Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Respect for autonomy: patients have the right to determine what can and cannot be done to their bodies
Nonmaleficence: do no harm, or at least, do more good than harm
Beneficence: do what is in the best interest of the patient
Justice: scarce healthcare resources should be distributed as justly as possible
Ethical questions arise frequently in medicine. Many assume that if they act in good faith and are well intentioned, they do not need to learn about medical ethics; the proper solution will simply present itself. Unfortunately, being a good person and meaning well is not enough. Like other disciplines, medical ethics involves learning to think through ethical dilemmas using reason, knowledge, and problem-solving techniques. Understanding medical ethics provides one with the tools necessary to recognize, analyze, and manage ethical dilemmas as they arise.
Informed consent is rooted in the ethical principal of respect for patients’ autonomy. It is the cornerstone of the patient-physician relationship and no discussion of medical ethics can go far without its consideration. The goal of informed consent is to maximize the ability of patients to make reasonably informed decisions about their care, based on their understanding of the risks and benefits of the proposed intervention.
Informed consent generally consists of the following components:
Medical decision-making capacity
Disclosure: the patient must be given adequate information regarding the nature and purpose of their proposed treatment, as well as risks, benefits, options, and alternatives
Voluntariness: their decision must be voluntary and free of coercion or manipulation
To possess medical decision-making capacity, a patient must:
Understand the relevant information about the proposed treatment
Appreciate their situation/medical consequences of their situation
Use reason to make their decision; applying their life values to their knowledge of the risks and benefits of the proposed treatment or procedure—irrespective if we agree with their conclusion
Communicate their choice to their care team
Competence generally refers to legal decisions, capacity to clinical decisions. In the past, these terms were regarded as separate concepts and their use differed based on locality. However, at present, no distinction between them is usually made.
When referring to the notion of competence, societies generally determine the level of impairment necessary to render an individual patient incompetent. Societal judgement on this matter reflects the delicate balance between respecting an individual’s autonomy and protecting them from harm and/or making bad decisions.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here