Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
You're a song, a wished-for song. Go through the ear to the center where sky is, where wind, where silent knowing. Put seeds and cover them blades will sprout where you do your work. —Rumi
This chapter delves into interdisciplinary education and training in pediatric palliative care, both its basis in the underlying principles of adult education and its creative initiatives specific to the field. The chapter explores:
Principles of adult education,
Principles of interdisciplinary education as a framework for pediatric palliative care,
The unique pedagogy of pediatric palliative care, including suggestions for creative initiatives in training.
In order to optimally tailor the teaching approach, the following factors must be considered: the background, perspective, and experience of the intended audience; the skills they bring; and the most likely and/or most significant gaps in their knowledge.
Learners seeking increased competency in pediatric palliative care are generally those with a large amount of experience, so the assumptions of andragogy (adult learning) are an integral part of curriculum development. These assumptions as defined by Malcolm Knowles include:
Adults have a self -concept of being responsible for their learning,
Adults become ready to learn what they need to know.
These attributes lead to highly pragmatic learners who are likely to be motivated when the material is relevant. They are able to be critical about the value of what they learn. When adult learners feel respected by the teachers, they can actively test what they learn in the real world, integrating new learning into their professional roles ( Box 11-1 ).
|
The World Health Organization (WHO) says “Interaction is the important goal, to collaborate in providing preventive, curative, rehabilitative, and other health-related services” regarding interdisciplinary education. Other goals include “enhancing” or “improving” both collaboration and quality of care ( Table 11-1 ).
Institute of Medicine—IOM | Interprofessional Education Consortium—IPEC |
---|---|
Provide patient-centered care | Family-centered practice |
Work in interdisciplinary teams Employ evidence-based practice Apply quality improvement Use informatics | Integrated services through collaboration and/or group process |
Assessment and outcome | |
Social policy issues | |
Communication | |
Leadership |
There is a mantra in palliative care circles that interdisciplinary teamwork and learning are beneficial. However, the supporting research and literature is limited, and where available, remains controversial. A review of the general and academic literature on interdisciplinary education identifies some of the salient qualities, benefits, and challenges ( Table 11-2 ).
Benefits | Challenges and/or disadvantages |
---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here