Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
This chapter will:
Describe the pharmacokinetic alterations that occur in critically ill children with acute kidney insufficiency that may affect drug dosing.
Review the limitations of the various methods used to calculate drug doses in children receiving continuous renal replacement therapy.
Identify the factors that influence drug removal through continuous renal replacement therapy.
Identify the factors that influence drug removal through intermittent hemodialysis.
Present a standard approach for crafting an appropriate dosing regimen for critically ill children on continuous renal replacement therapy.
Drug dosing in the pediatric population can be a challenging task and is particularly problematic in patients with acute kidney insufficiency (AKI) or those receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT). Dosing studies with RRT are sparse, especially for methods such as continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and newer hybrid forms of dialysis such as slow low-efficiency dialysis and extended daily dialysis. In fact, less than 20% of currently used medications have dosing recommendations for CRRT, and less than 1% have recommendations for new hybrid therapies. There are even fewer recommendations specific to pediatric patients. Therefore drug doses often are extrapolated from either the adult literature or clinical experience.
Several limitations exist with extrapolating drug doses for the pediatric population from the adult literature. First is the physiologic changes that occur during maturation that affect drug pharmacokinetics. For example, bioavailability is variable owing to changes in gastric acidity, motility, and enzymatic activity. Volume of distribution (V d ), which is the mathematic concept representing the nonphysiologic compartment in which a drug disperses, is higher in children, particularly for drugs that are highly water soluble (e.g., aminoglycosides). Protein binding is reduced, thereby increasing the free fraction or pharmacologically active portion of the drug at the site of action. Drug metabolism (phase I and phase II reactions) and elimination pathways are immature at birth but generally reach adult levels within 1 year. Another limitation pertains to the methodology used in the adult literature. Many drug doses for CRRT are extrapolated from pharmacokinetic studies conducted in patients with chronic kidney disease on intermittent hemodialysis (IHD). They fail to account for the differences in nonrenal clearance that are observed in patients with AKI. Even studies that are specific to CRRT frequently use outdated CRRT technology and substandard dialysis doses, which can lead to dosing errors when applied to current practices. Furthermore, differences in drug removal may exist based on the method of clearance used because the efficiency of each mode can vary with each medication and its physical or chemical properties (i.e., molecular weight, water vs. lipid solubility). Finally, the dialysis prescription used in pediatric patients can provide greater clearance than that achievable with the same prescription used in adults. Because the dialysis prescription typically is measured by urea kinetic modeling (i.e., Kt/V where k = dialyzer clearance of urea, t = time of dialysis, and V = total body water) and V naturally is smaller in pediatric patients, greater clearance (and increased drug removal) can be obtained, in case K and t do not vary.
This chapter reviews principles of drug dosing in critically ill pediatric patients with AKI requiring RRT. The primary focus is to provide a framework for making dosing decisions rather than providing individual recommendations for specific agents given the lack of primary literature in this area and the variability that exists with local practices. Hopefully initiatives such as the Kidney Health Initiative, a partnership between the Food and Drug Administration and the American Society of Nephrology, will increase awareness for the importance of dosing studies in this realm.
Quantification of kidney function is important in critically ill children to properly adjust the dosage of medications that are eliminated by the kidneys. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) represents a direct overall measure of kidney function and may be diminished significantly before the onset of overt signs or symptoms of kidney failure. GFR is a measure of the renal clearance of a substance from plasma and is expressed as the volume of plasma that is cleared of that substance over 1 minute—in absolute values (mL/min) or in relative values (mL/min/1.73 m 2 ), after correction for body surface area. Glomerular filtration must be monitored closely in the setting of acute kidney injury, especially in those children receiving potentially nephrotoxic agents that are eliminated by the kidneys. GFR is measured most accurately by evaluating the urinary or plasma clearance of exogenous filtration markers such as inulin, iohexol ( 99m Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid), Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), or iothalamate. However, these infusion techniques are impractical in clinical situations in which merely a reliable approximation of GFR is required to adjust medication dosages or to evaluate a trend in variable kidney function. As an alternative, equations that use serum creatinine levels are implemented routinely by clinicians to estimate GFR.
Creatinine is an endogenous metabolic product derived primarily from the metabolism of creatine and phosphocreatine in muscle. Creatinine typically is present at relatively stable serum levels and reflects overall muscle mass. Creatinine is filtered freely by glomeruli; however, it also is secreted into urine by renal proximal tubular cells. Because creatinine is filtered primarily through the glomerular capillary wall, a common approach to estimating GFR in pediatric and adult patients is to measure the 24-hour urinary creatinine clearance (CrCl). A measured CrCl is calculated by analyzing creatinine levels obtained from serum and from a 24-hour urine sample ( Box 203.1 ). In the critical care setting, however, medical decision making and institution of therapy typically occur before completion of such prolonged evaluations. As such, some clinicians have investigated the accuracy of shorter collection periods. One study of critically ill pediatric patients demonstrated that a 12-hour CrCl was as accurate as the standard 24-hour CrCl. A second study of critically ill adult patients recommended a minimum collection period of at least 8 hours for clinical decision making. Regardless of the urine collection period used, measured CrCl estimates can overestimate GFR by roughly 10% to 40% in healthy persons, owing to the renal tubular secretion of creatinine. This can be particularly relevant when estimated CrCl is low.
CrCl = [Ucr × (Vur/SCr)] × [1.73/BSA]
CrCl, creatinine clearance (mL/min/1.73 m 2 ); Ucr, urine creatinine (mg/dL); Vur, total urine volume (mL) divided by the duration of the collection (min); SCr, serum creatinine (mg/dL), (when midpoint values are not available, use average serum creatinine values from start and end of collection period); BSA, body surface area (m 2 )
Schwartz (updated)
Estimated GFR = 0.413 × (L/SCr)
GFR, glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73 m 2 ); L , length (cm); SCr, serum creatinine (mg/dL)
Flanders Metadata
Estimated GFR = (0.0414 × ln(age) + 0.3018) × L/SCr
GFR, glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73 m 2 ); L, length (cm); SCr, serum creatinine (mg/dL).
Counahan-Barratt
Estimated GFR = (0.43 × L)/SCr
GFR, glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73 m 2 ); L, length (cm); SCr, serum creatinine (mg/dL)
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here