Endoscopic Orbital Surgery: The Neurosurgeon’s Perspective


Neurosurgical approaches to the orbit are often done with the aid of ophthalmologist or otolaryngologist, to address intraorbital lesions invading intracranial spaces or, more recently, to gain skull base exposure. Dandy first reported use of a frontotemporal craniotomy to resect lesions from the orbit that then grew intracranial. The approach Dandy described has now evolved into the skull base workhorse approaches now commonly used for lesions of the orbit as well as anterior and middle cranial fossa. The development by Yasargil of the pterional craniotomy allowed for easy exposure of lesions in the anterior and middle fossa. Orbital pathology along the lateral edge of the orbit and the superior orbital fissure could be approached from the traditional version of this exposure. Later addition of a supraorbital craniotomy to the pterional approach created the orbitozygomatic craniotomy, which allowed for further exposure of the orbit. The purpose of the orbital removal with this exposure was not only to treat intraorbital pathology but to gain skull base exposure regardless of orbital involvement. Lesions of the superolateral area of the orbit as well as lesions extending into the anterior and middle cranial fossa could safely be resected from this approach. However, there are downsides of traditional craniotomies, including a large scar, temporalis atrophy, cerebrospinal fluid leak (CSF), and infection.

Subfrontal craniotomies are another commonly used approach to lesions of the orbit and anterior cranial fossa. These approaches usually include a variation of a bicoronal incision with removal of a portion of the frontal bar bilaterally or unilaterally depending on the pathology. Subfrontal retraction then allows for views of the superior orbit along with extended views of the superolateral or superomedial orbit. The required cranial exposure and retraction of a bifrontal craniotomy can be extensive. Therefore attempts have also been made to decrease the amount of craniotomy needed to expose the anterior fossa. One of these more minimal approaches includes the supraorbital craniotomy, which allows for anterior fossa exposure while minimizing frontal lobe retraction. Visualization offered with the supraorbital craniotomy has greatly been expanded with use of the endoscope and combining the supraorbital approach with endonasal approaches.

Endoscopic endonasal approaches were developed in the late 1990s by Jho, first for approaches to sellar pathology. Later, expanded approaches were able to expose the inferomedial orbital apex as well as the anterior cranial fossa. The first attempt to use the endoscope through the orbit was completed in the 1980s, but this technique was not advanced because of the lack of high-quality imaging and navigational capability. The potential of transorbital surgery as a corridor to intracranial pathology would not be advanced again until 2010. This transorbital corridor was developed in large part because of the tools developed for endonasal approaches, the advancement in imaging, and neuronavigation. The use of the endoscope allowed for small orbital craniotomies with more direct routes to surgical pathology of the anterior and middle cranial fossa, leading to minimization of brain retraction. Transorbital approaches have now opened the orbit as an extensive intracranial corridor.

Transorbital Approaches

Transorbital approaches have a classification based on the surgical target. Orbital endoscopic surgery is for access to the orbit and optic nerve within the orbit; transorbital endoscopic surgery or transorbital neuroendoscopic surgery (TONES) is for targeting intracranial pathology. These approaches offer a corridor to the lateral aspect of the anterior and middle fossa, as opposed to the direct approach to the central anterior fossa provided by endoscopic endonasal approaches. The choice of transorbital approach depends on the targeted anatomical region. Endoscopic orbital approaches include the superior eyelid crease approach (SLC), the precaruncular approach (PC), lateral retrocanthal approach (LRC), and preseptal lower eyelid (PS) approach ( Fig. 3.1 ). All these approaches have been tested in both clinical and preclinical settings for different pathologies.

Fig. 3.1, Overview of four quadrants of the orbit. The superior quadrant is the area covered by the superior eyelid crease approach. The lateral quadrant ( yellow ) is covered by the lateral retrocanthal approach with some overlap with the superior eyelid crease. The inferior quadrant is covered by the preseptal lower eyelid approach. The medial quadrant ( red ) is covered by the precaruncular approach.

Superior Eyelid Crease Approach

The SLC approach involves a superior eyelid incision with careful dissection along the superior orbital rim. Initial clinical use of this exposure was used to repair CSF leaks, fractures, and orbital compression as described by Moe et al. ( Table 3.1 ). With this exposure, a large portion of the superior and lateral orbit can be visualized. With drilling of the posterior orbit, the anterior and middle cranial fossa can be reached through this exposure. The SLC approach limits include the superomedial limit defined by the superior orbital fissure, the inferior limit defined by the inferior orbital fissure, and the lateral limit defined by the temporalis muscle ( Fig. 3.2 ). Preclinical cadaver studies have thoroughly evaluated the potential of this approach ( Table 3.2 ). The first use of this approach for intracranial pathology was described as a theoretical approach for an amygdalohippocampectomy. By drilling of the orbit adjacent to the inferior orbital fissure, the temporal pole was exposed and intradural exposure of the mesial temporal lobe was completed. Further cadaver studies have shown that the lateral cavernous sinus, including the cavernous carotid, gasserian ganglion, ophthalmic division of trigeminal nerve (V1), maxillarydivision of trigeminal nerve (V2), and mandibular nerves division of trigeminal nerve (V3), could all be reached through the SLC approach by more lateral dissection along the orbital rim. Using a combination of the SLC and endonasal approach, an almost 360-degree decompression of the optic nerve could be completed. The sylvian fissure has also been dissected through this route with exposure of the middle cerebral artery. More posterior exposure of the middle cranial fossa has also allowed for dissection and drilling of the petrous apex with the ability to visualize the cerebellopontine angle and internal auditory canal.

Table 3.1
Clinical Use of Endoscopic Transorbital Approaches
Author Year Approach Pathology Treated No. of Cases Type of Multiport Access
Moe et al. 2010 SLC CSF leak, frontal sinus mucocele, decompression of orbit 9
LRC Decompression of orbit apex, CSF leak repair 2
PC Tumor debulking, CSF leak repair, foreign body removal 10
PS Decompression orbit apex, CSF leak repair, metastatic squamous cell debulking 2
Moe et al. 2011 SLC CSF leak, orbital wall fractures, frontal sinus fracture 6
LRC CSF leak, orbital wall fracture 1
PC CSF leak, orbital wall fracture 5
PS CSF leak, orbital wall fracture 1
Lim et al. 2012 SLC Orbital abscess, epidural abscess, frontal sinus mucopyocele 9
PC Orbital apex syndrome, orbital abscess, fronto-orbital mucocele, 4
Raza et al. 2012 PC CSF leak repair, Paget disease, adjunct juvenile angiofibroma, and esthesioneuroblastoma resection 6 Endonasal
Rajappa et al. 2014 SLC Epidural abscess 1
Bly et al. 2014 SLC Tension pneumocephalus 1 Endonasal
Dallan et al. 2015 SLC Adjunct resection spheno-orbital meningioma 3 Endonasal
PS Malignant schwannoma 1
Tham et al. 2015 SLC Fibrous dysplasia of orbit and ethmoid 1 Endonasal
Chen 2015 SLC Amygdalohippocampectomy 2
Ramakrishna et al. 2016 SLC CSF leak repair, mucocele resection, orbital hematoma evacuation, evacuation of mucopyocele, optic nerve decompression, orbital fracture repair, sinonasal melanoma resection, fibroxanthoma resection, frontal sinus fracture repair 13
SLC/PS CSF leak repair, ORIF orbit fracture, epidural abscess drainage 6
LRC Esthesioneuroblastoma resection, melanoma resection, CSF leak repair 4
PC CSF leak repair, esthesioneuroblastoma resection, meningocele repair, osteoma resection, orbital fracture repair, osteoblastoma resection, fibrous dysplasia resection, squamous cell carcinoma resection, encephalocele resection, meningioma resection 17
Almeida 2017 SLC Resection spheno-orbital meningioma 2
Kong 2018 SLC Spheno-orbital meningioma, osteosarcoma, plasmacytoma, sebaceous gland carcinoma, intraconal schwannoma, cystic teratoma, and fibrous dysplasia resection 18
CSF , cerebrospinal fluid; LRC, lateral retrocanthal; ORIF, open reduction with internal fixation; PC, precaruncular; PS, preseptal lower eyelid; SLC, superior eyelid crease.

Fig. 3.2, Basic view provided by the superior eyelid approach. The upper panel is a lateral oblique view and the lower panel is an overhead view.

Table 3.2
Progression of Preclinical studies for Transorbital Endoscopic Approaches
Author Year Approach Focus of Investigation
Ciporen et al. 20107 PC, endonasal Sella region, pituitary gland
Bly et al. 2014 LRC Sella region, MCF, and GG
Chen et al. 2014 SLC/LRC Amygdalohippocampectomy
Ciporen 2016 PC, endonasal Cavernous carotid
Ferrari et al. 2016 PS MCF, GG, V2, V3
Almeida et al. 2017 SLC MCA, sylvian fissure, crural cistern
Ciporen et al. 2017 PC, endonasal posterior circulation arterial clipping
Dallan et al. 2017 SLC Cavernous sinus
Di Somma et al. 2017 SLC, endonasal Optic nerve decompression by SLC
Di Somma et al. 2017 SLC Surgical freedom, optic nerve decompression open versus combined
Priddy et al. 2017 SLC MCF, GG, V2, V3
Di Somma et al. 2018 SLC Sylvian fissure, MCF
D Somma et al. 2018 SLC MCF, petrous apex, GG
Noiphithak et al. 2018 LRC MCF, petrous apex, GG
GG, gasserian ganglion; LRC, lateral retrocanthal; MCA, middle cerebral artery; MCF, middle cranial fossa; PC, precaruncular; PS, preseptal lower eyelid; SLC, superior eyelid crease; V2, maxillary division of trigeminal nerve; V3, mandibular division of trigeminal nerve.

Despite multiple preclinical studies showing theoretical exposures and applications, practical clinical use of the SLC approach has remained limited. The first clinical cases used the SLC approach to repair CSF leaks, drain cerebral abscesses, decompress pneumocephalus, and repair orbital fractures. a

a References .

Decompression of the optic nerve and repair of difficult CSF leaks from trauma remain the most clinically used applications of the SLC approach. Because of the trajectory, SLC is particularly helpful in repair of anterior cranial fossa CSF leaks originating from the orbital roof, as well as CSF leaks from the frontal sinus. Orbital abscesses and cranial epidural abscesses have also been a common target of the SLC approach. In one case report, the SLC approach was chosen for a patient with a prior cranioplasty after bifrontal craniotomies and an isolated supraorbital epidural abscess. Because of the localized approach, the epidural abscess was able to be evacuated without hardware removal. One of the first reported nontraumatic applications of the SLC approach was a successful completion of two amygdalohippocampectomies. Tumor resection transorbitally with the SLC approach was first described by Dallan et al., who reported its use in three spheno-orbital meningioma cases. In these cases, subtotal resection was accomplished using the SLC approach in conjunction with transpterygoid and transmaxillary approaches for local control. Separate groups have also used the SLC approach as both a solo and combined approach for multiple types of mass lesions. Indications for SLC approach have included biopsy and resection of fibrous dysplasia, resection of sinonasal melanoma, and resection of fibroxanthoma. SLC as a solo approach was used by Almeida et al. for resection of two spheno-orbital meningiomas in patients with predominantly hyperostosis and proptosis. By using the SLC approach to drill out the bone of the hyperostotic orbital roof and lateral wall, the proptosis cold be relieved, even though gross total resection was not possible. The SLC approach is the most widely used transorbital approach in the literature. It was the approach chosen in the largest cohort of patients with mass lesions treated using the transorbital route. This cohort consisted of a total of 18 patients. Twelve of the patients had a diagnosis of spheno-orbital meningioma, and the other patients had diagnoses of osteosarcoma, plasmacytoma, sebaceous gland carcinoma, intraconal schwannoma, cystic teratoma, and fibrous dysplasia. Several of the tumors also had an intradural component, which was resected and the dural defect was repaired using a double-button technique. Only two of the patients with resections had a temporary CSF leak, but no long-term CSF leaks were reported.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here