Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Anatomy and Physiology Review
Indications
Technical considerations
From Cameron JL, Cameron AM: Current Surgical Therapy, 10th edition (Mosby 2011)
Historically, it is believed that British surgeon Claudius Amyand performed the first appendectomy during the repair of an inguinal hernia in 1735. However, inflammation of the appendix, including subsequent clinical sequelae of abscess and perforation, was first described in 1886 by Reginald Fitz.
Today, acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency of the abdomen, with more than 250,000 appendectomies performed annually in the United States. Although the diagnosis of appendicitis in a young man with acute abdominal pain localized to the right lower quadrant can be clear-cut, the clinical diagnosis may be less straightforward in women of childbearing age and in those at the extremes of age. In these patients, appendicitis can still be a challenging clinical entity to diagnose in a timely, accurate, and cost-effective manner.
Important considerations for surgeons and areas of debate include investigative radiology tests, such as computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography, and the use of laparoscopy as a diagnostic and therapeutic approach. As with other etiologies of the acute abdomen, early and accurate recognition of patients requiring urgent operative repair should be the overriding principle in the workup and treatment of patients with suspected appendicitis. Delayed diagnosis in the treatment of acute appendicitis is associated with higher rates of perforation with resultant increased morbidity and mortality.
Appendicitis is most frequently a disease of young and healthy individuals. The location, timing, and character of pain and associated symptoms are key factors to elicit in understanding the presentation of the disease. The classic symptoms are cramping and intermittent abdominal pain that usually begins in the periumbilical or epigastric region with subsequent migration to the right lower quadrant. As the course of appendicitis progresses, pain progresses from intermittent and cramping to constant and sharp in nature. If the appendix does not lie in an anterior or pelvic position, the diagnosis of appendicitis may be more difficult, leading to potential delay. In particular, a retrocecal appendix may not cause local signs of peritonitis.
The timing of nausea can also help to distinguish appendicitis, in which nausea follows the pain, from gastroenteritis, in which nausea typically precedes pain. In addition, most patients with gastroenteritis show evidence of anorexia. A low-grade fever is often present in uncomplicated appendicitis; high fevers are atypical for simple appendicitis and may be a sign of perforation, appendiceal abscess, or another disease process. Other clinical entities to be considered in the differential diagnosis include urinary tract infection, renal calculi, gastroenteritis, gynecologic diagnoses such as ruptured ovarian cyst or pelvic inflammatory disease, cholecystitis, diverticulitis, or small bowel obstruction.
The exact pathophysiology of acute appendicitis is not entirely clear, but the prevailing theory is that appendiceal luminal obstruction is the key mechanism. In children, lymphoid hyperplasia, often in the setting of infection or dehydration, is thought to be the most common etiology of obstruction.
In the adult population, fecaliths are the main causes of obstruction leading to acute appendicitis; other causes are scarring, which is rare, or tumor. Obstruction causes distension of the lumen of the appendix, yielding increased intramural and intraluminal pressures. This leads to lymphatic and vascular compromise with ischemia and then necrosis of the appendix with associated bacterial overgrowth. In the first 24 hours, the great majority of patients have inflammation and possibly necrosis, with perforation uncommon. Approximately two thirds of patients with perforated appendicitis have had symptoms for more than 48 hours. Early in appendicitis, the most common bacteria are aerobic organisms. In contrast, late appendicitis is associated with mixed infections. Common organisms associated with late appendicitis are Escherichia coli, Streptococcus spp., Proteus spp., Bacteroides fragilis, and Pseudomonas spp.
Initial features in the history are typically nonspecific, including indigestion, change in bowel habits, and malaise. Following this, patients most typically experience visceral-type pain in the periumbilical or sometimes epigastric region that is characteristically intermittent, poorly localized, and often not terribly severe. Nausea and vomiting, which can occur, usually follow the onset of pain. Similarly, fever may be present and usually occurs following the onset of pain. The presence of high fever (>39.4° C) may be a sign of a perforated appendix.
Early stages of appendicitis may not elicit tenderness on physical examination, but signs of localized inflammation or peritonitis occur as the disease progresses. Patients with an appendix in the anterior position typically have tenderness in the right lower quadrant near McBurney's point, two thirds of the distance from the umbilicus to the anterior superior iliac spine, often associated with peritoneal signs. In contrast, patients with a retrocecal appendix often have less impressive tenderness. Tenderness in patients with a pelvic appendix is often below McBurney's point. These patients often have symptoms of dysuria, urinary frequency, diarrhea, or tenesmus. Several classic maneuvers on physical examination that aid in the diagnosis of appendicitis are described ( Table 26-1-1 ).
Maneuver | Description |
---|---|
Rovsing sign | Palpation of the left lower quadrant that elicits pain in the right lower quadrant |
Obturator sign | Pain with internal rotation of the hip (pelvic appendix) |
Iliopsoas sign | Extension of the right hip that elicits pain in the right hip (retrocecal appendix) |
Laboratory tests are not a primary diagnostic modality in appendicitis, although they are helpful in ruling out other conditions and in assessing metabolic derangements from dehydration and other electrolyte abnormalities. The white blood cell count in patients with simple appendicitis is typically mildly elevated, but it may be normal in 30% of cases. More than 95% of patients, however, have a left shift in their differential.
Urinalysis is useful for ruling out a urinary tract infection or a stone in the urinary tract. Sterile pyuria or hematuria is observed in approximately a third of patients with appendicitis because of secondary inflammation of the bladder and ureter. In sexually active or menstruating women, a urinary β-human chorionic gonadotropin test is mandatory to rule out pregnancy, including possible ectopic pregnancy. Cervical cultures may also need to be obtained if pelvic inflammatory disease is suspected.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here