Plain Film, Barium, and Virtual Radiography


  • 1.

    When requesting an imaging examination, what information should a clinician provide for a radiologist?

    By communicating the following information, a clinician helps ensure that an imaging examination will be conducted and interpreted optimally for each patient.

    • Provide pertinent or significant medical history and clinical information related to the examination: (a) key findings from history, physical examination, and laboratory tests that suggest the diagnoses in question; and (b) any surgical alteration of the anatomy to be examined with imaging.

    • Explain the purpose of the examination, including possible diagnoses, potential complications from a recently performed procedure or an established diagnosis or finding to follow for change. A specific explanation of how the imaging findings may alter management decisions (i.e., follow-up vs. surgery) or confirm a notorious diagnostic dilemma is useful as the radiologist may not be aware of specific treatment algorithms.

    • Never hesitate to visit with the radiologist and discuss the case. Effective dialogue and communication between clinician and radiologist leads to more accurate and diagnostic radiologic imaging.

Abdominal Radiography

  • 2.

    What is the optimum radiographic evaluation for pneumoperitoneum?

    • Ideally, a frontal radiograph of the lower chest and upper abdomen with the patient in the upright position should be obtained to identify free air under the diaphragm.

    • If there is an equivocal finding for pneumoperitoneum, then lateral decubitus views can be performed, as this is the most sensitive plain radiographic technique to detect intraabdominal free air.

    • Supine frontal abdominal radiographs are insensitive for the detection of pneumoperitoneum, but these examinations are performed frequently so awareness of the diverse imaging manifestations of free air is important.

    The radiologic diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum is one of the most important findings to make in all of radiology as it may be subtle and, if missed, could result in significant morbidity and mortality. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) is the most sensitive test to detect pneumoperitoneum and should be considered in cases in which clinical suspicion is high and plain radiographs are indeterminate or negative.

  • 3.

    Name and describe several of the supine radiographic signs of pneumoperitoneum.

    • Doges cap sign

    • Rigler’s sign

    • Continuous diaphragm sign

    • Football sign

    • Cupola sign

    • Triangle sign

  • 4.

    What is the key radiographic finding of bowel obstruction?

    The hallmark of obstruction, whether mechanical or functional, is dilatation of bowel. The rule of “3s” defines abnormal dilation of the intestine:

    • Small bowel 3 cm or larger

    • Transverse colon 6 cm or larger

    • Cecum 9 cm or larger

    Differentiating bowel obstruction from paralytic ileus may be challenging, but several signs are suggestive: prominent abdominal distention, small bowel dilatation, and absence of large bowel dilatation all favor the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction ( Figure 66-1 ). A “stepladder” configuration of dilated small bowel loops extending from the left upper to the right lower quadrants is highly suggestive. Although previously considered a reliable sign, air fluid levels in the same loop of small bowel at differing heights are not as dependable in diagnosing mechanical small bowel obstruction as initially thought.

    Figure 66-1, Supine abdomen radiograph. Multiple dilated loops of small bowel are present throughout the abdomen without significant colonic distention. Small bowel mechanical obstruction was found at surgery secondary to ventral abdominal hernia.

  • 5.

    Where in the algorithmic approach for the work-up of small bowel obstruction does abdominal radiography lie?

    Abdominal radiography is the preferred initial radiologic examination for patients with suspected small bowel obstruction, primarily because of its widespread availability and low cost. However, it is only diagnostic in 50% to 60% of cases ( Figure 66-2 ) so if clinical suspicion for obstruction is high, abdominal CT should be considered the most definitive test.

    Figure 66-2, Portable supine abdomen radiograph. Because dilatation of small bowel does not reach the right lower quadrant, mechanical obstruction of small bowel substantially upstream of the terminal ileum is probable. This obstruction, however, was functional, a result of acute pancreatitis.

  • 6.

    What are the hallmark features of gallstone ileus?

    Although representing an infrequent cause of small bowel obstruction, gallstone ileus has significant associated mortality if the diagnosis is delayed. The characteristic imaging findings are referred to as Rigler’s triad: pneumobilia; small bowel obstruction; and an ectopic, intraabdominal, radiodense gallstone (most often lodged at the ileocecal valve).

  • 7.

    Is ascites detectable on abdominal radiography?

    Abdominal radiographs are insensitive for identification of ascites and should never be used as a diagnostic test for that indication. However, there are several findings that suggest the presence of ascites on supine radiography, such as centrally located, air-filled loops of bowel and lack of visualization of the abdominal contents, to include the liver, spleen, psoas, and urinary bladder outlines. There may also be a hazy density overlying the majority of the abdomen. For cases of suspected ascites, ultrasound is the most appropriate modality as it is not only sensitive for the detection of ascites but also can assist with guiding the site chosen for paracentesis.

  • 8.

    What distinguishes portal venous gas from “septic” pneumobilia?

    Although in both conditions gas is in a branching, tapering pattern, the location within the liver of the gas is usually distinctive. Because portal venous blood normally flows toward the periphery, gas in portal veins tends to accumulate in the periphery of the liver. Because bile normally flows toward the hilum, biliary gas tends to accumulate near the hilum. These rules occasionally fail, however, because at the instant the radiograph is exposed the location of the constantly moving gas may transiently be atypical ( Figure 66-3 ). Diligent inspection of the radiograph for secondary signs such as pneumatosis intestinalis is helpful because, if present, it is indicative of bowel ischemia and indicates the intrahepatic gas is within the portal system.

    Figure 66-3, A branching and tapering gas pattern in the liver, if predominantly near the hilum (arrowheads), usually is biliary (A) but occasionally is in portal veins. B , Bubbly and linear pneumatosis (arrows) below the liver is consistent with bowel ischemia.

Important Pearl

Pneumobilia is most commonly seen due to ampullary sphicterotomy or choledocoenterotomy. This is a benign finding. Pneumobilia caused by bacterial gas production within the biliary tree is uncommon and the patient is usually septic. It is imperative that the radiologist be provided with clinical information to make this distinction.

  • 9.

    Which types of foreign bodies are encountered on abdominal radiographs?

    A wide range of foreign bodies are radiopaque and therefore visible at abdominal radiography ( Figure 66-4 ). They can be categorized as intraluminal or extraluminal for logistical purposes ( Table 66-1 ).

    Figure 66-4, Examples of various abdominal foreign bodies. A, Round metallic structure (arrow) overlies the left hemiabdomen in a 3-year-old girl; in cases of suspected but not witnessed foreign body ingestion, a lateral view can be helpful to confirm the intraabdominal location. This was confirmed to be button battery ingestion. B , Three curvilinear radiodense structures (arrows) project over the abdomen on this frontal supine view of a 24-year-old woman. Patient initially denied ingestion of foreign bodies but subsequently admitted to swallowing numerous staples. C, Cylindrical radiopaque structure overlying the midline pelvis represents a vibrator inserted in the rectum. Rectal foreign bodies are typically oriented in the craniocaudal direction. D, Inadvertent laparotomy sponge (arrow) is present within the abdominal cavity following surgery. This portable supine radiograph was obtained after recognition of an incorrect sponge count. The laparotomy sponge itself is radiolucent; however, they are detectable because of an incorporated radiopaque marker. Bilateral ureteral stents are also present (arrowheads).

    Table 66-1
    Common Causes of Radiopaque Foreign Bodies
    Intraluminal Extraluminal
    Bezoars Surgical clips (either in expected or migrated position)
    Markers for measurement of colonic transit (Sitz-marks) Migrated intrauterine devices
    Packages of illegal narcotics (“body packing”) Retained surgical materials (e.g., inadvertent clamp or surgical sponge; latter typically occurs in setting of incorrect sponge count)
    Dislodged tubes from prior procedures (e.g., feeding tubes and biliary stents) Intentionally placed surgical materials (e.g., surgical sponge used to control bleeding in traumatic liver laceration—clinical history helps to distinguish from the inadvertent variety)
    Ingested or inserted items (coins, batteries, and endoscopic capsules used for work-up of small bowel disease)

  • 10.

    What are causes of intraabdominal calcification?

    • Renal calculi (80% radio dense) and bladder calculi

    • Cholelithiasis (10%-15% radio dense) and “milk of calcium”

    • Porcelain gallbladder (20% risk for cancer)

    • Pancreas (usually chronic pancreatitis, includes cancer, vessels and cysts)

    • Calcified lymph nodes (chronic inflammation, includes spleen)

    • Vascular calcifications (aortic aneurysm or dissection)

    • Appendicoliths (plus acute right lower quadrant pain very predictive of appendicitis)

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here