Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The authors wish to acknowledge Daniel S. Hutton and Kee D. Kim for their work on the previous edition’s version of this chapter.
Patients with acute type II odontoid fractures (< 6 months) and patients with fractures with either a transverse or an anterosuperior to posteroinferior fracture plane are the most favorable surgical candidates.
Subacute, unstable type II odontoid fractures (for which alignment cannot be maintained with orthoses) and chronic nonunion type II odontoid fractures.
Fractures with displacement of greater than 6 mm, which are unlikely to fuse with external immobilization.
“Shallow” type III odontoid fractures, in which the fracture pattern extends only minimally into the vertebral body, nonunion develops, or if unstable with orthoses.
Failure to maintain reduction in halo vest or inability to tolerate halo vest immobilization is another indication.
Patients opposed to wearing a halo vest, patients who cannot tolerate a halo vest (e.g., because of psychological concerns, multiple additional fractures, etc.), or patients who prefer surgery over a halo vest.
Elderly patients with type II odontoid fractures represent a treatment challenge because of comorbidities and varying degrees of osteopenia. However, fewer treatment failures and less morbidity are associated with surgical management compared with an external orthosis.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here