Ex Vivo Arterial Repair for Renovascular Hypertension Secondary to Fibrodysplasia


Fibrodysplastic disease of the renal arteries is bilateral in more than half of the patients, and involvement of the primary branches of the renal artery has been reported in as many as 40%. In most patients the fibrodysplastic lesions are located in the distal renal artery, but many lesions affect multiple smaller renal arteries or extend into the primary and secondary branches of the renal artery. In these latter patients, percutaneous angioplasty is not without complications, and dissection, occlusion, renal infarction, perforation, and contrast-induced kidney failure have been reported ( Figure 1 ). Open reconstructions are favored in many of these patients, yet prospective data comparing the results of transluminal angioplasty and open surgical repair are available for treatment of atherosclerotic lesions but not for fibrodysplasia.

FIGURE 1
A, Large false aneurysm in a primary branch of the left renal artery after repeated percutaneous dilatation of fibrodysplastic stenosis. B, The postoperative angiogram after ex vivo repair and autotransplantation of the left kidney.

Therapy

Surgical reconstruction is considered the gold standard of therapy for renal fibrodysplastic lesions. Operative morbidity and mortality rates in these young patients are very low, and excellent long-term functional results up to 15 years or more have been reported by many. A variety of surgical techniques have been used for surgical revascularization for repair of stenosis in the main renal artery. Lesions extending into the renal arterial branches can be repaired by both in situ and ex vivo techniques. In these circumstances, we prefer extracorporeal reconstruction and autotransplantation of the kidney.

The advantages of ex vivo reconstruction are optimal exposure, a bloodless surgical field, protection of the kidney from prolonged warm ischemia, no time limit for microvascular repair, and contraction of the kidney resulting from preservation, which allows an easier dissection. Finally, the complete reconstruction can be tested for both patency and leakage before implantation. Compared with in vivo repair, ex vivo repair is associated with longer operation times, more blood loss, and more wound hematomas. Although it has been suggested that stenosis at the renal bifurcation can be repaired in situ, results of extracorporeal repair appear to be superior. Standard indications for performing ex vivo arterial repair exist ( Box 1 ).

BOX 1
Indications for Ex Vivo Renal Reconstruction

Vascular Indications

  • Stenotic lesions extending into the primary and secondary branches

  • Macro aneurysms of the renal artery or its branches

  • Stenoses or occlusions in multiple smaller renal arteries caused by fibrodysplasia or other diseases, such as Takayasu’s disease

  • Spontaneous renal artery dissection

  • Pediatric renovascular disease

  • Congenital or acquired arteriovenous fistulas in the hilus

  • Redo renovascular reconstruction

  • Complications of angioplasty (dissection, occlusion, false aneurysm)

Urologic Indications

  • Renal cell carcinoma in a single kidney

  • Staghorn calculi

  • Stenosis, trauma, or resection of the ureter

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here