Perfusion assessment techniques following mastectomy and reconstruction


Access video content for this chapter online at Elsevier eBooks+

Introduction

The benefits of breast reconstruction after mastectomy can be profound, and often include improved quality of life, self-perceived body image, and sexuality. Coupled with recent data from the American Cancer Society demonstrating that breast cancer has now become the most commonly diagnosed cancer in the world, with 2.3 million people receiving new diagnoses in 2020 alone the potential to have a tremendous positive impact on this population becomes immediately apparent. Unfortunately, complications can arise during the reconstructive process as a result of tissue necrosis. The consequences of this can include psychological distress, delay in adjuvant therapies, the need for additional surgery, and increased costs to both the health system and the patients themselves, ultimately leading to suboptimal outcomes and reduced patient satisfaction.

In the past, detecting ischemic tissue has been left to the clinician’s subjective evaluation; however, the use of preoperative angiography and intra-operative perfusion imaging can offer objective evaluations and optimized surgical strategies that can dramatically reduce the rates of necrosis in this setting. The following sections will explore these techniques as they pertain to implant-based reconstruction and reconstruction with autologous tissue following mastectomy.

Perfusion imaging in implant-based breast reconstruction

History

It is fascinating to examine the evolution of implant-based reconstruction when considering the merits of perfusion imaging. Implant-based reconstructions were originally performed in one stage, with the implant sitting in the subcutaneous pocket, above the pectoralis muscle. These procedures were fraught with high capsular contracture and explantation rates. Later, upon introduction of the tissue expander by Radovan, two-stage, submuscular reconstructions became the new standard of care, and complication rates significantly declined.

It is no surprise that incorporating well-vascularized, muscular tissue contributed to increased success with implant-based reconstructions. However, with the introduction of acellular dermal matrices in the early 2000s as well as improved mastectomy techniques and autologous fat grafting, complete submuscular dissection has become less necessary, and many surgeons have now returned to performing their reconstructions within the prepectoral space. Though this technique improves postoperative discomfort and eliminates post-reconstruction animation deformity, it does create an increased need for well-perfused skin and subcutaneous tissues around the implant.

Detecting ischemic tissue after mastectomy has always been a challenging task, relying primarily on subjective observations of skin color, capillary refill, and mastectomy flap thickness. Unfortunately, the predictive ability of this approach is suboptimal, and highly variable between clinicians, as demonstrated by that fact that skin and nipple necrosis can affect up to 37% of nipple-sparing mastectomy operations. However, the intra-operative use of fluorescence angiography has recently emerged as an objective tool in the evaluation of tissue perfusion with consistent correlation to clinical outcomes.

The most common contrast agent for this application is indocyanine green (ICG), an intravenous dye that binds to plasma proteins and fluoresces in the near infrared spectrum upon excitation by a laser light source. When coupled with a camera capable of detecting these wavelengths, such as the SPY-PHI (Stryker) or FLUOBEAM (FLUOPTICS) systems, this allows for the real-time visualization of tissue perfusion, with well-perfused areas of the image appearing bright, and poorly perfused areas appearing dark ( Fig. 18.1 ). Furthermore, the dye has a low potential for causing adverse reactions, and a short plasma half-life of just 2–3 min, allowing for repeated use within a relatively short timeframe.

Figure 18.1, A 72-year-old female who underwent a left Wise-pattern mastectomy with nipple preservation by means of an inframammary fold pedicle. A prepectoral tissue expander was placed, and filled to approximately one-third capacity. The incisions were closed without tension, and indocyanine green perfusion imaging was performed, demonstrating the pattern seen here. The nipple–areolar complex appears to have adequate blood supply; however, the adipocutaneous tissue is suboptimally perfused inferiorly, near the T-junction. This patient was sent home with instructions to apply nitropaste twice a day and to refrain from wearing a bra or other compressive garments.

This technology has gained popularity among breast reconstruction surgeons primarily for its ability to assess skin and nipple viability following mastectomy. In a case series of 24 breasts, Komorowska-Timek and Gurtner showed that incorporating SPY values into surgical decision-making was associated with a decrease in the rate of mastectomy skin necrosis, from 15% to 4%. Similarly, in a larger study of 184 patients, Duggal et al . observed a lower incidence of skin necrosis (13%) in those for whom ICG angiography was utilized, versus those without use of the technology (24%) ( Fig. 18.2 ).

Figure 18.2, Same patient as in Fig. 18.1 at her 2-week follow-up appointment. Unfortunately, necrosis still resulted. Note that eschar formation occurred in a pattern remarkably similar to the areas of poor perfusion noted on ICG imaging.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here