Dermatoses Due to Plants


Key features

  • Plant constituents produce a variety of adverse cutaneous reactions, including a significant proportion of cases of allergic contact dermatitis

  • Adverse cutaneous reactions are due to a small minority of plants

  • The most common dermatoses related to plants are: urticaria, mechanical and chemical irritant contact dermatitis, phytophotodermatitis, and allergic contact dermatitis

  • Two major plant allergens are urushiol (Anacardiaceae family which includes poison ivy) and sesquiterpene lactones (Asteraceae family which includes chrysanthemums)

Important botanical synonyms

New family name Old family name
Apiaceae Umbelliferae (Parsnip family)
Arecaceae Palmae (Palm family)
Asteraceae Compositae (Daisy family)
Brassicaceae Cruciferae (Mustard family)
Fabaceae Leguminosae (Pea family)
Lamiaceae Labiatae (Mint family)
Poaceae Gramineae (Grass family)
Rhus ≠ Poison ivy or Toxicodendron (see text)
Non-immunologic urticaria = Toxin-mediated urticaria

Introduction

Contrary to the belief of patients, just because a product is “natural” and not “artificial”, it doesn't mean it is safe. When patients discover that a “natural” skin care product is harming them, they are dumbfounded. The light only goes on in their minds when we point out that, “Poison ivy is natural, too.” All the reactions described in this chapter are natural.

Plant reactions can be classified into urticaria (immunologic and toxin-mediated; see Chs 16 & 18 ), irritant dermatitis (mechanical and chemical), phototoxic dermatitis (phytophotodermatitis), and allergic contact dermatitis. Table 17.1 lists the most common plant reactions.

Table 17.1
Most common plant dermatoses.
These are admittedly biased by the anecdotal and unscientific observations as well as literature reviews of the author. ACD, allergic contact dermatitis; ICD, irritant contact dermatitis.
MOST COMMON PLANT DERMATOSES
Binomial name Common name Reaction type Inciting agent
Allium sativum Garlic ACD
ICD
Diallyl disulfide, allicin
Probably the same
Alstroemeria spp. Peruvian lily ACD Tulipalin A > B
Capsicum annuum Hot peppers Erythema/edema/burning Capsaicin
Citrus latifolia Persian lime Phytophotodermatitis Furocoumarins
Narcissus pseudonarcissus Daffodils ICD Calcium oxalate
Opuntia spp. Prickly pear and others Mechanical irritant dermatitis Glochids
Parthenium hysterophorus Scourge of India, congress grass ACD Sesquiterpene lactones
Toxicodendron radicans Poison ivy ACD
ICD (black-spot reaction)
Alkyl-catechols and resorcinols in urushiol
Toxicodendron diversilobum Poison oak ACD
ICD (black-spot reaction)
Alkyl-catechols and resorcinols in urushiol
Tulipa spp. Tulips ACD
ICD
Tulipalin A > B
Coarse hair on bulbs
Urtica dioica Stinging nettle Urticaria Histamine
X Dendranthema cultivars Chrysanthemums ACD Sesquiterpene lactones

Botanical Aspects

Becoming familiar with basic botanical nomenclature will help clinicians to better understand the literature that addresses plant-related dermatoses .

Poison ivy – just as allergenic despite a name change

It is occasionally necessary to change a plant's name. For example, the genus Rhus was once thought to be a cohesive, widespread genus that included poison ivy (previously known as Rhus radicans or Rhus toxico­dendron ). Research in the 1950s and 1960s revealed that poison ivy and its immediate relatives represented a distinct developmental lineage that should not be classified as Rhus but as a distinct genus, Toxicodendron, and thus the correct scientific name for common poison ivy is Toxicodendron radicans .

Binomial nomenclature

The nomenclatural scheme of botany and zoology gives every entity two names: a generic name followed by a specific epithet (e.g. Toxicodendron radicans ). A reference to the person (authority) who first published the species name is often placed after the binomial name. The full binomial name of common poison ivy reads “ Toxicodendron radicans (L.) O. Ktze”. “(L.)” refers to Carl Linnaeus, who first named the plant with the specific epithet radicans . “O. Ktze” refers to Otto Kuntze, who transferred the epithet radicans from the genus Rhus into the genus Toxicodendron .

The genus, species and any infraspecific epithets are called the “minor categories of nomenclature”, and these names are used when citing a plant's name ( Table 17.2 ). Genera are grouped into families, and if you know the family to which a plant belongs, you will probably be able to determine what kind of dermatologic manifestations (if any) it can cause.

Table 17.2
The basic nomenclatural scheme for plants, using common poison ivy as the example.
The distinctive ending for each category is underlined. Note that the minor categories of nomenclature have no special endings.
THE BASIC NOMENCLATURAL SCHEME FOR PLANTS, USING COMMON POISON IVY AS THE EXAMPLE
Kingdom Plantae (Metaphyta)
Division Magnoli ophyta (flowering plants)
Class Magnoli opsida (dicotyledons)
Subclass Ros idae
Order Sapind ales
Family Anacardi aceae (sumac or cashew family)
Genus Toxicodendron
Species radicans
(Author's name) (L.) O. Ktze

Plant identification

The following recommendations should be followed to identify an unknown plant that you or your patient thinks is causing an eruption.

  • Collect specimens . Herbs (low-growing plants with fleshy stems) should be collected in their entirety with their flowering and/or fruiting materials intact. For shrubs (low-growing plants with woody stems), the end of a branch (up to 60 cm) should be collected, with the leaves attached, and with any flowering or fruiting materials present. You may press plants before submitting them for identification, or you can put them into a plastic bag with no water added and submit them with data on: (1) where that plant was collected; and (2) its habitat (cultivated in a garden; growing wild along a creek bank, in an open field, in high-elevation woodlands, etc.).

  • Involve a plant taxonomist . Every US state and most Canadian provinces have an established mechanism for routine and rapid plant identification, and in most locales the service is free. In suburban and rural areas, the county or regional agricultural extension service or farm advisors are knowledgeable about the procedures for immediate plant identification, and they have access to the regional herbaria. Urban areas have similar services, usually accessed through the urban horticulturist of the state extension service, or through the local garden center or botanical garden. In other countries, look for a nearby herbarium housing a collection of flora of the region. A botanist who works there would likely be willing to help identify an unknown plant.

Patch Testing

Details of patch testing are beyond the scope of this chapter (see Ch. 14 ). The reader is also referred to the paper by Mitchell . The most common allergenic plants and a proposed botanical screening tray are found in Table 17.3 .

Table 17.3
Most common relevant botanical allergens and proposed botanical screening tray.
This list may help to narrow down a potential botanical allergy in a patient who brings specimens into your office to examine . Note this screening tray does not include urushiol.
MOST COMMON RELEVANT BOTANICAL ALLERGENS AND PROPOSED BOTANICAL SCREENING TRAY
Plant name Plant family Test solution
Achillea millefolium (yarrow)
Arnica spp.
Chrysanthemum cultivars
Matricaria chamomilla (chamomile)
Tanacetum parthenium (feverfew)
Asteraceae Compositae mix 6% in petrolatum, sesquiterpene lactones (SQLs) mix, and parthenolide
Cananga odorata Anonaceae Cananga (ylang-ylang) oil 2% in petrolatum
Citrus aurantium var. amara Rutaceae Neroli oil 4% in petrolatum
Lavandula spp. Lamiaceae Lavender (absolute) 2% in petrolatum
Lichens (fungus–alga dual organisms) Non-plant Lichen acid mix 0.3% in petrolatum
Melaleuca alternifolia Myrtaceae Tea tree oil 5% in petrolatum
Mentha spp. Lamiaceae Spearmint oil 5% in petrolatum
Pelargonium cultivars Geraniaceae Geranium oil (Bourbon) 2% in petrolatum
Rosa damascena Rosaceae Rose oil (Bulgarian) 2% in petrolatum
Santalum album Santalaceae Sandalwood oil 2% in petrolatum
Taraxacum officinale Asteraceae Dandelion 2.5% in petrolatum

Immunologic Contact Urticaria

Key features

  • Atopy and frequent contact with fresh fruits and vegetables are risk factors

  • May present as urticaria, pruritus, burning or chronic dermatitis

  • Oral allergy syndrome is mucosal contact urticaria caused by antigens similar to allergenic pollen

  • Protein contact dermatitis represents an eczematous eruption arising from repeated urticarial reactions

Plant-induced urticarial reactions are divided into immune and non-immune (toxin-mediated [see next section]). Several cutaneous reaction patterns besides wheals are possible, e.g. erythema, dermatitis.

Epidemiology

Immunologic contact urticaria is rather uncommon. Approximately 95% of cases are work-related – long-time food handlers with under­lying dermatitis are at greatest risk. However, fully half of patients with “protein contact dermatitis” (a type IV eczematous eruption arising from repeated type I urticarial reactions) are not atopic.

Examples of reported urticants include common vegetables (e.g. celery, onions, potatoes, lettuce), fruits (e.g. tomatoes, bananas, lemons), herbs (e.g. parsley, dill), nuts, shrubs, algae, lichens, trees and grasses.

Pathogenesis (see Ch. 18 )

IgE-mediated release of vasoactive mediators from mast cells leads to local urticaria and, rarely, a “contact urticaria syndrome” that includes local wheals plus systemic symptoms involving the nose, throat, lungs, gastrointestinal tract or cardiovascular system. The main cause seems to be histamine release, but prostaglandins, kinins and leukotrienes probably augment the inflammatory response.

Clinical Features

Within 30 minutes of contact with certain fresh foods, affected individuals experience pruritus, erythema, urticarial swelling, and even dyshidrotic-like vesicles. Sometimes, individuals only develop symptoms of pruritus, burning or tingling without objective findings . Theoretically, any plant can cause contact urticaria, especially with repeated exposures on the wet, macerated skin of food handlers. Cooking, processing, deep-freezing or crushing fruits and vegetables generally reduces their allergenicity.

Some individuals become cross-sensitized to pollen and similar allergens in fruits or vegetables . Upon eating a cross-reacting food, they experience sudden, IgE-mediated, oral cavity itching, stinging and pain. Edema of the lips, tongue, palate and pharynx typically ensue as the “oral allergy syndrome” (OAS) progresses. Gastrointestinal symptoms and anaphylaxis are possible if enough allergens are ingested. As an example, 70% of European patients with immediate hypersensitivity to birch pollen develop OAS while eating apples, pears, cherries, peaches, plums, apricots, almonds, celery, carrots, potatoes, kiwis, hazelnuts or mangoes. Pollen-associated foods are often, but not always, edible when heated.

The term “protein contact dermatitis” is used to describe a chronic dermatitis in which patch tests are typically negative but prick tests to large protein allergens are positive . Patients develop a chronic dermatitis that acutely urticates within minutes of contact with the offending allergen. This is one of multiple mechanisms by which plants can cause chronic hand and fingertip eczema ( Fig. 17.1 ).

Fig. 17.1, Causes and types of chronic hand or finger dermatitis caused by plants.

Differential Diagnosis and Pathology

See Toxin-Mediated (Non-immunologic) Contact Urticaria and Chs 16 & 18 .

Treatment

Prevention is the preferred form of “treatment”, but oral antihistamines are sometimes helpful. Parenterally administered epinephrine (adrenaline) is required for anaphylactic reactions.

Toxin-Mediated (Non-Immunologic) Contact Urticaria

Key features

  • Anyone can be affected

  • Stinging nettles ( Urtica spp.) are most common cause

  • Reaction can be subjective only

  • Sharp hairs on the plants can contain histamine, serotonin and acetylcholine

History

Plants causing toxin-mediated urticaria have been used since antiquity as counterirritants in folk medicine, and Native Americans used stinging nettles to treat rheumatism, stomach upset, postpartum hemorrhage, paralysis, fevers, colds and tuberculosis. Stinging nettle is used to produce homemade diuretics, and stem fibers were even used to make cloth until the early twentieth century.

Epidemiology

Urticaceae family members cause the majority of plant-induced contact urticaria. Because all persons exposed to the toxins develop urticaria, toxin-mediated urticaria is far more common than immunologic urticaria. Since very few affected people seek medical attention, the true incidence of toxin-mediated urticaria is unknown. The most common culprit in the US is the stinging nettle ( Urtica dioica ; Fig. 17.2A ) , which is widely scattered throughout the northern hemisphere (except in lowland tropical areas), especially in moist woods, roadsides and on waste land. Other common urticating plants are listed in Table 17.4 .

Fig. 17.2, Stinging nettle ( Urtica dioica ).

Table 17.4
The most common plants causing toxin-mediated urticaria.
THE MOST COMMON PLANTS CAUSING TOXIN-MEDIATED URTICARIA
Family Genus Species Notes
Urticaceae (nettle family) Urtica dioica, urens , pilulifera Stinging nettles – worldwide
Laportea canadensis “Wood nettle”, 5-foot-tall perennial herb – NE USA
Dendrocnide gigas , moroides , photinophylla Potentially deadly stinging trees – eastern Australian rainforests
Euphorbiaceae (spurge family) Acidoton urens Tropical Americas
Cnidosculus stimulosus Spurge nettle – SE USA
other species Spurge nettles of tropical Americas
Hydrophyllaceae (water-leaf family) Wigandia caracasana , urens Large-leafed shrubs – tropical Americas

Pathogenesis (see Ch. 18 )

Inciting plants possess sharp hairs (trichomes) on leaves and stems (see Fig. 17.2A ). The proximal silicaceous hair is attached to a distal calcified portion that possesses a terminal bulb. When rubbed against, the bulb dislodges to reveal a beveled, hypodermic needle-like, hollow hair ( Fig. 17.2B ). The latter releases an irritant chemical cocktail (histamine, acetylcholine, serotonin) that supposedly serves as a defense mechanism against herbivores.

Clinical Features

Wheals achieve maximal size 3 to 5 minutes after contact, and erythema, burning and pruritus last 1–2 hours. Paresthesias may last 12 hours or more. Although histamine, acetylcholine and serotonin explain the early cutaneous reaction, they do not account for the persistent paresthesias.

Reactions to stinging nettle pale in comparison to those elicited by members of the Dendrocnide genus of the Urticaceae family. These trees grow up to 40 meters tall in eastern Australian rainforests. Young shoots are covered with stiff stinging hairs. Severe urticaria from these may last for weeks, and contact with water or cold objects reactivates the urticaria. Severe, intermittent, stabbing pains may follow the course of lymphatics. Human and animal deaths due to Dendrocnide contact have been documented.

Pathology (see Ch. 18 )

Five minutes after contact with Urtica dioica , dermal edema and telan­giectasias with or without mild spongiosis are seen. At 12 hours, the edema resolves but vasodilation persists. Some patients develop spongiosis in conjunction with a neutrophilic and/or lymphocytic infiltrate. Mast cells are observed within the papillary dermis at 12 hours, but not at 5 minutes.

Differential Diagnosis (see Ch. 18 )

Although the evaluation of such patients is difficult, office testing of suspected allergens or toxin-containing plants may involve one of several methods . The most sensitive tests for immunologic contact urticaria are the prick and scratch-chamber tests. For the scratch-chamber test, a 5-mm scratch is made on the back or forearm. Test material is applied and occluded with a Finn chamber for 15 minutes. The site is examined following Finn chamber removal and every 15 minutes for an hour. After reading, the chamber can be replaced for 48 hours to test for delayed hypersensitivity.

The open application test provides the most reliable way to test for toxin-mediated urticaria. Samples (0.1 ml) from a series of dilutions are each spread onto discrete 3 × 3 cm areas of skin. Sites are observed every 10–15 minutes for an hour. Maximal erythema and edema typically occur 30–40 minutes after application.

Treatment

Most stings are benign, self-limited, and require no treatment. Trichomes may be removed with glue and gauze as described in the next section. Topical pramoxine or oral analgesics may provide some symptomatic relief.

Mechanical Irritant Dermatitis

Key features

  • Large spines (modified leaves) and thorns (modified branches) cause penetrating injuries and secondary infection

  • Small fishhook-shaped spines (glochids) can embed in the skin

  • Prickly pears are a cause of glochid dermatitis

Epidemiology

Mechanical irritant dermatitis can affect anyone. Many plants, including most cacti, can inflict mechanical injury via small or large emergences. Generally, the amount of damage to the skin is inversely proportional to the size of the emergence. Many of the plant families that can cause mechanical irritant dermatitis are listed in Table 17.5 .

Table 17.5
Common plants known to cause mechanical irritant reactions.
Although numerous plants possess irritant appendages, some of the well-known ones are listed here.
COMMON PLANTS KNOWN TO CAUSE MECHANICAL IRRITANT REACTIONS
Family Genus species Notes
Amaranthaceae Kali tragus Tumbleweed or Russian thistle – sharp-edged spines penetrate skin
Araliaceae Hedera helix Common ivy – leaf-borne stellate hairs detach as leaves age
Asteraceae Carduus and Cirsium spp. Thistles
Asteraceae Lactuca serriola Prickly lettuce
Boraginaceae Borago officinalis Borage – sharp, stiff leaf and stem hairs
Cactaceae Opuntia spp. Prickly pears; “Sabra dermatitis”
Liliaceae Tulipa spp. Coarse fibers on tulip bulb tunics cause irritant component of “tulip fingers”
Moraceae Ficus spp. Figs – abrasive bristles on leaves and fruit
Morus spp. Mulberries – abrasive bristles on leaves and fruit
Nyctaginaceae Bougainvillea Sharp spines on stems and spear-shaped crystals in trichomes on leaves (Brazil native)
Poaceae Many spp. Grasses – fine hairs, prickly spikes, and cutting leaf edges
Proteaceae Grevillea spp. Terminal, sharp points on leaves – Australia
Rosaceae Rosa spp. Thorns can cause penetrating injuries, tenosynovitis and foreign body granulomata
Rubiaceae Galium aparine “Goose-grass” – hooked prickles on fruit, stems, leaves
Scrophulariaceae Verbascum thapsus “Mullein” or “flannel-plant” – woolly hairs on leaves used as facial rubefacient
Sterculiaceae Fremontodendron spp. “California glory” possesses stiff, stellate hairs

Pathogenesis

Whereas cacti possess large spines, their smaller glochids cause more notorious dermatologic problems. The glochids – tufts of hundreds of short, barbed or hooked hairs – arise from pincushion-like structures called “areoles”, from which larger spines may also arise. The minute, barbed glochids ( Fig. 17.3A ) often point outward and backward like a fishhook and produce considerable irritation and pruritus after penetrating the skin. For example, Opuntia microdasys (“polka dot cactus”, “bunny ears cactus”), a house and garden favorite, bears disarming-appearing “fluffy” clusters of 100–200 glochids on its pads (see Fig. 17.12 ).

Fig. 17.3, Prickly pears ( Opuntia spp.) and their glochids.

Clinical Features

One form of glochid dermatitis from prickly pears ( Opuntia spp.) is “Sabra dermatitis”, a pruritic, papular eruption that occurs among prickly-pear pickers and those who unwarily stumble into burglar-proof hedges of this native Mexican plant ( Fig. 17.3B ). The fruit contains the highest concentration of glochids ( Fig. 17.3C ) and the ensuing eruption can resemble fiberglass dermatitis or scabies. Prickly pears should be picked only when wetted, and harvesting should cease when it is windy, since the glochids can become airborne.

All 200 or so species of Opuntia are native to the New World, ranging from New England and British Columbia southward to the Straits of Magellan. Numerous species have become established in the Mediterranean basin, South Africa, South Asia and Australia.

Spine and thorn injuries can be complicated by the inoculation of microorganisms such as Clostridium tetani and Staphylococcus aureus into the skin. Grasses, sphagnum moss and rose thorns can transmit Sporothrix schenckii . Atypical mycobacteria such as Mycobacterium kansasii (blackberries), M. marinum (cactus spines), and M. ulcerans (spiky tropical vegetation) have also added infectious insult to mechanical injury.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here