Antiplatelet medications are widely used to treat or prevent thrombosis in a variety of cardiovascular disorders. Currently available antiplatelet drugs comprise four categories:

  • 1.

    Acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) inhibits cyclooxygenase (COX-1),

  • 2.

    P2Y12 receptor antagonists (clopidogrel, ticlopidine, prasugrel, cangrelor, ticagrelor) block the platelet adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor,

  • 3.

    Phosphodiesterase inhibitors (dipyridamole, anagrelide, cilostazol) inhibit the platelet phosphodiesterases, and

  • 4.

    Glycoprotein (GP)IIb/IIIa inhibitors (abciximab, eptifibatide, tirofiban, lamifiban) block the platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptor.

The response to these medications varies among individuals, with some patients failing to achieve the expected decrease in platelet activation. This phenomenon, called high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HOPR), may be attributable to either the drug failing to inhibit the target (true resistance) or extrinsic factors that increase platelet reactivity despite the drug’s presence. Detection of true drug resistance requires highly specific tests that directly measure the effect of the drug on the target. On the other hand, evaluation of HOPR for any reason can be performed with nonspecific tests that measure the end result of platelet activation. Unfortunately, major problems arise from the weak correlation among the currently available methods in detecting poor drug response. Nonspecific tests tend to identify significantly more patients with HOPR than the highly specific ones. This problem makes it difficult to compare results utilizing different assessment methods. Furthermore, while initial studies generally showed favorable outcomes in patients whose treatments with antiplatelet medications were adjusted based on a given test modality, larger prospective studies tended to produce less impressive results. At present, the indications for testing outside of monitoring compliance with therapy and assessment of the presence of medication before invasive procedures remain controversial. The field is rapidly evolving, and further clinical studies may well provide an impetus to expand platelet therapy monitoring. Because HOPR is mostly described in clopidogrel and aspirin therapy, the chapter mostly focuses on monitoring the effect of these medications.

Methods

Although light-transmission aggregometry (LTA) is considered by many to be the gold standard for evaluating primary hemostatic function, the test is time-consuming, difficult to standardize, and not available in many clinical settings. Whole-blood aggregometry (WBA), particularly in newer, multiple electrode instruments, is faster and has less user variability. WBA is better suited for use outside of a specialized laboratory because it does not require centrifugation. More specific tests designed for particular drugs and for point-of-care (POC) use have been developed. The overview of techniques that are not covered in depth in other chapters is given below.

Light-Transmission Aggregometry

LTA methods are discussed in Chapter 140 .

Whole-Blood Aggregometry

WBA methods are discussed in Chapter 140 .

Platelet Function Analyzer-100

PFA is discussed in Chapter 138 .

VerifyNow

This fully automated POC instrument measures whole-blood platelet aggregation via fibrinogen-coated beads in cartridges designed to measure response to specific drugs. The VerifyNow aspirin cartridge uses arachidonic acid (AA). When present, aspirin prevents COX-1-mediated conversion of AA into platelet activating thromboxane A2 (TxA2) and reduces AA-induced platelet aggregation. The IIb/IIIa cartridge uses modified thrombin receptor-activating peptide (iso-TRAP) to maximally activate platelets without inducing clot formation. Under these conditions, the binding of platelets to fibrinogen-coated beads becomes proportional to the number of unblocked platelet GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors. In its newest iteration, the P2Y12 cartridge uses high-dose ADP in the presence of prostaglandin E1 (PGE). PGE provides an additional layer of specificity because it blocks P2Y1, but not P2Y12 receptor activity, making the assay P2Y12 receptor dependent. Results for all cartridges are now reported in platelets response units (PRU) that are based on changes in light transmittance due to platelet aggregation.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here