Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Myelopathy denotes any neurological deficit related to a pathology of the spinal cord. A spinal cord injury (SCI) can be produced by diverse etiologies such as trauma, ischemia, neoplasms, inflammatory processes, and infection. However, degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction. Degenerative myelopathy may result from spondylosis, disc herniation, or facet arthropathy, as well as ligamentous hypertrophy, calcification, or ossification. DCM accounts for 54% of all the nontraumatic SCI in the United States. This condition mainly affects aging people and is usually diagnosed during the fifth decade of life. C5-C6 is the most commonly involved level regardless of gender and age. The pathogenesis of neurological impairment hinges on the direct injury to neurons and glial cells, either from static or dynamic mechanical insults. The spinocerebellar and corticospinal tracts are usually affected first. Onset of symptoms is usually insidious, and initial complaints are frequently gait disturbances and fine motor deficits. To establish a reliable correlation between the severity of symptomatology and the degree of radiographic compression is challenging. Most of the abnormalities that contribute to the development of DCM can be demonstrated with a magnetic resonance image (MRI), and therefore an MRI should be routinely performed if cervical myelopathy is suspected. Surgery is the standard treatment for DCM. Cervical decompression halts disease progression and improves neurological outcomes, functional status, and quality of life. Besides decompression of spinal cord, surgery should restore cervical alignment and address instability if present. The ideal approach to attain the aforementioned is still a matter of debate. Several factors impact the surgical strategy, such as the localization of the compression (anterior or posterior), levels affected, and the need to preserve cervical lordosis. Anterior approaches include discectomy and fusion and/or corpectomy, whereas common posterior techniques include laminectomy/laminoplasty and fusion. In this chapter, we present the case of a 68-year-old man presenting with gait disturbances/instability and hand atrophy with suspected cervical myleopathy.
Chief complaint: instability
History of present illness: This is a 68-year-old man with a history of hand atrophy and gait instability for several weeks. He initially attributed these symptoms to his lumbar spine. He does have a history of prior lumbar laminectomy. The patient stated that he did have some difficulty with dexterity and balance and even suffered recurrent falls. He had some difficulty with urinary urgency, but he attributed this to his history of prostate cancer. Magnetic resonance image (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) of the cervical spine showed significant degenerative spinal canal stenosis with severe ventral compression of the spinal cord ( Figs. 20.1 and 20.2 ).
Medications: ramipril
Allergies: no known drug allergies.
Past medical and surgical history: prostatic cancer, hypertension
Family history: noncontributory
Social history: engineer, no smoking, no alcohol
Physical examination: awake, alert, and oriented to person, place, and time; cranial nerves II–XII intact; unsteady gait. Bilateral deltoids/triceps/biceps 5/5; interossei 4/5; iliopsoas/knee flexion/knee extension/dorsi, and plantar flexion 5/5
Reflexes: 2+ in bilateral biceps/triceps/brachioradialis with negative Hoffman; 2+ in bilateral patella/ankle; no clonus or Babinski; sensation intact to light touch
|
|
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Preoperative | ||||
Additional tests requested |
|
|
|
|
Surgical approach selected |
|
|
C3-4 corpectomy |
|
Goal of surgery | Decompress spinal cord, restore alignment, stabilize spine | Decompress spinal cord, restore lordosis and physiological alignment, stabilize spine | Decompress spinal cord, restore lordosis, stabilize spine | Decompress spinal cord, restoration of anatomical alignment, stabilization |
Perioperative | ||||
Positioning |
|
|
Supine, no pins |
|
Surgical equipment | Fluoroscopy |
|
|
|
Medications | Tranexamic acid | MAPs >85 | None | Vitamin D/calcium supplements if needed, PTH analog if needed, MAP >85 |
Anatomical considerations | Vertebral arteries, PLL, thecal sac | Esophagus, sympathetic plexus, trachea, carotid artery, recurrent laryngeal nerve, vertebral arteries | Esophagus, larynx, vascular structures, uncincate process, PLL | Vertebral arteries, spinal cord, cervical nerve roots |
Complications feared with approach chosen | Dysphagia | Inadequate decompression, misalignment | Vascular injury, esophageal injury, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury | Spinal instability, inadequate decompression |
Intraoperative | ||||
Anesthesia | General | General | General | General |
Exposure |
|
|
C3-6 |
|
Levels decompressed |
|
|
C3-4 |
|
Levels fused |
|
|
C3-6 |
|
Surgical narrative |
|
|
Position supine, head slightly extended, neutral, lateral x-ray to check level, right lateral horizontal incision, platysma dissection, identify border of sternocleidomastoid, open anterior cervical fascia, blunt finger dissection, palpate carotid artery, identify and retract larynx/thyroid/esophagus, put retractor on longus colli base, dissect levels as needed, place pins at C3 and C6, distract, C3-4 corpectomy, C4-5 discectomy, identify PLL and uncinate process, prepare end plates for implant, put PEEK implant with bone chips, x-ray to check position, screw fixation with plate, x-ray to confirm location and hardware, layered closure with drain |
|
|
|
|
||
Complication avoidance | Two-staged approach, flatten anterior cervical spine to prevent dysphagia, perform discectomy prior to corpectomy to get appropriate interbody, do not remove structural end plate during discectomy, C7 pedicle screws | Traction during anterior approach, troughs along uncovertebral joints, dissect through PLL, optimize lordosis with anterior cage, two-staged approach, Magerl technique for cervical lateral mass screws | Anterior cervical approach with distraction, maintain PLL | Two-staged approach dependent on degree of decompression between stages, traction to help with alignment, open PLL, MRI between stages |
Postoperative | ||||
Admission | ICU | ICU | ICU | Intermediate care |
Postoperative complications feared | Dysphagia, pseudoarthrosis, wound complications, instrument failure | Dysphagia, airway issues | Dysphagia, cervical hematoma, vascular injury, esophageal injury | Dysphagia, C5 palsy, CSF leak, instrument failure, pseudoarthrosis, esophageal injury |
Anticipated length of stay | 3–4 days | 4–5 days | 3–4 days | |
Follow-up testing | C-spine x-rays 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year after surgery |
|
C-spine x-ray 1 month after surgery |
|
Bracing | Aspen brace for 10 weeks, soft collar all day for 2 weeks, soft collar at night only for 2 weeks | Miami J for 10–12 weeks | Hard collar for 4 weeks | Collar dependent on bone quality |
Follow-up visits | 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year after surgery | 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after surgery | 1 month after surgery | 2 weeks, 6 weeks,3 months, 6 months, 12 months after surgery |
Cervical stenosis
Intramedullary spinal cord tumor
Transverse myelitis
Syringomyelia
Peripheral nerve entrapment
Normal pressure hydrocephalus
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here