standard of care for patients facing gonadotoxic therapies. , More than 130 live births have been reported in the literature following ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation, and this is likely an underestimate. Remarkably, ovarian tissue transplantation has been performed in adolescents to restore endocrine function and induce puberty. , In one case, ovarian tissue harvested from a premenarchal adolescent (13 years, 11 months) and transplanted more than a decade later resulted in a live, healthy child. We have also witnessed the success of the first series of human uterus transplants, which provides hope that even individuals who do not have a functional uterus might have the opportunity to carry a pregnancy. For males, fertility preservation options are often considered simpler than for females because postpubertal males can bank sperm relatively easily, and navigation of young male patients to sperm banks is relatively straightforward. However, the options for prepubertal males are significantly lacking. The recent emergence of formalized male oncofertility programs around the world is facilitating the development of investigational techniques such as prepubertal testicular tissue cryopreservation. ,

From a basic science perspective, continuous progress is being made to bridge experimental and standard fertility preservation technologies. Protocols continue to emerge from basic research laboratories to generate germ cells and their companion somatic cells from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), with the ultimate goal of doing so with patient-derived non-iPSCs. In the female, the ability to reliably support folliculogenesis and oogenesis completely outside the body is a critical technology on the path to producing high-quality in vitro -derived eggs. A major advance in the field was the demonstration that mature human eggs could be obtained from isolated secondary follicles grown in vitro . Through the advent of multistep culture systems, mature eggs can now be obtained even when starting from the culture of the very earliest stages of unilaminar follicles. However, more research is necessary to improve the efficiency and to understand the impact that long-term culture has on egg quality. , , In the male, a landmark proof-of-concept study in the rhesus macaque model demonstrated that autologous grafting of cryopreserved prepubertal testis tissue results in the production of sperm and offspring. This translational research lays a strong foundation for the clinical use of testis transplantation. The last several years have also witnessed significant growth in bioengineering in reproductive science with the development of gonadal bioprosthetics and organoids. These models aim to recapitulate the complexity of the native ovary and testis, serving as ideal niches to support the long-term development and function of germ cells seeded within them. Finally, microfluidic devices have been engineered to support the entire reproductive tract on a chip, which will facilitate the screening of emerging cancer therapies that may have fertotoxic side effects as well as the validation of fertoprotective agents.

The field of fertility preservation is mobilized now more than ever. Professional and clinical societies have issued guidance to healthcare teams about the emerging fertility preservation options for their patients. In addition, comprehensive registries are being established to track long-term fertility and reproductive health outcomes in cancer survivors. It is clear that oncofertility is now a global mission. Hundreds of sites worldwide are invested in sharing resources, methodologies, and other experiences in the field. Such global collaborations not only increase knowledge of fertility-threatening conditions and treatments in other countries; they also provide critical insights into broad cultural issues related to reproduction and fertility and their impacts on fertility preservation. By reducing duplicative efforts, addressing barriers and challenges proactively, and raising awareness worldwide, the field of fertility preservation has accelerated the pace of research and rapidly translated it to clinical care.

The goal of this chapter is to provide a comprehensive overview of the need, the current clinical methods, and the emerging future techniques of fertility preservation.

Fertility Preservation in Nononcologic and Oncologic Conditions

Reproductive Dysfunction as a Result of Nononcologic Conditions or Their Treatment

Although the primary indication for fertility preservation is to avoid the iatrogenic effect of cancer treatments (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery) on fertility, there is a growing list of nononcologic conditions where fertility preservation should be considered due to the underlying condition or the effect of specific treatment regimens ( Table 37.1 ).

TABLE 37.1
Potential Nononcological Conditions With Needs for Fertility Preservation or Counseling
Data from Hirshfeld-Cytron J, Gracia C, Woodruff TK. Nonmalignant diseases and treatments associated with primary ovarian failure: an expanded role for fertility preservation. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2011;20(10):1467–1477.
Autoimmune Diseases Transplantation and Transfusion-Related Disorders Genetic Conditions Metabolic Conditions Gender and Sex Diversity Postsurgical Etiologies/Other
  • Systemic lupus erythematosus

  • Multiple sclerosis

  • Chronic kidney disease

  • Thalassemia major

  • Sickle cell anemia

  • Aplastic anemia

  • Fanconi anemia

  • Myeloproliferative diseases

  • Transplant (renal, liver, pancreas)

  • Hemochromatosis

  • Turner syndrome

  • Fragile X syndrome

  • X chromosome deletions

  • BRCA mutations

  • Galactosemia

  • Diabetes

  • Polycystic ovary syndrome

  • Transgender

  • Differences in sex development

  • Inflammatory bowel disease

  • Ulcerative colitis

  • Familiar adenomatous polyposis

  • Endometriosis

  • Cryptorchidism

  • Genitourinary trauma

Reproductive Aging

Although there is a body of controversial literature suggesting that the ovary contains oogonial stem cells, their presence and functional relevance are still unclear; the widely accepted view is that females are endowed with a finite number of follicles making up the ovarian reserve. Females are born with approximately one million primordial follicles and this number drops throughout the reproductive lifespan, with follicular depletion accelerating in the mid to late 30s. Ovarian activity eventually ceases at menopause, when there are only approximately 1000 follicles remaining in the ovary. In addition to the age-dependent decline in egg quality, reproductive aging is also associated with a decline in gamete quality, with a progressive increase in oocyte aneuploidy as a major contributing factor. In particular, chromosome segregation errors related to meiotic nondisjunction and premature separation of sister chromatids contribute to age-related infertility, miscarriage, and an increased risk of having a child with birth defects. A large study of preimplantation genetic testing of embryos created by in vitro fertilization (IVF) demonstrated the lowest rates of aneuploidy (20%–27%) for women between 26 and 30 years of age and a steady age-related increase, with an 85% aneuploidy rate by 43 years of age. While these data suggest that the optimal time for women to attempt pregnancy is before their mid-30s, more women are delaying pregnancy beyond this age and seeking assisted reproduction for the treatment of infertility. Oocyte cryopreservation has been proposed as a method to expand the reproductive potential of aging women and has become a common indication for fertility preservation worldwide. Beyond fertility, reproductive aging has general health consequences because the loss of follicles results in decreased estrogen, which can negatively impact downstream tissue function (e.g., heart, brain, immune, bone, and uterus). Thus, ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation for hormone replacement have been proposed as treatments to delay ovarian aging and prevent the sequelae of menopause. ,

Conditions Associated With Premature Ovarian Insufficiency (POI)

Several genetic conditions associated with accelerated ovarian aging can also impact fertility. For example, females with Turner syndrome—who have either partial or complete absence of one X chromosome—are at risk of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI). In mosaic Turner syndrome, an X chromosome is lost during embryonic development, such that some proportion of the body’s cells contains two normal X chromosomes. Spontaneous puberty and normal gonadotropin and estrogen levels were found to be predictive of the presence of mature follicles in girls with Turner mosaicism, and several case reports have described fertility preservation efforts in this population. Cases of pregnancy have been reported in women with mosaic Turner syndrome, and recent work suggests that women with mosaic Turner syndrome may be candidates for fertility preservation by either tissue cryopreservation (in prepubertal girls) or hormone stimulation followed by oocyte cryopreservation (in postpubertal girls and women). , Men with Klinefelter syndrome (XXY) have normal testes development up to puberty but then develop hypergonadotropic hypogonadism with degeneration of the seminiferous tubules and almost total loss of sperm production. Small areas of the tubules may still produce viable sperm that are recoverable by surgical extraction procedures.

Females with BRCA mutations that confer an increased risk for ovarian cancer may undergo prophylactic oophorectomy and opt for fertility preservation at that time. In addition, there are a growing number of genetic mutations that have been associated with POI in animal and human studies. Early diagnosis of such mutations in the future may provide opportunities for fertility preservation in these populations. Patients with known genetic conditions should be counseled regarding the risk of passing the condition on to their children. Preimplantation genetic testing of embryos, prenatal diagnosis, and alternative methods for family building should be discussed.

Conditions Requiring Medical Treatment That Poses Reproductive Risks

Gonadotoxic treatment is not limited to cancer. Rheumatologic and autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, are treated with highly gonadotoxic agents. Furthermore, hematologic disorders such as thalassemia major, sickle cell anemia, aplastic anemia, Fanconi anemia, and myeloproliferative diseases do not inherently compromise reproductive function but are treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplant and newer gene therapies that place patients’ future fertility at risk. These treatments often require exposure to alkylating chemotherapy and radiation, which can significantly deplete the primordial follicles in the ovarian reserve and reduce the patient’s reproductive lifespan.

Conditions Requiring Surgical Treatment That Poses Reproductive Risks

Surgical complications may also threaten fertility due to disruption of tissue, formation of adhesions, and parenchymal damage. In boys, cryptorchidism, even after orchiopexy, can significantly decrease fertility later in life. Testicular tissue biopsy cryopreservation has been performed in boys with cryptorchidism, with spermatogonial survival and normal hormone production achieved after thawing. In males, genitourinary trauma is a serious nononcological condition that can threaten fertility. In fact, in 2016, the Secretary of Defense outlined a series of reforms to ensure fertility preservation was extended to wounded service members.

Transgender and Disorders of Sex Development (DSD)

Gender and sex diverse individuals, including transgender individuals and those with DSD, may be at risk of infertility, the reasons for which differ depending on the population. For example, transgender individuals possess inherent normal reproductive function, but infertility may occur due as a result of medical interventions required to facilitate phenotypic transition to the affirmed gender. On the other hand, infertility in individuals with DSD may be due to abnormal gonadal development, altered endocrine function, or premature gonadal failure. Working groups for individuals with gender and sex diversity have assembled to develop unified fertility preservation protocols for these populations. Fertility preservation counseling is advisable, and fertility preservation strategies may be appropriate in these populations.

Reproductive Dysfunction as a Result of Oncologic Conditions or Their Treatment

Survival rates for childhood cancer have steadily increased, with an overall cure rate above 80%. Approximately 1 in 530 young adults in the United States is a survivor of pediatric cancer. Maintenance of fertility is a very important quality of life issue for these individuals; however, an unfortunate consequence of life-saving cancer treatments is that nearly all aspects of both the male and female reproductive axis can be compromised. In the female, the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis, the ovaries and ovarian follicles, and the uterus are directly affected by cancer treatments; in the male, the testes are at risk; specifically the germinal epithelium and Leydig cells ( Figs 37.1, 37.2 ).

Fig. 37.1, Clinical fertility preservation options for women.

Fig. 37.2, Clinical fertility preservation options for men.

Cancer, Cancer Treatment, and Female Reproductive Function

A fertile woman must have: (1) a functioning neuroendocrine system that regulates the menstrual cycle and can maintain a pregnancy; (2) a healthy pool of follicles that will grow in response to hormonal cues and produce mature and fertilizable gametes; and (3) a receptive uterus that will support embryo implantation and fetal development to term. It is unclear whether cancer itself affects female reproductive function. In one recent study, the success of ovarian stimulation was compared in women with malignancies prior to cancer treatment to a similar group of women seeking assisted reproduction for male-factor infertility. No differences were found between these two groups of patients in terms of the number of dominant follicles and retrieved oocytes, proportion of mature eggs, or fertilization rates. However, a small meta-analysis that examined all types of malignancies found that there were fewer numbers of oocytes retrieved from women with breast and hormone-dependent cancers.

Cancer treatment can affect all aspects of the female reproductive axis ( Fig. 37.1 ). For example, radiotherapy can damage growing follicles, which triggers either repair or elimination pathways. In general, actively dividing cells are more susceptible to radiation-induced death, and because oocytes in the young adult are arrested in prophase of meiosis I, they are more resistant to radiation than cells in mitosis. Primordial follicles, which are quiescent, also appear to be more resistant to radiation compared with growing follicles. Nevertheless, the human oocyte is sensitive to radiation therapy. The LD50, or the radiation dose required to destroy 50% of immature human oocytes, is less than 2 Gy. Mathematical modeling predicts that the effective sterilizing dose of radiation is inversely correlated with age: it is 20.3 Gy at birth and 16.5 Gy at 20 years of age.

The female neuroendocrine axis (HPG axis) is also vulnerable to cancer therapies. The HPG axis controls the menstrual cycle and pregnancy by regulating the secretion of hormones, including gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol, progesterone, and prolactin. Radiation therapy, particularly targeting the cranium, can cause altered hypothalamic and pituitary function. , , The risk of gonadotropin deficiencies is directly related to the radiation dose to the hypothalamic-pituitary axis (HPA), with doses of 3000 to 4000 cGy placing the patient at risk. LH and FSH deficiencies are associated with oligomenorrhea or amenorrhea, ovulatory impairments, failed implantation, and early pregnancy loss.

The uterus functions primarily to support embryo implantation as well as fetal growth and development. Radiation can have negative long-term consequences on the ability of the uterus to support a future pregnancy. , Radiotherapy can reduce uterine volume and elasticity, damage the uterine musculature and endometrium, and decrease the vasculature. If women are able to conceive following radiotherapy, they may have an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including miscarriage, placental abnormalities, preterm birth, and delivery of infants with low birth weights. , There is no exact dose of radiation to the uterus above which sustaining pregnancy is unlikely, though doses in the range of 1400 to 3000 cGy will cause uterine damage. Guidelines suggest that patients receiving more than 2500 cGy to the uterus in childhood be counseled to avoid attempting pregnancy.

In addition to being radiosensitive, the ovary is chemosensitive. Certain agents, particularly alkylators, can cause significant damage to the oocyte itself and to the somatic cells of dormant and growing primordial follicles, decreasing the ovarian reserve. Some females experience total destruction of the primordial follicle pool with treatment, resulting in acute ovarian failure, while others resume some normal function posttreatment but have a diminished primordial pool and ultimately POI. , Alkylating agents, especially cyclophosphamide and busulfan, are more gonadotoxic compared to other chemotherapeutic agents, including platinum-based drugs, plant alkaloids, and antimetabolites ( Table 37.2 ). Alkylating agents, which cause DNA breaks irrespective of cell cycle stage, are associated with a high risk of primordial follicle death and compromised stromal cell function. Age at exposure, chemotherapy agent used, and cumulative dose are important factors when considering a patient’s risk for ovarian dysfunction. It is well documented that age is protective and younger females can tolerate larger cumulative exposures with less impact on the primordial follicle pool than a woman who is closer in age to natural menopause.

TABLE 37.2
Infertility Risk Associated With Specific Cancer Treatments and Regimens
Data from LIVESTRONG, see livestrong.org/fertility for more resources; Meirow D, Biederman H, Anderson RA, Wallace WH: Toxicity of chemotherapy and radiation on female reproduction. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;53:727–739; and Chow EJ, Stratton KL, Leisenring WM, et al: Pregnancy after chemotherapy in male and female survivors of childhood cancer treated between 1970 and 1999: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(5):567–576.
High Risk Intermediate Risk Low Risk Very Low/No Risk Unknown Risk
Female
  • Whole abdominal or pelvic radiation doses > 6 Gy in adult women

  • Total body irradiation (TBI)

  • Cranial/brain irradiation > 40 Gy

  • CMF, CEF, or CAF × 6 cycles in women > 40 years

  • Total cyclophosphamide 5 g/m 2 in women > 40 years

  • Alkylating chemotherapy (e.g., cyclophosphamide, busulfan, melaphan) conditioning for transplant

  • Any alkylating agent (e.g., cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, busulfan, BCNU [carmustine], CCNU [lomustine]) + TBI or pelvic radiation

  • Protocols containing procarbazine: MOPP, MVPP, COPP, ChlVPP, ChlVPP/EVA, BEACOPP, MOPP/ABVD, COPP/ABVD

  • Abdominal/pelvic radiation

  • CMF, CEF, or CAF × 6 cycles in women 30–40 years

  • Spinal radiation doses > 25 Gy CMF, CEF, or CAF × 6 cycles in women 30–40 years

  • Bevacizumab (Avastin)

  • Protocols containing cisplatin

  • FOLFOX4

  • Total cyclophosphamide 5 g/m 2 in women aged 30–40 years

  • CMF, CEF, or CAF × 6 cycles in women < 30 years

  • Nonalkylating chemotherapy: ABVD

  • Anthracycline + cytarabine

  • Radioactive iodine

  • MF

  • Multiagent therapies using vincristine

  • Monoclonal antibodies, e.g., bevacizumab (Avastin), cetuximab (Erbitux)

  • Tyrosine kinase inhibitors, e.g., erlotinib (Tarceva), imatinib (Gleevec)

Male
  • TBI

  • Testicular radiation dose > 2.5 Gy in men

  • Cranial/brain radiation ≥ 40 Gy

  • Protocols containing procarbazine: COPP, MOPP, MVPP, ChlVPP, ChlVPP/EVA, MOPP/ABVD, COPP/ABVD

  • Alkylating chemotherapy for transplant conditioning (cyclophosphamide, busulfan, melphalan)

  • Any alkylating agent (e.g., procarbazine, nitrogen mustard, cyclophosphamide) + TBI, pelvic radiation, or testicular radiation

  • Total cyclophosphamide > 5 g/m 2

  • Surgical removal of one or both testicles or the pituitary gland

  • Testicular radiation dose 1–6 Gy (due to scatter from abdominal/pelvic radiation)

  • BEP × 2–4 cycles

  • Cumulative cisplatin dose

  • 400 mg/m 2

  • Cumulative carboplatin dose ≥ 2 g/m 2

  • Hormone treatments (prostate cancer)

  • Surgical procedures within in the pelvis (prostate, bladder, lower large intestine, rectum)

  • CHOP/COP

  • Testicular radiation dose 0.2–0.7 Gy

  • Nonalkylating agents: ABVD, multiagent therapies for leukemia

  • Anthracycline + cytarabine

  • Bevacizumab (Avastin)

  • Testicular radiation dose < 0.2 Gy

  • Radioactive iodine

  • Multiagent therapies using vincristine

  • Monoclonal antibodies, e.g., cetuximab (Erbitux)

  • Tyrosine kinase inhibitors, e.g., imatinib (Gleevec)

Pediatric
  • TBI

  • Whole abdominal or pelvic radiation doses > 15 Gy in prepubertal girls or > 10 Gy in postpubertal girls

  • Testicular radiation dose ≥ 3 Gy in boys

  • Cranial/brain irradiation > 30 Gy

  • Spinal irradiation 24–36 Gy

  • Cyclophosphamide > 5 g/m 2 in boys

  • Cyclophosphamide > 15 g/m 2 in girls

  • Ifosfamide > 60 g/m 2

  • Alkylating chemotherapy (e.g., cyclophosphamide, busulfan, melaphan) conditioning for transplant

  • Any alkylating agent (e.g., cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, busulfan, carmustine, lomustine) + TBI, pelvic radiation, or testicular radiation

  • Protocols containing procarbazine

  • Surgical removal of both gonads

  • Whole abdominal or pelvic radiation 10 to <15 Gy in prepubertal girls

  • Whole abdominal or pelvic radiation 5 to <10 Gy in postpubertal girls

  • Spinal radiation doses 18–24 Gy

  • Testicular radiation dose 1–2 Gy (due to scatter from abdominal/pelvic radiation)

  • Cumulative cisplatin dose <400 mg/m 2 (boys only)

  • Testicular radiation dose <1.0 Gy

  • Nonalkylating chemotherapy

  • Radioactive iodine

  • Methotrexate/5-FU

  • Vincristine

  • Interferon-α

  • Monoclonal antibodies, e.g., bevacizumab (Avastin), cetuximab (Erbitux)

  • Tyrosine kinase inhibitors, e.g., erlotinib (Tarceva), imatinib (Gleevec)

ABVD , Adriamycin/bleomycin/vinblastine/dacarbazine; AC , Adriamycin/cyclophosphamide; BEACOPP , bleomycin/etoposide/Adriamycin/cyclophosphamide/oncovin/procarbazine/prednisone; BEP , bleomycin/etoposide/cisplatin; CAF , cyclophosphamide/Adriamycin (doxorubicin)/fluorouracil; CEF , cyclophosphamide/epirubicin/fluorouracil; CHOP , cyclophosphamide/hydroxydaunomycin/oncovin/prednisone; ChlVPP , chlorambucil/vinblastine/procarbazine/prednisolone; CMF , cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/fluorouracil; COP , cyclophosphamide/oncovin/prednisone; COPP , cyclophosphamide/oncovin/procarbazine/prednisone; EVA , etoposide/vinblastine/Adriamycin; MF , methotrexate/5-fluorouracil; MOPP , mechlorethamine/oncovin (vincristine)/procarbazine/prednisone; MVPP , mechlorethamine/vinblastine/procarbazine/prednisolone; NOVP , Novantrone (mitoxantrone)/oncovin/vinblastine/prednisone; OEPA , oncovin/etoposide/prednisone/Adriamycin (doxorubicin).

This information is available at Savemyfertility.org .

Exposure to radiation and certain chemotherapies can accelerate the depletion of the oocyte pool. This depletion can cause acute ovarian failure or POI in some females. Follicle destruction, whether by radiation- or chemotherapy-induced mechanisms, not only leads to gamete loss but also results in impaired ovarian hormone production and uterine dysfunction. Although follicles may resist combined cancer therapies, the ovarian reserve may be compromised and depleted early, resulting in premature menopause. Moreover, both the negative effects of radiation and chemotherapy on estrogen-producing growing follicles can severely impair the menstrual cycle. It is also becoming clear that both the germ cells and the somatic components of the ovary, including stromal cells and granulosa cells, are potential targets of iatrogenic insults. Cancer, Cancer Treatment, and Male Reproductive Function

Normal male reproduction is also dependent on a tightly regulated HPG axis. In males, the pulsatile release of GnRH from the hypothalamus acts on cells within the anterior pituitary gland to stimulate the production and release of FSH. FSH is secreted into the bloodstream and binds to FSH receptors on the basolateral aspect of Sertoli cells within the testicle, which stimulates the production of androgen-binding protein by Sertoli cells and is also responsible for the initiation of spermatogenesis. FSH production is modulated by inhibin B, a glycoprotein produced by the Sertoli cells that feeds back to the hypothalamus and pituitary to suppress FSH production and hypothalamic secretion of GnRH. LH is also produced by gonadotroph cells within the anterior pituitary gland; like FSH, the secretion of LH is regulated by the pulsatile release of GnRH. LH is secreted and stimulates Leydig cells to produce testosterone, and testosterone and FSH act synergistically on the Sertoli cells to initiate and support spermatogenesis. The precise endocrine relationship shared by the hypothalamus, pituitary gland, and testicles is essential for the normal production of sperm. Disturbance of this balance can have detrimental effects on spermatogenesis, resulting in decreased sperm number and quality.

Evidence suggests that cancer itself can affect male reproductive function. For example, at the time of cancer diagnosis, patients often present with impairment of the HPG axis. These findings are commonly noted in men with testicular tumors that produce alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG). Carroll et al reported in 1987 that two-thirds of men with testicular cancer had abnormal FSH, LH, and/or β-hCG levels. Specifically, decreased FSH levels and elevated LH and β-hCG levels were observed in men with poor semen parameters. The study authors asserted that β-hCG might have an inhibitory effect on FSH in some patients, resulting in impaired spermatogenesis. Other etiologic mechanisms have been proposed for the endocrine disruption that is sometimes seen in patients with cancer, including central cytokine effects. While this pathway has been suggested to play a role in oncologic anorexia-cachexia syndrome, it has not been specifically studied. More work is needed to specifically elucidate the mechanisms by which oncologic disease processes disrupt the normal HPG axis. In addition, some literature suggests that semen quality parameters tend to be poorer prior to treatment in men with testicular cancer, leukemia, or lymphoma.

The testis, like the ovary, is both radiosensitive and chemosensitive ( Fig. 37.2 ). Chemotherapy is widely used in the treatment of cancers affecting males, but its cytotoxic effects on healthy tissue can transiently or permanently deplete rapidly dividing cell populations, such as the testicular germinal epithelium. The high mitotic rate of the germinal epithelium within the testis makes it especially vulnerable to the cytotoxic mechanisms of certain chemotherapeutic agents. In contrast, Leydig cells are far more resistant than testicular germ cells to the cytotoxic effect of chemotherapy. As a result, it is more common for a male cancer survivor to experience impaired sperm-making ability while maintaining adequate testosterone production for pubertal progression, libido, and normal sexual function.

Chemotherapeutic regimens that include alkylating agents are among the most gonadotoxic and often lead to permanent oligospermia or azoospermia. These changes in spermatogenesis are typically seen within 90 to 120 days after administration of the alkylating agent. Platinum-based chemotherapy, such as cisplatin and carboplatin, predominately affects spermatogonia and spermatocytes. While most men treated with platinum regimens will experience an associated decline in semen parameters, the majority (80%) will have a return of sperm in the ejaculate within five years of completion of chemotherapy. Antimetabolites such as 5-fluorouracil, methotrexate, gemcitabine, and 6-mercaptopurine can also impair spermatogenesis, although the effects are commonly transient. Clinicians should be mindful of the fact that, while patients might start on a “fertility friendly” chemotherapeutic regimen, transition to other regimens is not uncommon in the course of cancer care. The best time point for sperm cryopreservation to help ensure optimal fertility preservation is prior to the initiation of chemotherapy. ,

The testis is a highly radiosensitive organ, and radiation-associated declines in semen parameters are commonly seen within 60 to 70 days after radiation treatment. Doses as small as 0.1 Gy can impair spermatogenesis, while doses of just 1.2 Gy have the potential to cause permanent azoospermia. Sperm concentration is typically observed 4 to 6 months after completion of radiation treatment, and recovery of spermatogenesis is often noted within 10 to 24 months. Fractionated radiation regimens result in more pronounced spermatogenesis impairment than nonfractionated regimens; the belief is that repeated injury to the germ cells impairs recovery and further diminishes spermatogonial stem cell and progenitor pools, thus leading to more severe and lasting damage than caused by single, larger doses. In contrast to germ cells, Leydig cells are relatively resistant to radiotherapy. While germinal epithelial damage is observed at low doses of radiation, Leydig cell injury is generally not evident until radiation exposure is 20 Gy or more, at which point serum LH elevation and serum testosterone decline are commonly seen.

In addition to the effects of chemotherapy and radiation therapy, surgical procedures can also lead to iatrogenic impairment of male reproductive potential ( Fig. 37.2 ). Orchiectomy leads to loss of testicular mass and thus germ cell mass, with diminished sperm production capability. Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, the most common solid cancer in males, sustain disruption of their excurrent ductal system via the removal of their prostate gland and seminal vesicles. Men being treated with cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer are at risk for similar excurrent ductal disruption. Retroperitoneal surgery can often result in disruption of the sympathetic nerves that control seminal emission and ejaculation. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for men with testicular cancer is one example of this kind of surgery. Template-driven, nerve-sparing approaches are now widely used in the course of RPLND, and these methods represent a technical approach to fertility preservation in males. Finally, pelvic and abdominal exenterative procedures (removal of all or most organs within the pelvic cavity) can necessitate resection of gonadal tissue and/or the components of the excurrent ductal system. If the possibility of such a resection arises during surgical planning, preoperative sperm cryopreservation should be strongly considered.

Additional Adverse Reproductive Outcomes Following Cancer

As described above, cancer and its treatments may lead to infertility or sterility due to premature ovarian failure, oligomenorrhea, uterine dysfunction, or altered endocrine function in females and testicular failure, disruption of the excurrent ductal system, and impaired endocrine function in males. However, there are also a number of other side effects of cancer or its treatment that can alter reproductive function. These effects are often overlooked or dismissed but pose a significant challenge to the reestablishment of a high quality of life in cancer survivors. These include increased depression, psychological disorders, and sexual function issues. Furthermore, patients often report a loss of self-identity or feelings of attractiveness.

It is quite difficult to predict precisely how a given individual’s reproductive potential will be affected by cancer or cancer treatments, as there are many case-dependent variables that contribute to reproductive risk. These factors include but are not limited to a patient’s age, genetic background, medical history, and fertility potential prior to diagnosis and treatment. In addition, the radiation and/or chemotherapy treatment regimen used—including dose, duration, frequency, field of treatment, and combination—has a significant bearing on future reproductive function.

Fertility Preservation Strategies

Relevant Sex Differences in Reproduction

Innate biological differences in gametogenesis between males and females have largely dictated the types of fertility preservation methods that are currently available or are being developed. In females, it is commonly accepted that oocyte production ceases during midgestation, resulting in a fixed number of primordial follicle-enclosed oocytes at birth (the ovarian reserve)—approximately 1 million—that set an individual’s reproductive lifespan. The fate of these follicles is to remain quiescent, to activate, or to die. Of those primordial follicles that are activated, only a small fraction will develop to the terminal Graafian follicle stage and produce oocytes that will be ovulated. Once destroyed, there is no mechanism to replace these follicles, as replenishment by ovarian germline stem cells does not appear to be physiologically relevant. By puberty, the primordial follicle number decreases to approximately 400,000, and reproductive senescence occurs at the time of menopause, when approximately 1000 primordial follicles remain in the follicle pool. In addition to having a finite supply, female oocytes also require relatively invasive techniques to access.

In contrast to oocytes, sperm are continuously generated in the adult testis. The process begins when type A pale spermatogonia differentiate into type B spermatogonia. The type B spermatogonia then differentiate into spermatocytes, which undergo meiosis to form spermatids and ultimately mature haploid spermatozoa. This process results in the production of millions of mature sperm daily. Because germline stem cells are very active in the male, there is an increased potential for slow recovery of fertility posttreatment if the spermatogonial stem cells are not irreversibly damaged, and the mitotically quiescent type A dark spermatogonia are able to transform into actively dividing and differentiating type A pale spermatogonia. Compared with oocytes, sperm are numerous and can be obtained using relatively simple and noninvasive methods.

Unlike treatment for adults, there are far fewer fertility preservation options for prepubertal males and females because their gonads are not fully developed. Testes of prepubertal males do not contain mature haploid gametes but instead are populated with spermatogonial stem cells that are poised to initiate spermatogenesis and generate sperm at the onset of puberty. Thus, current fertility preservation treatments in prepubertal boys rely primarily on removing and cryopreserving testicular tissue for potential future use with emerging oncofertility techniques (see sections on Clinical Fertility Preservation Options for Male Patients and Emerging Fertility Preservation Techniques ). Prepubertal females have follicles that develop in waves until the secondary stage but are then eliminated by atresia. It is not until puberty, when cyclic production of gonadotropins promotes the development of follicles to mature stages, that fertilization-competent eggs are ovulated. Thus, prepubertal females cannot make use of most standard fertility-preserving technologies (e.g., hormone stimulation and IVF) that involve the collection of mature gametes. Instead, current fertility preservation treatments for prepubertal females include ovarian tissue cryopreservation and potentially in vitro maturation (IVM) (see sections on Clinical Fertility Preservation Options for Female Patients and Emerging Fertility Preservation Techniques ).

Clinical Fertility Preservation Options for Female Patients

For females, the menu of fertility preservation options is constantly expanding as research breakthroughs are translated into clinical use ( Table 37.3 and Figs. 37.1 and 37.3 ). Although there are many approaches to fertility preservation, the unique set of patient- and case-based factors dictate the best course of action. These factors include a patient’s age, ovarian reserve prior to the start of treatment, and type of cancer, as well as the dose, duration, and timing of cancer therapy. Below is an overview of female fertility preservation options that are currently used clinically ( Table 37.3 and Figs. 37.1 and 37.3 ).

TABLE 37.3
Comprehensive Guide to Fertility Preservation Options for Males and Females
Data from Duncan FE, Jozefik JK, Kim AM, Hirshfeld-Cytron J, Woodruff TK. The gynecologist has a unique role in providing oncofertility care to young cancer patients. US Obstet Gynecol. 2011;6:24–34 and Stahl PJ, Stember DS, Mulhall JP. Options for fertility preservation in men and boys with cancer. In Reproductive Health and Cancer in Adolescents and Young Adults. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;733:29–39.
Fertility Preservation Option Male Female Suitable for Prepubertal Patients Potentially Delays Cancer Treatment > 2 Weeks Potentially Delays Cancer Treatment < 2 Weeks Requires Hyperstimulation Requires Sperm Donor at Time of Procedure Potentially Preserves or Restores Natural Reproductive Function Hormonal Requires Additional ART Procedures to Attempt Pregnancy Additional Considerations
Standard
Ovarian transposition/oophoropexy
  • Only protects against pelvic irradiation

  • Will not prevent natural ovarian aging from occurring

  • Does not protect the uterus

Gonadal shielding
  • Only protects against irradiation

Embryo cryopreservation
Sperm cryopreservation
  • Noninvasive, preserves many sperm, available for multiple ART attempts

Egg cryopreservation
  • Maintains the reproductive autonomy of the patient

Investigational
Immature oocyte cryopreservation
  • Is less effective than egg cryopreservation

Isolation of an oocyte or an egg from a natural cycle
  • Only results in one oocyte or egg from a natural cycle and takes approximately 2–10 days

  • Is risky for cancer patients who only have one chance

Isolation of oocytes from an ovarian biopsy
  • Can be performed at any stage of the menstrual cycle

  • Can potentially harm ovarian tissue remaining within the patient

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation followed by transplantation
  • Has the potential to reintroduce cancerous cells

  • Has a limited lifetime

Ovarian hormonal suppression
  • Is controversial in terms of mechanism of action and efficacy

Uterine transplantation
Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE)
  • Invasive, but conservative in using the least amount of testis tissue necessary to find sperm

  • Can cryopreserve sperm for future ART

Testicular fine needle aspiration (TFNA)
  • See TESE above

Microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA)
  • See TESE above

Percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration
  • Less invasive than TESE/TFNA/MESA above

Pre-clinical
Ovarian tissue cryopreservation followed by in vitro follicle growth
  • Avoids the risk of reintroducing cancerous cells

  • Is still being optimized for in vitro growth of primordial and primary follicles

Follicle isolation and cryopreservation
  • Avoids the risk of reintroducing cancerous cells

  • Requires in vitro follicle growth postthaw

  • Could be used for transplant

Transplantation of isolated follicles
  • Avoids the risk of reintroducing cancerous cells

Xenotransplantation of ovarian tissue or follicles
  • Avoids the risk of reintroducing cancerous cells

Testicular tissue cryopreservation followed by transplantation
  • Has the potential to reintroduce cancerous cells

Spermatogonial stem cell cryopreservation followed by transplantation
  • Avoids the risk of reintroducing cancerous cells

Xenotransplantation of testicular tissue or spermatogonial stem cells
  • Avoids the risk of reintroducing cancerous cells

  • Possibility of xenobiotic transmission

In vitro spermatogenesis
  • Avoids the risk of reintroducing cancerous cells

Use of fertoprotective drugs
Derivation of oocytes and sperm from stem cells
Nonbiological/third party
Sperm, egg, or embryo donor
  • Can be a very high cost for the patient

  • Will require a surrogate if the patient’s uterus has been compromised by cancer treatment

Surrogate
  • Bypasses pregnancy complications due to uterine dysfunction

  • Assumes that cryopreserved material is developmentally competent

  • Can also be used if patient’s fertility was not compromised by cancer treatment

  • Can be a very high cost for the patient

Adoption
  • Does not rely on patient’s natural fertility

  • Is not guaranteed since adoption agencies may discriminate against cancer survivors

ART , assisted reproductive technologies.

Fig. 37.3, Fertility preservation continuum, which outlines options for women and men and delineates the likelihood of success of each option.

Embryo Cryopreservation

Cryopreservation of embryos has been successful for decades, and millions of children worldwide have been born using cryopreserved and thawed embryos. Embryo cryopreservation is a good option for postpubertal females with a committed male partner or for women who are interested in using donor sperm. Embryo cryopreservation requires ovarian stimulation with injectable gonadotropins, minor surgery to retrieve oocytes, insemination of the oocytes, embryo culture lasting 2 to 7 days, and embryo cryopreservation. Preimplantation genetic testing for a specific genetic mutation or for aneuploidy screening may also be possible for patients pursuing embryo cryopreservation. This may be particularly relevant for patients who carry a genetic mutation that predisposes them to cancer, such as BRCA mutations. While the embryo stage and method of cryopreservation can vary by program, vitrification appears to be more effective than slow freeze techniques. According to 2017 data published by the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology summarizing over 248,000 cycles, the live birth rate per frozen embryo transfer was 45.9% in women less than 35 years of age. Success rates decline with age and are also related to the stage, quality, and number of embryos cryopreserved. While limited, data on success rates in patients with cancer appear to be similar to those of the general infertile population, though the number of high-quality embryos appears to be lower in the setting of fertility preservation. , When compared to unassisted pregnancies or fresh transfers, women undergoing frozen transfer cycles may have a higher risk of preeclampsia, preterm birth, and large for gestational age infants. , However, it is not clear if patient-related factors, indications for cryopreservation, or endometrial preparation methods play a role. Additional long-term follow-up child health studies are still needed, particularly in the fertility preservation population. Despite this success, the major drawbacks of this method in the context of fertility preservation include the time required for ovarian stimulation (see section below) and the requirement of sperm from a partner or sperm donor. A myriad of ethical and potential legal concerns exist surrounding the generation and cryopreservation of embryos. , In particular, patients should be aware that future legal disputes over embryos created with a male partner or with known donor sperm may prevent a woman from using these embryos later to build her family.

Oocyte Cryopreservation

One of the greatest advancements in reproductive medicine in the past decade has been the development of successful techniques for cryopreserving mature oocytes. This technology has been considered standard of care since 2013 by the American Society of Reproductive Medicine for fertility preservation in patients facing treatment with gonadotoxic therapies. Cryopreservation of mature oocytes is possible in postpubertal females following ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins (see below) and oocyte retrieval. Cryopreserving oocytes provides women with future reproductive autonomy and avoids many of the ethical and legal challenges related to embryo cryopreservation.

There are considerable data demonstrating high live birth rates when previously frozen oocytes from young egg donors are used as part of IVF. One large observational study reported an ongoing pregnancy rate of 40% and a cumulative delivery rate of 79% per donation cycle. This study estimated an overall live birth rate of 6.5% per warmed oocyte. According to data published by the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology, 3,013 donor oocyte cycles were performed in 2017, with a live birth rate of 43% per frozen donor oocyte recipient cycle. Indeed, some studies suggest that previously frozen oocytes are just as effective as fresh oocytes in this setting. However, there are considerably less data on outcomes in other populations, such as those pursuing autologous oocyte cryopreservation to circumvent reproductive aging and for medical indications. While success rates are known to diminish with advancing age, age-stratified data are sparse. In general, women pursuing oocyte cryopreservation for age-related concerns should be counseled that the optimal time to cryopreserve oocytes is prior to 36 years of age and that more than one cycle may be necessary to maximize the cumulative odds of live birth.

Ovarian Stimulation for Embryo or Mature Oocyte Cryopreservation

Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for egg or embryo cryopreservation has had the most proven success and should be offered as the first-line therapy for fertility preservation in postpubertal females. In the normal menstrual cycle, a tightly controlled sequence of hormones results in the development and ovulation of a single egg. Briefly, in the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle, the selection of the single dominant follicle from the pool of available follicles is determined by FSH responsiveness. The follicle that is most sensitive to FSH will upregulate FSH receptors and increase granulosa cell numbers. Granulosa cells produce estrogen and the increased estrogen levels have a negative feedback inhibitory effect on FSH production by the pituitary. The dominant follicle continues to grow because of its newly increased responsiveness due to increased FSH receptor density. The other follicles, however, suffer from FSH withdrawal and undergo atresia. LH receptors appear on the dominant follicle as it approaches ovulation and a pituitary-mediated LH surge signals the resumption of meiosis and ovulation. By this mechanism, a single follicle is recruited and a single egg is released in a natural menstrual cycle. The duration of the rise in FSH above a critical threshold determines the number of dominant follicles that are selected in a menstrual cycle.

In COS cycles, exogenous FSH is given in higher doses over a longer period of time to enable the recruitment of multiple follicles and the capture of more than one egg per cycle. GnRH agonist or antagonist can be used to block the LH surge to prevent premature ovulation and allow multifollicular recruitment. hCG is used in COS cycles to mimic the endogenous LH surge due to its longer half-life and its ability to promote ovulation similar to LH. Newer protocols using a GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) cause an endogenous LH surge to trigger final oocyte maturation and substantially reduce the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. , The choice of COS protocol, either downregulation with GnRH-a or GnRH antagonists and ovulation trigger with hCG or GnRH-a, is generally dependent on the patient’s age, ovarian reserve, and physician preference. However, antagonist protocols are preferred in the setting of urgent fertility preservation to expedite the process and to be able to use the GnRH-a trigger to reduce the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (see below). Following COS, mature oocytes are aspirated transvaginally or transabdominally under ultrasound guidance and either frozen or fertilized using assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures such as IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Embryos may be cultured for 2 to 7 days, cryopreserved using slow-freeze or more commonly by vitrification techniques, and stored in liquid nitrogen for the patient’s future use. , Later, the oocytes or embryos can be used to achieve pregnancy in the patient or a gestational carrier.

Random Start Protocols

Nonconventional COS protocols can take 2 to 6 weeks from initiation to oocyte retrieval; this potential delay in cancer treatment may be detrimental for women with aggressive or advanced cancers. Theneed to initiate immediate COS due to time constraints has led to a flurry of research into various clinical protocols to optimize success while minimizing wait time. Random start stimulation protocols, which allow patients to undergo COS on the day of presentation regardless of the menstrual cycle phase, have similar outcomes to conventional follicular phase start protocols. Studies comparing late follicular phase and luteal phase stimulation start protocols were as effective as conventional early follicular phase start protocols with regard to numbers of oocytes and mature oocytes retrieved, fertilization rates, and embryo development rates. For patients initiating gonadotropins in the late follicular phase with no dominant follicle present, the ovaries are stimulated and the LH surge is ignored. After ovulation, a secondary cohort of follicles is then recruited, and a GnRH antagonist is initiated to capture this secondary cohort and to prevent ovulation. Alternatively, if the patient is in the late follicular phase and a dominant follicle is present (>15 mm), ovulation is triggered with hCG and gonadotropins are initiated after ovulation to capture the secondary follicle cohort. If the patient presents in the luteal phase, gonadotropins and GnRH antagonists are administered in a similar fashion. Administration of the final oocyte maturation trigger can occur either with hCG or GnRH-a depending on the clinical scenario. It is even possible to perform back-to-back stimulation cycles to optimize the number of oocytes and embryos cryopreserved in patients who have a suboptimal response.

Letrozole Protocols

COS can result in estrogen levels that are 5 to 10 times higher than physiologic levels during a natural menstrual cycle. It has been hypothesized that high levels of estrogen cause accelerated tumor growth in patients with estrogen-sensitive tumors such as certain breast cancers and endometrial cancer. One way to avoid the risk posed by supraphysiologic estrogen levels is to cryopreserve oocytes or embryos on a natural menstrual cycle without COS. However, the results of natural-cycle IVF are poor; one study showed an average of only 0.6 embryos cryopreserved per patient. Success rates increase with increasing numbers of retrieved oocytes and embryos, making COS advantageous.

Adjuvant letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor, has been used in combination with FSH to decrease estrogen levels during COS. Aromatase converts androgens to estrogens in many tissues, including the granulosa cells of ovarian follicles. Letrozole can be used at a daily dose of 2.5 to 7.5 mg in anovulatory patients for ovulation induction while maintaining low estrogen levels. Letrozole can also be used as an adjunct to gonadotropin stimulation in the setting of COS for oocyte or embryo cryopreservation in patients with estrogen-sensitive cancer. Two prospective studies were conducted comparing letrozole to other agents in the setting of fertility preservation for patients with cancer. The first study compared 5 mg of daily letrozole plus FSH, 60 mg daily tamoxifen plus FSH, and 60 mg of tamoxifen alone. The authors found that patients who used either letrozole plus FSH or tamoxifen plus FSH had significantly more oocytes retrieved than those who used tamoxifen alone. Peak estrogen levels were lowest in the letrozole plus FSH group. In a later study, the same authors compared letrozole to anastrozole in a similar population of patients with breast cancer undergoing IVF for fertility preservation. In this study, letrozole was shown to be superior to anastrozole in the suppression of estradiol levels, though there was not a statistically significant difference in the number of oocytes retrieved. Other studies have found that titrating the dose of letrozole up to 10 mg/day can keep estradiol levels suppressed below 500 pg/mL. Long-term follow-up studies have not shown increased risk for breast cancer recurrence in patients who underwent fertility preservation protocols using letrozole as adjunct therapy. , While data are limited, subsequent clinical pregnancy rates have been shown to be similar to the US national mean among infertile patients undergoing IVF.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here