Esophageal Symptoms and Selection of Diagnostic Tests


A surgeon evaluating a patient prior to a possible esophageal operation must spend enough time in conversation with that patient to ensure a clear understanding of their symptoms. Such dialogue not only illuminates potential causes of those symptoms, but more importantly, it indicates whether a given surgical procedure may resolve them. The spectrum of symptoms in esophageal disease is wide, ranging from common typical symptoms (e.g., heartburn, regurgitation, and dysphagia) to atypical symptoms (e.g., cough, voice changes, chest pain, and globus sensation). Esophageal symptoms are often vague in nature, which should prompt further questioning of the patient. Surgeons should be familiar with the concept of “functional heartburn” so that surgery is not performed for patients who would not benefit from surgical intervention.

The tests used to evaluate symptoms should be selected in accordance with the suspected underlying pathology. Functional testing is critical when a functional operation is planned, and in the present era of justified cost containment, exhaustive testing is not always necessary. Nonetheless, shortcuts should be avoided, as most functional testing is additive in the assessment of a patient's pathology and generally carries meaning. An operation performed for the incorrect indication can be disastrous, particularly because the esophagus is a relatively unforgiving organ. The most common cause of failure after antireflux surgery is poor patient selection ; therefore, thoughtful analysis of presenting symptoms and a complete work-up to identify the cause of these symptoms are necessary before the surgeon advises a surgical procedure for a functional disorder. Surgeons whose patients experience dysphagia should be aware of the possibility of malignancy, as dysphagia is the most common presenting symptom associated with esophageal cancer.

Origin of Esophageal Sensation

Sensory nerve fibers in the esophagus are present in both the muscle and mucosa, and are carried in the vagus nerve and in the spinal nerves. The vagus nerve afferents have been described as tension-sensitive fibers with low thresholds for response. They are thought to contribute to physiologic reflexes. The spinal afferents likely provide a nociceptor function and convey noxious intensity of various stimuli. Stimuli that excite these afferents include distention and exposure to acid. The afferent nerves have been classified as muscle-tension-sensitive, mucosal mechano/chemosensitive, and tension/mucosal receptors; however, most afferent fibers respond to both mechanical and chemical stimuli. Acid excites primary sensory neurons in the esophagus by activating two proton-gated channels: transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 (TRPV1) and acid-sensing ion channels. The latter is thought to mediate heartburn in nonerosive reflux disease (NERD). The activation of the TRPV1 channel by acid can initiate neurogenic inflammation and the release of proinflammatory substances from the surrounding cellular matrix, with a resulting increase in noxious stimuli. Visceral hypersensitivity in patients with NERD appears to involve neurogenic inflammation, with an increase in both release of substance P and expression of neurokinin 1 receptor, which in turn activates TRPV1 and protease-activated receptor 2.

A number of tests have historically been used to understand esophageal symptomatology, including acid infusion (i.e., the Bernstein test) and balloon distention. These proved to be useful for understanding the stimulus-symptom axis of the esophagus, but they are seldom used in today's clinical practice. The sensory neurons from the heart and the esophagus converge on the dorsal horns of the spinal cord, which likely explains the overlap of pain from either organ and often prompts suspicion of myocardial infarction in patients with severe esophageal spastic syndromes. A gender difference in esophageal symptom perception has also been described, with males having both lower tolerance to acid perfusion and greater sensitivity to balloon distention after acid sensitization. Hyperalgesia (i.e., the heightened perception of painful stimuli) appears to occur over a greater anatomic region in females.

Sensory hypersensitivity includes both hyperalgesia and allodynia (i.e., the perception of pain from nonpainful stimuli) and can be caused by exposure to acid, among other things. Functional heartburn is a term used to describe a symptom of retrosternal burning that occurs without objective evidence of abnormal exposure of the esophagus to gastric juice. Early studies that characterized symptom perception in patients after balloon distention showed highly variable patient responses. Stimulus localization was poor, and perception of the distention as pain, nausea, or heartburn was also quite variable. These findings underscore the need for complete testing in patients presenting with various esophageal symptoms, especially when surgery is considered as a treatment option.

Symptoms

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is an extremely common condition that causes most esophageal symptoms. GERD symptoms may be classified as typical or atypical. Typical symptoms of GERD include heartburn and regurgitation (some authors include dysphagia); atypical symptoms include noncardiac chest pain, chronic cough and asthma, hoarseness and dental caries, nausea and vomiting, and globus sensation. A global consensus group defined GERD as troublesome symptoms or complications that result from reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus. GERD has been further classified into cases with endoscopically visible injury and cases without, the latter now commonly referred to as NERD. Patients with NERD may make up as much as 70% of patients who experience reflux symptoms. Erosive disease and esophageal stricture may be related to the concentration of the acid that is refluxed, as well as overall duration of exposure.

Typical Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Heartburn

The most common esophageal symptom of GERD is heartburn, usually resulting from reflux of acidic gastric juice into the esophagus. Acid irritates the esophageal mucosa, stimulating nociceptors and causing heartburn. The relationship between acid exposure and heartburn is quite complex, as evidenced by the variable response to acid suppression therapy (especially in patients with NERD). Up to 60% of the Western population experience heartburn at least once every year, and 20% to 30% have weekly symptoms. Heartburn is usually described as retrosternal burning that ascends from the epigastrium toward the throat. The classic billboard advertisements for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) that feature a patient with a grimace and a balled-up hand held to the chest are an apt representation of the sensation.

Many patients describe aggravation of their heartburn brought about by eating spicy or fatty meals, drinking citrus juices, or consuming chocolate, alcohol, or coffee. It is frequently associated with regurgitation, which is exacerbated by postural changes. Heartburn is usually relieved by antacids or antisecretory medications, and the availability of over-the-counter PPIs and oft-prescribed antisecretory medications have led to widespread use of these remedies. Not infrequently, physicians may find that their patient is completely dependent on these medications, and withdrawal of PPIs results in the rapid return of heartburn. It is therefore important to ask the patient about their use of these medications and what symptoms they experience when the medication is withheld. Nocturnal heartburn appears to be an especially serious symptom, as noted by a Gallup poll conducted by the American Gastroenterologic Society ( Box 5.1 ).

Box 5.1
Nighttime Heartburn Is an Underappreciated Clinical Problem

  • 50 million Americans have nighttime heartburn at least once per week

  • 45% of heartburn sufferers report that current remedies do not relieve all the symptoms they experience

  • 63% report that it affects their ability to sleep and affects their work the next day

  • 72% are taking prescription medications

  • 80% had nocturnal symptoms; 65% both day and night

The most appropriate objective measurement of refluxed gastric acid as a cause of the patient's symptoms is a 24-hour pH test. This test has been well studied and documented by Johnson and DeMeester, and their composite score helps distinguish normal acid exposure from abnormal levels, as described in Table 5.1 .

TABLE 5.1
Normal Values of Six Components of the 24-Hour Record for 50 Healthy Volunteers
Mean 95th Percentile
Total time pH <4 (%) 1.51 4.45
Upright time pH <4 (%) 2.34 8.42
Supine time pH <4 (%) 0.63 3.45
Number of episodes 19.00 46.90
Number of episodes ≥5 min 0.84 3.45
Longest episode 6.74 19.80

Functional Heartburn

The term functional heartburn , which is a concept developed further over the past decade, refers to the manifestation of heartburn in a patient with no objective evidence that relates the symptom to abnormal esophageal exposure of refluxed gastric juice. Similarly, functional chest pain is presumed to be of esophageal origin but has a negative work-up on routine testing. Galmiche and colleagues have defined the criteria for the diagnosis of functional heartburn. Diagnosing this condition requires a negative impedance study to exclude patients experiencing symptoms with either weak-acid or alkaline reflux. A recent study of pH impedance testing showed that 30% of PPI-refractory patients experience functional heartburn. These patients may have altered visceral hypersensitivity, as their condition frequently overlaps with other functional abnormalities and various psychiatric disorders. In patients with functional heartburn, antireflux surgery outcomes are often poor, which drives home the importance of pH testing before antireflux surgery is considered. Treatment for functional heartburn usually includes antidepressants, which are thought to have a neuromodulatory role in hypersensitivity disorders. However, scant data prove their efficacy.

The functional heartburn category of patients again reaffirms the sometimes-vague presentation of esophageal pathologies, and certainly adds weight to the argument that GERD must be objectively diagnosed with pH or pH impedance testing before surgery is considered.

Regurgitation

Regurgitation is the effortless return of gastric juice or recently ingested food or liquid into the back of the throat or mouth, and it is often exacerbated by postural changes. This symptom is most frequently accompanied by heartburn, but it may occur in isolation in patients with adequate acid-suppression therapy (i.e., with PPIs). Regurgitation occurring at night is especially significant, as it may result in silent aspiration and lung damage. Delayed gastric emptying may exacerbate regurgitation.

Dysphagia

Dysphagia may be either oropharyngeal or esophageal in origin. Oropharyngeal dysphagia may result from mechanical, obstructive, functional, or neurologic causes. Esophageal dysphagia usually results from a mechanical obstruction, or from poor bolus transport (i.e., hypomotility or uncoordinated, spastic contractions). Patients can frequently identify the general area in which dysphagia is occurring, but this is not always reliable. The symptom of dysphagia is often referred to as an alarm symptom , as it is usually the primary presenting symptom of esophageal cancer. It is a common symptom, however, and can accompany GERD with or without stricture and a number of other benign disorders. Symptom duration and rapidity of symptom progression often offer clues regarding the pathology. Rapid progression of dysphagia that inhibits swallowing solids first and ultimately impedes swallowing of liquids over a period of weeks or months forebodes a malignant process, whereas a slow progression over years suggests an underlying motility disorder such as achalasia. Patients often initially compensate for solid-food dysphagia by avoiding dense solid foods (e.g., steak, chicken breast), chewing food very well, or eating only very soft food.

If dysphagia is accompanied by a prominent history of heartburn, the surgeon should consider peptic stricture, but patients with achalasia sometimes experience heartburn, and reflux disease is the culprit behind the development of most esophageal carcinomas. Generally speaking, dysphagia should prompt a structural investigation such as endoscopy or dedicated barium esophagram. The former is more invasive but allows for biopsy of any abnormalities, whereas the latter provides evidence of narrowing from stricture or malignancy and offers some information on the propulsive capability of the esophagus. Potential causes of esophageal dysphagia are listed in Box 5.2 .

Box 5.2
Potential Causes of Dysphagia

  • Cancer

  • Congenital webs

  • Congenital aberrant subclavian artery (i.e., dysphagia lusoria)

  • Schatzki ring

  • Benign stricture

    • Peptic

    • Eosinophilic esophagitis

    • Pill-induced or caustic-induced

  • Motility abnormalities

    • Achalasia

    • Diffuse esophageal spasm

    • Hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter

    • Muscular A-ring

    • Hypomotility of the esophagus

  • Diverticula

    • Zenker diverticulum

    • Mid-esophageal traction diverticulum

    • Pulsion diverticulum associated with spastic motor disorders

The least invasive study in the work-up of patients with dysphagia is the barium esophagram. When done correctly, this test should identify spastic motor disorders, diverticula, achalasia, and strictures (benign or malignant). Barium studies performed with liquids and foods of various consistencies or with a large barium tablet, as described later, provide additional information. Endoscopy is both diagnostic and therapeutic, as it can facilitate biopsy and provide an opportunity to dilate a Schatzki ring or stricture. More subtle motility abnormalities often require manometry for diagnosis, and this test is necessary before surgery for a manometric disorder is considered.

Atypical Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Noncardiac Chest Pain

One of the more difficult GERD symptoms to diagnose and treat is noncardiac chest pain. It is frequently of esophageal origin, and although it may be on the spectrum of GERD or of a motility disorder, surgeons should approach this symptom with caution. A convergence of sensory neurons from both the heart and the esophagus exists on the dorsal horns of the spinal cord, so myocardial infarction is often suspected in patients with severe esophageal spastic syndromes. Unfortunately, the fear of missing a myocardial infarction results in significant expense in examining patients presenting with chest pain. It is thought that as many as 150,000 of the 500,000 coronary angiograms performed annually in the United States are performed for functional disorders. Manometry is generally required to confirm suspicion of a motor disorder, but it is not always diagnostic, as many of these motor disorders are episodic in nature. Twenty-four-hour manometry (often combined with 24-hour pH monitoring) has been useful in diagnosing these patients, but is not widely available and is rarely used in clinical practice. pH testing has been found to be predictive of a therapeutic response to omeprazole in patients with severe reflux and noncardiac chest pain.

Chronic Cough and Asthma

Reflux as a cause of chronic cough is a challenge to diagnose. Silent aspiration is presumed to inflame and irritate the airway. Alexander and colleagues observed an increased prevalence of GERD symptoms and increased esophageal exposure to acid in asthmatic patients. Schnatz and Castell also noted a high proportion (78%) of positive pH tests in patients with chronic cough or asthma. Increased esophageal exposure to gastric juice in these patients is probably both the cause and the effect: Severe coughing with wheezing increases intraabdominal pressure, driving gastric juice into the relatively negative-pressure environment of the chest, and esophageal acidification can result in a reflexive bronchospastic response ( Fig. 5.1 ). Furthermore, as discussed later, chronic aspiration contributes to ongoing cough and to progressive parenchymal fibrosis. Evidence of pharyngeal reflux on pH testing helps identify patients with respiratory symptoms who may benefit from an antireflux operation.

FIGURE 5.1, Cause-and-effect relationship between cough and esophageal acid exposure. (A) Coughing precipitated by a reflux episode may be the result of occult aspiration of refluxed gastric juice or a reflex brought on by esophageal acidification. (B) Conversely, increased intraabdominal pressure, as occurs with coughing, may overcome antireflux mechanisms and result in a gastroesophageal reflux episode. LES , Lower esophageal sphincter.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here