Renal Protection in the Organ Donor


Objectives

This chapter will:

  • 1.

    Provide an overview of deceased kidney donation and discuss donor medical suitability.

  • 2.

    Describe the physiologic sequelae of brain death, the effect on organ function, and protective strategies that may prevent damage to transplantable organs.

  • 3.

    Provide an overview of the clinical management of the brain-dead potential organ donor that will facilitate successful organ procurement, minimize organ damage, and optimize outcome for the kidney transplant recipient.

  • 4.

    Discuss donation after circulatory death.

Kidney transplantation for the treatment of chronic renal failure results in improved health and longevity. Rates of living and deceased (cadaveric) donation vary considerably internationally. In the United States, Europe, the United Kingdom, and Australia the majority of transplanted kidneys are from deceased donors.

Deceased donation is of two types: (1) donation from persons declared deceased using neurologic criteria—that is, donation after brain death (DBD); and (2) donation after irreversible cessation of the circulation, otherwise known as donation after circulatory death (DCD) or “non–heart-beating organ donation.” Because of the universal shortage of organs for transplantation, there has been renewed interest in DCD, with increasing numbers of kidney donations through this pathway in the last decade, notably in the United Kingdom, Netherlands, and Australia. Despite a higher incidence of delayed graft function (usually defined as a need for dialysis in the first week posttransplantation) in kidneys from DCD donors, recipients who receive kidneys from DCD and DBD donors have similar outcome in terms of long-term allograft and patient survival.

Medical Suitability

Because of the shortage of donated organs and advances in transplantation medicine, the criteria for donor suitability are constantly broadening. As with other therapies, a decision about whether to accept an organ for transplantation must be individualized based on risk and benefit analysis in the particular recipient.

Absolute contraindications to kidney donation are few but include metastatic or incurable malignant disease (or a history of malignancy that poses a high risk for subsequent transmission) and transmissible spongiform encephalopathy such as Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease (CJD). Although HIV generally is considered an absolute contraindication, there has been some recent experience with kidney donation from HIV-infected deceased donors to HIV-infected recipients with favorable outcomes. Patients with a history of malignancy and a long cancer-free interval represent a small risk of transmission and should be considered as potential donors. Treated bacterial infection, including bacterial meningitis, also should not be considered a contraindication. Organs from potential donors infected with (or with evidence of past infection with) hepatitis B virus (HBV) may be transplanted into recipients infected with the same virus, or indeed HBV-immune recipients with careful consideration of posttransplantation passive immunoprophylaxis and antiviral therapy. Although hepatitis C–infected donors have been considered for donation only generally to hepatitis C–infected kidney recipients, the recent availability of direct-acting antivirals may alter this. Patients with negative testing for HIV and hepatitis C but with a history of intravenous drug use or other risk factors for contracting these blood-borne viruses should be referred to the donor agency for careful exploration of the risk to potential recipients.

Medical comorbidities in the donor that potentially affect recipient graft function, including hypertension, acute kidney injury, and vascular disease, as well as age, previously were incorporated into an expanded criteria donor (ECD) stratification in the United States for offer to preconsented potential recipients. More recently, a new kidney allocation system has been developed, using 10 donor factors (those listed above in addition to diabetes mellitus, proposed DCD pathway, and others) to calculate a Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI), which is a prediction of graft function on a continuous scale. As well as providing improved survival matching of donor graft and recipient, an outcome of this system and others such as the Eurotransplant Senior Program initiative is to maximize access to transplantation through use of organs that otherwise may not be able to be matched to a recipient. Whatever local system is in place, neither donor age nor any of these comorbidities universally precludes kidney donation, and a survival benefit for ECD kidney transplantation has been demonstrated when compared with “standard therapy” of waiting for a non-ECD kidney.

Brain Death and Physiologic Sequelae

Brain death is associated with progressive physiologic instability that ultimately can affect kidney graft function after transplantation ( Fig. 132.1 ). Timely confirmation of brain death, referral to the organ donor agency, and procurement of organs minimize the loss of donors and maximize the number of organs suitable for transplantation. Reported loss of potential donors through failed physiologic support ranges from 5% to 25%. Those who medically manage the potential donor and oversee the logistics of organ donation should work to minimize this loss through ensuring timely procurement and provision of excellent supportive treatment.

FIGURE 132.1, Brain death and effect on kidney function. AKI, Acute kidney injury.

Brain death may develop as a result of progressive brain swelling in the hours or days after a severe brain injury (e.g., trauma, cerebral hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, anoxic injury). Because the brain is contained within a rigid skull that limits its expansion, progressive edema and/or hemorrhage results in rising intracranial pressure and inadequate cerebral perfusion pressure. A cycle of cerebral infarction, edema, and further increase in intracranial pressure occurs with eventual loss of blood flow to the entire brain, including the brainstem. Brain death has implications on maintaining homeostasis with potential effects on kidney graft function as described below. Moreover, acute neurologic injury and acute kidney injury may coexist not only because of shared risk factors but also through kidney-brain crosstalk (e.g., mediated by cytokine secretion, inflammation, or oxidative damage ).

Cardiovascular

This process of brainstem ischemia may result in an intense sympathetic surge with marked hypertension, tachycardia (or reflex bradycardia [Cushing's reflex]), and/or arrhythmias, known as the “autonomic storm.” This is usually short-lived but may result in cardiac ischemia and myocyte necrosis, electrocardiographic changes, and cardiac dysfunction, and pharmacologically blunting this process mitigates against myocardial injury. Any drugs administered for this purpose should have a very short duration of action, because longer-acting agents will exacerbate the hypotension that usually follows this period.

Subsequent to the autonomic storm, there is usually loss of sympathetic outflow, resulting in vasodilation and hypotension. The hypotension may be exacerbated by preexisting hypovolemia, polyuria from diabetes insipidus (DI), and cardiac dysfunction. Adequate support of blood pressure and cardiac output is necessary to optimize organ perfusion and therefore the outcome of kidney transplantation. Vasopressor agents and/or inotropic drugs often are required for persistent hemodynamic disturbance after correction of volume depletion.

Diabetes Insipidus

DI occurs in approximately 80% to 90% of brain-dead potential donors and is caused by the loss of posterior pituitary function, which results in deficiency of antidiuretic hormone (ADH). This results in polyuria, hypernatremia, and hypovolemia. Prior treatments for raised intracranial pressure, such as hypertonic saline and mannitol, also may contribute to hypernatremia and hypovolemia. Polyuria can be marked if untreated, often exceeding 1 L of urine output per hour, which can contribute to hemodynamic instability and hypoperfusion. Attempts to correct the free water loss through the administration of large volumes of fluid may result in further derangements, such as hyperglycemia and hypothermia. Hypernatremia in the donor has been associated with inferior graft function at 2 and 3 years after renal transplantation.

Hypothermia

Hypothermia is common after brain death because of the loss of hypothalamic thermoregulation, inability to shiver, and loss of vasoconstriction. Hypothermia may be exacerbated by the administration of large volumes of relatively cool fluids in the treatment of DI. Severe hypothermia has many adverse effects include cardiac dysfunction, arrhythmias, coagulopathy, and a leftward shift of the oxyhemoglobin dissociation curve with reduced oxygen delivery to tissues. Moreover, temperatures lower than 35°C preclude or delay the declaration of death via clinical brain death testing. As an intervention in the donor after declaration of brain death, however, the induction and maintenance of mild hypothermia (34°C to 35°C) compared with targeted normothermia was associated with a significant reduction in delayed graft function in kidney recipients.

Hyperglycemia

Administration of large volumes of dextrose-containing fluids in the treatment of DI may cause hyperglycemia. Hyperglycemia also may be caused by preexisting diabetes mellitus or by increases in the levels of counterregulatory hormones and peripheral resistance to insulin. It may result in an osmotic diuresis and electrolyte abnormalities.

Anterior Pituitary Dysfunction

Animal models demonstrate that a deficiency of thyroid hormone, cortisol, and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) occurs with brain death and that exogenous hormone administration may improve hemodynamics and myocardial contractility. On the other hand, it is unclear whether clinically significant thyroid hormone or cortisol deficiency occurs in humans after brain death. There is conflicting evidence regarding the presence of adrenal insufficiency in brain-dead donors with evidence of decreased, unchanged, , and increased cortisol levels. Brain-dead patients appear to have decreased circulating T3 levels in the setting of normal or increased levels of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) consistent with the sick euthyroid syndrome. In the referenced studies no correlation was found between low levels of cortisol or thyroid hormone and blood pressure or vasopressor requirement. In a further study of 32 patients, serial measurements up to 80 hours after brain death failed to show a progressive decline in the level of free triiodothyronine (T 3 ) or cortisol.

Inflammatory and Immunologic Changes

Significant changes in the cytokine profiles, including elevation of proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 6 (IL-6) and IL-8, are observed in the circulation after brain death, as well as being present in increased concentration in kidney grafts from brain-dead donors. Grafts from these donors exhibit T cell and macrophage infiltration and significant release of inflammatory mediators on reperfusion in recipients. These proinflammatory factors are thought to be mediators in posttransplant immune reaction, reperfusion injury, and graft dysfunction.

Respiratory Changes

Hypoxia from atelectasis and pulmonary edema may contribute to deterioration in cardiopulmonary status, increasing the risk of cardiac arrest before organ procurement.

Hematologic Changes

Anemia may be dilutional, resulting from bleeding resulting from trauma and exacerbated by coagulopathy. Coagulopathy may occur as an effect of substances released from the necrotic brain that induce fibrinolysis (especially in traumatic brain injury), or as a result of dilution from bleeding and fluid administration; it may be worsened by hypothermia. Disseminated intravascular coagula­tion (DIC) in the donor may not affect short-term graft function.

Management of the Brain-Dead Potential Organ Donor

Intensivist-led management of brain-dead organ donors has been shown to be associated with retrieval of more organs for transplantation. The approach to management for the potential organ donor after brain death is similar to that for other critically ill patients with the aim of achieving and maintaining physiologic homeostasis. Meeting predefined donor management goals is associated with a reduction in delayed graft function, and consensus guidelines recommend consideration of the usual spectrum of invasive and noninvasive monitoring strategies. As a minimum this will require arterial pressure (and generally central venous pressure) monitoring, although there is no evidence to guide selection of an optimum monitoring tool. Earlier protocols and guidelines advocated the use of a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). A more recent retrospective study of PAC use in donors at a single center showed a decline in use over time and no association with increased retrieval of kidneys for transplantation, albeit an association with increased heart procurement. A protocolized fluid and vasopressor management algorithm using minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring (pulse-pressure-variation) has been evaluated in a multicenter randomized trial with no increase in the number of organs transplanted per donor.

An awareness of the specific perturbations that may occur in brain death and timely institution of appropriate supportive treatment is essential.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here