Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Patients with disordered hemostasis present one of the greatest challenges to blood banks and transfusion practitioners. Early intervention with appropriate directed therapy can provide adequate hemostasis in a variety of bleeding conditions; however, the rapidly hemorrhaging patient can deplete the transfusion service's inventory and pose a major challenge to the hospital and the community. With the availability of alternatives to blood such as recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa), antifibrinolytic agents, and vasopressin analogues, the issues of efficacy, adverse effects, monitoring, cost, and optimal integration of pharmacologic treatments with blood transfusion therapies have achieved a highly prominent and visible role in patient care. This chapter describes various blood-derived biologicals, non–blood-derived pharmaceuticals, and strategies to prevent hemorrhage and manage hemostatic disorders. These biologicals, pharmacologic agents, and other therapies and their use are discussed in this chapter and, where indicated, elsewhere in the text ( Box 28.1 ).
Traditional blood components
Red blood cells (RBCs)
Platelets
Fresh frozen plasma (FFP)
Cryoprecipitate
Plasma fractions
Recombinant coagulation factors (also see Chapter 3 )
Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa)
Pharmaceutical agents
Desmopressin (1-desamino-8- d -arginine vasopressin [DDAVP])
Lysine analogue antifibrinolytics
Aprotinin
Vitamin K
Estrogens
Protamine
Antiplatelet agents (aspirin [ASA] and clopidogrel) (see Chapter 21 )
Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) inhibitors (abciximab, tirofiban, and eptifibatide) (see Chapter 21 )
Warfarin (see Chapter 37 )
Unfractionated heparin (UFH) (see Chapter 27 )
Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (see Chapter 27 )
Fondaparinux (see Chapter 27 )
Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) (lepirudin, argatroban, and bivalirudin) (see Chapter 37 )
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (see Chapter 37 )
The evolution of the treatment of bleeding disorders with transfusions and pharmacologic therapy both parallels and differs from developments in traditional pharmacology. Early pharmaceutical preparations, such as digitalis, insulin, and vitamin B 12 , were crude extracts that have been replaced by purer preparations or even by recombinant products. Similarly, the early use of whole blood transfusion to treat patients with conditions such as hemophilia and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) has been supplanted by the use of blood component therapy, specific plasma protein concentrates, recombinant clotting factors, and U.S. pharmacopeia (USP)—standardized antidotes such as vitamin K to treat warfarin toxicity. Just as progress in pharmacology has depended on an improved understanding of disease pathophysiology, so has progress in transfusion medicine depended on a detailed understanding of the mechanisms involved in hemostasis and the development of diagnostic laboratory assays to monitor management. To some extent, rational transfusion management suffers from a need for clinical trials as well as from a lack of widely accessible assays to confidently and reproducibly measure the details of hemostasis, such as clinically relevant platelet function, the separate components of the fibrinolytic system, and the impact of hemostatic therapies at the site of cellular injury, especially in flowing blood.
Several sentinel discoveries have played critical roles in blood transfusion and pharmacologic therapies for bleeding patients. Landsteiner's discovery of blood groups in 1901 allowed pretransfusion testing to be performed to avert reactions caused by ABO-incompatible whole blood transfusion. Blood group compatibility remains of critical importance in red blood cell (RBC) transfusion therapy and may exert significant impact when plasma, apheresis platelets, or manufactured plasma fractions that contain RBC antibodies are used. With the development of citrate anticoagulant for blood storage, whole blood transfusion was successfully adapted during the First World War, ultimately leading to the birth of the modern blood bank. The advent of the sterile plastic interconnected bag system has made component therapy possible. More recently, strategies to reduce or inactivate pathogens in blood components and recombinant technology have given birth to safer and more specific transfusion therapies.
Costs of the new safer blood components and fractions have risen dramatically. Likewise, the costs of pharmaceuticals and recombinant biologicals are substantial. At the same time, the emergence of strategies for using pharmacologic agents to control bleeding associated with surgery may reduce the need for reoperation, improve overall mortality, reduce requirements for transfusion, and decrease exposure to allogeneic donors. Further, such agents may reduce the cost of therapy and may provide superior hemostasis compared with traditional blood components. The promise of agents such as rFVIIa, fibrinogen concentrate, and plasma-derived antithrombin III (ATIII) is tempered by issues of cost, monitoring, and safety. Moreover, these agents are just now receiving the degree of scrutiny that revealed lower than expected efficacy or higher than expected toxicity during more extensive follow-up with previous agents such as desmopressin (1-desamino-8- d -arginine vasopressin, DDAVP) or aprotinin. Despite these costs and uncertainties, the treating physician now has a variety of choices and considerations when faced with a hemorrhaging patient or one who is being prepared for procedures that are likely to challenge the hemostatic system.
The transfusion service can now provide a wide range of blood components and plasma fractions, each with characteristic hemostatic properties, as well as expert consultation regarding efficacy and safety. Available products include those obtained by traditional single donation and centrifugal separation of whole blood or by donor apheresis, as well as those obtained from fractions of pooled products processed from collections from tens of thousands of donors, such as coagulation factor concentrates and prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs). Recombinant blood proteins such as rFVIIa, factor VIII, factor IX, factor XIII, although not blood derived, may be considered interchangeable with their plasma-derived relatives or may be considered as a pharmacologic agent. The hemostatic properties and toxicities of these products are intimately related to the preparation processes. Increasingly, recombinant proteins have replaced virus-inactivated pooled plasma products for management of hemophilia A and B, and intermediate-purity factor VIII preparations have replaced cryoprecipitate in the treatment of von Willebrand disease (VWD). Cryoprecipitate remains the mainstay of treatment for fibrinogen and factor XIII deficiencies, although a commercial pasteurized concentrate of the former has been licensed as an orphan drug for treatment of congenital afibrinogenemia and recombinant factor XIII concentrate has been approved for a parallel indication. Use of these products to treat hemophilia and other congenital coagulopathies is discussed elsewhere ( Chapter 3, Chapter 4, Chapter 5, Chapter 6 ). Both concentrates are anticipated to be used off-label for indications such as trauma. Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) may be used to provide replacement for deficiencies of other coagulation factors (factors XI, X, V, and II). Platelet concentrates and FFP are the blood components most frequently used for hemostasis; however, RBCs and granulocytes, as well as other preparations, may have important hemostatic effects related to their plasma content or other properties.
RBCs, commonly referred to as packed cells , may be prepared by whole blood donation or through apheresis procedures. Although not typically considered a hemostatic component, RBCs may contribute to normal clot formation, or perhaps more accurately, a decrease in RBCs may contribute to a bleeding tendency. Template bleeding time is prolonged as hematocrit falls, and RBC transfusions alone have been shown to improve hemostasis in patients with uremia and chronic anemia. The mechanism for this effect is not known but is likely multifactorial and may involve RBC mechanical properties affecting viscosity and blood flow, hemostatic activation by RBC microparticles, ability of RBCs to aggregate and adhere to each other and to vascular endothelium, molecular signaling via RBC surface proteins, including blood group antigens, participation in nitric oxide metabolism, and movement of platelets toward the vessel wall with increasing intravascular RBC mass.
A meta-analysis of studies comparing liberal with restrictive transfusion practices reported no benefit for a higher hemoglobin threshold to improve hemostasis. However, the adverse association of hematocrit with bleeding is greatest at hemoglobin concentrations of less than 6 g/dL, a level hardly ever accepted in these trials. RBC transfusions may produce rapid hemostatic effects while restoring oxygen-carrying capacity; however, the liberal transfusion thresholds may be too low to demonstrate these effects. Administration of the erythroid lineage cytokine erythropoietin (EPO) has become standard therapy for treating anemia and raising hemoglobin concentration in patients with renal disease and chronic conditions. Although EPO administration may have some effects on platelet reactivity, the improvement in baseline hematocrit that occurs during EPO administration may account for the reduced incidence of bleeding in patients with uremia. RBC transfusions provided to maintain hemoglobin concentrations higher than 9 g/dL produce no significant increment in hemostasis. At the other end of the spectrum, both hemorrhage and thromboembolic disease have been reported with elevated red cell mass. Little is currently understood as to the exact mechanism, risk factors, and best approach to prevent them. For example, about 8% of patients with polycythemia vera present with, and a similar percentage eventually develop, bleeding episodes. Whereas hemostatic defects may result from clones of abnormal platelets and leukocytes, elevated blood viscosity and sluggish blood flow likely play a role as well, since hemostatic defects are not uncommon in other syndromes of erythrocytosis such as high-altitude polycythemia and cyanotic heart disease; phlebotomy applied judiciously is standard management.
Exclusive reliance on RBC replacement in the rapidly bleeding patient may induce a hemostatic defect. Stored RBCs contain few functional platelets and as little as 5% to 10% plasma, depending on the preservative solution and method of collection used. Goal-directed therapy using serial testing for platelet count and screening coagulation assays such as prothrombin time (PT), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), and in some centers viscoelastometry are used to guide component replacement during “massive transfusion,” conventionally defined as transfusion that exceeds one blood volume within 24 hours. However, the approach to massive transfusion/fluid resuscitation has been changing, particularly in the setting of trauma where an unpredictable and highly lethal hemostatic disorder termed “trauma-associated coagulopathy” (TAC) may develop. Early balanced transfusion therapy is currently recommended for the massively bleeding trauma patient, as it may prevent the onset of microvascular hemorrhage. A proactive approach on the part of the transfusion service as part of “damage control resuscitation,” early administration of blood components in a balanced ratio such as 1 : 1 : 1 for units of plasma to platelets to RBCs, that closely approximates whole blood, can improve survival even if such strategies do not prevent or correct TAC, and minimize the need for blood and crystalloid fluids (see Chapter 40 ).
Platelet concentrates may be prepared by pooling platelets obtained through centrifugation from individual units of whole blood. A “unit” of platelets has been defined as containing at least 5.5 × 10 10 platelets—hence the term “six pack,” which describes an often prescribed dose of 3.3 × 10 11 . Recent trends in blood center collection procedures have resulted in the creation of most platelet products by single-donor apheresis, with the “dose” expressed by dividing the measured platelet content of the product by 3.0 × 10 11 . These are arbitrary designations. Assessment of clinical response according to the dose of platelets administered and a posttransfusion platelet count measured ideally within 1 hour of transfusion should be performed in all patients to guide further therapy (see later discussion).
Apheresis or single-donor collections result in fewer donor exposures for a given dose of platelets. Apheresis platelets may contain 200 to 250 mL of donor plasma, but heat-labile clotting factors decay rapidly at a storage temperature of 22°C (71.6°F). It has been surprisingly difficult to document an advantage of single-donor apheresis platelets over pooled random donor components, although one suspects that alloimmunization, bacterial contamination, and virus transmission all should be reduced. Pathogen-inactivated apheresis platelets have been licensed in the United States to reduce the risk of transfusion-transmitted infections.
Platelets are transfused for prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Prophylactic transfusion triggers remain controversial. Previous recommendations using a trigger of 20,000 platelets/µL for patients in stable condition were based on estimates of bleeding in children with leukemia, many of whom had received aspirin before recognition that aspirin is a powerful antiplatelet agent. Subsequent studies, although avoiding aspirin, indicate that far lower platelet numbers are not dangerous. However, relying on a therapeutic transfusion strategy alone may not be safe, at least for some patients, and may result in an increased overall risk of hemorrhage and of cerebral bleeding. Most clinicians now administer platelet transfusions prophylactically to nonbleeding patients in stable condition who have amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia caused by chemotherapy and/or leukemia at platelet counts of less than 5000/µL, the number calculated necessary to maintain the integrity of the vascular endothelium. A trigger of 20,000 platelets/µL may be more prudent for patients who are febrile, have rapidly falling counts, or have evidence of additional hemostatic defects. Platelet counts of at least 50,000/µL may be more reassuring to the clinician when invasive procedures such as endoscopy, lumbar puncture, and bronchoscopy are anticipated. Meager evidence suggests that higher counts reduce morbidity and mortality. Clinical indications for therapeutic platelet transfusions are controversial and should be based on the patient's clinical condition, the cause of bleeding, and the number and function of circulating platelets (see Chapter 7 ).
Bleeding caused by platelet defects acquired after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery or aspirin ingestion often responds to platelet transfusion; oozing related to uremia does not respond in this way, because transfused platelets rapidly acquire the uremic defect. Evolving algorithms for platelet transfusion in surgical settings based on point-of-care testing of platelet count and function have the potential to improve patient care and blood product utilization.
Most platelet transfusions are administered to patients with defects in platelet production or function. However, some patients with immune-mediated thrombocytopenia may have satisfactory responses to platelet transfusions. Platelet survival generally is no longer than a few hours. Therefore patients rarely benefit from prophylactic transfusions, although therapeutic transfusions may be lifesaving. Platelet transfusions are ordinarily considered to be contraindicated in patients with thrombotic platelet destruction, such as those with TTP, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), and possibly disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). However, a retrospective analysis of 110 patients with the clinical diagnosis of TTP, 55 of whom had ADAMTS13-deficient TTP, and 23 of whom received platelet transfusions, showed no evidence of increased adverse events associated with these transfusions. Whereas an analysis of a nationally representative hospital discharge database suggested an increased frequency of arterial thrombosis and in-hospital mortality when platelets are transfused to patients with such consumptive disorders as HIT and TTP, the classical teaching that platelet transfusions are contraindicated in these circumstances should not prevent their administration when patients are at risk of life-threatening hemorrhage.
Platelet transfusions should be monitored through baseline and posttransfusion platelet counts. Some physicians prefer to standardize this evaluation by calculating a “corrected count increment” (CCI) as follows:
where (platelet count) pre and (platelet count) post are the platelet counts before and after transfusion, respectively.
A CCI above 4000 to 5000 platelets/µL suggests an adequate response to platelet transfusion, although two consecutive poor CCIs in the absence of fever, splenomegaly, active bleeding, consumption, ABO incompatibility, or other causes associated with increased platelet destruction suggest refractoriness to therapy. Development of platelet immune refractoriness presents a vexing clinical problem. Many patients can be treated well with platelets from human leukocyte antigen (HLA)–compatible relatives or even unrelated matched donors. When such donors are unavailable, treatment by HLA “best matching” or platelet cross-matches should be tried. These strategies may be cumbersome and expensive, and are not uniformly effective. A computer-assisted matching program that can identify epitope-matched platelets is proving increasingly helpful. Repeated platelet transfusion in the absence of documented count increments exposes patients to the potential risks of transfusion without evidence of any benefit and depletes an often scarce and costly blood resource.
Pathogen-reduced platelet concentrates are now licensed and available, although increased cost of this component has slowed widespread introduction. This component all but eliminates the risk of bacterial contamination of platelets stored at room temperature and dramatically reduces the risk of most viral agents—most notably human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV). Although platelet increments from these components may be modestly reduced, clinical studies have confirmed equivalent hemostasis and safety.
FFP is prepared by freezing the plasma component of a unit of whole blood within 6 to 8 hours of collection. Hemostatic activity of the coagulation factors is maintained even after storage for 1 year or longer, depending on the storage temperature. Once thawed, the plasma can be stored at a refrigeration temperature for no longer than 24 hours. On average, 1 mL of FFP contains 1 unit of each coagulation factor. However, the volume of a “unit” of FFP, the concentration of the citrate anticoagulant, and the concentration of individual donor coagulation factors are variable, depending on the donor blood composition, the method of collection, and the anticoagulant solution used. Although for an individual donor the factor concentrate levels may vary from 50% to 150% of 1 unit per mL, the differences are usually unimportant except for infants and small children, where single units may be transfused.
FFP remains the blood component of choice for treating patients with deficiency of factor II, V, X, or XI who require treatment. FFP is commonly used to treat bleeding patients with acquired deficiencies of multiple coagulation factors, such as those with DIC, dilutional coagulopathy, and TTP. The rationale and use of FFP for patients with prolonged PT and PTT assays appears to be decreasing with the increased understanding of the coagulopathy of liver disease, lack of proven efficacy, and growing appreciation of the risks of plasma infusion (see Chapter 36 ). FFP may also be used for rapid yet temporary reversal of the coagulation defects induced by vitamin K antagonists, although administration is limited by the large volumes required (see later discussion); these patients may require vitamin K therapy for long-term control, and those with cerebral hemorrhage may benefit from the use of rFVIIa or the higher concentration of vitamin K–dependent factors contained in PCCs. Plasma is not effective in reversing anticoagulation induced by heparin or the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).
Depending on the cause, mild prolongations of PT and PTT (<1.5 times the midpoint of the normal laboratory range) do not mandate FFP prophylaxis in trauma patients or in those scheduled to undergo elective invasive procedures (see Chapter 34 ). FFP transfusion in critically ill patients has limited efficacy and is associated with significant morbidity—in particular, pulmonary edema and acute lung injury. Indiscriminate transfusion of FFP for mild, clinically insignificant prolonged PT may result in unnecessary allergic reactions and delays in diagnostic procedures. No clinical benefit has ever been documented.
Several other plasma components are available. Plasma stored for 24 hours before freezing (SP-24) is technically not FFP, but in practice is used interchangeably. A psoralen and ultraviolet light treated pathogen-inactivated single donor FFP has been licensed, but is not yet widely used in the United States. Solvent detergent (SD) plasma is FFP that has been pooled and treated to inactivate lipid-encapsulated viruses such as HIV, HBV, and HCV. Both inactivated products are several-fold more expensive than FFP. SD plasma is now available in the United States and Canada (Octaplas), and has been widely used in Europe for years. SD plasma has a more uniform concentrations of coagulation factors and reduced concentrations of high-molecular-weight von Willebrand factor (VWF)—a potential advantage for treatment of TTP but a potential disadvantage in other hemostatic disorders. SD plasma also has reduced concentrations of protein S and α 2 -plasmin inhibitor (α 2 -PI). Use of SD plasma in patients in stable condition, in critically ill neonates, in women with obstetric and gynecologic emergencies, and in patients with liver disease appears safe and improves abnormal coagulation test results. Consensus recommendations for SD plasma include patients who require a high volume of plasma transfusions, such as those with TTP or hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) with associated factor H deficiency; patients with clotting factor deficiencies for which specific licensed concentrates may not be readily available (factors V, XI, XIII) who have experienced allergic reactions to FFP; and patients who require plasma infusion but for whom blood group compatible products are not available in a timely manner. The advantages of a product that is free of the major class of transfusion-transmitted viruses must be weighed against the potential disadvantages of trading a relatively safe single-donor component for one made from larger pools that may contain nonencapsulated viruses such as hepatitis A virus and parvovirus B19. Transfusion related acute lung injury (TRALI) has not been reported after SD plasma administration.
Cryoprecipitate is the cold insoluble fraction formed when FFP is thawed at 4°C (39.2°F). “Cryo” is rich in factor VIII, factor XIII, VWF, and fibrinogen. The product can be stored frozen at −20°C (−4°F) for up to a year. When resuspended in a plasma volume of 10 to 20 mL after preparation from single-donor plasma, cryoprecipitate contains 80 to 100 U of factor VIII/VWF, which represents 40% to 70% of the original amount in the plasma; 100 to 250 mg of fibrinogen; and approximately 30% of the original amount of factor XIII. Because of its higher concentration of these factors compared with FFP, cryoprecipitate served for decades as the primary replacement therapy for patients with hemophilia A and VWD. Cryoprecipitate has been replaced by DDAVP (see later discussion) and by virus-inactivated or recombinant preparations for first-line therapy for most mild cases of either disease, and it should no longer be used for these purposes unless other therapies are not available. Similarly, the use of cryoprecipitate to treat uremic bleeding (10 units per treatment) has largely been supplanted by treatment with DDAVP, estrogen, RBC transfusion, or EPO. The use of cryoprecipitate as a source of fibrinogen for “home-brewed” fibrin glue preparations has largely and thankfully been supplanted by standardized commercial products that contain virus-inactivated human fibrinogen.
Currently, cryoprecipitate is used primarily as replacement therapy in patients with hypofibrinogenemia that is congenital (rare) or acquired (i.e., after thrombolytic therapy, DIC, plasmapheresis, or massive transfusions), although a commercial virus-inactivated concentrate (Riastap) is available for the former application. When cryoprecipitate is used for these indications, 10 to 20 units are normally pooled and infused, with repeat doses administered every 6 to 8 hours depending on clinical status and results of laboratory tests of fibrinogen concentration. Fibrinogen levels of more than 50 mg/dL are considered sufficient to support physiologic hemostasis and produce normal PT or PTT results. The commercial concentrate is labeled for potency in milligrams; a vial contains approximately 1 g fibrinogen. Cryoprecipitate may also be useful for treatment of patients with factor XIII deficiency, a rare congenital deficiency, or an acquired disorder resulting from autoantibody formation. A recombinant concentrate (Tretten, catridecacog) is now available and is administered in doses ranging from 20 to 75 U/kg. A plasma-derived concentrate (Corifact) suitable for management of patients with isolated factor XIII subunit B deficiency has been licensed. Cryoprecipitate still enjoys widespread use because of the increased cost and limited availability of the commercial products.
All single-donor components carry approximately equivalent risks of HIV, HBV, and HCV infection. In the United States, for blood provided by repeat donors, the most widely quoted estimate of the risk of HIV transmission is 1 in 2,135,000 units transfused; of human T-lymphotropic virus transmission, 1 in 2,993,000 units; of HCV transmission, 1 in 1,935,000 units; and of HBV transmission, 1 in 205,000 units. Slightly higher risks are observed for blood obtained from first-time donors. The overall risk of transmission of HIV or HCV from a blood unit is estimated to be on the order of 1 in 2,000,000. New and emerging pathogens such as West Nile virus, Chikungunya virus, Zika virus, dengue viruses, Babesia , and infectious prions continually threaten world blood supplies. Thus, despite increasingly sophisticated testing and screening strategies, until activation procedures for cellular components become available, infections from current and emerging agents will prevent realization of a zero-risk blood supply.
Other adverse events are presently much more common than transfusion-transmitted viral infection. The reactions most often associated with transfusion are febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions from RBC or platelet transfusion, and urticarial reactions associated with FFP or plasma transfusion. These reactions are not life-threatening but may cause apprehension in the patient and may lead to significant delays in procedures or diagnostic studies while the cause is being determined. Febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions typically occur in fewer than 1% of transfusions overall but are more common with platelet transfusions and are observed in as many as 6% to 12% of adults with hematologic malignancies and among pediatric patients. Urticarial allergic reactions may occur in 1% to 3% of transfusions of RBCs, platelets, or FFP; anaphylactic shock occurs once per 20,000 to 47,000 units of blood components transfused. Severe hemolytic transfusion reactions are associated almost exclusively with incompatible red cells, but hemolysis related to antibodies in plasma or platelet concentrates remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Acute hemolytic transfusion reactions due to intravascular hemolysis may occur once per 25,000 units transfused, and delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions occur 5 to 10 times more frequently. Both acute and delayed hemolytic reactions are associated with mortality, with estimated risks of 1 in 630,000 and 1 in 1,150,000 units, respectively. Errors that result in transfusion of ABO-incompatible units still occur, but required reports to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) confirm that most fatal acute hemolytic transfusion reactions are now caused by other antibodies directed at red cell antigens.
The incidence of bacterial contamination and related shock is of particular concern in platelet transfusion. This component must be stored at room temperature and thus is particularly susceptible to bacterial growth. A procedure to reduce viral and bacterial pathogens has been licensed, but is not as yet in widespread use. Although platelet increments from pathogen-reduced platelets may be decreased, there is no evidence of increased bleeding or increased requirements in platelet recipients. The true risk of contamination and frequency of reactions are unknown, but such events are probably underreported. A wide variety of gram-positive and gram-negative organisms are associated with platelet contamination, and Yersinia species and other cryophilic organisms are most frequently implicated in RBC contamination. An estimated 25% of cases of transfusion-related bacterial sepsis are severe, resulting in septic shock or death.
Estimates from early prospective studies indicate that bacterial contamination occurs in 0.3 of every 10,000 RBC units, 0.5 to 23 of every 10,000 apheresis platelet concentrates, and 5 to 30 of every 10,000 pooled random-donor platelet concentrates. Screening strategies introduced to detect bacterial contamination in plateletpheresis components can detect up to 75% to 90% of contaminated units before release, which increases transfusion safety. Current screening tests even with release testing have less than 100% sensitivity and specificity; thus significant efforts to develop new strategies to reduce bacterial contamination are ongoing.
Less common but dramatic and more severe reactions may occur as a result of TRALI, posttransfusion purpura (PTP), and transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease (TAGVHD). The former two reactions are caused by plasma-containing components, and TAGVHD is associated with transfusion of cellular elements. These reactions are likely underdiagnosed, but each may be associated with clinically significant reactions.
TRALI is a life-threatening complication that is characterized by severe acute pulmonary edema and hypoxemia associated with normal cardiac filling pressures that is indistinguishable from adult respiratory distress syndrome ( Box 28.2 ). TRALI by conventional definition occurs within 1 to 6 hours of transfusion of plasma-containing blood components. However, credible cases have been reported 24 hours post transfusion and longer. Treatment is supportive. Whereas the mechanisms of TRALI remain incompletely understood, the pathogenesis is likely the result of two events: the first related to the recipient's clinical condition, predisposing to acute lung injury through leukocyte sequestration, and the second being the infusion of antibodies or mediators that activate these adherent neutrophils leading to endothelial damage. Patients who receive plasma-containing components with antibodies directed toward human neutrophil antigens (HNA), particularly HNA-3a or HLA class II antigens, and express the cognate antigen are at particular risk for TRALI. In prospective studies, little risk has been attributed to noncognate or weak cognate class II antibody, or class I antibody. Whereas the incidence is highest for recipients of components that contain high volumes of plasma—FFP, followed by platelet concentrates—the actual number of cases annually is highest for recipients of RBCs because so many more of these components are transfused.
Sudden onset of new and acute noncardiac pulmonary distress during transfusion of any blood product or up to 6 hours after completion of transfusion
Rapid onset of dyspnea, tachypnea, and hypoxia associated with fever, cyanosis, and hypotension
Radiographic findings of bilateral pulmonary infiltrates without evidence of volume overload
Cardiac function normal on echocardiography (unless patient known to have preexisting heart failure)
Mortality rate approximately 25% in otherwise healthy patients and up to 60% in ICU patients
Cardiogenic pulmonary edema (aided by evidence for volume overload)
Anaphylaxis (aided by laryngeal edema, bronchospasm with normal chest x-ray)
Transfusion related sepsis from contaminated blood products (aided by chills, fevers, rigors and positive blood cultures)
Seen with infusion of any blood product to include IVIg or cryoprecipitate, but most commonly with packed RBC transfusions as this is the most commonly transfused blood product
Estimated to occur in approximately 1 : 5000–1 : 12,000 infusions yet may be underdiagnosed and/or underreported
A leading cause of transfusion-related death
Current hypotheses require two separate events:
Clinical condition of recipient such as surgery, trauma, burns, or infection causing pulmonary endothelial activation and subsequent sequestration of neutrophils, followed by:
Infusion of plasma or plasma-containing product containing donor-derived anti-HLA or anti-HNA antibodies that activate the sequestered neutrophils to release their constituents which in turn causes capillary leak
Most common cause of donor-derived antibodies seems to be blood product(s) from women who have been pregnant, especially those having had multiple pregnancies
General ICU medical care with ventilator support
Diuretic and/or corticosteroid use has no clear role
Survivors typically improve as do their radiographic findings within 2–5 days
As donor-derived antibodies are essential in the etiology of the syndrome, further transfusion, if needed, is NOT contraindicated
TRALI is a reportable transfusion-related event
Limit all transfusions to those clearly needed
Blood banks should be notified to quarantine other components from the same donation
Plasma from male donors is preferred
Using specialized laboratory evaluation of platelet donors, those harboring anti-HLA and/or anti-HNA antibodies can be identified and subsequently removed from the donor pool so as to minimize further recipient exposure thus decreasing further risk of TRALI
HLA , Human leukocyte antigen; HNA, human neutrophil antigens; ICU, intensive care unit; IVIg , intravenous immune globulin; RBC , red blood cell; TRALI , transfusion-related acute lung injury.
Because of the patient's preexisting condition, TRALI may remain unsuspected as a cause of worsening pulmonary function and may go undiagnosed. The true incidence of TRALI is unknown but may be as high as 0.34% of transfusions. TRALI reactions have been implicated in up to 12% of all transfusion-related fatalities and remain one of the most common causes of death due to transfusion. Strategies to prevent TRALI include restriction from the use of plasma and platelets collected from women, particularly those who are multiparous, and screening of plasma-containing components for the presence of antibodies directed toward class II HLA antigens. Both strategies have reduced the TRALI risk. Diagnosis and reporting of TRALI are important, so that the transfusion service can perform an appropriate individual donor evaluation, including possible deferral from future donation.
TRALI may be difficult to differentiate from transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO). TACO is increasingly recognized as a significant cause of transfusion fatalities and has been reported as second only to TRALI as the most common cause of death in reports to the FDA ( http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/ReportaProblem/TransfusionDonationFatalities/ ).
PTP is characterized by dramatic precipitous thrombocytopenia occurring within 3 weeks of blood transfusion in a patient with a history of previous transfusion or pregnancy. The sera of patients characteristically reveal the presence of a potent antibody directed against donor platelet antigens that the recipient lacks. Profound thrombocytopenia occurs because of a poorly characterized reaction resulting in destruction of transfused and autologous (patient) platelets, referred to as an innocent bystander effect. The syndrome is most common after RBC transfusions but may occur after infusion of single-donor plasma and platelet products. The condition is refractory to transfusion of antigen-negative or antigen-positive platelets but may respond rapidly to intravenous immune globulin (IVIg) or plasmapheresis with albumin replacement. Steroid therapy is ineffective.
TAGVHD is far less common than TRALI, although the precise incidence remains unknown. TAGVHD mimics the presentation of bone marrow transplant–related graft-versus-host disease, with the additional clinical finding of bone marrow aplasia, typically occurring 8 to 10 days (maximum of 4 weeks) after transfusion. TAGVHD occurs when immunocompetent donor T cells in the blood component engraft within the recipient. The most susceptible patients are those who receive transfusions from closely matched family members and patients who are immunocompromised, including organ and bone marrow transplant recipients, premature infants, patients with particular neoplasms, and those receiving therapy with purine analogue agents for malignancy or autoimmune disease. Leukocyte reduction is not effective prophylaxis. Blood product irradiation prevents TAGVHD. Because TAGVHD is almost always fatal, it is imperative that treating clinicians recognize at-risk patients and request blood product irradiation from the transfusion service.
A variety of products prepared through special processing of plasma pools are used to treat patients with hemostatic disorders. Among the earliest preparations were the so-called PCCs, which are impure mixtures of vitamin K–dependent proteins that are isolated by ion exchange chromatography from the cryoprecipitate supernatant of large plasma pools after removal of ATIII and factor XI. Various processing techniques involving ion exchangers permit production of four-factor concentrates (4F-PCC), which include factor VII, or three-factor concentrates, which consist mainly of factors II, IX, and X. The PCCs are standardized according to their factor IX content. During production, activated clotting factors are produced that are later inactivated through a variety of processes, including manipulation of pH and addition of heparin and/or ATIII. These products may be further adjusted to produce activated PCCs used for the treatment of patients with acquired factor VIII or factor IX inhibitors (see Chapter 3 ). PCCs are now treated to inactivate transfusion-transmitted viruses. Adverse events associated with PCC transfusion include immediate allergic reactions, HIT (for preparations containing heparin), and thromboembolic complications such as DIC, arguably the most important adverse effect. PCC administration is indicated only when the desired increase in factor activity cannot be achieved through other therapeutic measures (e.g., life-threatening bleeding in cases of excessive oral anticoagulation with vitamin K; see later discussion).
When rapid reversal of warfarin is indicated, for example in a bleeding patient with a prolonged PT/international normalized ratio (INR) or one requiring emergency surgery, 4F-PCC infusion is now considered the treatment of choice as compared with FFP. 4F-PCC has a safety profile similar to that of plasma, but a lower risk of fewer fluid overload events. Because some studies have reported an increase in thromboembolic events, particularly in patients with malignancies, PCCs should not be used for warfarin reversal for elective invasive procedures. Discontinuation of warfarin is generally sufficient. Rapid PCC infusion in volunteers produces rapid and sustained increases in coagulation factors II, VII, IX, and X and anticoagulant proteins with no clinical evidence of thrombosis or viral transmission.
Virus-inactivated, intermediate-purity factor VIII preparations with high VWF content have replaced cryoprecipitate as the primary therapy for VWD. One of these products, Humate-P, has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of patients with VWD, and the package insert now provides the concentration of ristocetin cofactor activity required to facilitate dosing.
Recombinant coagulation factors, such as factor VIII, IX, XIII, and vWF preparations used to treat hemophilia A, hemophilia B, factor XIII deficiency, and VWD, respectively, are more expensive than virus-inactivated pooled products. However, these agents provide physicians and patients with a variety of products of high purity and safety and have become the mainstay of therapy for previously untreated patients and patients in whom these disorders have been newly identified (see Chapters 3 and 4 ). Of special interest in the field of hemostasis and transfusion medicine has been the adaptation of rFVIIa, developed initially for the treatment of hemophilic patients with inhibitors, to a much broader use in a wide variety of hemostatic disorders (see Chapter 3 ).
Since the first reports of the hemostatic response in trauma patients with uncontrolled hemorrhage, a growing body of literature has described the use of rFVIIa (NovoSeven) in settings outside the treatment of hemophilic patients with high titers of inhibitors. Although prevention and treatment of bleeding in hemophilic patients with inhibitors and in patients with congenital factor VII deficiency, in acquired hemophilia, and in Glanzmann thrombasthenia remain the only approved indications for rFVIIa in the United States, a body of published trials and anecdotal evidence describes the diversity of applications for this agent, reflective of its widespread use in community practice. Despite its cost and potential toxicity, rFVIIa is used in a variety of hemostatic disorders, and the majority of patients treated with this medication in the United States receive it for off-label indications. Whereas a large body of safety data available on the use of rFVIIa support its favorable safety profile in the approved indications, its efficacy and associated toxicity in off-label indications, as well as appropriate dosing and laboratory monitoring, still have not been fully established. A complete assessment of the risk:benefit ratio of rFVIIa therapy, in light of its potential efficacy and a small but real incidence of clinically significant toxicity, including fatalities, is not possible at the present time. Whether or not rFVIIa will achieve the promise of being a safe, effective, broadly applicable or universal hemostatic agent continues to be debated. The available data indicate that this agent should be reserved for life-threatening bleeding not controlled by traditional methods or situations, and even here, the risk:benefit calculus has been questioned. An overview of rFVIIa is presented in Box 28.3 .
In combination with tissue factor (TF) expressed on the cell surface at sites of injury, rFVIIa acts to initiate coagulation with a small burst of thrombin produced via the factor X/factor V complex; this leads to thrombin-mediated platelet activation and generation of factor IXa, which results in a much larger burst of thrombin generation. May produce a clot that is stronger and relatively more resistant to fibrinolysis.
Administered as an intravenous bolus after reconstitution (20 minutes) by the pharmacy at 90 µg/kg for hemophilic patients with inhibitors. Acquired hemophilia, along with congenital factor VII deficiency and Glanzmann thrombasthenia, are the only approved indication in the United States.
Doses in other settings are not well established. Smaller doses of 20–40 µg/kg may be effective. A vial-based dosing algorithm that uses patient weight and indication has been applied by some experienced transfusion services.
Repeat dose is based on clinical response. No widely applicable satisfactory monitoring algorithms have been developed. Excessively high or repetitive dosing should be avoided. In general, efficacy is apparent within a few doses if it is to be effective; repeated doses probably result in more toxicity rather than more efficacy.
No correlation is apparent between laboratory values (e.g., shortening of the prothrombin time [PT]) and efficacy; thus laboratory monitoring is less useful than monitoring in more typical hemostatic treatments.
Control of bleeding in hemophiliacs who have inhibitors to factor VIII, factor IX, and congenital factor VII deficiency and patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) who have von Willebrand factor (VWF) inhibitors.
Urgent hemostasis in factor XI deficiency, thrombocytopathy, refractory thrombocytopenia, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, trauma, and massive transfusion.
May have activity in excessive anticoagulation caused by dabigatran when combined with dialysis and in bleeding associated with fondaparinux.
May be useful in blood avoidance surgery for patients whose clinical conditions or religious beliefs are incompatible with blood component therapy.
Unlikely to be effective in patients with severe thrombocytopenia and very low levels of fibrinogen, factor V, or factor X. Consider giving concomitantly with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) in patients with multiple factor deficiencies, low (<60–80 mg/dL) fibrinogen or with platelets in patients with thrombocytopenia.
Use cautiously in disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).
Unlikely to be effective in the face of uncorrected acidosis, shock, and hypothermia (see Chapter 40 ).
Associated with a small (approximately 4% in patients with acquired hemophilia) but real incidence of thromboembolism, arterial more so than venous, that may increase with higher doses or repeated dosing or in older patients.
Contraindicated in patients with known hypersensitivity to components.
Recombinant FVIIa was developed to produce hemostatic bypassing activity without the adverse events associated with the use of PCCs in the treatment of hemophilic patients with inhibitors. Although the full spectrum of activity and the interrelated mechanisms responsible for its clinical activity have not been fully elucidated, evidence suggests that the effects of this agent extend beyond those that are measurable through traditional in vitro assessments of hemostasis. In a cell-based model of coagulation described by Roberts and colleagues ( Fig. 28.1 ), rFVIIa, in combination with tissue factor (TF) exposed locally on the surface of a damaged cell and factors V and X, generates thrombin, which catalyzes a series of reactions on the platelet membrane involving factors XI, VIII, and IX to cause platelet activation, release of VWF, and a still larger burst of thrombin that further augments hemostasis. In addition to exerting coagulation and platelet activation effects, thrombin activates factor XIII, which results in fibrin cross-linking. The high local concentrations of thrombin produce a stable clot structure that is relatively resistant to fibrinolysis and further counteracts fibrinolysis through activation of thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI).
Additional considerations for the clinical use of rFVIIa are hypothermia and acidosis. Hypothermia inhibits platelet adhesion at mild temperatures (33°C to 37°C [91.4°F to 98.6°F) and both platelet adhesion and coagulation at lower temperatures (<33°C); acidosis further inhibits coagulation and can worsen hemorrhage. Clinical anecdotal experience suggests that rFVIIa is effective in some hypothermic patients with acidosis in vitro, and clinical studies indicate that activity is more significantly reduced by acidosis than by hypothermia.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here