Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
A 39-year-old West African man underwent his first total hip arthroplasty 13 years before presentation. His hospitalization was complicated by prolonged postoperative drainage and persistent pain. He presented for treatment with an 8-year history of hip pain with ambulation and night sweats. On physical examination, the patient was afebrile, had a shortened extremity, walked with a profound limp, and had groin pain with any passive rotation of the left hip. Radiographs of the pelvis and hip revealed grossly loose cemented components ( Fig. 57.1 ). Serology demonstrated a normal white blood cell count but an elevated C-reactive protein level and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Aspirate cultures grew Staphylococcus aureus .
The patient was taken to surgery, where he underwent removal of his implants, followed by a radical soft tissue débridement and primary revision ( Fig. 57.2 ). The patient was treated with 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics. His wounds healed uneventfully, and he remains pain and limp free 5 years after revision.
Difficulty in establishing the appropriate position for placement of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty remains a vexing problem for even the most experienced hip surgeons. In a review of the experience of surgeons at one of the best-known teaching centers in the United States, only 50% of components were found to be properly placed. This chapter reviews the goals of acetabular placement and identifies intraoperative landmarks that can facilitate proper cup placement and orientation.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here