Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
As surgical and anesthetic techniques have evolved, perioperative mortality in complex cancer surgical interventions has decreased significantly. However, complications and associated morbidity remain a challenge not only for surgical recovery, but also for functional restoration, completion of care for the patient, and long-term cancer outcomes. As such, optimization and preparation for major cancer surgery (prehabilitation) should be a high priority safety initiative and a fundamental strategy in perioperative medicine. Appropriate preparative management or optimization of functional capacity prior to an anticipated stressor can mitigate adverse outcomes, which carry substantial clinical and economic implications. Pivotal strategies with substantial impact include hematological optimization (including the correction of iron deficiency and anemia), appropriate use of blood products, and prevention of thromboembolic complications.
Blood loss is an inherent risk with more complicated cancer surgeries. Moreover, even prior to surgery, anemia and iron deficiency are common findings and remain important contributors to adverse postoperative outcomes and mortality. Equally, perioperative allogeneic red cell transfusions, which remain the most common strategy to correct anemia, are an independent predictor of postoperative complications and have been linked with an increased risk of cancer recurrence and reduced overall survival (OS).
Prevention of thromboembolism (TE) has been a high priority safety initiative for over a decade. TE is a common complication among patients with cancer, particularly in the postoperative period, and a leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality. Yet systematic real-time approaches to TE prevention, particularly postsurgery, remain suboptimal.
Here we review the burden of these important contributors to outcomes in patients with cancer in association with the perioperative period. In addition, we propose pragmatic, expert, and evidence-based strategies that can be easily implemented and scaled in real-time to patient care.
Anemia is a symptom of erythropoietic failure, reflecting inadequate substrate (particularly iron) or red cell production that is exceeded by loss. These processes frequently coexist in cancer patients and represent a continuum; even in the nonanemic patient, iron deficiency may still be present, impacting on skeletal muscle and respiratory chain function. Patients with cancer about to undergo major surgery require assessment of both hemoglobin and iron status and consideration of appropriate preoperative optimization prior to proceeding.
Iron deficiency and anemia contribute to cancer-associated morbidity. These reflect blood loss (particularly in tumors of the gastrointestinal tract) and the inflammatory response to the tumor and neoadjuvant therapy. The European Cancer Survey highlighted the prevalence of anemia in different cancer types; 39% of patients were anemic at time of diagnosis, with 68% becoming anemic within 6 months of starting treatment, a reflection of the additive effects of multiple rounds of chemotherapy and/or surgery.
Emerging evidence suggests that iron deficiency, even in the absence of anemia, should be considered an actionable pathology in its own right. Data on the prevalence of iron deficiency as an independent laboratory abnormality in the oncological population are highest in the colorectal cancer population, ranging from 50%–60% in some series, as a reflection of chronic blood loss. , However, even in patients where ongoing bleeding is not a hallmark of the malignancy, iron deficiency is also found in up to 46% of cases.
Causes of anemia can be divided into three categories:
Blood loss;
Increased red cell destruction;
Decreased red cell production.
Although certain tumors enable chronic, ongoing blood loss, most cancer-associated anemia is caused by diminished red cell production and is often due to iron deficiency ( Fig. 8.1 ). Broadly speaking, iron deficiency can be defined as:
a lack of stored iron due to chronic losses (absolute iron deficiency), and
inability to access stored iron (functional iron deficiency).
Functional iron deficiency is a consequence of the inflammatory response. A key contributor to the associated “anemia of inflammation” is dysregulation of the cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6). Overexpression of IL-6 has been found in almost all types of tumor, promoting tumorigenesis, suppressing erythropoietin, and increasing expression of the iron regulatory hormone hepcidin. Hepcidin downregulates ferroportin-1, a transmembrane protein that enables iron to be transported across cell membranes. Consequently, iron cannot be absorbed from the gut, and stored iron cannot be accessed by bone marrow. This restricts erythropoiesis and limits the efficacy of oral iron supplementation. Additionally, overexpression of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) suppresses the hemoglobinization of erythroid progenitor cells, cytotoxic therapies impair hematopoiesis, and nephrotoxic therapeutics impact the production of erythropoietin. Consequently, perioperative risk is increased in patients who have undergone neoadjuvant treatment.
Separate to the perioperative period, anemia is associated with poor outcome in cancer patients, both due to worsening of local tumor control and increased requirement for allogeneic blood transfusion. While some authors maintain that anemia is a marker of increased concomitant comorbidity, rather than an independent risk factor in its own right, major randomized controlled trial data are lacking. Most guidelines promote hemoglobin concentration as a therapeutic target prior to proceeding to major surgery.
Iron deficiency, independent of anemia, is gaining attention in the perioperative sphere. While clinicians often consider the two to be synonymous, physiological effects of iron deficiency (particularly fatigue and exercise intolerance) may be noted before hemoglobin drops below the anemic threshold. This is because iron is a key contributor to basic cellular function, with roles in energy metabolism, cell signaling, gene expression, and regulation of cell growth. Most iron is inserted into protoporphyrin IX as the final step in the production of heme to allow oxygen binding to hemoglobin. Additionally, iron serves as a prosthetic group for other oxygen-carrying molecules, notably myoglobin, cytochromes, and nitric oxide synthase, and is integral to the function of enzyme systems responsible for DNA synthesis and repair, energy metabolism via the function of the respiratory chain, and production of ADP. Hence iron deficiency can impact respiratory chain and skeletal muscle function adversely, affecting fatigability and recovery from exercise. Early retrospective data from colorectal cancer populations have highlighted a possible association between iron deficiency and poor postoperative outcomes independent of anemia. , Consequently, some consensus statements recommend correction of iron deficiency in patients presenting to major surgery regardless of the starting hemoglobin concentration. Prospective evidence for this practice is limited.
Differentiation and identification of iron deficiency as part of a program of preoperative optimization can be challenging, as ferritin (an acute phase reactant) may be elevated for a variety of reasons, possibly reflecting cellular damage and leakage of ferritin from storage sites into the bloodstream. Indeed, serum ferritin in the normal reference range in the setting of a C-reactive protein greater than 5 mg/L will only be 39% sensitive for iron deficiency. An alternative metric is transferrin saturation (TSAT). Taken as the quotient of serum iron divided by transferrin concentration and expressed as a percentage, TSAT is a more direct measure of the physiological demand for iron (although it may still be affected by inflammation independent of iron status). A value of less than 20% is interpreted as being reflective of iron deficiency ( Table 8.1 ). Therefore a patient presenting for surgery with serum ferritin less than 100 µg/L regardless of TSAT, or a TSAT of less than 20% in the setting of serum ferritin at 100–300 µg/L, should be considered iron depleted.
Test | Normal Values | Comment |
Serum iron | >14 µmol/L | Little use for diagnosing iron deficiencySpecificity lost in inflammation |
Serum ferritin | 10–300 µg/L | Allows safe storage of iron in Fe 3+ formAppears in serum due to ICF leakageAcute phase reactant—cannot be used in isolation to determine iron status |
Transferrin | 2.0–3.5 g/L | Rarely used in isolation, but commonly combined with serum iron to determine transferrin saturation (TSAT) |
Transferrin saturation | ≥20% | Measure of binding capacity for ironObtained by dividing serum transferrin by serum iron |
More sensitive markers of iron deficiency have been described. These include soluble transferrin receptor, serum hepcidin, reticulocyte hemoglobin concentration, and percentage hypochromic red cells. Although these are increasingly being cited in best practice guidelines, they have not yet entered widespread use. ,
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here