Cardiovascular Compromise in the Newborn Infant


Key Points

  • It is difficult to diagnose neonatal shock in its uncompensated phase during the immediate transitional period, while it is even harder to diagnose neonatal shock in its compensated phase using standard clinical monitoring and clinical approach.

  • It is unclear what gestational- and postnatal-age-dependent blood pressure and systemic and organ blood flow values represent hypotension and poor tissue perfusion (respectively), warranting timely intervention in the neonate.

  • Although there is some recent evidence that management of neonatal hypotension/systemic blood flow improves clinically relevant outcomes, more data are needed.

  • A thorough understanding of the principles of developmental cardiovascular physiology, the etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical presentation of neonatal shock, and the mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of medications used to treat cardiovascular compromise are essential for neonatal care providers.

  • Recent advances in bedside monitoring technologies such as near-infrared spectroscopy and the application of point of care ultrasonography in assessing cardiovascular function hold promise for early diagnosis and better management of circulatory failure in neonates.

Although the prevalence of hypotension in neonates admitted for intensive care is unclear, up to 50% of very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates present with blood pressure values considered to be low in the immediate transitional period. However, VLBW neonates account for only approximately 25% of all patients diagnosed with hypotension in neonatal intensive care units. The lack of clear data on the prevalence of neonatal hypotension is primarily due to the uncertainty about the lower limit of the gestational- and postnatal-age-dependent normal blood pressure range in neonates. This is illustrated, among others, by the significant differences in the prevalence of the use of vasopressor/inotropes in preterm neonates during the transitional period among different intensive care units. In addition, depending on the ability of the patient to compensate for the cardiovascular compromise, a given blood pressure value in a given patient might represent appropriate systemic and organ blood flow while at another point in time, it may signal compromised tissue perfusion. Therefore, considering only blood pressure and the fairly inaccurate indirect clinical signs of tissue perfusion makes it difficult if not impossible to accurately diagnose neonatal shock in time. Also, a timely diagnosis is one of the cornerstones of initiating effective treatment modalities.

As long as pulmonary gas exchange is adequate, shock is caused by hypovolemia, cardiac failure, vasoregulatory failure, or a combination of these etiologies. Shock has been defined as a “state of cellular energy failure resulting from an inability of tissue oxygen delivery to satisfy tissue oxygen demand.” According to this definition, when oxygen delivery is inadequate to meet oxygen demand, the organs start failing and, if corrective measures are not effective, will result in irreversible organ damage and ultimately death. Although oxygen delivery to the organs is dependent on several factors, it is fundamentally driven by both the oxygen content of the blood and the volume of blood flowing to those organs. Because oxygen content is primarily determined by the hemoglobin concentration and oxygen saturation, with less contribution from the dissolved oxygen (see later discussion), it is relatively easily evaluated and monitored in the neonatal intensive care unit. However, reliably assessing systemic and organ blood flow and tissue oxygen delivery and consumption at the bedside is challenging because, to provide adequate information on the rapidly changing hemodynamic status of the critically ill neonate, it requires continuous monitoring of key hemodynamic parameters in absolute numbers ( Fig. 46.1 ).

Fig. 46.1
Tools of Comprehensive Hemodynamic Monitoring.
Tools used to provide a global (outside circles) and regional (inside the circles) assessment of developmental hemodynamics. Global monitoring of the relationship among systemic flow, blood pressure, and resistance and arterial/venous oxygen content provides information on systemic oxygen delivery and consumption. Regionally monitored parameters provide direct or indirect information on a specific organ blood flow, function, and vital or non-vital blood flow regulatory assignments. aEEG , Amplitude-integrated electroencephalography; BE , base excess; CRT , capillary refill time; PaCO 2 , arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide; PaO 2 , arterial partial pressure of oxygen; SaO 2 , arterial oxygen saturation; SvO 2 , venous oxygen saturation; WBC , white blood cells.

(Modified from Azhibekov T, Noori S, Soleymani S, et al. Transitional cardiovascular physiology and comprehensive hemodynamic monitoring in the neonate: relevance to research and clinical care. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med . 2014;19:45–53.)

Recent advances in our ability to monitor systemic and organ blood flow and tissue oxygenation as well as vital organ (brain) function at the bedside will likely lead to a better understanding of the complex hemodynamic changes associated with neonatal cardiovascular compromise. These advances should lead to the development of treatment modalities more appropriately based on the etiology, pathophysiology, and phases of shock, thereby improving clinically relevant outcomes. The impact of treatment using some of these advances is currently under investigation.

At present in clinical practice, tissue perfusion is routinely assessed by monitoring heart rate, blood pressure, capillary refilling time, acid-base status, serum lactate levels, and urine output. However, Doppler ultrasound and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) data have highlighted that these parameters are relatively poor indicators of acute changes in organ blood flow and tissue oxygen delivery in critically ill neonates. These observations and the very limited evidence that treatment of neonatal cardiovascular compromise and hypotension improves outcomes call for a paradigm shift in our thinking about pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neonatal shock. This suggests that the assessment of the hemodynamic status in critically ill neonates should include the complex interactions between blood flow and blood pressure as well as tissue oxygen delivery and consumption. A comprehensive, real-time hemodynamic monitoring and data acquisition system has been developed, although its use is limited to clinical research at present. However, integration of point of care echocardiography and NIRS in clinical management of circulatory compromise has now been used at a number of centers and preliminary results are encouraging. The reader is referred to the recent review on the applications and limitations of various advanced hemodynamic monitoring tools in neonates.

Principles of Developmental Cardiovascular Physiology and Pathophysiology, Phases, and Etiology of Neonatal Shock

Principles of Oxygen Delivery

Oxygen is essential for mitochondrial respiration but is not stored in the body. Thus, interruption of oxygen supply to cells can result in irreversible damage (sometimes within minutes), particularly in vital organs such as the brain and myocardium.

The primary function of the cardiorespiratory system is to provide adequate oxygen delivery to tissues. Accordingly, shock is defined as inadequate systemic tissue oxygen delivery (see earlier). Oxygen delivery can be expressed as

where


DO 2 = cardiac output (CO) × arterial oxygen content (CaO 2 )

and

Stroke volume is the result of a complex interplay among preload, afterload, and contractility ( Fig. 46.2 ), all three of which are, at present, impossible to monitor reliably and continuously at the bedside. Although these parameters are more fully described below, in brief preload is the end-diastolic volume of the ventricle (a three-dimensional reflection of pre-contractile myocardial cell fiber length), and, up to a point, the greater the preload, the larger the stroke volume (the Frank-Starling relationship). Afterload is the force the ventricle must generate against the systemic or pulmonary vascular resistance. As long as appropriate perfusion pressure is ensured, the lower the afterload, the higher the cardiac output. Contractility (the intrinsic ability to generate force per unit time) may be assessed noninvasively but not continuously by echocardiogram. Since at present most of the measures of cardiac contractility are both preload and afterload dependent, contractility is not truly an independent variable. In addition, cardiac output in neonates is considered more dependent on heart rate than contractility because the ability of neonates to augment their stroke volume is limited when compared to children or adults.

Fig. 46.2, Factors Regulating Cardiac Output, Blood Pressure, and Systemic Vascular Resistance

From this simple model, it is easily appreciated that if there is an acute decline in CaO 2 , by a decrease in either the hemoglobin concentration or SaO 2 or both, the cardiac output will increase in response to maintain DO 2 . On the other hand, because neither hemoglobin concentration nor SaO 2 can be physiologically increased rapidly, other than increasing tissue oxygen extraction and selective blood flow distribution, there is no acute compensation for a low cardiac output due to decreases in myocardial contractility and/or preload.

The purpose of oxygen delivery is to provide for oxygen consumption (VO 2 ), which can be expressed as

where CvO 2 is the mixed venous oxygen content.

This relationship is based on the Fick principle, from which, knowing the flow rate and arterial-venous content difference of a trace element (in this case, oxygen), one can calculate the uptake or removal rate of the tracer.

Normally DO 2 and VO 2 are well matched, with O 2 extraction being approximately 25%. Accordingly, if the SaO 2 is 100%, SvO 2 would be expected to be 75%. If cardiac output falls, VO 2 may be maintained constant by capillary bed vasodilation and recruitment and/or by increased O 2 extraction by the tissues. Increased O 2 extraction is manifested as a lower CvO 2 and therefore greater CaO 2 − CvO 2 difference. The relationship between DO 2 and VO 2 may be graphically displayed as in Fig. 46.3 . Once oxygen extraction is maximal, at the critical DO 2 threshold, anaerobic metabolism ensues, resulting in lactic acidosis. If not reversed, the oxygen debt accumulates, and organ failure and death will ensue. In general, during aerobic metabolism 38 mol adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is produced per 1 mol glucose, whereas during anaerobic metabolic conditions, 2 mol ATP and 2 mol lactate are produced per 1 mol glucose.

Fig. 46.3, Relationship Between Oxygen Consumption and Delivery.

Before reaching the stage of delivery-dependent VO 2 , the SvO 2 can be used as a proxy for DO 2 . Assuming VO 2 , hemoglobin concentration, and SaO 2 are constant over a short period of time, a decline in SvO 2 represents a decrease in cardiac output. This relationship is clinically important, as SvO 2 can be measured intermittently via a venous catheter, ideally placed in the pulmonary artery in a patient without intracardiac shunts in order to obtain a true mixed venous sample. Central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO 2 ) may also be used as a proxy for DO 2 , measured via a venous catheter with its tip at the superior vena cava—right atrial junction. It is of note that the location of the catheter tip is critical; if the tip is located lower in the right atrium, it will sample more desaturated blood streaming from the coronary sinus and/or hepatic veins. However, for several reasons, measurement of ScvO 2 is not done routinely in neonates in neonatal intensive care units except for some neonates with congenital heart disease in the postoperative period following surgical correction of the underlying cardiac condition.

In general, these principles are valuable guides to understanding and managing global DO 2 and VO 2 , but they do not readily assist with the assessment of individual organ DO 2 . Furthermore, the limitations of measuring VO 2 , DO 2 , and even just ScvO 2 are often daunting. However, advances in noninvasive regional tissue oxygen saturation (rSO 2 ) monitoring via NIRS have increasingly allowed for such assessments in different tissues including the brain, kidneys, intestine, and muscle (see later discussion).

Finally, there is a class of neonates where calculations using the Fick principle can be critical in directing therapy. Newborns with congenital heart disease and intracardiac shunts may have perturbations in the usual pulmonary to systemic blood flow ratio (Qp:Qs). Normally, of course, in patients with the two circulations in series and no shunts, Qp:Qs = 1. By comparing the oxygen utilized by the body with the oxygen taken up by the lung, Qp:Qs can be estimated.

and

where pv and pa represent pulmonary vein and pulmonary artery, respectively.

After substituting and eliminating common terms

This formula requires two assumptions unless saturation values are determined directly, as done in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: first, SpvO 2 is 95% to 100%, and second, SvO 2 measured through a central venous line reflects a mixed venous sample. A Qp:Qs ratio of < 1 would suggest the presence of a right-to-left shunt and, typically, decreased pulmonary circulation, both of which result in less oxygenated blood entering the systemic circulation with resultant cyanosis. A Qp:Qs ratio of>1, in turn, would suggest left-to-right shunting with resultant pulmonary overcirculation. Of note is that changes in Qp:Qs ratio in either direction will affect oxygen content and/or oxygen delivery to the organs.

The value of this calculation can be illustrated with the following example. A newborn infant with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) is found to have an SaO 2 of 95% and an SvO 2 of 80%. Using the formula just given, assuming a SpvO 2 of 100% and recognizing that SaO 2 and SpaO 2 are the same in this patient, we arrive at a Qp:Qs ratio of 3:1. If systemic blood flow is to be preserved, the single right ventricle will need to sustain a fourfold increase in cardiac output while the significant pulmonary overcirculation will lead to the development of congestive heart failure. The inability of the right ventricle to sustain such an increase in cardiac output will then lead to inadequate systemic blood flow, resulting in shock. Importantly, both conditions can be present at the same time. However, by maintaining an SaO 2 within the target range of 75% to 85% in these patients, the Qp:Qs ratio will shift closer to 1:1, providing a simplistic rationale for using such an SaO 2 target range. However, in patients with HLHS, the effects of shunting on blood oxygen content and/or delivery are far more complex as systemic oxygen availability is determined, along with other factors, by the relationship among SpvO 2 , SaO 2 , SvO 2, and cardiac output. Accordingly, in addition to a targeted SaO 2 range, management of these patients must be guided by the difference in systemic arterial and venous oxygen saturations and other indicators of tissue perfusion (see also Chapter 50 ).

Developmental Regulation of Cardiac Output and Its Determinants

Cardiac output is the product of stroke volume and heart rate and is determined by the amount of blood returning to the heart (preload), the strength of myocardial contractility, and the load against which the heart must pump (afterload). Unlike preload, afterload is in general more difficult to conceptualize and therefore often used interchangeably with the simpler but less accurate term, vascular resistance. However, although afterload is altered by changes in vascular resistance, other factors also determine its magnitude. Afterload is the load or force the heart faces during contraction and is affected by the impedance of the central vasculature, the resistance of the peripheral vascular beds, the ventricular mass, blood pressure, and the inertia of the blood. In addition, it is affected by myocardial contractility and preload as well. If the myocardial function is intact, cardiac output depends solely on preload and afterload according to the relationships described by the Starling curve.

Therefore, low cardiac output and thus low systemic blood flow can result from various combinations of abnormalities of the three determinants of cardiac output: low cardiac preload, poor myocardial contractility, or high cardiac afterload. In addition, extremes of these variables in the opposite direction (i.e., high cardiac preload, increased myocardial contractility, or low cardiac afterload) can contribute to cardiovascular insufficiency, albeit not as commonly. This is due to the fact that these three variables as well as heart rate affect one another. For example, in an infant of a diabetic mother with hypertrophied cardiomyopathy, increased contractility and low afterload can further compromise systemic flow by reducing preload and worsening left ventricular outflow tract obstruction.

Preload

Decreases in preload lead to diminished stroke volume and cardiac output and are most often caused by low effective circulating blood volume. This can be due to loss of circulating blood volume following hemorrhage (absolute hypovolemia), or the circulating volume may be inadequate for the vascular space as in vasodilatory shock or as a side effect of administration of lusitropes (relative hypovolemia). Because approximately 75% of the circulating blood volume is on the venous side of the circulation at any given point in time, the increases in venous capacitance caused by venodilation significantly contribute to relative hypovolemia under these circumstances. The interaction between the respiratory and cardiovascular system is complex, and the provision of positive pressure respiratory support alters this interaction. Excessive mean airway pressure, especially in compliant lungs, increases pulmonary vascular resistance and decreases pulmonary blood flow with a resultant decrease in systemic blood flow. Because preload is also augmented by the negative intrathoracic pressure generated at each spontaneous inspiration, the positive intrathoracic pressure associated with positive pressure mechanical ventilation reduces venous return and hence preload and cardiac output. However, the impact in neonates with low lung compliance ventilated on appropriate positive pressure ventilatory settings appears to be modest.

Contractility

The strength of myocardial contractility depends on the filling volume and pressure, and the maturity and integrity of the myocardium. Thus, decreases in preload (hypovolemia, cardiac arrhythmia), as well as prematurity (especially extreme immaturity), hypoxic insults, and infectious (viral or bacterial) agents, all negatively affect the ability of the myocardium to contract with resultant decreases in cardiac output.

Afterload

If cardiac afterload is too high, the ability of the myocardium to contract and pump may become compromised, and cardiac output may fall. Such increases in afterload are associated with enhanced endogenous catecholamine release during the period of immediate postnatal adaptation along with loss of the low-resistance placental circulation. Similar increases in afterload are seen in hypovolemia, hypothermia, or when inappropriately high doses of vasopressor-inotropes are being administered to a patient with intact cardiovascular adrenoreceptor responsiveness. High afterload can affect either ventricle and if the output of one of the ventricles is reduced, this will affect the function of the other ventricle, especially when the fetal channels are closed. For instance, if the right ventricular output is low because of high pulmonary vascular resistance, the amount of blood traversing the lungs to the left ventricle will be reduced, leading to low systemic blood flow with blood pooling in the systemic venous system.

Changes in Preload, Contractility, and Afterload During Transition

With delivery and the separation of the placenta, the fetal circulation begins its transition to the mature (adult-type) circulation in which the systemic and pulmonary circuits are in series and, with the closure of the fetal shunts between the two circulations, the right and left cardiac outputs are equal. However, some component of the normal transition (e.g., removal of placental circulation) is rather abrupt while others (cessation of flow through the ductus arteriosus and foramen ovale) are more gradual. With the initiation of breathing resulting in lung expansion and the separation of the placenta, the pulmonary vascular resistance drops precipitously and systemic vascular resistance increases, respectively. The resultant increase in the left ventricular (LV) afterload could lead to a decrease in myocardial contractility, which in selected populations of vulnerable preterm infants may result in decreased cardiac output. In addition, the above-mentioned changes in the pulmonary and systemic vascular resistance lead to an evolution in ductal flow pattern from a purely right-to-left to bidirectional and, eventually, purely left-to-right ductal flow. In healthy term infants, LV stroke volume and output increase in the first few minutes after birth. This change coincides with increasing net left-to-right ductal shunting. The increase in LV preload from ductal shunting likely explains the increase in LV output, and the increase in LV output may offset the potential impact of the left-to-right ductal shunt on the systemic circulation. Therefore, there is usually no evidence of circulatory compromise in the healthy neonate. Subsequently, the ductus arteriosus constricts and then closes in the vast majority of term neonates within 24-to-48 hours. Therefore, in the healthy term neonate, the rapidly constricting ductus arteriosus prevents the development of hemodynamically significant left-to-right shunting across the ductus. However, the transition to adult-type circulation is prolonged in preterm, especially in extremely preterm infants and can result in circulatory compromise. Indeed, by 2 months of age, less than 50% of preterm infants born at <26 weeks’ gestation close their ductus arteriosus spontaneously and, as the right-sided pressures fall, blood will shunt left-to-right from the systemic circulation back into the pulmonary circulation. In most VLBW neonates, pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) initially decreases relatively rapidly for physiologic and non-physiologic reasons. Physiologic mechanisms most important in the postnatal decrease of PVR include the mechanical effects of initiation of breathing on PVR and the increased postnatal oxygenation-associated direct, paracrine, and endocrine vasodilation. Iatrogenic causes include surfactant administration or the inappropriate targeting of higher arterial oxygen saturations. With the left-to-right ductal shunting, pulmonary overcirculation develops and left ventricular output, the gold standard of bedside assessment of systemic perfusion, cannot be used as a measure of systemic perfusion ( Fig. 46.4 ). Indeed, under these circumstances, left ventricular output measures systemic perfusion and ductal blood flow. In earlier studies investigating the post-transitional changes in systemic perfusion and/or the effects of vasoactive agents on cardiovascular function, this fact has often not been acknowledged. Therefore, the conclusions drawn from some of these studies need to be reevaluated. More recent studies have acknowledged this hemodynamic paradigm and used right ventricular output to assess systemic perfusion in the VLBW neonate during the transitional period. However, right ventricular output only represents systemic perfusion as long as left-to-right shunting across the foramen ovale does not become significant. In many preterm neonates, however, as left-to-right shunting across a nonconstricting patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) increases during the first 12 to 36 hours, left atrial volume and pressure increase, often leading to the development of a significant left-to-right shunt across the foramen ovale. The left-to-right shunt through the patent foramen ovale (PFO) will then render the use of right ventricular output as a measure of systemic blood flow inaccurate because right ventricular output now represents systemic inflow and PFO flow. This hemodynamic scenario results in the lack of an acceptable conventional measure of systemic blood flow in these neonates. To circumvent this problem, superior vena cava (SVC) flow has been used as a measure of upper body blood flow in preterm neonates with the fetal channels open. The use of SVC flow has provided novel insights into the mechanisms of transitional hemodynamics, such as the observation that intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) develops in many VLBW neonates as systemic blood flow improves, resulting in reperfusion of the brain (see discussion below). However, the vulnerability of SVC flow measurements to error and the technical difficulties associated with its use as a surrogate measure of systemic blood flow have forced these measurements to remain primarily a research rather than a clinical tool.

Fig. 46.4, Impact of Left-to-Right Shunting Across the PDA and PFO on LVO and RVO Measurements.

Developmental Regulation of Systemic Blood Pressure

Systemic blood pressure is the product of systemic blood flow and systemic vascular resistance. There is an association between low blood pressure and central nervous system injury in the preterm neonate. Yet, blood pressure correlates only weakly with blood flow in this patient population during the period of immediate postnatal adaptation when the fetal channels are open. Thus, in preterm infants during the first postnatal day, blood pressure may be low because resistance (vasomotor tone) is low even in the presence of normal or high blood flow ( Fig. 46.5 ). Alternatively, blood pressure may be normal or high because resistance is high in the presence of normal or low blood flow. The lack of clarity surrounding the nature of the relationship between blood pressure and systemic blood flow during the transitional period results, at least in part, from our inability to appropriately define the normal blood pressure range and systemic blood flow (see earlier), and to characterize the developmental regulation of organ blood flow and vital organ assignment (see later discussion) in the preterm neonate. Indeed, the recent findings of a higher rate of survival without severe morbidity and a lower rate of severe IVH and cerebral injury among preterm infants with isolated (asymptomatic) hypotension who were treated compared to those who were not treated highlights the complexity of the blood pressure and blood flow interaction during the postnatal transitional period. These findings also challenge the “permissive hypotension” strategy stemming from the uncertainty surrounding the nature of the relationship between blood pressure and systemic blood flow during the transitional period as well as from the potential side effects of vasopressor-inotropes, especially when not appropriately titrated.

Fig. 46.5, Pathophysiology of Neonatal Cardiovascular Compromise in Primary Myocardial Dysfunction and Primary Abnormal Vascular Tone Regulation With or Without Compensation by the Unaffected Other Variable.

Developmental Regulation of Organ Blood Flow and Its Autoregulation and Vital Organ Assignment

Cerebral Blood Flow Autoregulation

Even very immature preterm neonates autoregulate their cerebral blood flow (CBF). However, the autoregulatory blood pressure range in this patient population is believed to be narrow, and thus “normal” blood pressure is very close to the lower elbow of the autoregulatory curve. Some data suggest that CBF autoregulation is different during the cardiac cycle with CBF being pressure-passive mainly during diastole in preterm infants <34 weeks’ gestation. Organ blood flow autoregulation is impaired in preterm neonates who are sicker and/or more immature. In these patients, changes in blood pressure are mirrored by changes in CBF with a high coherence, and these babies are at higher risk for cerebral injury. Similarly, impairment of the autoregulatory system in dampening the impact of changes in blood pressure on CBF can increase the risk of brain injury in preterm infants. Factors that impair cerebral and other organ blood flow autoregulation include birth asphyxia, acidosis, infection, hypoglycemia, tissue hypoxia and ischemia, and sudden alterations in arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO 2 ). It is of clinical importance that the CO 2 -CBF reactivity is more robust than the pressure-CBF reactivity, as 1 mm Hg change in PaCO 2 results in ~4% change in CBF, whereas 1 mm Hg change in blood pressure is associated with only a ~1% to 2% change in CBF. The impairment of CBF autoregulation in the preterm neonate during the immediate postnatal period has been proposed to contribute to cerebral injury with loss of vascular reactivity to both blood pressure and CO 2 . However, the finding that impaired autoregulation may also be a consequence of a preceding ischemic insult makes clarification of this question particularly difficult.

Vital Organ Assignment

The vessels of the vital organs respond to decreased perfusion pressure and/or oxygen delivery with vasodilation (i.e., high-priority vascular beds), whereas the vessels of the nonvital organs, with low-priority vascular beds, vasoconstrict. Several lines of evidence in human neonates and developing animals suggest that the assignment of the forebrain circulation to a high-priority vascular bed may not be complete at birth. For instance, in response to hypoxic exposure, the forebrain vessels of newborn dogs vasoconstrict like those of a nonvital organ whereas the hindbrain vessels vasodilate. The finding that CBF autoregulation also appears in the brainstem first and in the forebrain only later in gestation supports the notion that there are developmentally regulated differences in the timing of the blood flow autoregulatory functions and vital organ assignment characteristics between the forebrain and the hindbrain. The cellular mechanisms responsible for the assignment of vital and nonvital organ status from a blood flow regulatory standpoint are poorly understood. Based on these findings, it is tempting to speculate that the diminished capacity of the forebrain vessels to vasodilate in the very preterm neonate during the complex process of cardiovascular transition after delivery may contribute to hypoperfusion of the forebrain. These neonates may present with blood pressure values in the perceived normal range while being in the compensated phase of shock. Because this early phase of shock is difficult to recognize immediately after delivery, forebrain hypoperfusion can go unnoticed. Similarly, the subsequent evolution to the reperfusion phase as a result of the eventual adaptation of the cardiovascular system to the extrauterine environment may not be detected clinically. This proposed vital organ assignment-associated hypoperfusion-reperfusion cycle might contribute to cerebral injury in the very preterm neonate (see below).

Developmental Regulation of Cerebral Oxygen Demand-Delivery Coupling

Very little is known about the regulation of oxygen demand–oxygen delivery coupling in neonates, especially in the transitional period. Yet, several lines of evidence indicate that the very preterm neonate is unable to couple cerebral oxygen demand with blood flow, and instead increases oxygen extraction when oxygen demand is increased. This phenomenon may be linked to the developmental delay in the vital organ assignment of the forebrain immediately after delivery (see earlier discussion).

Phases of Shock

From a pathophysiologic standpoint, three phases of shock depicting advancing severity have been identified.

In the “compensated phase,” complex neuroendocrine and autonomic compensatory mechanisms maintain perfusion and oxygen delivery in the normal range to the vital organs (brain, heart, and adrenal glands) at the expense of decreased perfusion to the remaining organs (nonvital organs). This is achieved by vasodilation and vasoconstriction of the vessels to vital and nonvital organs, respectively, in response to a fall in perfusion pressure and/or oxygen delivery. Blood pressure is maintained within the normal range, and heart rate increases. As perfusion of nonvital organs is decreased because of the compensatory vasoconstriction of their vascular beds, there often are clinical signs of compromised nonvital organ function such as decreased urine output. In addition, signs of poor peripheral perfusion can often be detected, such as cold extremities and prolonged capillary refill time.

If adequate treatment is not commenced, compensatory neuroendocrine and autonomic mechanisms begin to be exhausted and hypotension develops as the shock enters its “uncompensated phase.” Systemic perfusion (cardiac output) will decrease, perfusion of all organs including the vital organs becomes compromised, and lactic acidosis develops.

If treatment is ineffective in the uncompensated phase of shock, multiorgan failure develops and shock may enter its “irreversible phase,” where permanent damage to the various organ systems occurs and further interventions will be ineffective in reversing the patient’s condition.

Pathogenesis of Neonatal Shock

Etiologic Factors

The etiologic factors leading to the development of neonatal shock include hypovolemia, myocardial dysfunction, abnormal peripheral vasoregulation, or a combination of two or all three of these factors.

Hypovolemia

Hypovolemia may be absolute (loss of intravascular volume), relative (increased venous capacitance), or combined, such as is often seen in septic shock ( Fig. 46.6 ). Hypovolemia results in cardiovascular compromise primarily by the decrease in cardiac output (systemic blood flow) caused by the decrease in preload. In addition, if blood loss is the primary cause of hypovolemia, the associated decrease in oxygen carrying capacity contributes to the development of the circulatory compromise. Because of the weak relationship between blood pressure and blood volume in hypotensive preterm neonates, hypovolemia was traditionally thought to be a relatively uncommon primary cause of circulatory compromise, especially during the first postnatal day. However, given the difficulty in assessing intravascular volume, especially during the transition, hypovolemia can be difficult to detect clinically. Therefore, the true contribution of hypovolemia to circulatory failure is uncertain. Interestingly, recent studies comparing the effects of delayed umbilical cord clamping or cord milking with immediate cord clamping found increased blood pressure and decreased use of vasopressor-inotropes suggestive of improved hemodynamic status in the delayed cord clamping and cord milking groups. In addition, patients with delayed cord clamping have higher blood volume and fewer receive transfusions. These findings imply that hypovolemia might be a more common presentation in preterm neonates who receive standard care with immediate cord clamping than previously thought.

Fig. 46.6, Etiology of Hypovolemia in Neonates.

Absolute hypovolemia in the newborn can be due to several conditions. Intrapartum fetal blood loss is usually caused by open bleeding from the fetal side of the placenta, and therefore it is likely to be detected. More difficult to diagnose is the closed bleeding of an acute fetomaternal hemorrhage or an acute fetoplacental hemorrhage. The latter can occur during delivery when the umbilical cord comes under some pressure (breech presentation or nuchal cord). Because the umbilical vein is more compressible, it is occluded before the artery and blood continues to be pumped into the placenta. If the cord is clamped early, the excess blood remains trapped in the placenta. This probably happens to some degree in all babies with tight nuchal cords who, as a group, have lower hemoglobin levels. However, in some neonates, a tight nuchal cord may also cause severe circulatory compromise. Postnatally, acute blood loss may occur from any site and is frequently associated with perinatal infections or severe asphyxia-induced endothelial damage and the ensuing disseminated intravascular coagulation. Finally, acute abdominal surgical problems and conditions associated with the nonspecific inflammatory response syndrome and subsequent increased capillary leak with loss of fluid into the interstitium can lead to significant decreases in the circulating blood volume. Iatrogenic causes of absolute hypovolemia include inadequate fluid replacement in conditions of increased insensible losses in the very preterm neonate and gastroschisis before closure of the defect, or the inappropriate use of diuretics.

Relative hypovolemia, that is, a decrease in the effective circulating blood volume, may occur in pathologic conditions leading to vasodilation, such as those associated with the nonspecific inflammatory response syndrome (sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis [NEC], asphyxia, major surgical procedures, use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO]). In addition, the use of afterload-reducing agents (e.g., milrinone, PGE 2 ) may cause significant vasodilation (especially venodilation), thereby decreasing the effective circulating blood volume.

Finally, absolute and relative hypovolemia most frequently occurs in conditions associated with the nonspecific inflammatory response syndrome such as sepsis, asphyxia, and major surgical procedures.

Myocardial Dysfunction

Both systolic and diastolic cardiac dysfunction can cause circulatory failure. As echocardiographic assessment of diastolic function is complex and not well established, except in extreme cases, diastolic dysfunction often goes undetected. Nevertheless, diastolic dysfunction is recognized to be the primary cause of circulatory failure associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in infants of diabetic mothers. In addition, extrinsic factors such as pericardial effusion evolving to tamponade and tension pneumothorax can lead to diastolic dysfunction. Systolic dysfunction, on the other hand, is easier to diagnose using echocardiography.

Acquired heart disease presenting as circulatory compromise includes cardiomyopathies, postasphyxial myocardial dysfunction due to hypoxic-ischemic injury, viral myocarditis, and myocardial dysfunction in the late stages of septic shock. For more detail on structural heart disease and cardiomyopathies, see Chapter 50 .

Among the different types of congenital heart disease, structural heart defects that produce a ductus arteriosus–dependent systemic circulation such as the hypoplastic left heart syndrome, critical coarctation, and critical aortic stenosis, if not diagnosed prenatally or immediately after delivery, classically present as acute circulatory compromise with pallor, tachypnea, impalpable pulses, and hepatomegaly as the ductus starts closing. The presentation may be initially misdiagnosed as sepsis.

Abnormal Peripheral Vasoregulation

Peripheral vasodilation causes circulatory compromise by resultant decreases in perfusion pressure. However, patients with intact myocardial function usually present with normal or high cardiac output as they attempt to compensate for the decrease in organ blood flow. Pathologic peripheral vasodilation in neonates occurs primarily in conditions associated with the nonspecific inflammatory response syndrome such as sepsis, NEC, severe asphyxia, major surgical procedures, use of ECMO, or respiratory distress syndrome of prematurity. It is of clinical importance that preterm neonates born to mothers with chorioamnionitis, especially if they have evidence of funisitis (fetal vessel inflammation), frequently present with hypotension and hyperdynamic, vasodilatory cardiovascular compromise at birth or shortly afterward.

Clinical Presentations of Shock in Neonates Associated With Multiple Etiologic Factors

Transitional Circulatory Compromise of the Very Preterm Neonate

The transitional circulatory changes at birth and in the first 12 to 24 hours after birth denote a period of unique circulatory vulnerability, especially for the extremely preterm infant. As mentioned earlier, the timing of umbilical cord clamping has a significant effect on volume status and systemic hemodynamics. During normal postnatal adaptation, pulmonary vascular resistance falls, systemic vascular resistance rises with removal of the placenta from the circulation, the ductus arteriosus closes, and the foramen ovale is closed by the reversal of the atrial pressure gradient. During this time frame, the left ventricle must double its output. Given that the very preterm infant’s cardiovascular system is adapted to the low-resistance intrauterine environment and its myocardium is immature, it is not surprising that these patients have difficulties during this critical period. In addition, as discussed earlier, developmentally regulated factors such as the state of vital organ assignment of the forebrain and cerebral oxygen demand-flow coupling make cardiovascular adaptation of the very preterm neonate an even more complex process. It is important to note that there is much more to understand about the complex interactions between immediate postnatal cardiovascular adaptation and immaturity, organ development, myocardial and vasoregulatory function, and vital organ assignment.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here