Brazil


Introduction

For the purposes of this chapter, vascular trauma is considered in the following anatomic distributions, each of which has differing diagnostic and management considerations: (1) cervical or carotid, (2) axillo-subclavian, (3) thoracic, (4) abdominal, and (5) extremity domains. Whereas the majority of vascular injury is managed via an open operative approach, the use of endovascular techniques is common in the metropolitan centers throughout the country. In these instances, stent grafts are often used to treat or “seal” vascular disruption in anatomically-challenging-to-reach vessels such as those in the thorax and thoracic outlet. In Brazil, challenges exist as to the “best training paradigms” to prepare trauma and vascular surgeons. However, a number of Brazilian medical centers and emergency medical systems, working alongside the efforts of professional societies such as the Brazilian Trauma Society (Sociedade Brasileira de Atendimento Integrado ao Politraumatizado, SBAIT), have emphasized the importance of trauma care in the country.

Epidemiology

Currently, urban violence, automobile crashes, and work-related accidents are responsible for most injuries in Brazil; a notable amount of those injuries are to major vascular structures. Concomitant with this experience, better lifesaving interventions and early resuscitation strategies have been established in many of the larger emergency rooms in Brazil. Additionally, a full understanding of the epidemiology of vascular trauma is hampered by the lack of standardized data retrieval and archiving mechanisms or databases.

According to Brazil’s Institute of Geography and Statistics, just over 210 million people live in Brazil. Increasing levels of violence and trauma within certain urban areas and regional locations in Brazil ( Table 37.1 ) were the norm until the most recent decade (2010–19). This trend has lessened recently as rates of violent crime, including homicide, have plateaued or declined in proportion to population growth. Currently, the overall homicide rate fluctuates at around 30 per 100,000 people.

Table 37.1
Ranking of States by Homicide Rates (per 100,000): Brazil 2000–16.
State 2000 2010 2016
Rate Position Rate Position Rate Position
Alagoas 25.6 11th 66.8 1st 55.9 3rd
Espirito Santo 46.8 3rd 50.1 2nd 32.5 16th
Pará 13.0 21st 45.9 3rd 50.9 4th
Pernambuco 54.0 1st 38.8 4th 47.6 6th
Amapá 32.5 9th 38.7 5th 49.6 5th
Paraíba 15.1 20th 38.6 6th 33.1 13th
Bahia 9.4 23rd 37.7 7th 46.5 7th
Rondônia 33.8 8th 34.6 8th 32.8 14th
Paraná 18.5 16th 34.4 9th 25.9 20th
Distrito Federal 37.5 7th 34.2 10th 22.1 22nd
Sergipe 23.3 12th 33.3 11th 64.0 1st
Mato Grosso 39.8 5th 31.7 12th 35.5 11th
Amazonas 19.8 14th 30.6 13th 29.4 18th
Ceará 16.5 17th 29.7 14th 39.8 9th
Goiás 20.2 13th 29.4 15th 43.8 8th
Roraima 39.5 6th 27.3 16th 19.8 25th
Rio de Janeiro 51.0 2nd 26.2 17th 37.6 10th
Mato Grosso do Sul 31.0 10th 25.8 18th 22.7 21st
Ri Grande do Norte 9.0 24th 22.9 19th 56.9 2nd
Tocantins 15.5 19th 22.5 20th 27.1 19th
Maranhão 6.1 27th 22.5 21st 33.7 12th
Acre 19.4 15th 19.6 22nd 29.8 17th
Rio Grande do Sul 16.3 18th 19.3 23rd 31.2 16th
Minas Gerais 11.5 22th 18.1 24th 20.7 24th
São Paulo 12.2 4th 13.9 25th 11.0 27th
Piauí 8.2 25th 13.7 26th 21.9 23rd
Santa Catarina 7.9 26th 12.9 27th 15.0 26th
Sistema de Informação sobre Mortalidade (SIM)/Secretária de Vigilância em Saúde (SVS)/Ministério da Saúde (MS); Araujo et al. (2006), Waiselfisz (2018), and Rossi et al. (2013).

The growth in homicide over these three and a half decades was largely due to death from firearms, whereas deaths from other means remained relatively constant. In the early 1980s, there was an “arms race” associated with an increase in social tension, caused by a massive growth in urban population (following population transition from rural areas), although the 2003 Disarmament Statute helped to limit firearm availability.

We have two types of health care systems in Brazil: public (Sistema Único de Saúde, SUS) and private (health and private plans). About 90% of the Brazilian population rely on the public health system that is maintained by the government. The health system is composed of facilities of varying complexity: basic health units and Emergency Care Units, secondary hospitals, tertiary hospitals and University Hospitals, where some tertiary and university hospitals correspond and function as trauma centers ( Fig. 37.1 ). Systematized, standardized clinical responses to polytraumatized patients began in the public (University) hospitals in the 1980s, with the introduction and expansion of Advanced Trauma Life Support in Brazil. In the last decade, some private hospitals have started to implement trauma care systems based around teams of trauma surgeons. Prehospital emergency care is performed by the Emergency Medical Care Service (Serviço de Atendimento Móvel de Urgência, SAMU), which is structured with basic care units composed of technicians and nurses and advanced units composed of doctors and nurses. An emergency medical response ( ambulância ) is obtained by telephoning 192. However, in some cities such as São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, and Curitiba, in addition to the SAMU response, prehospital trauma care is performed by physicians and nurses in conjunction with the rescue team of the Fire Department ( Corpo de Bombeiros ), activated by dialing 193.

Fig. 37.1, State Institute of Cardiology Aloísio de Castro (IECAC) in Rio de Janeiro, which is the primary medical center of the authors of this international perspective.

Urban Setting

The severity of vascular trauma varies, with injuries stemming from military- or combat-related munitions generally cause more extensive damage. Brazilian surgeons generally have little experience of managing severe injury caused by military munitions and explosive devices, although the sporadic use of military-type weapons in the urban setting is a regrettable but new reality that is not unique to Brazil. Although uncommon, vascular trauma resulting from weapons such as the AR-15, AK-47, M16, and even grenades occurs on a sporadic basis in some areas of Brazil ( Fig. 37.2 ), though the proportion of such injuries was seen to decline in a series from the Hospital Municipal Souza Aguiar (1995–2000). This observation was made during a time when the homicide rate was increasing, suggesting that high-velocity munitions remained a significant cause of trauma including lethal injury. In an encouraging and more-recent trend, the rate of violence and the number of high-velocity gunshot wounds currently tended to in the state has plummeted.

Fig. 37.2, Right external iliac (vein and artery) following a high-velocity gunshot wound (wounding by AK-47).

Rural Setting

Between 1% and 4% of injuries in the more remote areas of Brazil have a vascular component. Lower extremity traumas usually result from automobile crashes, whereas upper extremity injuries typically occur as result of factory or industrial accidents, agricultural mishaps, or domestic disputes (i.e., knife or glass lacerations). In the case of domestic disputes where knife and lacerations from glass are more common, upper extremity vascular injury is often confined to the radial artery (34% of cases) or the ulnar artery (36% of cases), either of which frequently can be managed by ligation instead of repair or reconstruction.

Automobile Crashes

Brazil has one of the highest numbers of trauma deaths due to traffic, exceeded only by India, China, the United States, and Russia. Between 1980 and 2011, almost one million people died due to traffic accidents in the country; between 2000 and 2010, the number of fatalities increased from 28,995 to 42,844, a 32.3% increase. Males accounted for 82.3% of this total and the highest rates were observed in the Midwest and South regions, with rates of 29.0 and 25.4 deaths per 100,000 inhabitants. Motorcyclists accounted for 76.9% of all deaths. The trend of motorcycle fatalities has also been found in Great Britain, with an annual increase of 4.6% in hospitalizations of road accidents. In Brazil, a 2008 study from Campinas, State of São Paulo, recorded a significant increase in fatal traffic accidents with motorcyclists accounting for 49.3% of deaths in traffic.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here