Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists and Perioperative Medicine


Key Points

  • Certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) are well positioned within the perioperative care model to provide high-quality care throughout the surgical continuum.

  • Many areas of practice within the profession of nurse anesthesia, including background, training, and personal care delivery, align with the delivery needs of perioperative medicine.

  • The CRNA's perspective enables them to be effective leaders, champions, and active participants in the organization, planning, and delivery of perioperative medicine.

The Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist Lens

The concept of “upstream thinking” is ingrained in nurses early in their education. Nurses attempt to avoid the downstream fallout of a particular condition by focusing on the origin of a pathophysiological problem and the relevant social concerns and not just reacting to the presenting illness. This concept necessarily involves and addresses health inequalities and population health, which, as presented in an earlier chapter, overlaps with perioperative medicine (POM). The foundational education and experience of certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) is rooted in this “upstream thinking” (i.e., not “reacting” but being “proactive” in caregiving). On the path to becoming a CRNA, many nurses witness postoperative complications first-hand, such as comforting a disoriented elderly patient, attempting to ease the intractable nausea and vomiting of a young woman, and denying a hungry patient food while awaiting bowel sounds to return. However, on becoming a CRNA, nurses are empowered to make decisions that directly impact those outcomes that they seemingly had no control over as a nurse. The problem was upstream. Now as a CRNA the nurse is working upstream, positioned to make an impact.

An additional aspect of CRNA training, rooted in the nursing background, is developing the ability and desire to provide patient education and to use empathetic communication with patients and colleagues. CRNAs enter anesthesia understanding the importance of multidisciplinary teamwork in patient care. This team-based experience creates an ideal opportunity for CRNAs to engage in interdepartmental education, helping healthcare teams recognize the importance that a multidisciplinary contribution brings to patient healing and recovery.

CRNAs can act as touchpoints in multiple phases of care as they monitor the evolution of the patient's condition across the surgical continuum. Many CRNAs lead or staff preadmission clinics, perform preoperative evaluations, deliver intraoperative care, collaborate care in the postanesthesia care unit, and often round on patients postoperatively. With this vantage point, CRNAs possess the ability to bridge disparate groups of clinicians brought together in perioperative care models. The value of the CRNA role in POM can be overlooked because of their clinical workload, but their work inside and outside of the operating room (OR) links physicians and nursing.

Implementation of Perioperative Medicine: The CRNA Perspective

Previous chapters offer an in-depth discussion and multiple examples of the “what, whys, and hows” of POM. Although there is no silver bullet or “secret sauce” to success, countless enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs and perioperative pathways are based on following the general principles of enhanced recovery and using implementation science and quality improvement (QI) to put these pathways into practice. The intent of this chapter is to highlight the CRNA's ability to adopt such principles and operationalize them. The CRNA's perspective enables them to be effective leaders, champions, and active participants in the organization, planning, and delivery of POM. This chapter also aims to inspire and empower fellow CRNA colleagues and all providers in the perioperative space to examine their practice and to ask these key questions:

  • “Do I know my own outcomes?”

  • “Can my practice be enhanced through perioperative medicine models?”

  • “Can I, as a (insert provider type), use my training and experience to be the catalyst for better patient care?”

The following are three real-world examples of CRNA providers and their contribution to POM.

Example 1: “Being Part of the Bigger Picture”

A small team of providers (an anesthesiologist, general surgeon, advanced practice nurse, and a CRNA) developed, implemented, and disseminated the adoption of an ERAS initiative in a large community facility in 2015.

Background

Within the hospital facility, routine postoperative rounds were performed by CRNAs approximately 24 hours after surgery. Commonly noted were differing states of recovery between different surgeons and patient types. Because of a lack of data, true quantitative outcomes were unknown, though it was assumed there was room for improvement. At the time, ERAS programs were reported to improve recovery by reducing length of stay (LOS), complications, and readmission rates, ultimately improving the value of care delivered by the hospital as a whole. Inspired by the work in the National Healthcare System of Great Britain (NHS) and Henrik Kehlet, an ERAS team was formed, organically derived from a small group of interested clinicians and driven by the Department of Anesthesiology Medical Director. The team reviewed the available research and evaluated its potential effectiveness for the patient population of the facility, located in Kentucky, ranked 44th in the United States for overall health of the population.

Methods

A standardized service line protocol was developed for colorectal patients. It included the major tenets of ERAS: preadmission testing (PAT) education, preoperative carbohydrate loading, nothing by mouth (NPO) for clear fluids 2 hours before surgery, multimodal pain management, intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy, routine surgical site infection prevention, immediate postoperative regional anesthesia, and postoperative “DrEaMing” (patients no longer had lines or drains and were encouraged to “ Dr ink E at and M obilize” within 24 hours of surgery). The protocol was disseminated through printed materials, educational sessions, group meetings and one-on-one conversations. The program was highlighted by the hospital, and provider engagement was prioritized by designing internal marketing material for the clinicians and external patient-facing ERAS packets. Providers were empowered to follow the protocols, knowing their decisions would be supported based on those best practice guidelines. The hospital provided metrics of success, such as LOS data, readmission rates, discharge disposition, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, blood bank costs, and pharmacy costs.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here