Echocardiography in cardiac trauma


Overview

Cardiac injury as a result of blunt or penetrating chest trauma is common and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Approximately 25% of traumatic deaths are caused by cardiac-related injuries, with the majority involving either cardiac or great-vessel damage. Most penetrating cardiac wounds are immediately fatal. For those arriving at the hospital alive, focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) are the primary screening modalities. These injuries remain a challenge to trauma surgeons and are associated with high mortality. The incidence of blunt cardiac injury is unknown because of the lack of an accepted “gold standard” test for diagnosis. Blunt cardiac trauma can cause a wide spectrum of injuries (e.g., conduction abnormalities, valvular injuries, septum or free wall rupture, and coronary artery thrombosis).

Patients with cardiac injury may have profound hypotension necessitating urgent surgery; however, a significant number of patients arrive at the emergency department without overt symptoms of heart injury. Regardless of the cause or the clinical picture, diagnosis should be made rapidly. If these patients are exposed to delays in diagnosis or treatment, deaths may occur that would otherwise have been classified as preventable .

The initial evaluation of patients who sustain cardiac trauma includes physical examination and chest radiography. The sensitivity and specificity of both modalities for diagnosing cardiac injury are low, however. Other diagnostic tools include subxiphoid exploration (SXE), two-dimensional TTE, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and FAST.

Diagnostic methods

Subxiphoid exploration

SXE is a time-tested technique that has proved to be accurate in diagnosing cardiac injuries. Disadvantages of its use relate to its lack of specificity for significant injury. Moreover, it is an operative procedure that subjects patients to the risks associated with surgery and general anesthesia. The rate of negative explorations approaches 75% to 80% in most series.

Focused assessment with sonography for trauma

FAST has become an integral part of primary cardiac injury evaluation because it is valuable in the diagnosis of pericardial effusion (sensitivity, 92% to 100%; specificity, 99% to 100%). , However, absence of pericardial fluid rules out tamponade, but it does not rule out cardiac injury. FAST cannot assess cardiac function or detect valvular injuries.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here