Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Partial nephrectomy is now considered the treatment of choice in all small renal tumors when technically feasible, because long-term oncologic outcomes are equivalent to radical nephrectomy while preserving renal function. Despite its oncologic safety, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is still considered a technically challenging procedure with a prolonged learning curve. Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has progressed as a technique that attempts to address the technical challenges of pure LPN, while offering the benefits of the minimally invasive approach. The three-dimensional (3D) view and wristed instruments enable significantly greater precision in resecting and suturing even complex tumors. In experienced hands, all but the most complex partial nephrectomies can be performed robotically without using open techniques.
Transperitoneal
Access, pneumoperitoneum, and port placement
Bowel mobilization and identification of ureter and gonadal vessels
Retroperitoneal
Access, balloon dilation of retroperitoneal space, and port placement
Incision of posterior layer of Gerota fascia and anterior mobilization of kidney
Identification of natural plane between perinephric and perihilar fat
Transperitoneal/retroperitoneal
Hilar dissection and isolation of renal artery(ies) with vessel loops
Removal of perinephric fat for 1 to 2 cm around tumor
Ultrasound confirmation of margins, shape and depth of tumor with scoring of margin on capsule
Preclamp “time out”
Clamping of renal artery (and vein when required); ischemic time started
Tumor resection
Hemostatic deep layer (followed by early unclamp) OR
Sliding clip renorrhaphy
Unclamp and oversew briskly bleeding vessels
Tumor placed in retrieval bag, drain placed, vessel loops and ports removed, and closure
The indications for RAPN have expanded over the years to include larger, more central, endophytic, and complex tumors. Accordingly, the indications for an open partial nephrectomy (OPN) apply to the robotic approach in experienced hands.
Indications can be classified as absolute, relative, or elective ( Table 19.1 ). Similarly, contraindications of this modality relate to both NSS and the minimally invasive components. To date, contraindications include radiologic T3 disease (i.e., invasion of other organs, or renal vein or inferior vena cava [IVC] thrombi in the presence of a normal contralateral kidney).
Absolute | Relative | Elective |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
Relative contraindications include a limited life expectancy and normal contralateral kidney and musculoskeletal deformity/contractures that prevent proper positioning. Other relative contraindications include severe cardiopulmonary disease, uncontrolled coagulopathy or hepatic disease, recent cerebrovascular or cardiovascular accident, and recent deep venous thrombus.
All patients should undergo a high-fidelity, narrow slice (2-mm) contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis for full staging, to exclude metastases or locally advanced disease.
The abdominal imaging should include reconstructed series to clearly define the tumor and renal vasculature, including the number and course of renal vessels and the tumor size, anatomy, position, and proximity to the collecting system. Detailed preoperative imaging is crucial and will help to determine if the tumor is amenable to a nephron-sparing and or/minimally invasive approach. It is now possible to create a 3D-printed or virtual image of the kidney including tumor anatomy, renal vasculature, and collecting system detail to plan robotic partial nephrectomy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be indicated if more detailed evaluation of venous involvement or a reduction in radiation is required or to avoid intravenous CT contrast medium. The role of renal tumor biopsy is still controversial. To date, current guidelines do not recommend routine tumor biopsy prior to curative surgery, , although this is becoming increasingly popular in circumstances where surgery is technically challenging and/or the patient has significant comorbidity. Anticoagulants should be discontinued before surgery when feasible.
A number of scoring systems to assess tumor complexity have been derived over recent years. These are based on factors including tumor size, endophytic or exophytic nature, involvement of the renal sinus or collecting system, and lateral or medial position. They allow surgeons to predict case difficulty and potential complications, but each has its limitations. The most popular and established are the RENAL and PADUA scores, which can be divided into low-, intermediate-, and high-complexity tumors.
See the box that follows for special equipment required and Fig. 19.1 for the operating room setup.
Robotic instruments
Fenestrated bipolar forceps
Monopolar scissors
ProGrasp forceps
Large needle holders ×2
Sutures
Deep layer: 1 or 2 18/20-cm 3-0 Monocryl suture with Hem-o-lok applied (or 3 × 15 cm 3/0 V-Loc with Hem-o-lok applied)
“Rescue sutures”: 4/0 polyglactin, 12 cm and 20 cm; 2/0 polyglactin 20 cm
Superficial renorrhaphy: 4 or 5 × 0 polyglactin 12 cm with Hem-o-lok applied
Drop-in or laparoscopic ultrasound probe
Robotic or laparoscopic bulldog clamps
AirSeal insufflator, particularly for retroperitoneal cases
Laparoscopic scissors, suction device, graspers, Hem-o-lok clip appliers
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here