Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Nosocomial infections continue to pose a significant burden on the healthcare system. The most recent summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) showed that gram-positive organisms remained a leading cause of healthcare–associated infections (HAIs) between 2015 and 2017. Similarly, the EPIC II study in 2007 demonstrated that gram-positive organisms were associated with 47% of infections in the intensive care unit (ICU). Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most commonly isolated pathogen in nosocomial bacteremia, and the former was responsible for the greatest proportion of ventilator-associated pneumonia and surgical site infections in hospital ICUs. Along with the increase in prevalence of gram-positive cocci in the ICU, staphylococci are becoming multidrug resistant. This chapter addresses gram-positive organisms and resistance issues associated with each of the antimicrobials with activity against these pathogens.
Vancomycin was discovered in 1956 and marketed in 1958. Early preparations of the drug contained pyrogens and impurities that produced a brownish, muddy appearance that provided vancomycin’s nickname, “Mississippi mud.” In addition, these pyrogens and impurities caused high fevers, hypotension, severe phlebitis, and possibly nephrotoxicity.
Vancomycin is a glycopeptide that inhibits synthesis of the cell wall by binding to the d -alanyl- d -alanine terminus of cell wall precursor units and is bactericidal against most gram-positive organisms. In the mid-2000s, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) changed the vancomycin breakpoints against S. aureus from less than or equal to 4 μg/mL to less than or equal to 2 μg/mL for susceptible strains. Intermediate susceptibility is now 4–8 μg/mL, and resistance to vancomycin is greater than or equal to 16 μg/mL. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) changed their vancomycin interpretations against S. aureus to less than or equal to 2 μg/mL as susceptible and greater than 2 μg/mL as resistant. These changes in breakpoints will alter how literature is interpreted with respect to the frequency or prevalence of vancomycin-intermediate or vancomycin-resistant S. aureus over the past 30 years.
Vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA), defined using the previous breakpoints of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) 8–16 μg/mL, was first reported from Japan in 1996; by June 2002, eight cases were confirmed in the United States. A precursor to VISA, known as heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA), was described around the same time. A systematic review and meta-analysis from 2015 found that both phenotypes are increasing in prevalence. In June 2002, the first case of vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) with an MIC greater than 32 μg/mL was identified in Michigan, and to date, 14 clinical isolates have been reported. , , Although the exact mechanism leading to reduced susceptibility in VISA isolates has yet to be determined, many agree that a common element involves thickening of the cell wall, whereas all VRSA strains possessed the VanA gene.
Nine types of resistance for vancomycin have been isolated from enterococci: VanA, VanB, VanC, VanD, VanE, VanG, VanL, VanM, and VanN. The VanA phenotype, inducible by vancomycin, confers high-level resistance to both teicoplanin (MICs: 16–512 μg/mL) and vancomycin (MICs: 64 to greater than 1000 μg/mL), whereas VanB confers low-level resistance primarily to vancomycin. Both have been identified in Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis . VanA, B, D, and E are all transferable to other organisms. In contrast, the VanC phenotypes are endogenous (constitutively produced) and are components of Enterococcus gallinarum, Enterococcus casseliflavus, and Enterococcus flavescens and confer resistance to vancomycin alone.
Vancomycin is active primarily against aerobic gram-positive cocci, including streptococci and staphylococci. Although it is considered the drug of choice for most methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections, it has been shown to be inferior to nafcillin or oxacillin for the treatment of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), and similarly should be considered an agent of last resort against streptococci. , It has reliable activity against Corynebacterium spp. and is also considered first-line for such infections. The activity of vancomycin against enterococci varies greatly with the species. E. faecium is the most resistant, with approximately 80% of strains demonstrating resistance compared with only ∼10% of E. faecalis strains.
Vancomycin is active against anaerobic gram-positive organisms such as Peptostreptococcus spp., Propionibacterium spp., Eubacterium spp., Bifidobacterium spp., and most Clostridium spp., including C. difficile.
Vancomycin is administered orally and parenterally. The drug is poorly absorbed after oral administration, and although the majority of the drug is excreted unchanged in feces, inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract may result in increased absorption. Intramuscular injections are extremely painful and should not be used. Intraperitoneal, intrathecal, or intraventricular administration may be needed in certain circumstances. Vancomycin is approximately 55% bound to plasma proteins. The volume of distribution (V d ) corrected for weight ranges is 0.4–0.9 L/kg. Vancomycin does not penetrate well into aqueous humor or noninflamed meninges; however, penetration ranges from 1% to 37% of serum concentrations in the setting of meningeal inflammation. Penetration is greater than 75% serum concentrations into ascitic, pericardial, and synovial fluids; approximately 50% into pleural fluid; and 30%–50% into bile. Elimination of vancomycin is 80%–90% unchanged drug in the urine via glomerular filtration and the remaining via nonrenal elimination (up to 40 mL/min in healthy individuals). The half-life of the drug increases with decreased renal function; in patients with creatinine clearances (CrCl) greater than 80 mL/min, the half-life is 4–6 hours. The pharmacodynamic target predicting efficacy has received much attention and is suggested to be an area under the concentration time curve to MIC (AUC/MIC) ratio of 400.
Routine monitoring of vancomycin serum concentrations has become a highly debated issue over the years. Those who advocate routine monitoring cite the need to ensure therapeutic concentrations and to minimize toxicities.
Studies have shown that peak concentrations of vancomycin are not associated with safety or clinical efficacy. Therefore monitoring peak serum concentrations has largely fallen out of favor. On the other hand, vancomycin troughs have been heavily studied for their correlation with efficacy and toxicity. And although a few publications found improved outcomes when targeting vancomycin troughs of 15–20 μg/mL for serious MRSA infections, mounting evidence suggests that vancomycin troughs of this magnitude (greater than or equal to 15 μg/mL) are associated with an increased risk of nephrotoxicity. Because of this, greater attention has been given to AUC-based dosing strategies, with recent literature finding that an AUC/MIC target ratio of ≥400 was associated with decreased mortality and clinical failure while at the same time lower rates of nephrotoxicity and overall vancomycin exposure. Unfortunately, AUC monitoring is not routinely performed in clinical practice, and most critically ill patients are inappropriate for AUC-based dosing. Thus it still remains prudent to measure serum trough concentrations until more definitive guidance is provided to address these patient populations.
In nonobese adults with normal renal function, the usual dose of vancomycin is 1 g (~15 mg/kg actual body weight) intravenously (IV) every 12 hours. For severe MRSA infections, 15–20 mg/kg every 8–12 hours has been recommended to achieve serum trough concentrations of 15–20 μg/mL, and loading doses of 25–30 mg/kg are proposed for critically ill patients in order to achieve higher concentrations sooner (both grade IIIB recommendations). Several dosing nomograms using body weight and CrCl have been developed to accurately and easily dose vancomycin; however, significant interpatient variability exists in both volume of distribution and renal clearance estimation in the critically ill population, so use of these nomograms is limited. Similarly, use of continuous infusion has been proposed, but with limited data on its benefit over intermittent infusion. , Table 108.1 lists dosing regimens for the antimicrobials discussed in this chapter.
Drug | Dosage | Adverse Effects | Considerations |
---|---|---|---|
Vancomycin |
|
|
|
Teicoplanin |
|
|
|
Telavancin | IV: 10 mg/kg once daily | Nausea and vomiting Taste perversion Foamy urine Renal impairment |
Teratogenic in animal models, further information needed in humans Interferes with common anticoagulation and urine protein dipstick testing |
Daptomycin |
|
|
|
Linezolid |
|
|
|
Tedizolid | Bioequivalence between PO and IV formulations 200 mg daily for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections |
|
Less myelosuppressive and risk for monoamine oxidase interaction |
Quinupristin/dalfopristin | IV: 7.5 mg/kg q8–12h infused over 1 hr |
|
Last-line agent because of significant toxicities |
Morbidly obese, critically ill patients are difficult to dose given the lack of pharmacokinetic studies. Although actual body weight and CrCl continue to be the best correlate to volume of distribution and vancomycin clearance in the obese population, use of traditional weight-based dosing has led to overexposure and toxicity. This has prompted various alternative dosing strategies, including AUC-targeted nomograms, but these have yet to be studied in the combined critically ill and obese cohort. Because of this, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) remains a key tool in managing vancomycin dosing in this population. ,
Dose reduction is recommended for patients with renal dysfunction. In patients receiving intermittent hemodialysis, vancomycin pharmacokinetics vary depending on the patient’s actual body weight, timing of administration, residual renal function, and type of dialysis membrane used. With older, low-flux membranes, less frequent and lower postdialysis supplemental doses are required. With high-flux membranes, as much as 50% of vancomycin is removed. In these situations, common practice involves administration of a weight-based loading dose followed by maintenance doses given during the last hour of each dialysis session. Use of trough levels before each dialysis session may further guide dosing.
When continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is being used, vancomycin dosing again depends on patient- and dialysis modality–related factors. Continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD) and continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) result in a greater total body clearance of vancomycin than does continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH); therefore dosing every 12–24 hours and every 24–48 hours has been proposed for each modality, respectively. , For patients receiving sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED), a newer modality combining intermittent hemodialysis and CRRT, it appears that an initial weight-based loading dose followed by maintenance doses coupled with TDM may be appropriate. Overall, a review of several pharmacokinetic studies in patients receiving various forms of CRRT showed an association between effluent flow rate and vancomycin clearance. However, these findings require additional validation. Based on the variability in clearances achieved with each of these methods depending on blood flow rate, ultrafiltration rate, and the membranes used, TDM remains an effective method of ensuring appropriate vancomycin dosing when CRRT is used.
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was found to significantly affect the pharmacokinetic parameters of vancomycin in several small studies over the past 20 years. For example, Ortega and colleagues observed an immediate decrease in vancomycin serum concentration by 7 μg/mL after initiation of CBP, followed by gradual and steady decreases over the next 30 minutes. However, a recent prospective, comparative evaluation of vancomycin pharmacokinetics found no difference in maximum plasma concentration (C max ), area under the curve (AUC 0–8 ), V d , and clearance (Cl) between patients undergoing cardiac surgery with and without CBP.
Three studies in adult patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) found no significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters compared with matched controls, reflecting vancomycin’s relative stability in ECMO circuits.
Oral administration of vancomycin is only for treating C. difficile colitis. The dose is 125–500 mg orally every 6 hours depending on severity and is not adjusted for renal dysfunction. Two oral formulations (capsules or liquid) can be used, or the IV solution can be administered orally to treat C. difficile . In cases of ileus or toxic megacolon, administration via rectal tube (as a retention enema) or ileostomy can be considered.
The most notable adverse effects associated with vancomycin include nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and infusion-related reactions.
Initial reports of nephrotoxicity were thought to be related to impurities in the early formulations. After improved purification methods, the rate is generally accepted to be between 5% and 10% when vancomycin is not administered with other nephrotoxic agents and trough concentrations are less than 10 μg/mL. Factors that may increase the risk of nephrotoxicity include trough concentrations >15 μg/mL, higher total daily doses (≥4 g/day), larger patient weight, prolonged durations (>7 days), and concomitant nephrotoxins (i.e., aminoglycosides). , Recently, piperacillin-tazobactam in combination with vancomycin has also been associated with increased risk of acute kidney injury when compared with either agent alone and when compared with combinations of vancomycin with other beta-lactams. , On the other hand, use of continuous infusion appears to lower these risks. Although vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity is usually reversible, it can lead to increased hospital length of stay, healthcare costs, and even mortality.
Ototoxicity is rare and ranges from vertigo and tinnitus to hearing loss. , Correlation between vancomycin exposure and risk of ototoxicity is lacking, suggesting that early reports of toxicity may have been caused by either another drug or the combination of another drug with vancomycin. , In the majority of cases, ototoxicity symptoms disappear within a month of discontinuing vancomycin.
Red man syndrome comprises erythema, pruritus, and flushing of the upper torso and is often associated with too rapid an infusion of the drug. In general, the infusion rate should not exceed 1 g/hr. Less frequently, hypotension and angioedema can occur. It is thought that increased histamine release is the cause of this syndrome, and the effects can be relieved by antihistamines. , ,
Other toxicities associated with vancomycin include maculopapular or erythematous rashes (2%–8%) , , and anecdotal reports of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. ,
Teicoplanin is a glycopeptide antibiotic and is not approved for use in the United States. It is available for use in Europe, some Asian countries, Mexico, New Zealand, and Australia. It has a more favorable adverse effect profile than vancomycin; however, there is concern over teicoplanin’s clinical efficacy in the treatment of severe gram-positive infections.
Teicoplanin, like other glycopeptide antibiotics, inhibits synthesis of the cell wall by binding to the d-alanyl-d-alanine terminus of cell wall precursor units. Resistance has been reported in both staphylococci and enterococci. The VanA phenotype confers high-level resistance to both teicoplanin (MIC: 16–512 μg/mL) and vancomycin (MIC: 64 to >1000 μg/mL). The VanB phenotype has also been identified in both E. faecium and E. faecalis and usually confers low-level resistance to vancomycin but not to teicoplanin. This resistance may limit the utility of teicoplanin for some vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections. Several reports of S. aureus resistance developing during therapy with teicoplanin have been reported. The mechanism of the resistance was determined in one patient to be constitutive and non–plasmid-mediated. Most phenotypes of hVISA and VISA demonstrate cross-resistance to teicoplanin.
Teicoplanin is only active against gram-positive organisms. Activity against MSSA and MRSA is comparable to that of vancomycin. Coagulase-negative staphylococci have a varied pattern of susceptibility to teicoplanin. Staphylococcus haemolyticus is the most resistant species to teicoplanin (30%). For methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci, 39% of isolates have teicoplanin MICs greater than 8 μg/mL compared with 1% with vancomycin. , Teicoplanin is active against other aerobic and anaerobic gram-positive organisms such as Corynebacterium spp.; Clostridium spp., including C. difficile and C. perfringens; Peptostreptococcus spp.; and Propionibacterium acnes .
Teicoplanin is administered orally and intravenously. The drug is poorly absorbed after oral administration, and approximately 40% of the drug is excreted unchanged in feces. IV administration of 400 mg (6 mg/kg) should provide a peak serum concentration of 20–50 μg/mL attained 1 hour after administration. The volume of distribution is large, at 0.9–1.41 L/kg, and teicoplanin is 90%–95% protein bound. Tissue distribution is variable; most notably, penetration is poor into noninflamed meninges and fat but good into myocardium and pericardium. Teicoplanin is primarily eliminated via glomerular filtration, and only 3% is metabolized. The half-life is approximately 150 hours in patients with normal renal function. In patients with mild to moderate renal dysfunction, the half-life was found to be 157–567 hours. ,
Despite the long half-life in patients with normal renal function, teicoplanin should be administered daily, and the dose is dependent on the severity of infection. For less serious infections involving the urinary tract, skin, soft tissue, and lower respiratory tract, a loading dose of 400 mg (6 mg/kg) × 1 is administered, followed by a maintenance dose of 200 mg (3 mg/kg) every 24 hours. For severe infections such as septicemia, endocarditis, and osteomyelitis, 400 mg of teicoplanin is administered every 12 hours for 3 doses, followed by 400 mg every 24 hours. For specific clinical scenarios such as S. aureus endocarditis, levels between 20 and 30 mg/L have been recommended. Therefore higher doses (up to 12 mg/kg) are suggested. ,
Teicoplanin is not removed by hemodialysis or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). , The amount removed by high-flux membranes such as CVVH, CVVHD, and CVVHDF can be significant. For renal dysfunction, several dosing regimens exist, with doses even as high as 600–1800 mg/day during CVVH. Even with such high doses, therapeutic drug monitoring is still recommended, given the variability in protein binding and ultrafiltration rates when using CRRT.
Limited data are available on the use of teicoplanin in patients receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Eleven patients received a median loading dose of 11.6 mg/kg every 12 hours × 3 then a fourth dose 24 hours after the third dose. The range of trough concentrations was 14.85–44.84 μg/mL.
Nephrotoxicity associated with teicoplanin is much lower than with vancomycin. The incidence from published and unpublished studies found the nephrotoxic rate to be 4%. Ototoxic rates with teicoplanin are similar to those with vancomycin. Hypersensitivity reactions are the most common adverse reaction to teicoplanin (2%–15%).
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here