Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Regulated cell death (RCD) maintaining tissue homeostasis and integrity comprises apoptosis, autophagic cell death, and necroptosis.
Chemoresistance involves deregulation of particular mechanisms/pathways of RCD.
A better understanding of chemotherapy-induced RCD mechanisms may help to improve treatment options.
New drugs addressing particular deregulated mechanisms of RCD may improve therapy of bone sarcoma.
Regulated cell death (RCD) is a physiological cell death program of eukaryotic cells to maintain tissue homeostasis and integrity and involves different mechanisms including apoptosis, autophagic cell death, and necroptosis [ ]. RCD has been extended in recent years to include autophagy and necroptosis, both of which are independent in their signaling mechanisms from apoptosis but equally important for organism development and preservation [ , ]. Damage of the cell death program can lead to tumor formation by shifting the tightly regulated balance between tissue integrity and cell death into the direction of cell growth, and can result in treatment resistance, since radiotherapy and most of chemotherapeutic agents induce RCD.
Apoptosis is an active process in which caspases (CASPs), a family of cysteine proteases, are key mediators [ ]. In humans, there are 14 different caspases known. They are synthesized as inactive proenzymes consisting of a prodomain, a large and small subunit. The active caspases are tetramers composed of two large and two small subunits arising from the cleavage of procaspases. So-called initiator caspases, such as CASP8, CASP9, and CASP10, receive the apoptotic signal, get activated, and in turn activate effector caspases such as CASP3, CASP6, and CASP7. These induce the apoptotic phenotype by cleavage of enzymes such as the DNA-repair enzyme PARP, activation of endonucleases, and cleavage of structural proteins including lamins, which are important for the maintenance of the nuclear membrane. The activity of the caspases is tightly controlled by proteins of the inhibitor of apoptosis family (IAP), including NAIP, BIRC2, BIRC3, XIAP, survivin (BIRC5), BRUCE, BIRC7, and BIRC8 [ , ].
Two major apoptotic pathways exist, the intrinsic and extrinsic pathways [ , ]. A key event in the intrinsic pathway is the disruption of the mitochondrial membrane leading to the release of cytochrome c which binds the cytosolic protein APAF1 (apoptosis activating factor 1). Both proteins together bind pro-CASP9 and form the apoptosome wherein pro-CASP9 is cleaved into active CASP9. Loss of mitochondrial membrane integrity is controlled by a tight balance between pro- and antiapoptotic members of the BCL2 family of proteins [ ]. Twenty members of this family are known, divided into three subfamilies, depending on the presence of conserved BCL2 homology (BH) domains [ ]. The proapoptotic proteins comprise two families, one comprising BAX, BAK1, BAD which contain either three BH homology domains (BH1-3) the other with only one domain (BH-3) such as BID, BCL2L11, BBC3 and PMAIP1. The antiapoptotic family includes BCL2, BCL2L1, BCL2L2, and MCL1. BCL2 and BCL2L1 form stable complexes with the proapoptotic BH-3 domain-only proteins, thereby preventing the activation and translocation of BAX and BAK to the mitochondria. This balance of pro- and antiapoptotic proteins is influenced by TP53 which becomes activated upon cellular stress. TP53 induces transcriptional activation of proapoptotic BAX and PUMA (BBC3), thereby shifting the balanced network of this family of proteins toward apoptosis [ , ]. Chemotherapeutic agents induce intracellular damage. They often induce apoptosis via the intrinsic pathway. Disruption of the intrinsic pathway via mutations in proapoptotic genes, e.g., TP53 , or BAX , or overexpression of antiapoptotic proteins, such as BCL2 or survivin, often leads to chemoresistance.
Binding of death ligands to their receptors activates the extrinsic apoptotic pathway [ , ]. Death receptors belong to the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, including TNFRSF1A (DR1/CD120a/p55/p60), FAS (Apo-1/CD95), DR3 (APO-3/LARD/TRAMP), TRAILR1 (DR4/APO-2), TRAIL2 (DR5), DR6, and ectodysplasin A receptor (EDAR). Activation of these death receptors leads to trimerization and assembly of death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), including the FAS-associated death domain–containing protein (FADD) and the initiator caspases, proCASP8/10 [ , ]. The interaction between FADD and CASP8/10 results in autoproteolytic cleavage and the activation of CASP8/10 [ ]. CASP8 and CASP10 activate effector caspases and the proapoptotic BCL2 family protein BID.
Apoptosis via the extrinsic pathway is tightly controlled and resistance can occur at various levels. On the receptor level there are TRAILR3 and TRAILR4 which do not contain a death domain and can sequester TRAIL from the apoptosis-inducing receptors TRAILR1 and TRAILR2. Overexpression of the protein cFLIP (CFLAR) has been shown to prevent the binding of the adaptor FADD to proCASP8 and proCASP10. Mutations in FAS as well as absent expression of death receptors or CASP8 and CASP10 are also known causes of resistance to the induction of apoptosis via the extrinsic pathway.
Another response to cellular stress besides apoptosis is autophagy . It is a highly conserved process characterized by vesicular sequestration and degradation of cytoplasmic components. Autophagy is induced and precisely regulated following nutrient deprivation, via growth factors, hormones, intracellular energy information, and cell stressors such as hypoxia, osmotic stress, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and viral infection [ ]. Main steps in autophagy are induction, vesicle nucleation and elongation, autophagosome formation, and autolysosome formation. More than 30 autophagy-related genes (ATGs) have been characterized; several molecular complexes seem essential in the process of autophagy [ ]. They are divided into five groups according to their function in the process of autophagy: ATG1 protein kinase complex, class III phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K)-Beclin 1 (BECN1) complex, ATG12 conjugation system, ATG8 conjugation system, and ATG9 [ ]. Upon mTOR inhibition, Unc-51-like kinase 1 (ULK1) and ULK2, two mammalian homologs of ATG1, are activated, followed by phosphorylation of FIP200 (a focal adhesion kinase family interacting protein of 200 kDa) and ATG13, which initiate autophagy activity [ ]. The class III PI3 kinase-Beclin complex is essential for vesicle nucleation. It is crucial for recruiting the ATG12-ATG5 conjunction to the preautophagosomal structure. Autophagy can precede apoptosis and serve as an alternative mechanism to activate CASP8 [ ]. Members of the BCL2 family are involved in regulation of autophagy as well. BCL2 can form a complex with BECN1 inhibiting autophagy. Dissociation of this complex initiates autophagy [ , ]. Deregulation of autophagy might contribute to resistance of tumor cells toward environmental stress factors like nutrient deprivation and hypoxia. For example, upregulation of intracellular components such as high mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) contributed to chemotherapy resistance [ ]. Drugs inducing autophagy in tumor cells death may complement apoptosis-inducing anticancer agents in order to maximize the cytotoxic effect on a tumor [ ].
Necroptosis has been identified as an independent cell death mechanism. It is triggered by multiple stimulators, and interacts with death receptors (TNFRSF1A, TRAILR, or FAS), toll-like receptors (TLRs), and cellular metabolic and genotoxic stress. The most important signal molecules of necroptosis are the serine/threonine kinase receptor interaction protein 1 (RIP1) and RIP3 as well as the pseudokinase mixed lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL). For example, binding of TNF-α to its receptor TNFRSF1A leads to the internalization of the receptor, the assembly of RIP1 together with RIP3 into the necrosome complex, and the activation of RIP3 [ ]. Then, the activated RIP1 and RIP3 transphosphorylate each other and initiate necroptosis. Both RIP1 and RIP3 necrosome recruits and activates MLKL and phosphoglycerate mutase 5 (PGAM5). MLKL is phosphorylated and multimerized, is inserted into the plasma membrane, and forms channels that increase NA + influx, osmotic pressure, and membrane rupture, ending with necroptosis-induced cell death [ , ].
Subsequently, the current status of individual therapeutic treatment is correlated to pathways of RCD in malignant bone tumors. Insight into new vulnerabilities discovered is given, new treatment concepts are highlighted, and their potential from the perspective of RCD is discussed.
Osteosarcomas (OSs), especially high-grade OSs (HGOSs) comprising 90% of OSs, are genetically unstable malignancies presenting complex karyotypes with a large variety of numerical and structural variants often associated with chromosomal alterations named kataegis and chromothripsis [ ]. For patients with localized disease standard chemotherapy consists of a three-drug combination with methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatin. This leads to a 5-year survival of approximately 80% in patients with nonmetastatic OS and complete tumor resection [ ]. However, the survival rate of high-risk patients with nonresectable, primary metastatic, or relapsed disease is still inacceptable and requires concerted efforts to improve therapy [ ].
Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in several candidate genes of possible relevance for the biology, treatment response, and drugs activation or detoxification of OS have been evaluated in order to identify markers predictive of tumor progression, therapy response, or patients' susceptibility to develop treatment-related toxicities [ ]. Furthermore, next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches led to the identification of OS driver genes that may not have emerged with conventional techniques [ , , ].
Fellenberg et al. demonstrated that chemotherapeutic drugs doxorubicin, methotrexate, and cisplatin induced apoptosis in different OS cell lines (HOS/TE-85, MG-63, Saos-2) [ ]. Induction of apoptosis resulted in the reduction of the mitochondrial potential and cytochrome c release into the cytoplasm and was CASP dependent. No increase in the expression of FAS or induction of FASL expression by chemotherapeutics was observed. However, all OS lines tested were either TP53 null or expressed mutant TP53, while FAS expression has been shown to be upregulated by wtTP53 in various cell systems. Newer results indicate that GRFA1 (glial cell–derived neurotropic family receptor A1) can induce chemoresistance to cisplatin in OS by inducing autophagy through SRC-AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-mediated signal transduction [ ].
Ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide are further chemotherapeutic agents with potential efficacy in HGOS. Gene expression profiles of a panel of OS xenografts indicated that poorly responsive specimens revealed a resistance profile against intrinsic apoptosis. Ifosfamide, in addition, demonstrated a drive toward dedifferentiation and increased tumor aggressiveness [ ]. Etoposide, a topoisomerase II inhibitor, activates the intrinsic apoptosis pathway mediating PARP1 cleavage and endonuclease DNAS1L3 activation resulting in DNA fragmentation [ ]. Ifosfamide demonstrated some therapeutic activity in relapsed/refractory HGOS [ ]. However, adding ifosfamide to standard chemotherapy, including doxorubicin, methotrexate, and cisplatin (the MAP backbone), did not improve outcome in frontline chemotherapy [ ].
The application of sophisticated genetic approaches such as NGS and SNP array analysis to investigate HGOS tumor samples from within the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group demonstrated that more than 80% of OSs exhibit a specific combination of single-base substitutions, LOH, or large-scale genome instability signatures characteristic of BRCA1/2-deficient tumors [ ]. This so-called BRCAness genomic signature includes genes that are involved in the maintenance of genome integrity (i.e., homologous recombination repair, HRR). Tumors with features of BRCAness should be more sensitive to therapies that target HRR defects, e.g., poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. This group observed a good response to the phase III PARPi talazoparib in the OS cell line MNNG/HOS, which carries impairing variants in HRR genes (i.e., PTEN , ATM ). This effect was more pronounced when agents that cause DNA damage (e.g., temozolamide or SN-38) were added [ ]. A good response of OS cell lines to the phase II PARPi olaparib was also reported by the pediatric preclinical testing program investigators [ ]. In BRCAness- positive OS cell lines Engert et al., in addition, identified temozolomide (TMZ) as the most potent chemotherapeutic drug, able, together with talazoparib, to synergistically reduce cell viability and to suppress long-term clonogenic survival. Mechanistically, TMZ and talazoparib cooperated to induce apoptotic cell death, as demonstrated by activation of BAX and BAK, loss of mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), caspase activation, DNA fragmentation, and caspase-dependent cell death. Genetic silencing of BAX and BAK or inhibition by the pan-caspase inhibitor zVAD.fmk significantly rescued OS cells from talazoparib/TMZ-induced apoptosis [ ], providing the rationale that PARPi together with chemotherapeutics should be further investigated in BRCAness -positive HGOS.
NGS analysis from within the US Children's Oncology Group (COG) identified the PI3K/mTOR pathway as being altered in approximately one quarter of HGOS patient samples. They treated OS lines with dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitors and observed responses even in the absence of PI3K/mTOR pathway mutations [ ]. Several studies suggest that the mTOR pathway is overactivated in OS which is taken as a sign that normal autophagy is inhibited [ , ]. Dual inhibitors of PI3K/mTOR are in development [ ] and combinations of PI3K inhibitors (e.g., buparlisib) [ ] with allosteric mTOR inhibitors (e.g., everolimus) warrant clinical testing in HGOS.
Zoledronic acid (ZOL) is an aminobisphosphonate (N-BP) which inhibits osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. In OS cells, ZOL has been shown to activate an intra-S DNA checkpoint with an increase in pATR (phosphorylated ATR), pCHEK1, WEE1, and pCDK1 and a decrease in CDC25, independent of the TP53 and RB1 status [ ]. Induction of apoptosis has been demonstrated to be caspase-independent and to be characterized by increased mitochondrial permeability with translocation of apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) and endonuclease G from a mitochondrial to a perinuclear location. In an orthotopic OS mouse xenograft model, ZOL resulted in inhibition of primary tumor growth and reduction of lung metastases of Saos-2 tumor-bearing mice [ ]. Furthermore, the beneficial results of combining ifosfamide with zoledronate in preclinical models of OS [ , ] provided the rationale for the French OS2006 trial. In this trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00470223), more than 300 patients were randomized to receive chemotherapy or chemotherapy + zoledronate. However, the addition of zoledronate did not improve event-free or overall survival of patients with previously untreated HGOS [ ] and requires further investigations [ ].
Flavopiridol is a pan-cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor that induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in many cancer cells. Flavopiridol induced apoptosis in OS cell line MNNG [ ]. Apoptosis was also observed in P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance–associated protein 1 overexpressing subclones which were resistant to doxorubicin. Flavopiridol caused release of mitochondrial cytochrome c and activation of CASP9, CASP3, and CASP8. Apoptosis was inhibited by pan-CASP and CASP3 inhibitor, but not CASP8 inhibitor, suggesting activation of the intrinsic pathway. CDK inhibitors such as flavopiridol or dinaciclib, the latter more specifically directed against CDK1, CDK2, CDK5, and CDK9, demonstrated high efficacy in combination therapy together with bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) inhibitors in vitro , accompanied by an effective increase of apoptosis [ ].
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here