Anesthesia for Bariatric Surgery


Key Points

  • In the United States more than two out of three people are overweight or obese. Worldwide, more people are obese than are malnourished. Obesity is becoming the largest single preventable cause of death and represents major morbidity and mortality.

  • Metabolic syndrome includes abdominal obesity, decreased high-density lipoprotein, insulin resistance, glucose intolerance, and hypertension, and is present in approximately 34% of the adult population in the United States alone.

  • The single greatest risk factor for sleep apnea is obesity, with the majority of obese patients having increased oral and pharyngeal tissue. This makes ventilation, intubation, and extubation more challenging.

  • Choices for medical management of obesity are limited and efficacious achievement with just medical management is uncommon. Changes in behaviors are important for success.

  • Surgery for obesity is recommended at a body mass index (BMI) of 40 kg/m 2 or BMI over 30 kg/m 2 with comorbidities expected to respond to weight loss, secondary to surgical therapy, like hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia. In clinical trials, long-term survival is better in the surgically treated group over the medically managed.

  • Preoperative evaluation should focus on cardiopulmonary issues and securing an airway, along with other concerns such as diabetes, hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea.

  • Anesthetic drugs should be tailored based on lipid solubility and awareness of lingering respiratory depression effects.

  • Patient preparation and positioning are keys to successful airway management. Preoperative pressure support ventilation should be used adjunctively if possible.

  • Intraoperative ventilation is assisted by complete paralysis, moderate positive end-expiratory pressure, tidal volumes based on ideal body weight, and recruitment maneuvers as needed.

  • Common serious postoperative complications are deep vein thrombosis and staple line issues.

  • Obese patients presenting for nonweight-loss surgery benefit from anesthetic approaches similar to that used for bariatric surgery.

Obesity as a Disease

Obesity is firmly established as one of the great epidemics of the 21st century. Worldwide, obesity was considered a rarity until the middle of the previous century, but now there are 1.9 billion overweight adults and over 650 million obese people globally including a significant proportion of the adult population in the United States. Obesity is a problem that is affecting the younger population as well since over 340 million children and adolescents aged 5 to 19 were overweight or obese in 2016. Current estimates are that more than 2 out of 3 of the U.S. adult population are overweight or obese. Of these one in three adults has obesity and 1 in 13 has extreme obesity with a body mass index (BMI) greater than 40. Among children and adolescents ages 2 to 19, about 1 in 6 are obese, and about 1 in 17 are considered to have extreme obesity. Obesity and its associated health concerns are now major causes of morbidity and mortality resulting in an enormous impact on healthcare spending. Over 300,000 deaths per annum in the United States and about $270 billion in annual healthcare spending are attributable to obesity, placing it second only to smoking as a preventable cause of death.

Obesity can be defined as a disease since it is a physiologic dysfunction of the human organism with environmental, genetic, and endocrinologic etiologies. Obesity most frequently develops when food caloric intake exceeds energy expenditure over a sustained period of time. Factors influencing obesity involve either energy intake or energy expenditure, and are influenced by genetic, behavioral, cultural, and socioeconomic factors. For example, there are syndromes that are associated with obesity, including leptin deficiency, Prader-Willi syndrome, and Lawrence-Moon-Biedl syndrome. Metabolic factors can influence energy regulation, including hormones, peptides, nutrients, uncoupling proteins, and neural regulatory substances emanating from gut, liver, brain, and fat cells, but most of these are not well understood.

The BMI is the most widely applied classification tool used to assess individual weight status. The BMI is specifically defined as the patient’s weight, measured in kilograms, divided by the square of the patient’s height, measured in meters, yielding a measurement bearing units of kilograms per square meter (kg/m 2 ). Fig. 58.1 shows a family of iso-BMI curves for BMI ranging from 13 to 50 kg/m 2 and mapped on axes for height (in both inches and centimeters) and weight (in both pounds and kilograms). Most electronic medical record systems are programmed to indicate patient BMI when height and weight inputs are provided. The National Institutes of Health maintains an online BMI calculator and also provides links for downloadable smartphone BMI applications at https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/educational/lose_wt/BMI/bmicalc.htm . Using this system, patients are classified according to BMI and the associated risk of developing health problems is shown in Table 58.1 . Patients are considered to be overweight if they have a BMI between 25 and 29.9 kg/m 2 , and they are classified as obese with a BMI between 30 and 49.9 kg/m 2 . The obese classification is further subdivided into Class 1 (BMI range 30-34.9 kg/m 2 ), Class 2 (35-39.9 kg/m 2 ) and Class 3 (40-49.9 kg/m 2 ). Patients with a BMI of 50 kg/m 2 or greater are classified as superobese. As BMI increases beyond normal weight, the risk of developing serious health problems rises greatly and can be correlated with the individual’s waist circumference ( Table 58.2 ). Malnourishment and malnutrition are commonly offered as explanations for the fact that underweight patients are also at increased risk for developing illnesses.

Fig. 58.1, A family of iso-body mass index (BMI) curves for BMI ranging from 13 to 50 and mapped on axes for height (in both centimeters and inches) and weight (in both kilograms and pounds).

Table 58.1
Levels of Risk Associated With Increasing Body Mass Index
Classification BMI (kg/m 2 ) Risk of Developing Health Problems
  • Underweight

<18.5 Increased
  • Normal weight

18.5-24.9 Least
  • Overweight

25.0-29.9 Increased
  • Obese

    • Class 1

  • 30.0-34.9

  • High

    • Class 2

  • 35.0-39.9

  • Very high

    • Class 3

40.0-49.9 Extremely high
  • Superobese

≥50 Exceedingly high
BMI , Body mass index.

Table 58.2
Waist Circumference and Risk
Waist BMI (kg/m 2 )
Circumference Normal Weight Overweight Obese Class 1
<102 cm (♂) Least risk Increased risk High risk
<88 cm (♀)
≥102 cm (♂) High risk Very high risk Increased risk
≥88 cm (♀)

There are specific diseases commonly associated with obesity, and obesity is often accompanied by multiple, and not single, comorbid states. These frequently include insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypoventilation, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, certain malignancies, and osteoarthritis. Virtually every organ system can be included in the extended list of health risks associated with having an abnormally elevated BMI. A listing of the most common specific disease states along with their obesity-associated risk is detailed in Table 58.3 . As a result, obesity is also associated with early death. Of all the health risks included in Table 58.3 , metabolic syndrome and OSA merit additional attention as they pose special concerns for the anesthetic care of obese patients.

Table 58.3
Health Risks Associated With Increasing Body Mass Index
Metabolic syndrome 30% of middle-aged people in developed countries have features of metabolic syndrome
Type 2 diabetes 90% of type 2 diabetics have a BMI of >23 kg/m 2
HTN 5× risk in obesity
66% of HTN is linked to excess weight
85% of HTN is associated with a BMI >25 kg/m 2
CAD 3.6× risk of CAD for each unit change in BMI
CAD and stroke Dyslipidemia progressively develops as BMI increases from 21 kg/m 2 with rise in small particle low-density lipoprotein
70% of obese women with HTN have left ventricular hypertrophy
Obesity is a contributing factor to cardiac failure in >10% of patients
Overweight/obesity plus hypertension is associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke
Respiratory effects (e.g., obstructive sleep apnea) Neck circumference of >43 cm in men and >40.5 cm in women is associated with obstructive sleep apnea, daytime somnolence, and development of pulmonary hypertension
Cancers 20% of all cancer deaths among nonsmokers are related to obesity (30% of endometrial cancers)
Reproductive function 6% of primary infertility in women is attributable to obesity
Impotency and infertility are frequently associated with obesity in men
OA Frequent association in the elderly with increasing body weight—risk of disability attributable to OA equal to heart disease and greater to any other medical disorder of the elderly
Liver and gall bladder disease Overweight and obesity associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and NASH. 40% of NASH patients are obese; 20% have dyslipidemia
3× risk of gall bladder disease in women with a BMI of >32 kg/m 2 7× risk if BMI of >45 kg/m 2
BMI, Body mass index; CAD, coronary artery disease; HTN, hypertension; NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; OA, osteoarthritis;

Metabolic Syndrome

The clustering of a group of defined metabolic and physical abnormalities is now referred to as the metabolic syndrome. Patients with metabolic syndrome commonly have abdominal obesity, reduced levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL), hyperinsulinemia, glucose intolerance, hypertension, and other characteristic features as listed in Box 58.1 . Specific criteria for diagnosing metabolic syndrome are included in Table 58.4 . The diagnosis requires that at least three of the following be present: abdominal obesity, elevated fasting glucose, hypertension, low HDLs, and hypertriglyceridemia. Weight gain with visceral obesity is a major predictor of the metabolic syndrome. The clinical approach uses waist circumference, rather than BMI, to define the adipose mass component contributing to the metabolic syndrome since BMI has been shown to be a relatively insensitive indicator of the risk for obesity-associated metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. Waist circumference, but not BMI, reflects abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue as well as abdominal visceral adipose tissue and is therefore a better index of central, or truncal, fat mass.

Box 58.1
Features Associated With Metabolic Syndrome

  • Abdominal obesity

  • Atherogenic dyslipidemia (↑ TGs, ↓ HDL-C, ↑ ApoB, ↑ small LDL particles)

  • Elevated blood pressure

  • Insulin resistance ± glucose intolerance

  • Proinflammatory state (↑ hsCRP)

  • Prothrombotic state (↑ PAI-1, ↓ FIB)

  • Other (endothelial dysfunction, microalbuminuria, polycystic ovary syndrome, hypoandrogenism, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, hyperuricemia)

ApoB , Apolipoprotein-B; FIB , fibrinogen; HDL-C , high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; hsCRP , high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; LDL , low-density lipoprotein; PAI-1 , plasminogen activator inhibitor; TG’s , triglycerides.

Table 58.4
Clinical Criteria for Diagnosing Metabolic Syndrome
Central obesity Waist circumference >102 cm in men
Waist circumference >88 cm in women
Plus any two of the following:

Criteria Defining Value
Triglycerides 150 mg/dL (1.7 mmol/L), or
Specific treatment for this lipid abnormality
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol <40 mg/dL (1.03 mmol/L) in men, or
<50 mg/dL (1.29 mmol/L) in women, or
Specific treatment for this lipid abnormality
Blood pressure Systolic blood pressure >130 mm Hg, or
Diastolic blood pressure >85 mm Hg, or
Treatment of previously diagnosed hypertension
Fasting glucose 110 mg/dL (5.6 mmol/L), or
Previously diagnosed type 2 diabetes

In the United States, approximately 34% of the adult population have metabolic syndrome. Of these, more than 83% meet the criterion of abdominal obesity. The incidence of metabolic syndrome increases with age, with more than 40% of the U.S. population affected by the age of 60 years. Men are affected more commonly than women, and Hispanics and South Asians appear to be particularly susceptible. Its frequency is lower in African American men than in Caucasians. Metabolic syndrome may result from use of some commonly prescribed drugs, including corticosteroid, antidepressant, and antipsychotic agents. Protease inhibitors used to treat human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection can induce metabolic syndrome secondary to insulin resistance.

Patients with metabolic syndrome have an increased risk for cardiovascular disease events and are at increased risk for all-cause mortality. Metabolic syndrome increases the risk of type 2 diabetes, which itself is an important risk factor for atherosclerotic disease and may be considered as a coronary heart disease equivalent. Metabolic syndrome is also associated with a variety of other conditions, such as polycystic ovary syndrome, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, gallstones, sleep disturbances, sexual impotence, and numerous forms of cancer including breast, endometrial, pancreatic, colon, and liver cancer, as detailed in Table 58.3 . In multiple trials involving nearly 1900 patients, morbidly obese individuals had much greater weight loss following bariatric surgery than after nonsurgical therapy, with amelioration of most of the diseases associated with morbid obesity in a year’s time. Metabolic syndrome is resolved by bariatric surgery in over 95% of patients who achieve the expected weight loss, making it clear that bariatric surgery is a metabolic intervention and not simply a weight management procedure.

Inflammatory processes appear to play an important role in the metabolic syndrome. Adipose tissue has two major functions: storage and release of energy-rich fatty acids and secretion of proteins required for endocrine and autocrine regulation of energy metabolism. Adipocytes exert their metabolic effects by release of free fatty acids, whose release is enhanced by the presence of catecholamines, release of glucocorticoids, increased beta-receptor agonist activity, and reduction of lipid storage mediated by insulin. Visceral adipose tissue has been identified as an important source of proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), as well as antiinflammatory cytokines such as adiponectin. Increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines likely contribute to the etiology of insulin resistance primarily by obstructing insulin signaling and contributing to downregulation of peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor-γ, which are fundamentally important regulators of adipocyte differentiation and control. Additionally, insulin resistance may promote inflammation through diminution of insulin’s antiinflammatory effects. Lastly, oxidative stress is increased with obesity, primarily as a result of excessive intake of macronutrients and a concomitant increase in metabolic rate. These factors may also contribute to the inflammatory response noted with obesity.

Native immune responses act aberrantly in obese individuals. Natural killer (NK) cell cytotoxic activity is depressed with obesity, as are plasma levels of cytokines such as IL-12, IL-18, and interferon-γ known to regulate NK cell function. Other cytokines (primarily IL-6 and TNF-α) and adipokines (leptin, adiponectin, adipose-derived resistin) are two additional major groups of inflammatory proteins produced and released by adipose and adipose-associated tissue. Both serum and adipose tissue obtained from obese subjects consistently have elevated levels of IL-6 and TNF-α, and circulating levels of IL-6 are consistently increased in individuals having either type 2 diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance. Proteins such as leptin and adiponectin, which are produced primarily by adipocytes, are classified as adipokines. Although leptin is primarily involved in appetite control, its immunologic effects include protection of T lymphocytes from apoptosis and regulation of T-cell activation and proliferation. Reduced leptin levels may increase appetite and slow metabolism, but may also increase susceptibility to the toxicity of proinflammatory stimuli, such as endotoxin and TNF-α. Elevated leptin levels are proinflammatory, and this likely plays an important role in the progression of heart disease and diabetes, especially in obese patients. Serum levels of adiponectin correlate with insulin sensitivity and do not rise in obesity. Significantly reduced adiponectin levels are found in patients having type 2 diabetes. Adiponectin reduces both TNF-α production and activity. It also inhibits IL-6 production. Resistin, an adipokine that induces insulin resistance, is induced by endotoxin and cytokines. Resistin acts at the cellular level to upregulate production of proinflammatory cytokines, most likely through the nuclear factor κB (NFκB) pathway. Resistin appears to present a molecular link among metabolic signaling, inflammatory processes, and the development of cardiovascular disease. Resistin levels have been associated with inflammatory markers apparently independent of BMI in humans.

An understanding of the role of NFκB in insulin resistance is required to fully appreciate the links between obesity and inflammation. Both free fatty acids and TNF-α act via intracellular inflammatory cascade pathways to arrest insulin signaling. This process is mediated by activation of transcription factors present within the cell cytoplasm. Following their translocation to the nucleus, they eventually bind to transcription factors regulating the inflammatory process. The cytoplasm also contains NFκB, another transcription factor whose activation is implicated in a number of diseases, including diabetes. NFκB is also induced by hypoxia, and it increases production of proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-6, both of which are frequently increased in patients with OSA syndrome. Therefore inflammation provides the common linkage underlying the association between obesity, metabolic syndrome, and OSA.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea—Hypopnea Syndrome

OSA is a condition characterized by recurrent episodes of partial or complete upper airway collapse occurring during sleep. An obstructive apneic event is defined universally as the complete cessation of airflow during breathing lasting 10 seconds or longer despite maintenance of neuromuscular ventilatory effort. The definition of an obstructive hypopneic event however may vary depending on the criteria being used for scoring. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) defines a hypopneic event as the partial reduction of airflow of 30% or more lasting at least 10 seconds, accompanied by a decrease of at least 4% in the oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ) as opposed to the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM), which accepts a 3% drop in SpO 2 or a terminal cortical arousal. Additionally, the AASM recommends scoring a third type of respiratory event in which flow limitation is detected and is associated with a cortical arousal. These events are designated respiratory effort related arousals (RERAs).

The diagnosis of OSA can only be made in patients who undergo polysomnography, or a home sleep study. Results of polysomnography are reported as the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), which is derived from the total number of apneas and hypopneas divided by the total sleep time or the respiratory disturbance index (RDI) which includes RERA. A normal lower limit for AHI has not yet been defined in an epidemiologic study of healthy subjects. Most sleep centers commonly use an AHI between 5 and 10 events per hour as a normal limit. The severity of obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) is arbitrarily defined, but recommendations for disease classification are as follows :

  • Mild Disease: AHI of 5 to 15 events per hour

  • Moderate Disease: AHI of 15 to 30 events per hour

  • Severe Disease: AHI of greater than 30 events per hour

Due to the risks of developing systemic and pulmonary hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, cardiac arrhythmias, cognitive impairment, persistent daytime somnolence, and other factors, treatment is recommended for patients with either moderate or severe disease. Treatment partly depends on the severity of the sleep-disordered breathing, but the consensus view is that patients with moderate or severe disease should be treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during sleep. Other conservative treatment measures may include weight loss, avoidance of alcohol prior to bedtime, and sleeping on one’s side.

Numerous studies have confirmed that obesity is the greatest risk factor for OSAHS, with about 70% of patients (up to 80% of males and up to 50% of females) with OSAHS being obese. Severe sleep apnea disease is more common in men until women reach the age of menopause, and a strong negative correlation between the AHI and minimum SpO 2 has been observed. Importantly, the diagnosis of OSAHS may be missed until the patient presents for surgery. In one study of 170 patients presenting for surgery, only 15% had already been diagnosed with sleep apnea, but on preoperative testing, 76% were found to have OSAHS. A STOP-Bang questionnaire ( Box 58.2 ) can be used to screen patients for OSA, with a score of 5 to 8 identifying patients at risk for moderate to severe disease. We believe it is important for obese patients presenting for bariatric surgery to undergo preoperative polysomnography testing for OSAHS. Preoperative diagnosis and appropriate interventional management can have the following benefits: less postoperative sleep deprivation, improved response to analgesic and anesthetic drugs, and normalization of cardiovascular disturbances.

Box 58.2
STOP-Bang Questionnaire
  • High risk of OSA: Yes to ≥3 questions.

  • Low risk of OSA: Yes to <3 questions.

  • 1.

    Snoring: Do you snore loudly (loud enough to be heard through closed doors)?

  • 2.

    Tired: Do you often feel tired, fatigued, or sleepy during daytime?

  • 3.

    Observed: Has anyone observed you stop breathing during your sleep?

  • 4.

    Blood pressure: Do you have or are you being treated for high blood pressure?

  • 5.

    BMI: BMI more than 35 kg/m 2 ?

  • 6.

    Age: Age over 50 years old?

  • 7.

    Neck circumference: Neck circumference >40 cm?

  • 8.

    Gender: Male?

BMI , Body mass index; OSA , obstructive sleep apnea.

Anatomically, obese patients with OSAHS typically have increased amounts of adipose tissue deposited into oral and pharyngeal tissues including the uvula, tonsils, tonsillar pillars, tongue, aryepiglottic folds, and lateral pharyngeal walls. An inverse relationship exists between the degree of obesity and pharyngeal area. Deposition of fat in the lateral walls decreases the size of the airway and changes the shape of the oropharynx into an ellipse with a short transverse and long anteroposterior axis. This configuration can contribute to both the development and severity of airway obstruction and can also increase the expectation that it will be more difficult to maintain airway patency during mask ventilation and to perform direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation with general anesthesia. Neuromuscular blockade should be fully reversed prior to extubation, and low tidal volumes or lung protective ventilation should be employed.

Additionally, airway obstruction following extubation is likely to be complicated by the use of opiate and sedative drugs needed for postoperative pain management because these drugs tend to decrease pharyngeal dilator tone and increase the likelihood of upper airway collapse.

OSA also plays an important role in inflammation and the metabolic syndrome. The hypopneic and apneic events that occur in OSAHS are part of the cycle of events that involves both arousal from sleep and oxyhemoglobin desaturation. Sympathetic nervous system activation results as patients with untreated OSA undergo cyclic episodes of hypoxia and reoxygenation. This process leads to elevation of proinflammatory cytokines and may also induce oxidative stress of vascular endothelium, thus inducing an even more heightened state of systemic inflammation in obese patients with OSA. Levels of many different inflammatory mediators, including IL-6, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), leptin, TNF-α, IL-1, reactive oxygen species, and adhesion molecules, such as intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), are increased in patients with OSAHS. Thus obesity, the metabolic syndrome, and OSAHS are interrelated diseases that significantly alter a patient’s inflammatory disease profile and increase multiple health risks, particularly those of cardiovascular and airway origin. Importantly, surgical intervention to cause weight loss has been shown not only to improve obesity-related respiratory disease, but it also can lead to significant and sustained increases in plasma adiponectin levels while decreasing both IL-6 and hs-CRP levels as well as improve NK cell function and increase IL-12, IL-18, and interleukin-γ plasma levels.

Nonsurgical Management of Obesity

The primary goals of nonsurgical management of obesity involve weight loss, the treatment of abnormalities associated with metabolic syndrome, and prevention of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease-related events. Treatment of metabolic syndrome needs to follow an aggressive, multifaceted approach to address multiple underlying metabolic abnormalities and coexistent risk factors simultaneously. An appropriate initial treatment of obesity and metabolic syndrome is therapeutic lifestyle change. This includes dietary modification, weight loss, physical activity, and discontinuation of smoking. The treatment aim is improvement in health, and is the primary reason for advocating weight loss. Modification of energy homeostasis is not easily achieved because a strong brain-gastrointestinal axis drives both food intake and satiety. This axis has hormonal components involving endogenous production of ghrelin, an orexigenic peptide that is produced by the foregut of the stomach and that stimulates appetite. Therefore it is important to monitor the effects of treatment on risk factors and comorbidities at the systems, organ, cell, and molecular levels. Treatment success should be reflected in the decreasing need to treat other coexisting diseases.

The goal for weight loss in therapeutic lifestyle change is not the achievement of normal or ideal body weight (IBW). Even a modest weight loss, in the range of 5% to 10% from the presentation weight, can result in significant initial improvement in the comorbidities of diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension by lowering total cholesterol and triglyceride levels, raising HDL-cholesterol, lowering arterial blood pressure, and lowering blood glucose values while reducing insulin resistance. Obesity guidelines stress the need for weight reduction using behavioral change to reduce caloric intake and increase physical activity. A decrease in caloric intake is the most important component in achieving weight loss and increased physical activity is critical in maintaining the lost weight. Reduced-energy diets are more effective and healthier for achieving long-term weight loss. Long-term maintenance of any weight loss achieved is best accomplished with the inclusion of regular exercise as a staple of the weight-reduction regimen. Regular physical exercise improves several risk factors associated with obesity and metabolic syndrome. The standard exercise recommendation is a daily minimum of 30 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity that is practical to perform. Larger weight loss goals are more appropriate for the more profoundly obese individuals who are contemplating surgical interventions. Even with surgery, ideal weight is hardly ever achieved, and after a number of years at a plateau, weight gain often recurs. In some patients, especially in the presence of severe comorbidities, simple prevention of additional weight gain may be the most reasonable goal.

Beyond the beneficial effects of therapeutic lifestyle change, specific intervention may be required to treat the dyslipidemia and hypertension associated with obesity and metabolic syndrome. Most commonly, patients with metabolic syndrome have elevated triglyceride levels and low HDL cholesterol levels. Many patients receive statin therapy as the treatment of choice when low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels are excessive. Statins reduce cardiovascular disease risk in patients with type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Ezetimibe, which selectively inhibits intestinal cholesterol absorption, can be combined with statin therapy to further reduce LDL cholesterol by 15% to 20%. Fibrates effectively decrease triglyceride levels while increasing HDL cholesterol. Fibrates lower LDL cholesterol levels mildly, but when combined with statin therapy, fibrates may increase the risk of myopathy. Omega-3 fatty acids decrease triglyceride levels and improve insulin resistance in patients with metabolic syndrome. They are often used in combination therapy with other classes of the hypolipidemic drugs. Nicotinic acid is highly effective in raising HDL cholesterol levels in patients with metabolic syndrome. Nicotinic acid decreases the concentration of small, dense LDL particles and also lowers serum levels of lipoprotein (a).

Dietary salt restriction and therapeutic lifestyle change are the primary means to address hypertension in obesity and metabolic syndrome. According to the 2017 guidelines published by the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA), patients having arterial blood pressure higher than 130/80 mm Hg may require antihypertensive drug therapy. There is no specific antihypertensive drug that is recommended as a first-line treatment in these patients, and generally the goal of antihypertensive therapy requires that polypharmacy be employed. A considerable element of the risk reduction resulting from antihypertensive therapy is decreasing arterial blood pressure.

The treatment of insulin resistance and hyperglycemia in metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and obesity is usually achieved with oral hypoglycemic drugs. A number of different drug groups (and drugs within each group) that work through various mechanisms of action are available to treat hyperglycemia. These include α-glucosidase inhibitors, sulfonylureas, meglitinides, D-phenylalanine derivatives, biguanides, and thiazolidinediones. Anesthetic implications include the need to assess and treat abnormal blood glucose levels in the perioperative period while being especially careful in the use of insulin in patients who are both insulin resistant and temporarily unable to continue on oral medication. At present, the optimal anesthetic management of patients who are taking metformin is not clear. There is a serious potential for postoperative lactic acidosis that can develop in patients using this drug. This possibility has led some physicians to routinely cancel or delay surgical procedures if metformin has been ingested within 48 hours of the scheduled surgery. Other physicians, however, have their patients continue taking metformin, both before and after surgery, without interruption if possible. Recent evidence indicates that patients taking metformin have a reduced risk for complications. It appears that metformin may be safely used in the perioperative period.

Patients with metabolic syndrome and obesity may also be prescribed antiplatelet therapy. The AHA recommends that low-dose aspirin be used as a form of primary prevention in patients with metabolic syndrome whose 10-year risk for cardiovascular disease is 10% or greater as determined by Framingham risk scoring.

Behavioral Interventions and Modification

Behavioral interventions and behavioral modification are essential for obese patients to change their learned habits related to eating and physical activity in order to produce weight loss and long-term weight reduction. This applies both for nonsurgical and surgical approaches to weight loss. The key features of typical behavioral programs include self-monitoring, goal setting, nutrition and exercise education, stimulus control, problem solving, cognitive restructuring, and relapse prevention. Patients often benefit from referral to multidisciplinary weight loss programs that incorporate diet, physical activity, and behavioral interventions to achieve their weight loss goals because these combined interventions provide the best weight loss and weight maintenance results without pharmacologic or surgical intervention. However, it is essential to identify and treat patients with eating disorders or major psychiatric disorders who require specialized psychiatric and psychological treatment to achieve meaningful weight loss.

Pharmacotherapy for Weight Loss

Recommendations for pharmacotherapy as a treatment of obesity, first and foremost, stress lifestyle and behavioral modifications as the initial approaches to initiate weight loss. Patients who do not reach their established reasonable weight loss goals by a combination of diet and exercise may be directed to pharmacotherapy to increase weight loss. There are weight loss drugs that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and are currently prescribed for long-term use. These are typically used adjunctively with diet and exercise for patients having a BMI of 30 or greater (≥27 for patients with obesity-related risk factors or comorbid diseases). In current practice, there are only two categories of weight loss drugs: appetite suppressants and lipase inhibitors. Three drugs are currently available for the specific indication of weight loss: phentermine, lorcaserin, and orlistat. Phentermine, an adrenergic reuptake inhibitor, augments adrenergic signaling within the central nervous system and peripheral tissues. Phentermine decreases appetite and food intake and increases resting metabolic rate to promote weight loss. Its side effects include tachycardia and hypertension. Lorcaserin is a selective 5-HT 2C receptor agonist that reduces food intake through the activation of pro-opiomelanocortin. Due to its selectiveness for the 5-HT 2C receptor, lorcaserin has a better safety profile than the previous serotonin agonists for weight loss that have since been removed from the U.S. market due to increased risk of stroke and acute coronary syndrome. Lorcaserin should not be used in patients on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) due to the risk of serotonin syndrome, which can be life threatening. Orlistat, a lipase inhibitor, reversibly binds to lipase and prevents both absorption and digestion of certain dietary fats. Because orlistat also interferes with the absorption of fat-soluble vitamins, patients using this drug need to supplement fat-soluble vitamins A, D, E, and K. It has significant gastrointestinal side effects including diarrhea, steatorrhea, flatulence, fecal incontinence, and oily rectal discharge.

Alternative Pharmacologic Options

Allison and colleagues reviewed the literature on dietary and herbal medications for weight loss. These agents are marketed as “food supplements,” thereby escaping the purview of the FDA. Even though these supplements cannot legally claim to treat a disease, they can claim to reduce the risk of a disease. According to the review, claims for weight loss have been made for multiple products such as chitosan, chromium picolinate, conjugated linoleic acid, ephedra alkaloids (ma huang), and Garcinia cambogia . Most of the reports involving these compounds are from poor quality studies without any randomization, control groups, or blinding, thereby placing in question both efficacy and safety of these compounds. The only studies involving herbals that have consistently demonstrated weight loss involve combinations of ephedrine and caffeine. Pharmacologically, this is expected because ephedrine, an adrenergic agonist, is known to be an appetite suppressant and a thermogenic agent. For this reason, ma huang , a natural source of the ephedra alkaloid, is added to most, if not all, dietary supplements marketed for weight loss. The success of ephedrine as a weight loss agent in combination with caffeine and or aspirin is well established. Unfortunately, multiple cases of cardiac and neurological issues, including hypertension, stroke, seizure, and even death have been reported, possibly related to the inconsistent doses in the preparations and the lack of medical supervision in people consuming these products for weight loss. Consequently, the National Institutes of Health has banned these products from any recommended weight loss regimen.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here