Basic principles of mechanical ventilation


Mechanical ventilatory support provides pressure and flow to the airways to help accomplish oxygen (O 2 ) and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) transport between the environment and the pulmonary capillary bed. The overall clinical goal of mechanical ventilation is to maintain appropriate levels of O 2 and CO 2 content in the arterial blood while unloading the ventilatory muscles. An equally important goal is to provide this support without harming the lungs. Positive-pressure mechanical ventilation can be applied through either an artificial airway or a tight-fitting mask (noninvasive ventilation, discussed in detail in Chapter 55 ).

Design features of modern mechanical ventilators

Most modern ventilators use high-pressure gas sources to drive gas flow. Tidal breaths are generated by metering this gas flow and can be classified regarding what initiates the breath (trigger variable), what controls gas delivery during the breath (target or limit variable), and what terminates the breath (cycle variable). In general, breaths can be initiated (triggered) by patient effort (assisted breaths) or by the machine timer (controlled breaths). Target or limit variables are either a set flow or a set inspiratory pressure. With flow targeting, the ventilator regulates the airway pressure to maintain a clinician-determined flow pattern. In contrast, for pressure targeting, the ventilator adjusts flow to maintain a clinician-determined inspiratory pressure. Cycle variables are a set volume, flow, or set inspiratory time. Breaths can also be cycled if pressure limits are exceeded. Using this approach, standard breath delivery algorithms from modern mechanical ventilators can be classified into five basic breath categories based upon trigger, target, and cycle criteria: (1) volume control (VC), (2) volume assist (VA), (3) pressure control (PC), (4) pressure assist (PA), and (5) pressure support (PS) ( Fig. 37.1 ).

Fig. 37.1, Airway pressure, flow, and volume tracings over time depicting the five basic breaths are available on most modern mechanical ventilators. Breaths are classified by their trigger, target or limit, and cycle variables.

The availability and delivery logic of the different breath types define the mode of mechanical ventilatory support. The mode controller is an electronic, pneumatic, or microprocessor-based system designed to provide the desired combination of breaths according to set algorithms and feedback data (conditional variables). The five most common modes are volume assist-control (VACV), pressure assist-control (PACV), volume synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (V-SIMV), pressure synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (P-SIMV), and standalone pressure support ventilation (PSV). It is important to note that a technique using pressure-targeted IMV set in a long inspiratory:expiratory configuration (airway pressure release ventilation) has often been labeled a “new mode” when it can be viewed simply as a modification of P-SIMV that extends the inflation period and allows tidal breaths superimposed on the higher pressure level.

Current ventilator designs incorporate advanced monitoring and feedback functions to allow continuous adjustments in the breath delivery patterns. , An early approach involved adding flow to the end of a pressure-targeted inflation if a target volume was not achieved (volume-assured pressure support). A similar concept involves a feedback mechanism during volume-assist breaths that adds inspiratory flow to assure airway pressure does not fall below zero in the presence of vigorous inspiratory efforts.

Today, however, the most common of these feedback control mechanisms provides additional inspiratory pressure during pressure-targeted breaths to assure that the targeted average tidal volume is achieved. This mechanism makes adjustments based on previous tidal volumes and is commonly termed pressure-regulated volume control (pressure assist-control breaths) or volume support (pressure support breath). Inspiratory pressure feedback control features can incorporate additional inputs (e.g., exhaled CO 2 , minute ventilation, respiratory rate) to “fine-tune” breath delivery. A more sophisticated and advanced form of these feedback control systems incorporates a minute volume target and adjusts inspiratory pressure, respiratory rate, and inspiratory:expiratory timing to minimize the calculated work per breath and avoid air trapping (adaptive support ventilation) .

Finally, over the last three decades, two truly novel assist modes have been introduced: proportional assist ventilation (PAV) and neutrally adjusted ventilatory assistance (NAVA). The former calculates respiratory system mechanics and adjusts flow and inspiratory pressure to proportionately unload inspiratory muscles; the latter uses the diaphragmatic electromyographic (EMG) signal to adjust flow and pressure delivery in accordance with patient effort. These modes are discussed in more detail elsewhere in this text.

Physiologic effects of mechanical ventilation

Alveolar ventilation and the equation of motion

Alveolar ventilation denotes fresh gas delivery to the gas - exchanging regions of the lungs. Mathematically this is expressed as:


VA = f × (VT VD)

where VA = alveolar ventilation per minute, f = breathing frequency, VT = tidal volume, and VD = wasted ventilation or dead space per breath. Alveolar ventilation needs to be adequate for the rates of tissue oxygen consumption (VO 2 ) and carbon dioxide production (VCO 2 ). By convention, CO 2 transport, as expressed by the relationship between VCO 2 and the steady-state arterial PCO 2 , is used to quantify VA:


VA = 800 × (VCO 2 / PaCO 2 )

The difference between total ventilation (f × VT) and VA is VD.

The lungs are inflated by mechanical ventilation when a dynamic pressure increment or flow is applied at the airway opening. These applied forces interact with respiratory system compliance (both lung and chest wall components), airway resistance, and, to a lesser extent, respiratory system inertance and lung tissue resistance to effect gas flow. For simplicity, inertance and tissue resistance are relatively small and for clinical purposes can be ignored, so that the interactions of pressure, flow, and volume with respiratory system mechanics can be expressed by the simplified equation of motion:


Pressure across the respiratory system in excess of the end-expiratory pressure = (flow × resistance) + (tidal volume/compliance)

In the mechanically ventilated patient, this relationship is expressed as:


Δ Pcir + Δ Pmus = ( V ˙ × R) + (VT / Crs)

where ΔPcir is the change in ventilator circuit pressure above baseline (peak pressure minus end-expiratory pressure: Ppeak − PEEP); ΔPmus is inspiratory muscle pressure generated by the patient (if present);
V ˙
is the flow into the patient’s lungs; R is the resistance of the external circuit, artificial airway, and natural airways combined; V t is the tidal volume; and C rs is the respiratory system compliance. If intrinsic or auto-PEEP (PEEPi) is present, muscle and circuit pressure must overcome this end-expiratory bias before flow and volume can be delivered, and thus PEEPi will add to the pressure requirement.

When flow is paused and pressure is held constant at end inspiration (
V ˙
= 0, Pmus = 0), the ventilator circuit pressure levels off at a pressure commonly referred to as the “plateau” pressure (Pplat). By use of this inspiratory hold, the components of Pcir required for flow and for respiratory system distention can be separated to describe R and Crs:


R = (Ppeak Pplat)/ V ˙

Crs = VT / (Pplat PEEP)

Importantly, airway pressure measurements made under no-flow conditions are alveolar pressures and are determined by the pressure needed to distend the lung and the chest wall at that volume (Pplat at end inspiration, PEEP at end expiration). However, it is only the pressure across the lungs (transpulmonary pressure [TPP]) that affects alveolar stretch, drives regional ventilation, and maintains end-expiratory lung volume. TPP can be directly measured if an estimate of average pleural pressure (approximated by esophageal pressure) is available. Thus TPP = alveolar pressure minus pleural pressure = Paw − Ppl.

In practice, because chest wall compliance (the major determinant of Ppl) is generally high, Ppl changes over the respiratory cycle are usually small, and measurements of airway Pplat and PEEP are reasonable approximations of TPP. In contrast, under conditions of very low chest wall compliance (e.g., obesity, anasarca, abdominal compartment syndrome, tight bandages), Ppl may be quite high, and thus the measured Pplat and PEEP will markedly overestimate the actual TPP. This influence needs to be considered when setting the upper limits of ventilator settings in such patients and may require actual measurements of Ppl (Pes) to be safe.

In situations where spontaneous efforts occur, no-flow conditions at end inspiration are difficult to obtain, and consequently Pplat may be impossible to measure in real time. One solution to approximate Pplat under these conditions would be to deliver a controlled (i.e., passive) breath with an inspiratory pause using a similar VT and PEEP. Alternatively, there are proprietary monitors that can analyze the expiratory flow pattern during a passive exhalation to calculate respiratory system compliance and resistance and then determine a Pplat.

Flow-targeted vs. Pressure-targeted breaths

As noted earlier, there are two basic approaches to delivering positive-pressure breaths: flow targeting and pressure targeting. With flow targeting, the clinician sets inspiratory flow so that circuit pressure is the dependent variable. With pressure targeting, the clinician sets an inspiratory pressure target (with either time or flow as the cycling criterion) so that flow and volume are dependent variables (i.e., varying with lung mechanics and patient effort). With a flow-targeted breath, changes in compliance, resistance, or patient effort will change Pcir (but not flow); in contrast, with a pressure-targeted breath, similar changes in compliance, resistance, or effort will cause a change of tidal volume (but not Pcir).

Each strategy has advantages and disadvantages. , For flow-targeted breaths, a minimal tidal volume can be guaranteed. For pressure-targeted breaths, the rapid initial flow and subsequent declining flow of pressure targeting may enhance gas mixing and patient synchrony. As noted earlier, on modern ventilators, a variety of feedback mechanisms can combine features of flow- and pressure-targeted breaths.

Intrinsic (auto) peep

PEEPi is the positive end-expiratory pressure that develops within alveoli because of insufficient expiration time, either because of inadequate time allowed between breaths by the ventilator or patient or because of increased expiratory resistance and collapse (flow limitation). , PEEPi depends on three factors: the minute ventilation, the expiratory time fraction, and the respiratory system’s expiratory time constant (the product of resistance and compliance). The potential for developing PEEPi rises with increases in the minute ventilation, decreases in the expiratory time fraction, or increases in the expiratory time constant (i.e., with higher R or C rs values).

The development of PEEPi will have different effects during pressure-targeted compared with flow-targeted ventilation. In flow-targeted ventilation, the constant delivered flow and volume (and thus ΔPcir) means that a rising PEEPi will increase both the Ppeak and the Pplat. In contrast, in pressure-targeted ventilation, the set Pcir limit coupled with a rising PEEPi level will decrease ΔPcir and, with it, the delivered tidal volume (and minute ventilation). Importantly, this accommodation may help limit the buildup of PEEPi.

In the patient without respiratory effort, PEEPi can be recognized in two ways. First, when an inadequate expiratory time produces PEEPi, analysis of the flow graphic will show that expiratory flow has not returned to zero before the next breath is given. Second, PEEPi in alveoli with patent airways can be quantified during an expiratory hold maneuver that permits equilibration of the end-expiratory pressure with Pcir. Note that total end-expiratory pressure is the sum of applied PEEP and PEEPi. Importantly, in patients with airway collapse, the expiratory hold maneuver will not detect the presence of PEEPi in units peripheral to the zone of closure.

In the patient with respiratory efforts, PEEPi can function as an inspiratory threshold load that produces delayed or even missed triggering of the desired breath. In those cases with tidal flow limitation, this load can be counterbalanced with the judicious application of applied PEEP, guided either clinically or with Pes measurements.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here