Transfusion management of the pregnant woman and fetus requires special consideration. This chapter will address the following related issues: (1) routine prenatal and neonatal transfusion testing in relationship to maternal red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization, (2) hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN), and (3) transfusion management of HDFN, including maternal, fetal, and neonatal testing and treatment. HDFN occurs when maternal plasma contains an RBC alloantibody against an antigen carried on the fetal RBCs, resulting in hemolytic anemia.

The diagnosis and management of HDFN includes maternal, fetal, and neonatal testing and treatment. HDFN occurs when maternal plasma contains an RBC alloantibody against an antigen carried on the fetal RBCs, resulting in hemolytic anemia. The administration of Rh immune globulin (RhIg) perinatally has dramatically decreased the incidence of HDFN due to anti-D. The primary goals of prenatal testing are to determine which women would benefit from RhIg prophylaxis and which women/fetuses require further monitoring/treatment for HDFN.

Other obstetrical issues associated with transfusion medicine that may occur are discussed in different chapters of this book. These include obstetrical complications resulting in massive transfusion, such as placenta previa, uterine atony or rupture, and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (see Chapter 117 ). These obstetrical complications can lead to hysterectomy and loss of future reproductive capacity, and/or loss of the mother, child, or both. In addition, thrombocytopenia can occur in pregnancy and may be secondary to immune thrombocytopenia (ITP); thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura ; hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets (HELLP syndrome); and acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Transfusion management during pregnancy in patients with hemoglobinopathies, such as transfusion management of sickle cell disease and thalassemia (see Chapter 52 ). Lastly, neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia occurs as a result of maternal platelet alloantibodies directed against an antigen on fetal platelets resulting in thrombocytopenia, which can result in intracranial hemorrhage (see Chapter 94 ).

Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn

HDFN occurs when maternal plasma contains an alloantibody against an antigen carried on the fetal RBCs. The maternal IgG crosses the placenta and coats the fetal RBCs. The sensitized RBCs are removed from circulation by splenic macrophages, which leads to fetal anemia. In an effort to compensate for the RBC loss, bone marrow erythropoiesis is stimulated, and release of immature RBCs results in erythroblastosis fetalis. When the bone marrow fails to produce enough RBCs, then extramedullary erythropoiesis occurs in the spleen and liver. The enlarged spleen and liver (hepatosplenomegaly) results in hepatocellular damage associated with insufficient production of plasma proteins, leading to high-output cardiac failure with generalized edema, effusions, and ascites (hydrops fetalis). Hydrops fetalis may develop as early as 17 weeks of gestational age and was previously uniformly fatal. With current management strategies, including intrauterine transfusions (IUTs) and other therapeutic modalities, there is a ∼75% survival rate. Severe nonhydropic HDFN, requiring IUT, has a ∼90% survival rate. If severe anemia and/or hydrops fetalis develop before the ability to perform IUT (before 18 weeks of gestational age), treatment may include a combination of maternal plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) until IUT is possible.

In utero, the bilirubin released from hemolyzed RBCs is cleared by the placenta. After birth, the neonatal liver has limited capacity to conjugate the bilirubin. When increased levels of unconjugated bilirubin exceed the albumin-binding capacity, the unbound, unconjugated bilirubin crosses the blood–brain barrier and results in neuronal cell death in the basal ganglia and brain stem (known as kernicterus). Treating the neonatal hyperbilirubinemia by phototherapy and RBC exchange, if needed, prevents kernicterus. Some recommend the use of IVIG if the bilirubin level is not sufficiently lowered by phototherapy in an attempt to avoid exchange transfusion. Guidelines for detection, management, and use of phototherapy, and RBC exchange transfusion for hyperbilirubinemia are published by the American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Hyperbilirubinemia.

Antibody titer and specificity (anti-D, anti-c, and anti-K have the highest likelihood of severe HDFN), immunoglobulin class, and number of antigenic sites on the RBC influence disease severity. In general, the severity of HDFN increases with subsequent pregnancies. Anti-A and/or anti-B are the most common antibodies associated with HDFN, but the disease is usually mild.

Immune sensitization to RBC antigens occurs after fetomaternal hemorrhage (FMH) during pregnancy or delivery, or through previous RBC transfusion. As little as 0.1 mL of D-positive RBCs may result in D sensitization. The incidence of maternal RhD antigen sensitization decreases with ABO-incompatibility between the fetus and mother. Because of the use of RhIg prophylaxis, the incidence of anti-D formation has decreased from 14% to 0.1% of RhD-negative mothers.

Prenatal and Neonatal Transfusion Testing

Testing for RhD Type

At the first prenatal visit, usually at 12 weeks of gestational age, the maternal ABO/RhD type and antibody screen are performed. A challenging area in the laboratory has been properly identifying patients who have a variant D phenotype. These individuals have altered or weakened expression of their D antigen, which often requires a sensitive antiglobulin test or other method to detect, referred to as a serologic weak D phenotype. Depending on the methodology and/or reagents, these patients may test as D-negative, weak D, or D-positive. This leads to confusion about whether these patients should be considered as candidates for RhIg prophylaxis and transfused D-negative blood products.

The three broad categories of D variants include weak D, partial D, and the rare DEL phenotypes, which are most common among those of Asian ancestry and are not detected by conventional serologic typing methods. In particular, individuals with weak D and partial D are often determined to have a serologic weak D phenotype when tested in the transfusion service. Weak D is a quantitative polymorphism resulting in reduced expression of D antigen; whereas, people with partial D can make alloanti-D because of a qualitative polymorphism resulting in an altered D antigen epitope. The majority of individuals with serologic weak D phenotype of European ancestry are weak D types 1, 2, or 3, and will not form anti-D when exposed to D-positive cells, but the percentage varies depending on ethnic background. The remainder, including an estimated 10% of individuals serotyped as weak D, who are partial D variants, can potentially form anti-D and should be managed as if they were D-negative. In 2015, recommendation for RHD genotyping for pregnant women and females of childbearing potential with a serologic weak D phenotype, was endorsed by AABB, America’s Blood Centers, the American Red Cross, the Armed Forces Blood Program, the College of American Pathologists, and the College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Specifically, an algorithm was published for resolving serologic weak D phenotype test results by genotyping to determine candidacy for RhIg and RhD type for transfusions (see Fig. 50.1 ).

Figure 50.1, Algorithm for Managing a Serologic Weak D Phenotype. The algorithm illustrates how RHD genotyping can determine which individuals with a serologic weak D phenotype can be managed safely as Rh-positive.

RhIg Prophylaxis

If a pregnant woman is D-negative and is not sensitized to the D antigen, or has a serologic weak D phenotype that should be managed as D-negative, then she should receive RhIg perinatally.

Antepartum and postpartum dosing is usually with 300 μg of RhIg (which neutralizes 30 mL of whole blood or 15 mL of D-positive RBCs), although some institutions prefer to give 50 μg (which neutralizes 5 mL of whole blood or 2.5 mL of D-positive RBCs) at ≤12 weeks of gestational age, particularly with abdominal trauma or threatened miscarriage, but there is a risk of inadvertent misadministration of the lower dose (see Chapter 40 ). The half-life of passive anti-D is 3–4 weeks and is detectable in over half of women who deliver less than 76 days after administration of RhIg.

RhIg is administered at:

  • 28 weeks of gestational age (dose 300 μg);

  • at delivery, if the neonate is D-positive, weak D-positive, or D-untested (minimum dose of 300 μg, further dosing determined by FMH testing); and

  • after perinatal events associated with FMH, such as abortion, ectopic pregnancy, amniocentesis, chorionic villus sampling, external cephalic version, abdominal trauma, and antepartum hemorrhage (minimum dose of 300 μg, further dosing determined by FMH testing, if >20 weeks of gestational age).

After a perinatal event or delivery beyond 20 weeks of gestational age, when the fetal blood volume exceeds 30 mL, quantification of FMH is recommended. In all situations, RhIg should be administered within 72 hours of the event. If a dose is not administered during that time frame, then it should be administered as soon as possible, even up to 28 days after the event. While passive anti-D may be detectable up to 6 months after administration, very few women (less than 3%) will have demonstrable anti-D after 76–95 days of RhIg administration. Therefore, any woman with detectable anti-D beyond this timeframe may not have had adequate antepartum protection and should be considered suspicious for the development of immune anti-D.

Fetomaternal Hemorrhage Testing

The goal of FMH testing is to determine an adequate dose of RhIg to neutralize fetal D-positive cells in the maternal circulation; thus, preventing maternal alloimmunization to RhD antigen. A sample for FMH testing should preferably be obtained approximately 1 hour after delivery on all D-negative women who deliver a D-positive infant (or 1 hour after an event as described above). FMH testing can be performed by a screening test, which is typically the rosette test. If positive, quantification of FMH is usually performed by an acid elution test (Kleihauer–Betke test) or by flow cytometry. Other FMH detection methodologies are in use, such as gel agglutination and enzyme-linked antiglobulin test.

Rosette Test (Fetal RBC Screen [Qualitative])

The rosette test demonstrates the number of D-positive cells in a D-negative suspension using an anti-D reagent. The anti-D binds to D-positive fetal RBCs, and when indicator D-positive RBCs are added rosettes are formed. This method has an FMH detection limit of about 10 mL. For the test to be valid, fetal cells must be D-positive (not weak D or D unknown—result is false negative) and the maternal cells must be D-negative—result is false positive; in those situations, a test that detects fetal hemoglobin should be used, such as the Kleihauer–Betke or flow cytometry test.

Kleihauer–Betke Test (Fetal RBC Count [Quantitative])

The Kleihauer–Betke test has several limitations, including low sensitivity, poor reproducibility, and tendency to overestimate the FMH volume, yet it is the most commonly used test to quantify FMH in the United States. The Kleihauer–Betke test is performed on a maternal blood smear treated with acid and then stained, so the fetal RBCs remain red, and the maternal RBCs appear as ghosts. 2000 cells are counted, and the percentage of fetal RBCs is determined.

Flow Cytometry (Fetal RBC Count [Quantitative])

Flow cytometry techniques quantitate the amount of hemoglobin F or D-positive RBCs and are simpler, more precise, reliable, and thus may result in lower RhIg administration than the Kleihauer–Betke test. Flow cytometry techniques are not routinely available throughout the United States.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here