Allergic contact dermatitis and photoallergy


Evidence Levels: A Double-blind study B Clinical trial ≥ 20 subjects C Clinical trial < 20 subjects D Series ≥ 5 subjects E Anecdotal case reports

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a delayed or type IV hypersensitivity reaction. It consists of a primary sensitization phase followed by secondary elicitation by haptens, leading to activation of T lymphocytes.

ACD usually appears 24–48 hours after contact with an allergen. Typically, the rash is localized to the site of contact. It may later spread to other areas. Spreading is characteristic of ACD and can help differentiate the diagnosis from that of irritant contact dermatitis. The spread of the rash can occur from transfer of the allergen (e.g., from hands to face), or as a result of an id reaction (also known as autoeczematization). Other possible routes of exposure to contact allergens include systemic, airborne, and proxy exposures.

The rash of ACD is typically pruritic and eczematous, with papules and vesicles on an erythematous base.

The location on the body at which the rash originated can assist in determining the causative allergen. For example, if the hands are affected, the causative allergen could be rubber glove accelerators. If the rash begins at the scalp and neck, perhaps para-phenylenediamine from hair dye is the culprit. ACD to nickel might occur at the left wrist from a watch, at the ears or neck from jewelry, or at the navel from a belt buckle.

Factors that increase the likelihood of sensitization include chemical factors (such as chemical size and concentration); skin factors (such as integrity of the skin exposed to the chemical); and factors pertaining to the conditions of contact (such as the duration of contact).

Photoallergens additionally require activation by UV light to cause photoallergic contact dermatitis (PACD). Organic UV absorbers and topical non-steroidal antiinflammatory agents are the two most common photoallergens. Other potential photoallergens include fragrances, antibacterials, plants, and insecticides.

Management Strategy

Identification and avoidance of offending allergens and potential cross-reacting agents is the principal management strategy for ACD. Patch testing is the gold standard for diagnosing ACD and identifying allergens. Following this, patient education regarding the diagnosis, the relevant allergen(s), and how to avoid them, is essential.

Government legislation can reduce ACD rates significantly. The European Union has introduced legislation to limit the concentration of the preservative methylisothiazolinone (MI) in personal products, to restrict nickel content in jewelry, and to reduce available chromate in cement by adding ferrous sulfate. These measures have resulted in reduced sensitization rates and a reduced number of cases of ACD to MI, nickel, and chromate, respectively.

The workplace also plays an important role in minimizing exposure to allergens, thereby reducing rates of sensitization and ACD. This can be done by modifying work environments; for example, by improving ventilation to reduce exposure to airborne substances, by substituting common allergens, and by providing and ensuring the use of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE).

Glove use is an important component of ACD prevention and management. Glove choice will depend on the activity being performed and on the chemicals being handled. When working in a hot environment, sweating and leaching of chemicals from gloves can occur. Cotton gloves can be worn underneath rubber or leather gloves to prevent sensitization to rubber accelerators and chromate.

The initial management of ACD follows the general principles of eczema therapy. This includes avoiding skin irritants (such as water, soap, friction, and heat), using emollients or moisturizing creams, and applying topical corticosteroids to affected areas. Barrier creams have had limited success in preventing dermatitis. Topical tacrolimus and pimecrolimus have been shown to be effective. In severe cases, oral corticosteroids may be required. These are usually short courses of prednisolone 25–50 mg daily for 1 week.

If secondary infection is suspected, oral antibiotics (cephalosporins, erythromycin, or flucloxacillin) or topical antibiotics (mupirocin or fusidic acid) may be required.

ACD will usually resolve with this initial treatment, provided that the responsible allergen has been identified and avoided. However, patients may experience ongoing issues if they are inadvertently exposed to the allergen or if they develop persistent postoccupational dermatitis, a dermatitis that recurs despite absence of exposure to causative agents.

If ACD is chronic or refractory to first-line treatments, ultraviolet light therapy with narrowband ultraviolet B (UVB) or psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) can be used. Systemic immunosuppression with ciclosporin, azathioprine, and methotrexate may be considered. Acitretin may be helpful in some cases, particularly if there is hyperkeratotic palmar involvement. Alitretinoin is helpful in cases of chronic hand eczema; however, more evidence is required to determine its usefulness in treating ACD specifically.

Small case series and a retrospective chart review have suggested that dupilumab is effective in treating ACD. A phase 4 clinical trial is underway to investigate the effects of dupilumab on ACD in 20 patients.

Recent evidence suggests that there is an association between contact dermatitis and smoking. There is no strong evidence available to show that smoking cessation leads to improvement of ACD. However, smoking cessation could be a worthwhile action, especially when considering health cobenefits.

For PACD, identification and avoidance of the photoallergen is again the major treatment goal. Sun protection, with sunscreen and protective clothing, is also important. If the photoallergen is an ingredient in sunscreen, avoidance and substitution of that ingredient is recommended. Physical UV blockers such as zinc oxide or titanium dioxide are not known to cause allergic or PACD and may be useful substitutes to chemical sunscreens.

Specific Investigations

  • Patch testing to appropriately diluted allergens

  • Photopatch testing if PACD is suspected – duplicate sets of allergens are applied, and after 48 hours one set is exposed to 5 J/cm 2 UVA; results are read after a further 48 hours

  • Repeat open application test (ROAT) to determine whether a reaction is significant in individuals who develop weak (1+) positive reactions to an allergen

First-Line Therapies

Allergic contact dermatitis

  • Allergen avoidance and substitution

  • C

  • Skin care education

  • B

  • PPE

  • D

  • Topical corticosteroids

  • B

  • Emollients and soap substitutes

  • C

  • Barrier creams

  • B

  • Calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus, pimecrolimus)

  • B

  • Prednisolone

  • D

  • Antibiotics – topical and systemic

  • D

  • Alitretinoin

  • A

Photoallergy

  • Allergen avoidance and substitution

  • C

  • Photoprotection

  • C

  • Sunscreens – physical UV blockers

  • E

Skin care education and individual counseling versus treatment as usual in healthcare workers with hand eczema: randomised clinical trial

Ibler KS, Jemec GBE, Diepgen TL, et al. BMJ 2012; 345: e7822.

Two hundred and fifty-five healthcare workers with hand eczema were randomized to an intervention or control group. The intervention comprised education in skin care, individual counseling based on patch and prick testing, and assessment of occupational and domestic exposures. At the 5-month follow-up, hand eczema was significantly improved in the intervention group compared with the control group as measured both objectively and subjectively.

Determinants of epoxy allergy in the construction industry: a case-control study

Spee T, Timmerman JG, Rühl R, et al. Contact Dermatitis 2016; 74: 259–66.

A case-control study compared 179 German epoxy workers with diagnosed ACD to epoxy (cases) with 151 epoxy workers without such an allergy (controls). ACD to epoxies was found to be associated with unusually high levels of exposure to the chemicals (OR 2.13) and with poor compliance with personal protection, including wearing short sleeves and trousers (OR 2.38), and incorrect glove use (OR 2.12).

Effectiveness of skin protection measures in prevention of occupational hand eczema: results of a prospective randomized controlled trial over a follow-up period of 1 year

Kütting B, Baumeister T, Weistenhöfer W, et al. Br J Dermatol 2010; 162: 362–70.

A total of 1020 metalworkers were randomized to one of four arms: skin care (use of moisturizer), skin protection (application of protection creams before or during work), both combined, and a control group. Eight hundred subjects were retained in the study after 12 months, with a compliance range of 73.7–88.7%. Hands were examined using a quantitative skin score. The group following the regime of both skin care and skin protection demonstrated the greatest improvement.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here