Bioengineered Vascular Grafts


Basic Principles

Surgical repair or replacement of diseased blood vessels, including aortic reconstruction for aneurysmal disease, bypass of occlusive atherosclerotic lesions, vascular trauma, oncologic vascular reconstruction, and creation of durable arteriovenous access for hemodialysis, remains a mainstay of modern vascular surgery. All of these procedures require implantation of a vascular conduit to replace diseased vessels or to augment normal anatomy. When available, autogenous blood vessels are generally the conduit of choice. This is limited as individuals have a finite number of available vessels that can be utilized for reconstruction, and options may be further limited due to concomitant disease of the desired vessels. Wound complications and infection from vessel harvest sites remain a vexing problem. Devitalization of the vessel during surgical excision prematurely injures the conduit and may contribute to poor performance or failure. Even in the best of conditions, autogenous venous tissue eventually remodels in high resistance arterial or high flow arteriovenous circuits in a manner that more closely resembles a hyperplastic injury response than the more desirable development of a vessel-like structure with functional adventitial, medial, and intimal layers. Synthetic alternatives provide additional options when autologous conduit is not available, but these grafts pose a clear disadvantage to host tissue in terms of patency, compliance, infection, and durability.

The development of an ideal arterial substitute has been referred to as the “Holy Grail” of vascular surgery. Since the initial concept of tissue engineering in the 1980s, the field of regenerative medicine has been steadily growing in search of novel, engineered tissue replacements to create these substitute vessels. Such research has focused on creating conduits with exquisitely exact design criteria, including adequate tensile and recoil strength to withstand long-term cardiac cycles, as well as an antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory blood-contacting surface to prevent conduit failure. Conduits would require low risk for immunogenicity, foreign body response, and development of infection that could impact the long-term patency. The vessel would need to be immediately functional and combine durability, both for maintaining suture strength and resistance to subsequent mechanical stresses, with a capacity to remodel into a functional tissue and to respond to physiologic stimuli. Lastly, it would need to be cost-effective and ready to use “off the shelf”. ,

Although the search remains ongoing for an ideal conduit that encompasses all of these design elements, dramatic advancements have been made in the past several decades, due to developments in the field of tissue engineering. Indeed, in 2020 alone, there were over 600 cell-based or engineered tissue–based clinical trials currently registered as “ongoing” on ClinicalTrials.gov . In this chapter, we review a brief history on the field of bioengineered grafts, highlight important advances in the field, provide an update on current clinical activity, and look to the future of bioengineered vascular conduit.

Initial History

The origin of vascular surgery is frequently traced back to the development of the triangulated vascular anastomosis in the early 20th century by Alexis Carrel, a French surgeon who received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1912 for this advancement. Carrel would later partner with aviator and engineer, Charles Lindberg, to develop perfusion pumps and incubators that would allow maintaining of organs for prolonged periods of time, paving the way for organ culture that would anticipate many modern approaches in tissue engineering. Although venous interposition grafts had been used for trauma and aneurysmal disease, it was not until 1948 that saphenous vein was used successfully as a bypass graft for atherosclerotic vascular disease. In the 1950s Michael DeBakey, Denton Cooley, and colleagues reported the use of Dacron grafts for aortic reconstruction. Shortly thereafter, in the 1960s, the field of nephrology was revolutionized when Michael Brescia and James Cimino developed the radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula as an alternative to the Scribner shunt. , By the 1970s, the earlier pioneering investigations into the use of synthetic vascular conduits progressed to using polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and expanded PTFE (ePTFE) as replacements for small arteries and as hemodialysis access. ,

Somewhat surprisingly, the first investigations into the use of bioengineered blood vessels were conducted in the 1940s when Robert Gross and colleagues experimented with aortic transplantation in dogs. This work demonstrated that, although preservation of graft vessels by freezing alone carried unacceptable rates of thrombosis and hemorrhage, biological modification of donor aortas by storage in a nutrient solution at temperatures slightly above freezing resulted in long-term patency even after several weeks of extracorporeal storage. Those experiments led to the successful translation of these techniques to human tissue. Cadaveric human arteries were successfully treated and used both for aortic reconstruction in pediatric patients with aortic coarctation and as shunt material in patients with tetralogy of Fallot. This type of tissue preservation strategy, although successful, was quite volatile and required significant improvement in order to produce a therapy that was reliable and readily available.

Intact Isolated Blood Vessels

Gross’ work spurred the earliest examples of bioengineered blood vessels: intact blood vessels isolated from either animals (xenogeneic grafts) or later from humans (allogeneic grafts). While intact isolated blood vessels come from donor cells, they can be considered bioengineered grafts because they undergo an extensive process to biologically modify the tissue so that it can be implanted without producing an immune-mediated response. A common way to prepare xenogeneic grafts for use is by treating the tissue with a chemical decellularization process and then fixation of the remaining collagen, connective tissue proteins, and cells with glutaraldehyde to reduce antigenicity. This technique fixes or “tans” the tissue, cross-linking proteins to prevent an immunogenic reaction. Unfortunately, variations in xenogeneic graft fixation and inability of the chemically cross-linked vascular matrix to become repopulated with host cells , introduce the potential for aneurismal degradation over time.

The use of isolated intact blood vessels, first reported in the 1960s, persists in several grafts commercially available today.

Artegraft

Rosenberg and colleagues successfully translated enzyme treatment of bovine arteries follow by chemically fixing the vessels to pre-clinical and clinical models. In this early work, bovine arteries were stripped of most of their parenchymal proteins and subjected to “decellularization” by controlled enzyme action, leaving a tubular prosthesis composed mostly of collagen. The first clinical application of this technology was reported in 1966, when a conduit made from collagen matrix of a bovine carotid artery treated with enzymatic removal of the musculoelastic portion of the vessel was used for lower extremity bypass. These processes were refined and the Bovine Carotid Artery Graft technology was ultimately developed by Artegraft ( North Brunswick, NJ). In 1970, these xenogeneic grafts were FDA approved for use as conduit for dialysis access, and the graft is also currently approved for peripheral arterial bypass and as an arterial patch.

Procol

Decades after the introduction of bovine carotid artery xenografts, Hancock Jaffe Laboratories Inc (Irvine, CA) developed a method to treat bovine mesenteric veins with a decellularization process, followed by fixation with glutaraldehyde crosslinking and gamma radiation. The muscle content of the bovine mesenteric vein, as well as its relatively high content of elastin, provided a theoretical advantage of improved vessel compliance and thus decreased rate of venous stenosis. This xenograft technology, Procol (now LeMaitre Vascular, Inc., Burlington, MA) was FDA approved in 2003 for vascular access in patients who have failed at least one prosthetic access graft.

Cryovein

In the 1970s, Ochsner and colleagues built on efforts to develop vascular homografts from cadavers or living donors and demonstrated the superiority of venous homografts to arterial homografts; however, due to the dependence of arteries on the vasa vasorum, the techniques used for fixation and decellularization of xenogeneic grafts did not translate to allogeneic grafts. Ultimately a combination of cryopreservation and fixation with either glutaraldehyde or dialdehyde improved upon early results in terms of vein integrity and tissue handling, although long-term patency remained a significant concern with allogeneic grafts through the remainder of the 20th century. , Subsequent improvements in cryopreservation and tissue fixation led to the development of the CryoVein graft by CryoLife (Kennesaw, GA), which is currently approved for both hemodialysis access and as a peripheral bypass conduit.

Luminal Modification (Biohybrids)

The endothelium is a dynamic environment, not simply an inert blood-contacting surface. The endothelium, and particularly vascular endothelial cells (ECs), play a central role in regulating cardiovascular physiology. ECs regulate vascular tone and thus modulate hemodynamics. In addition to providing an antithrombotic surface for blood flow under normal conditions, ECs control platelet activation and adhesion as well as the adhesion and migration of both leukocytes and vascular smooth muscle cells in response to pathological stimuli. The benefits of an intact and functional endothelium are clear, leading several investigators to develop “biohybrid” grafts by modifying the luminal surfaces of conduits in order to recreate the physiologic function of the native endothelium.

The concept of transplanting autogenous ECs into grafts emerged in the late 1970s. This can be done as either a single stage or two stage method. In one stage methods, ECs are both harvested and seeded at the time of surgery. Two stage methods require seeding of the recipient graft with ECs via serial passaging in a bioreactor and incubation for several weeks prior to implant. In the 1990s, Zilla, Deutsch and colleagues in Europe and South Africa developed means of seeding autologous endothelium into the lumen of ePTFE conduits, where ECs derived from small vein biopsies were expanded and cultured on ePTFE grafts over approximately 4 weeks. These endothelialized grafts were then implanted as infrainguinal femoropopliteal grafts in more than 300 patients with severe peripheral arterial disease. Primary and secondary patency rates were successfully comparable to those of native saphenous vein. However, the need for harvesting suitable numbers of autologous ECs from vein segments, and challenges with long-term EC adherence to artificial surfaces, has prevented widespread adoption of this technology.

Later investigators were able to improve cell retention as well as cell growth structure and adaption, by exposing the EC-treated conduit in vitro to hydrostatic pressure, laminar shear stresses, and circumferential and longitudinal stretching. , Indeed, some suggest that shear stresses from prolonged laminar flow (as opposed to turbulent flow) play a crucial role in the signal transduction, gene expression, cell proliferation, and cell survival of both ECs and vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC). This is hypothesized to reduce the incidence of both thrombotic complications and the development of atherosclerotic lesions in vivo .

Tissue-Engineered Vascular Grafts

Tissue-engineered vascular grafts (TEVGs) are cellular or tissue-based vascular conduits designed to have any synthetic components degrade over time with progressive replacement by autogenous tissues resulting in a functional blood vessel with an intact endothelium and a capacity to respond appropriately to physiologic stimuli. This technology has been made possible only recently by groundbreaking advances in the field of tissue engineering, although it truly represents the extension of half a century of continuous exploration and improvement.

TEVGs may be classified by the method used to construct the conduit. At present there are three main categories of TEVGs: grafts created in vivo by “bioreactors,” scaffold-based TEVGs, and sheet-based TEVGs.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here