Cellulitis and erysipelas


Evidence Levels: A Double-blind study B Clinical trial ≥ 20 subjects C Clinical trial < 20 subjects D Series ≥ 5 subjects E Anecdotal case reports

Cellulitis is an infection of the deep dermis and subcutaneous tissue thought to occur after pathogen entry into the dermis through breaks in the skin. In erysipelas, superficial infection gives rise to an edematous, palpable, well-demarcated, often advancing, edge. These infections are often grouped together and included in the larger category of skin and skin-structure infections (SSSIs). The causative organism is commonly group A streptococcus, though many organisms have been isolated, including Staphylococcus , Haemophilus influenzae , and, more rarely, Aeromonas hydrophila , Streptococcus pneumoniae , and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, as well as fungi and Gram-negative rods. Fulminating and necrotic cellulitis and fasciitis may occur rarely, usually in relation to immunosuppression or atypical organisms, and are accompanied by a high mortality rate.

Management Strategy

The management of SSTIs should initially assess illness severity and determine the appropriate treatment setting (i.e., outpatient vs. hospital), identifying the organism responsible when indicated, and then directing antimicrobial therapy. Underlying and predisposing conditions should be treated to prevent recurrence.

In the United States, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) has published treatment guidelines for non-purulent and purulent SSTIs; however, there is little agreement on regimen. As published by Raff and Kroshinsky (2016), the following is derived in combination from the IDSA 2014 guidelines, Johns Hopkins antibiotic guidelines, and results from the literature for non-purulent cellulitis ( Box 39.1 ) and purulent cellulitis ( Box 39.2 ). Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is identified by two or more symptoms including fever or hypothermia, tachycardia, tachypnea, and change in blood leucocyte count.

Box 39.1
Non-purulent cellulitis

  • Mild – Oral therapy with amoxicillin/clavulanate, cephalexin, dicloxacillin, penicillin VK

  • Moderate – If 1 SIRS criterion present, oral antibiotics as for mild cellulitis. If ≥ 2 SIRS criteria or treatment failure with oral antibiotics, intravenous cefazolin, ceftriaxone, penicillin G

  • Severe – Intravenous vancomycin plus piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem, or meropenem. Consider surgical evaluation for necrotizing process with culture and sensitivity. If S. pyogenes or methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) is suspected, intravenous cefazolin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, or penicillin G. If treatment failure or suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), intravenous vancomycin, clindamycin, linezolid, daptomycin, ceftaroline, telavancin, or tigecycline

Box 39.2
Purulent cellulitis (purulent drainage or pustules in the absence of an abscess)
Adapted from Raff AB, Kroshinsky D. Cellulitis: a review. JAMA 2016;316(3): 3253–7.

For all, perform I&D.

  • Mild – If suspected MSSA, oral cephalexin, dicloxacillin, or amoxicillin/clavulanate. If suspected MRSA, oral TMP-SMX, doxycycline, or minocycline. Cover with cephalexin or penicillin if streptococcal coverage also needed

  • Moderate – If 1 SIRS criteria present, as above for suspected MSSA or suspected MRSA. If ≥2 SIRS criteria and suspected MSSA, intravenous oxacillin, nafcillin, or cefazolin. If ≥2 SIRS criteria and suspected MRSA, intravenous vancomycin, clindamycin, or linezolid

  • Severe – Culture and sensitivity plus consideration of surgical evaluation for necrotizing disease with culture and sensitivity of any surgically obtained tissue. Empiric broad coverage with intravenous vancomycin, clindamycin, linezolid, daptomycin, ceftaroline, telavancin, or tigecycline. If MSSA culture positive, deescalate to intravenous oxacillin, nafcillin, cefazolin, or ceftriaxone. If MRSA culture positive, continue broad-spectrum coverage

For both non-purulent and purulent cellulitis, the following definitions apply:

  • Mild cellulitis – cellulitis without systemic signs of infection

  • Moderate cellulitis – cellulitis in a patient who meets 1 point of the following criteria: heart rate greater than 90/min; temperature greater than 38°C or lower than 36°C; respiratory rate greater than 20/min; or white blood cell count greater than 12,000 cells/mm 3 or fewer than 4000 cells/mm 3

  • Severe cellulitis – cellulitis in a patient with any of the moderate cellulitis criteria and hypotension, rapid progression, or immunocompromise

Mild non-purulent cellulitis should be treated with amoxicillin/clavulanate, cephalexin, dicloxacillin, penicillin VK, or, in cases of true penicillin allergy, clindamycin to provide antistreptococcal coverage.

The same agents used for mild cellulitis may be used in cases of moderate cellulitis. Intravenous antibiotics such as cefazolin, ceftriaxone, and penicillin G should be considered in patients who fail oral therapy or meet two or more SIRS criteria. Clindamycin may be used in penicillin allergy.

Patients with severe non-purulent cellulitis should receive broad coverage therapy. Intravenous vancomycin with piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem, or meropenem may be used. If necrotizing infection is suspected, urgent surgical evaluation with cultures and sensitivities should be sought. If streptococcal toxic shock syndrome is suspected, penicillin G and clindamycin should be used.

Other risk factors that should prompt broad-spectrum coverage with vancomycin or linezolid include cases secondary to penetrating trauma, active injection drug use, or evidence of MRSA infection or colonization. Patients who cannot receive vancomycin may be treated with oral linezolid. Severely immunocompromised patients should receive broad-spectrum coverage.

Purulent cellulitis should be accompanied by culture and sensitivity testing. Cases of purulent cellulitis are more likely to be S. aureus , and patient risk factors for MRSA may guide empiric antibiotic choice. Risk factors for MRSA include athletes, children, men who have sex with men, prisoners, military recruits, residents of long-term care facilities, individuals with previous MRSA exposure, and intravenous drug use.

Mild purulent cellulitis therapy is based on suspicion for methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) versus MRSA. If MSSA is suspected, consider cephalexin, dicloxacillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, or clindamycin if there is a penicillin allergy. If MRSA is suspected, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, doxycycline, or minocycline should be used. If both streptococcal and staphylococcal organisms are suspected, cephalexin or penicillin should be added to therapy, with clindamycin or linezolid for penicillin-allergic patients.

Moderate purulent cellulitis in patients meeting only one SIRS criterion may be treated with the same initial therapy as mild non-purulent disease, with empiric therapy selected based on suspicion for MSSA versus MRSA. Intravenous antibiotics should be considered if patients meet two or more SIRS criteria. For suspected MSSA, agents of choice include cefazolin, oxacillin, or nafcillin. For suspected MRSA, vancomycin, clindamycin, or linezolid should be used.

Empiric MRSA coverage with intravenous vancomycin, clindamycin, linezolid, daptomycin, or ceftaroline should be used in patients with severe cellulitis. If necrotizing cellulitis is suspected, surgical evaluation with culture and sensitivity should be obtained.

Newer antibiotic agents include telavancin, tedizolid, dalbavancin, and oritavancin. These agents may be considered; however, they currently have limited clinical applications. Second-line therapies for cellulitis discussed below are limited in clinical practice due to cost and concern for adverse effects.

Sites of entry for infection should be sought and should be treated, such as tinea pedis and chronic skin ulcers. Lymphedema can be associated with recurrence of cellulitis and so should be managed with long-term compression and elevation, when possible.

The use of long-term antibiotics for the prevention of recurrent cellulitis has produced conflicting evidence but may be considered for at least 3–4 recurrent cases/year once underlying risk factors have been mitigated. There are no supporting data for antibiotic prophylaxis for MRSA cellulitis.

Specific Investigations

  • Blood cultures – not routinely done in uncomplicated patients due to low yield

  • Swabs of any purulent exudate, pustules, or wounds

  • Ultrasound to assess for a drainable fluid collection if clinical exam indeterminant for abscess

  • Skin scrapings for mycology

The IDSA recommends against performing routine blood or tissue cultures, except in cases of malignancy on chemotherapy, severe cell-mediated immunodeficiency, neutropenia, animal bites, or immersion injuries. Routine use of procalcitonin to diagnose or evaluate cellulitis is not recommended.

Ultrasound may be helpful in identifying abscesses.

In the case of SSTIs of the lower leg, skin scrapings from toe web spaces, sides of feet, or toenail subungual debris may be taken for mycologic examination. Facial erysipelas should warrant sinus radiographs to exclude underlying sinusitis. Crepitus should prompt the clinician to the presence of either Clostridia or non-spore–forming anaerobes, either alone or mixed with other organisms, and warrants surgical consultation and/or imaging.

Procalcitonin and cellulitis: correlation of procalcitonin blood levels with measurements of severity and outcome in patients with limb cellulitis

Brindle RJ, Ijaz A, Davies P. Biomarkers 2019; 24(2): 127–30.

Procalcitonin levels are not recommended in the evaluation or confirmation of limb cellulitis and is a poor predictor of improvement.

Clinical practice. Skin and soft-tissue infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Daum RS. N Engl J Med 2007; 357(4): 380–90.

In cases of purulent cellulitis, culture and sensitivity testing should be performed to guide therapy, with empirical antibiotic selection based on patient risk factors for MRSA infection.

Clinical usefulness of imaging and blood cultures in cellulitis evaluation

Ko L, Garza-Mayers AC, St. John J, et al. JAMA Intern Med 2018; 178(7): 994–6.

Radiologic imaging and blood cultures are not recommended for routine use in evaluation and treatment of cellulitis and may contribute significant cost to the healthcare system.

Methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections among patients in the emergency department

Moran GJ, Krishnadasan A, Gorwitz RJ, et al. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 666–74.

A study of 422 patients in the United States who presented with purulent SSTIs found that swabs showed 59% had MRSA, 17% had methicillin-sensitive S. aureus, and 2.9% had β-hemolytic Streptococcus, demonstrating importance of swabs in such cases.

Clinical practice. Skin and soft-tissue infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Daum RS. N Engl J Med 2007; 357(4): 380–90.

Risk factors for MRSA colonization include household and day-care contacts of a patient with MRSA infection, children, soldiers, incarceration, men who have sex with men, athletes, infectious drug use, and previous MRSA infection.

Effect of dermatology consultation on outcomes for patients with presumed cellulitis: a randomized clinical trial

Ko LN, Garza-Mayers AC, St. John J, et al. JAMA Dermatol 2018; 154(5): 529–36.

This randomized clinical trial demonstrated that inpatient dermatology consultation may improve outcomes by identifying misdiagnosed cases of cellulitis and decreasing length of antibiotic treatment, improving antibiotic stewardship.

First-Line Empiric Therapies for Mild, Non-Purulent Cellulitis

  • Cephalexin

A
  • Dicloxacillin

A
  • Penicillin VK

A
  • Amoxicillin with clavulanic acid

A
  • Clindamycin

B

First-Line Therapies for Mild Purulent Cellulitis – MSSA

  • Cephalexin

A
  • Dicloxacillin

A
  • Amoxicillin with clavulanic acid

A
  • Clindamycin

B

First-Line Therapies for Mild Purulent Cellulitis – MRSA

  • TMP-SMX

A
  • Doxycycline

A
  • Minocycline

A
  • Clindamycin

B
  • Linezolid

B

Cellulitis

Fabre V, Bartlett, JC. Johns Hopkins ABX Guide, The Johns Hopkins University, 2019. Johns Hopkins Guide: www.hopkinsguides.com/hopkins/view/Johns_Hopkins_ABX_Guide/540106/all/Cellulitis.

Informs the above treatment recommendations for purulent and non-purulent cellulitis.

The course, costs and complications of oral versus intravenous penicillin therapy of erysipelas

Jorup-Ronstrum C, Britton S, Gavlevik A, et al. Infection 1984; 12: 390–4.

In this study of 60 patients there appeared to be no appreciable benefit from intravenous rather than oral therapy with penicillin for erysipelas, and so oral therapy is recommended if there are no associated complications with the infection.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here