Arthroscopic Management of Other Hip Disorders


Introduction

Complications of the posterior and posterolateral aspects of the hip have been extremely uncommon. A comprehensive understanding of the anatomy, biomechanics, clinical evaluation, and diagnostic strategies allows the physician to interpret the vast array of pathologies routinely encountered in the lateral and posterior hip. The comprehensive physical examination will help sort out the levels of pathology of the hip, including pathology involving the osseous, capsulolabral, musculotendinous, neurovascular, and kinematic chain ( Fig. 43.1 ). The kinematic chain in this region involves the pelvis and lumbar spine. The function of the hip as the longest lever and shortest lever arm contributes significantly to the strain parameters that are loaded downstream through the ligamentous structures, pelvis, and lower lumbar spine, and into the lower extremity. The critical factor involved with this load transfer is the planar torsional parameters in all three planes.

• Fig. 43.1, The five levels of the hip consist of the (1) osseous, (2) capsulolabral, (3) musculotendinous, (4) neurovascular, and (5) kinematic chain.

Hip arthroscopy has evolved since the original paper by Watanabe, and has further developed through time. Reports by Larson et al. , described the most common complications encountered with hip arthroscopy to be postoperative lateral femoral cutaneous nerve disturbance, iatrogenic chondral injuries and labral punctures, and superficial portal infections. The lateral-based technologies and our understanding of lateral-based pathology were further developed by Nawabi et al. through the peritrochanteric space endoscopy with minimal complications. Surgical strategies for the posterior hip have advanced circumferentially around the hip from the lateral to the posterior spaces. Posterior hip treatment techniques involving hamstring repair, lesser trochanterplasty, and sciatic nerve decompression from scar vascular bands or aberrant tendinous structures have been reported, with low complication rates. , , , This chapter will address the potential complications encountered during treatment of the lateral and posterior hip. The lateral and posterior regions will be further analyzed through each aspect of the patient encounter, including the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative time periods.

The goal for any surgery is to have an accurate diagnosis that accounts for all five levels of the hip. Insufficient understanding of hip anatomy and biomechanics have led to improper surgical selection in many patients. Proper education will guide outlining an appropriate plan for each of the five levels. Diagnostic strategies surrounding each of these five levels is critical for improving diagnostic acumen and patient safety. An incorrect diagnosis will likely lead to unfortunate complication, regardless of surgical expertise. A comprehensive evaluation encompassing a thorough history and physical examination will help most importantly to identify the correct pathophysiology and supply a treatment algorithm.

Lateral hip pathology encompasses peritrochanteric pain syndrome and torn gluteus minimus/medius muscles. Patients presenting with these specific pathologies usually complain of pain over the lateral aspect at the hip, which is increased by rising from a chair or climbing stairs. Pain is located over the anterior, lateral, or posterior facet. The anterior facet is more associated with tears involving the gluteus minimus, whereas the lateral facet is associated with the gluteus medius, and the posterior facet with increased tension or thickness within the iliotibial (IT) band. These pathologies can be identified through strength testing with abduction and adduction maneuvers, which evaluate overall tension and function. They frequently coexist with intraarticular complaints and should be sorted out. The most likely complication of lateral-based pathology is failure to recognize the lateral pathology contribution to the overall pathological symptoms. Table 43.1 provides a summary of the key preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative complications associated with lateral hip- and posterior hip-based complaints. All phases of the treatment require understanding of the shared responsibility between the patient and caregivers to optimize outcome.

Table 43.1
Preoperative, Intraoperative, and Postoperative Complications Encountered for Pain Associated With the Lateral Hip and Posterior Hip
Preoperative Complications Intraoperative Complications Postoperative Complications
Lateral-based pain
  • Failure to properly diagnose pathology

  • Misdiagnosed imaging

  • Failure to recognize concomitant pathology

  • Prolonged traction

  • Bleeding and hematoma formation

  • Fluid extravasation

  • Failure to identify undersurface tears

  • Poor operative patient positioning

  • Improper radiofrequency exposure or improper identification of neural tissue

  • Failure to release neurovascular bands that inhibit normal nerve mobility

  • Poor strengthening compliance

  • Failure to adhere to crutch protocol

Posterior-based pain
  • Failure to properly communicate expectations with patient

  • Failure to screen entire kinematic chain

  • Anxiety and depression

  • Abnormal hip biomechanics contributing to secondary strain

  • Poor rehabilitation compliance and long-term follow-up

  • Excessive postoperative nerve strain

  • Failure to comply with knee brace protocol

Preoperative Complications

Lateral-Based Pain

The first potential complication that may arise with lateral-based complaints is failure to properly diagnose the lateral-based pathophysiology with the concurring other levels of pathological diagnosis. Once again, this requires a through comprehensive history and physical examination. One of the key factors in lateral-based evaluation is the radiographic interpretation. Undersurface tears of the hip abductors can be frequently misdiagnosed and missed. These tears can be associated with tendinopathy, and concomitantly with contracted IT bands. Multiplanar assessment can help to distinguish between these similarly presenting images and can be correlated with the physical examination. The quality of muscle on T2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will help identify fatty muscle atrophy, which contributes to nonrepairable tendinous structure, requiring graft or gluteus maximus transfer.

Additional complications may arise in the case of misdiagnosis or by improperly identifying concomitant pathology. All hip examinations require spine examination, and all spine examinations require hip evaluation. The physician must be mindful of coexisting peritrochanteric pain syndrome created by a thickened IT band over a subtendinous tear of the gluteus minimus or gluteus medius. IT band contribution can be evaluated through fluoroscopic or ultrasound-guided injections to increase diagnostic accuracy of the inter/extraarticular concomitant pathologies.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here