Traumatic Arterial Injuries: Diagnosis and Management


Chapter Preview

  • Chapter Synopsis

  • Vertebral artery injuries (VAIs) are becoming increasingly recognized as more screening protocols are being used. Angiography is the gold standard, but many centers are using computed tomography angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) as the initial screening study. Treatment is recommended for all patients with symptomatic injuries. Treatment of asymptomatic injuries remains controversial, and treatments should be individualized to each particular situation.

  • Important Points

  • Traumatic VAIs have an incidence of 0.5% in all patients who have sustained blunt trauma.

  • Among patients with traumatic VAIs, 70% will have an associated cervical spine fracture.

  • Most VAIs occur after motor vehicle accidents or falls, and they occur in the second segment of the vertebral artery (V2).

  • Angiography is the gold standard study for diagnosis of VAI.

  • Many centers are now using CTA or MRA as a screening study.

  • Treatments include observation, antiplatelet agents, anticoagulation, and endovascular interventions.

  • Symptomatic injuries should be treated.

  • Treatment of asymptomatic injuries is controversial and should be individualized for each case.

Background

Vertebral artery injury (VAI) secondary to blunt trauma has become an increasingly discussed topic. Initially, these injuries were thought to be extremely rare events with minimal significance. However, studies using rigorous screening protocols demonstrated that VAIs occur with some regularity (the overall incidence in blunt trauma is approximately 0.5%) and can be associated with significant morbidity. Some of these investigators argued that routine anticoagulation is effective and should be considered for patients with these injuries. However, other studies concluded that no compelling evidence exists to recommend treatment of asymptomatic traumatic blunt VAIs (BVIs).

Incidence and Risk Factors

Although the overall incidence of VAI in patients who have sustained blunt trauma is approximately 0.5%, the incidence is certainly higher in certain subsets of patients. Seventy percent of patients with traumatic VAIs have an associated cervical spine fracture. Cervical spine injuries associated with increased VAI include subluxations and dislocations, fractures involving the transverse foramen, and fractures of the upper cervical spine (C1-C3) ( Fig. 20-1 ). Other patients considered at higher risk and potentially requiring screening include those with basilar skull fractures, significant facial fractures, cervical hematomas, neurologic examination findings inconsistent with head computed tomography (CT) scans, or lateralizing neurologic examination findings.

FIGURE 20-1, Sagittal ( A ) and coronal ( B ) computed tomography (CT) images showing facet diastasis at C3-C4 on the left, in a patient who was later diagnosed with a vertebral artery injury on CT angiography.

In general, most traumatic BVIs occur after high-energy mechanisms, often with rapid deceleration. Most of these injuries occur after motor vehicle accidents, after falls, or when pedestrians are struck by vehicles. Another rarely cited reason for BVI is chiropractic manipulation. In a large review of published case reports from 1934 to 2003, Ernst found 26 published fatalities associated with chiropractic manipulation. At least 6 of these deaths were believed to have resulted from vertebral artery dissection. The true incidence of such events is difficult to estimate, however. Aside from traumatic BVI, the other major category of traumatic VAI includes penetrating injuries, such as gunshot wounds and lacerations. Traumatic VAIs from lacerations have a high mortality rate related to bleeding.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here