Drugs under investigation for treatment-resistant depression


Medications targeting the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis

Dysfunction in the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis is one of the most well-established biological alterations in psychiatry ( ). The first observations of an elevation in basal cortisol levels in patients with depression were made almost half a century ago by Board and colleagues ( ) and multiple pieces of evidence contributed to this idea, including the role of stress in the precipitation of depressive episodes in susceptible individuals, the observation that depression is frequent in patients with abnormalities of cortisol production, such as Cushing’s disease ( ), and that exogenous corticosteroid administration is associated with increased prevalence of depression ( ). In fact, in patients with MDD, higher cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) levels are found in plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, and urine, suggesting that drug treatments that directly lower cortisol levels should reduce depressive symptomatology. However, HPA axis dysfunction differs by severity and subtype of depression and has been found to be linked to nonresponse to antidepressants and relapse following successful treatment ( ). This idea opened the investigation of a broad range of new treatment options related to direct interventions in the HPA axis in patients with MDD and treatment-resistant depression.

Mifepristone

The synthetic steroid mifepristone, also known as RU-486, is an antagonist with a high affinity at progesterone and glucocorticoid receptors (GR) ( ). Following oral administration of a single dose, mifepristone is rapidly absorbed, with a peak plasma concentration occurring approximately 90 min after ingestion. Despite rapid degradation and poor brain penetration, mifepristone can reach the brain, leading to a decrease in GR-mediated negative feedback, which increases cortisol and ACTH secretion. However, the mechanism of action induced by mifepristone has not been fully elucidated, and it is speculated that it may act by a rebound increase in GR function. Other effects could be attributed to an indirect effect of higher circulating cortisol levels on mineralocorticoid receptors, which may lead to its downregulation and resetting of the HPA axis ( ; ).

Early work highlighted the potential for mifepristone to normalize endocrine parameters in patients with MDD ( ; ). Murphy and colleagues (1993) conducted the first open-trial study, including four patients with chronic severe depression who were resistant to conventional therapies. Mifepristone (200 mg/day, up to 8 weeks) produced a 16% to 66% improvement in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores in three patients ( ). Recently, studies are focusing on mifepristone’s potential to treat psychotic depression, a form of depression with pronounced HPA axis dysfunction and hypercortisolemia ( ). Randomized controlled trials also suggested positive effects of mifepristone for psychotic depression ( ; ). However, data interpretation and the possible application in clinical settings were challenged by . The positive findings have been followed by a larger negative trial that found no statistically significant differences between mifepristone and placebo on reduction in psychotic symptoms ( ). However, a positive linear correlation between plasma concentration of mifepristone and efficacy was observed. The authors argued that mifepristone has good tolerability and might elicit more robust responses at higher doses.

One interesting characteristic of antiglucocorticoid strategies for the treatment of psychotic depression is that their effects appear to initiate a rapid, short-term clinical response. Thus, we can speculate that they might be helpful for TRD, used to increase the efficacy of treatment regimens in medicated patients, or initiate a response that can be maintained with conventional treatments ( ).

Metyrapone

Metyrapone inhibits the enzyme 11-β hydroxylase, which catalyzes the conversion of 11-deoxycortisol to cortisol. This effect reduces cortisol synthesis and attenuates the HPA axis negative feedback, resulting in increased ACTH, desidroepiandrosterona (DHEA), and 11-deoxycortisol levels after repeated administration ( ; ). Metyrapone is well tolerated and rapidly absorbed in humans following oral administration, and blood levels peak 1 h after ingestion.

Since the late 1970s, metyrapone has been suggested for the treatment of psychiatric complications of Cushing’s disease ( ). However, evidence supporting the role of metyrapone in treatment-resistant depression is limited and inconclusive. Most studies have utilized metyrapone as an augmenting agent for antidepressants, and no double-blind, randomized controlled trials of metyrapone monotherapy are available so far.

described a patient with TRD in an early case report responding to metyrapone and aminoglutethimide, another inhibitor of cortisol synthesis, who remained in remission for more than 2 years ( ). Also, the authors conducted an open-label study using one or more steroid suppressive agents (aminoglutethimide, ketoconazole, and/or metyrapone) in eight patients with TRD for 2 months. The study shown that six patients achieved symptoms remission for 5 months after the end of the treatments, and two patients had partial remission ( ). Positive responses for patients with TRD treated with compounds that decrease corticosteroid biosynthesis (aminoglutethimide, ketoconazole) combined with metyrapone were also observed in 13 out of 20 patients ( ). Metyrapone was also combined with hydrocortisone in a single-blind crossover study to assess the therapeutic value of blocking and replacing glucocorticoids. Treatment with metyrapone for 2 weeks produced a significant reduction in symptoms in 8 patients with depression compared to placebo, even in the presence of normal replacement levels of hydrocortisone ( ). Iizuka and colleagues treated six patients with TRD with Metyrapone (doses that varied up to a maximum of 2 g per day) for 4 weeks. Three patients achieved complete remission, and one went into partial remission.

Metyrapone was also used as an augmentation strategy of serotonergic antidepressants. In an open-trial study conducted by Rogoz and colleagues, metyrapone produced augmentation of imipramine’s effects in patients with treatment-resistant depression ( ). Additionally, in a placebo-controlled double-blind study including 63 patients treated with nefazodone or fluvoxamine, metyrapone (250 mg four times daily for 3 weeks) also showed improvement compared to placebo ( ). However, in recent studies, negative results were observed. In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial including 83 treated with metyrapone and 82 with placebo, metyrapone, in addition to standard serotonergic antidepressants, did not produce augmentation effects when compared to placebo. Moreover, , in a double-blind, randomized controlled trial including patients with TRD, no benefits were observed with metyrapone augmentation to ongoing serotonergic antidepressants. These negative findings might be related to the relative absence of HPA axis dysfunction in this population ( ).

It is important to highlight that metyrapone might act through different mechanisms that do not seem to involve a simple reduction in plasma cortisol. It is speculated that some of the potential beneficial effects for TRD might be associated with GR upregulation, changes in serotonergic 5-HT1A receptors sensitivity, activation of the MR, or effects induced by other hormones in the steroid pathway, including 11-deoxycortisol, ACTH, and DHEA ( ).

Serum and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase I (SGKI)

SGK1 is a member of the serum/glucocorticoid-regulated kinase (SGK) family, a ubiquitously expressed serine/threonine kinase regulated by a wide variety of factors, including glucocorticoids ( ). In the brain, SGK1 expression is positively regulated by glucocorticoids ( ). Moreover, SGK1 is a downstream target of GR signaling and exerts a positive feedback loop, favoring nuclear translocation and activation of GR ( ). Besides this role in GR regulation, SGK1 has multiple effects relevant for brain function, including the regulation of ion channels, neuronal activity, BDNF, and VEGF signaling, cell proliferation and neurogenesis, and apoptosis ( ; ).

SGK1 has been investigated as a potential target in psychiatric conditions, including depression ( ). Most data associating SGK1 and depression come from preclinical studies. In preclinical models of stress or chronic corticosterone administration, different nutraceutical compounds with antidepressant-like effects counteract the increase in cytosolic GR and SGK1 levels in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex ( ). Moreover, SGK1 is upregulated in the striatum and hippocampus of mice treated with ketamine, a drug recently approved for treatment-resistant depression ( ). However, human studies are by far more complex. SGK1 polymorphisms were associated with susceptibility to depression in a Chinese cohort of coronary heart disease patients. Additionally, SGK1 mRNA increased in the blood of drug-free depressed patients ( ). On the other hand, found that MDD patients with less peripheral expression of SGK1 had smaller hippocampal volumes, suggesting SGK1 as a marker of reduced activation of the glucocorticoid system. Collectively, the causative role of SGK1 in MDD is made more confusing in the presence of different splicing variants, altered distribution in distinct cell types, and different levels of expression. However, in light of the potential mechanisms associated with SGK1, compounds targeting SGK1 might represent potential treatment strategies that deserve future investigation, especially for their effect in counteracting stress-induced impairments in neuroplasticity and neurogenesis.

Fludrocortisone

Fludrocortisone is a synthetic adrenal steroid that acts as an MR agonist. In the brain, although both GRs and MRs inhibit cortisol secretion through negative feedback, MRs have 10 times the affinity of GRs to glucocorticoids and are vital to controlling the HPA responses ( ).

Clinical studies examining MR function in MDD revealed mixed results. Polymorphisms of the MR gene were associated with MDD ( ). Besides that, increased MR function was found in patients with MDD, and an upregulation in MR was found in postmortem hypothalamic tissue of patients with MDD. On the other hand, other studies found a decreased MR density in postmortem anterior hippocampus and prefrontal cortex samples of MDD subjects ( ) and in suicide victims ( ), suggesting that stimulating MR might be beneficial in MDD. In fact, the previously described results with GR antagonists reinforce this notion by pointing that a possible shift in MR/GR balance toward predominant MR effects after GR antagonism is responsible for the beneficial effects of GR antagonists such as mifepristone ( ; ). MR dysfunction has been demonstrated in TRD ( ). showed that fludrocortisone’s ability to inhibit cortisol secretion was attenuated in patients with psychotic depression, suggesting impaired MR function. No studies assessed the effects of fludrocortisone as monotherapy in MDD ( ). Nevertheless, two studies failed to show beneficial effects of fludrocortisone treatment as monotherapy on depressive symptoms in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome ( ; ). However, the stronger evidence supporting the beneficial effects of fludrocortisone for MDD came from its use as an adjuvant treatment to classical antidepressants. In a randomized controlled clinical trial including 64 patients, fludrocortisone used as add-on therapy to standard antidepressants accelerated the antidepressant response ( ). Thus, more studies are necessary, especially in patients with TRD, but it is possible that fludrocortisone acts as an accelerator at least in a subgroup of patients.

Medication targeting the melatonergic system

Agomelatine

Agomelatine is an agonist at melatonergic MT1/MT2 receptors and antagonist at serotonergic 5-HT2C receptors. One of the most important pharmacological properties of agomelatine is its pro-chronobiological effect. Melatonin is a hormone involved in the regulation of the sleep–wake cycle, and depressed patients have decreased concentrations of melatonin as well as dysfunctions in the circadian rhythms. Agomelatine was demonstrated to improve disrupted sleep–wake rhythms, enhance dopamine and noradrenaline levels in the frontal cortex, and produce neuroplasticity and neurogenesis effects ( ). The recommended therapeutic dose of agomelatine is 25–50 mg/day ( ).

The antidepressant efficacy of agomelatine and better tolerability, compared to other antidepressants, was evaluated in several controlled clinical trials ( ). One randomized clinical trial, including 164 patients treated with agomelatine and 160 patients treated with escitalopram, showed that agomelatine was better tolerated than escitalopram and displayed long-term benefits on sleep–wake quality and emotional responses in depressive patients ( ). Agomelatine was also studied in combination with other antidepressants, especially selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. However, only a few studies evaluated agomelatine for TRD, most of them with small samples and uncontrolled designs. Different case reports have looked at combinations of agomelatine with escitalopram, venlafaxine, and clomipramine, which resulted in improved outcomes in depression ( ). Moreover, better remission rates and successful remission for TRD were achieved by combining agomelatine with moclobemide in a case report ( ) and with bupropion in a sample of 15 patients ( ).

A larger 12-week open-label noninterventional study (VIVALDI study) evaluated the effects of agomelatine alone or in combination with other antidepressants in 3317 patients. According to the results, remission was achieved for 66.5% of the patients treated with agomelatine as monotherapy, 44.7% of the patients treated with agomelatine as add-on-therapy, and 50.9% of the patients who switched to agomelatine after another antidepressant. The results suggest that agomelatine improved depressive symptoms, daytime functioning, and sleep-wake rhythm ( ). Agomelatine was also investigated in combination with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) but without significant results in terms of baseline effect and prevention of relapse ( ). Thus, considering the neurobiological targets of agomelatine, its safety profile, and its ability to improve the effectiveness of other antidepressants, larger studies with TRD might be indicated.

Medications targeting the glutamatergic system

Clinical and preclinical studies suggest that dysfunction of the glutamatergic system may play a role in the pathophysiology and treatment of MDD. Trullas and Skolnick (1990), substantiated by preclinical data from behavioral despair models, hypothesized that N -methyl- d -aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists would possess antidepressant properties. The clinical proof of concept came from the study of and was systematic and elegantly replicated by , leading to a revolution in the field of antidepressant drug discovery. Ketamine is, by far, the best studied of the glutamatergic modulators, as well as the most effective. In clinical studies of individuals with TRD, rapid reductions in depressive symptoms have been observed in response to subanesthetic intravenous (IV) doses of ketamine, an agent whose mechanism of action involves the modulation of glutamatergic signaling ( ).

Based on the discovery of ketamine, there has been intense interest in the repurposing and/or development of other glutamatergic modulators that produce rapid and efficacious antidepressants actions, both as monotherapy or adjunctive to other therapies. Some of the glutamatergic system modulators that are under investigation for treatment of TRD are discussed below.

Esketamine

Recently, the researchers found that ketamine’s antidepressant effects appeared to be produced by one of its metabolites—(2 R ,6 R )-hydroxynorketamine (HNK)—through an NMDA receptor-independent mechanism that seems to enhance AMPA receptor activation ( ). Esketamine is the S (+) enantiomer of ketamine and has a three- to fourfold higher affinity for NMDA receptors ( ). Clinical trials are currently underway to study the efficacy of intranasal and intravenous esketamine in TRD. Singh et al. (2016) investigated the efficacy of intravenous esketamine in patients with TRD in a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Esketamine 0.20 mg/kg and 0.40 mg/kg had a robust and rapid (within 2 h) antidepressant effect (as assessed by the Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale - MADRS) compared to placebo ( ). A phase III, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter study conducted in 67 individuals with TRD evaluated the efficacy of each individual dose of esketamine nasal spray (28 mg, 56 mg, or 84 mg) compared to placebo. All three esketamine doses improved depressive symptoms in participants with TRD, as assessed by MADRS total score on day 8 ( ). Another multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, 12-week study investigated the efficacy of intranasal esketamine (84 mg) in 68 adults with MDD and active suicidal ideation. Intranasal esketamine significantly reduced depressive symptoms (MADRS) within 4 h, as well as suicidal thoughts, which were measured by Scale for Suicide Ideation (SSI) ( ). Currently, clinical trials are in course to evaluate the efficacy and safety of switching elderly TRD participants from a prior unsuccessful antidepressant treatment to either intranasal esketamine plus a new oral antidepressant or to a new oral antidepressant plus intranasal placebo.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here