Introduction

This chapter reviews current understanding of the genetic architecture of coronary atherosclerosis as gleaned from Mendelian and common, complex forms of the disease. Newly identified pathways and biologic mechanisms are highlighted before discussing the present and future role of genetic testing for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

Heritability of Coronary Artery Disease

Familial clustering of CAD has long been observed and suggests an inherited basis for CAD and its downstream complication of myocardial infarction (MI). In the offspring cohort of the Framingham Heart Study, a parental history of premature CAD conferred a two- to three-fold increase in the age-specific incidence of cardiovascular events after adjustment for conventional CAD risk factors—implying a genetic basis for the observed susceptibility to CAD. Twin and family studies have estimated that the heritability of CAD is approximately 40% to 60%. Heritable effects appear most pronounced for early-onset CAD, denoting the importance of inherited over acquired risk factors for the development of premature disease. Furthermore, several risk factors for CAD, including plasma lipid concentrations, blood pressure, and type II diabetes mellitus, are themselves heritable and as such contribute to the overall heritability of the CAD/MI phenotype.

Varying patterns of inheritance have provided insights into the genetic underpinnings of CAD. Some forms of CAD demonstrate a simple, Mendelian inheritance pattern, manifest at a young age without the influence of environmental risk factors, and are typified by a single causal gene with a large effect size. Candidate gene studies and linkage analyses have elucidated these monogenic disorders through the study of patients and families with extreme phenotypes to identify causal genes contributing to the disease of interest.

However, the majority of CAD in the population exhibits a more complex and multifactorial inheritance pattern inconsistent with the ratios of Mendel. Such polygenic forms of CAD involve the interplay of many common DNA variants of small to moderate effect sizes, together with nongenetic factors, including both lifestyle and environment. Advancements in high-throughput DNA microarray technologies have permitted the identification of nearly 60 common DNA variants associated with CAD/MI through large-scale genetic association studies, accounting for approximately 13% of the cumulative genetic variance of CAD. Next-generation sequencing technologies and additional studies interrogating potential gene-environment interactions have begun to bridge the gap on the missing heritability of CAD and its risk factors.

Mendelian Causes of Coronary Artery Disease

Examples of Mendelian forms of CAD largely involve gene defects that lead to extremely high plasma concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). One such disease is familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) where defects in the LDL receptor mediate disordered uptake of cellular LDL particles from the bloodstream ( Table 3.1 ). Investigations of homozygous FH patients led to the sequencing and identification of mutations in the LDL receptor ( LDLR ) gene, resulting in defective cellular uptake of LDL-C. LDLR mutations are associated with elevated plasma concentrations of LDL-C, typical physical stigmata of severe hypercholesterolemia—ie, tendon xanthomas and corneal arcus (see Fig. 7.4, Fig. 7.5 )—and premature coronary atherosclerosis. FH is inherited in a codominant pattern where the number of abnormal allelic copies (1 or 2) correlates directly with the severity of the FH phenotype.

TABLE 3.1
Major Mendelian Disorders That Cause Severe Hypercholesterolemia
(Adapted from Rader DJ, Cohen J, Hobbs HH. Monogenic hypercholesterolemia: new insights in pathogenesis and treatment. J Clin Invest . 2003;111:1795–1803.)
Disease Causal Gene(s) Inheritance Pattern Prevalence Metabolic Defect
Familial hypercholesterolemia LDLR
APOB
PCSK9
Autosomal dominant HeFH – 1: 500
HoFH – 1: 1 × 10 6
Reduced LDL clearance
Autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia LDLRAP1 Autosomal recessive < 1: 5 × 10 6 Reduced LDL clearance
Sitosterolemia ABCG5
ABCG8
Autosomal recessive < 1: 5 × 10 6 Reduced plant sterol clearance
ABC , ATP-binding cassette; APOB , apoliporotein B; HeFH, heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia; HoFH, homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; LDLR, LDL receptor; PCSK9, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9.

Subsequent studies in FH patients without LDLR mutations led to the discovery of additional causal mutations in the APOB and PCSK9 genes, which encode for apolipoprotein B (ApoB) and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), respectively. ApoB is a key protein on the LDL particle that facilitates its binding to the LDL receptor for cellular uptake and degradation. APOB mutations associating with FH were found to interrupt the binding of the ApoB protein to LDL receptor on the cell surface, leading to reduced LDL uptake and higher plasma LDL concentrations.

PCSK9 is highly expressed in the liver and regulates cholesterol homeostasis by binding to the LDL receptor and inducing its degradation. Gain-of-function mutations in the PCSK9 gene are associated with FH presumably due to reduced LDL receptor availability and a resultant decrease in LDL particle uptake. Similar to LDLR and APOB , mutations in PCSK9 demonstrate an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern, with one copy of the mutant allele leading to an FH phenotype. Notably, loss-of-function mutations in PCSK9 are associated with upregulation of LDL receptors, a marked reduction in LDL-C concentrations, and an 88% reduction in CAD risk.

Other Mendelian disorders of hypercholesterolemia mediate CAD but through an autosomal recessive pattern of inheritance. Two aberrant copies of the LDLRAP1 gene are causative for autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia (ARH), the mechanism of which remains uncertain but appears to involve a defect in an adapter protein that disrupts the interaction between the LDL receptor and clathrin-coated pits. Individuals with ARH manifest an intermediate form of hypercholesterolemia somewhere between that of LDLR heterozygotes and LDLR homozygotes. Sitosterolemia is a rare autosomal recessive disorder of plant sterol metabolism caused by a defect in the genes encoding ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter proteins involved in the excretion of dietary plant sterols. The disease shares several clinical features with FH, such as tendon xanthomas and premature development of CAD. However, unlike FH, the disease is characterized by elevated plant sterol levels, whereas total cholesterol levels may be normal.

Attempts to uncover Mendelian forms of CAD/MI independent of the aforementioned lipoprotein pathways have been unsuccessful. A 21-kb deletion within the MEF2A gene (which encodes the myocyte enhancer factor [MEF] 2A transcription factor strongly expressed in the coronary endothelium) was initially identified as a putative autosomal dominant form of CAD/MI in a 21-member family with 13 affected individuals. However, the noted deletion and others in the MEF2A gene failed to segregate with the disease in a subsequent cohort analysis, casting doubt on whether the gene leads to CAD/MI.

Common, Complex Forms of Coronary Artery Disease

Genome-Wide Association Studies

Beyond rare variants of Mendelian disorders that confer exceptional disease risk, common DNA variants (minor allele frequency [MAF] > 0.05) with more modest effect sizes have also been shown to impact CAD risk. Population-based association studies—ie, genome-wide association studies (GWAS)—compare the DNA profiles of CAD cases and control participants free of CAD to detect statistically significant differences. GWAS have been enabled by the systematic classification of millions of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the human genome and the advent of high-throughput technologies permitting the interrogation of 1 million or more SNPs on a single microarray chip. Due to linkage disequilibrium—the nonrandom association of alleles at different loci—it is possible to cover the entire human genome of certain populations with approximately 500,000 marker SNPs for the detection of common DNA variants.

In GWAS, large populations are genotyped and allele frequencies of each SNP are compared in cases and controls to test for associations between common variants and a particular phenotype in a relatively unbiased manner. For GWAS of quantitative traits (ie, blood lipid concentrations), analysis is focused on whether SNPs associate with increases or decreases in the specific trait. Given the simultaneous interrogation of up to a million SNPs for association with the disease or quantitative trait, a stringent p -value criterion of 5 × 10 −8 or less is required to achieve genome-wide significance. Accordingly, these studies have relied upon worldwide collaborations to recruit thousands of carefully phenotyped individuals with and without the disease of interest.

Genome-Wide Association Studies of Coronary Artery Disease/Myocardial Infarction

The first locus associated with CAD at a level of genome-wide significance was reported concurrently in 2007 by three independent groups employing distinct cohorts and genotype arrays. All three studies demonstrated a 58-kb interval on chromosome 9p21 containing multiple index SNPs strongly associated with CAD with high allele frequency and robust effect size. Approximately 20% to 25% of the population were found to be homozygous for the variant, with homozygosity conferring a greater than 60% increase in risk of CAD. The locus has also been associated with the extent and severity of CAD, as increased allele frequency has been reported among patients with premature, as well as multivessel, disease. Of note, it has been repeatedly demonstrated that the 9p21 locus is not associated with traditional CAD risk factors such as plasma lipids, blood pressure, diabetes, older age, or obesity. Furthermore, the 58-kb block does not harbor any annotated genes, which renders unclear the exact mechanism by which the locus confers an elevated risk of CAD. However, studies have associated the 9p21 locus with other vascular phenotypes including carotid atherosclerosis, abdominal aortic aneurysm, peripheral artery disease, and intracranial aneurysm, suggesting a pathogenic process related to vessel wall integrity.

Subsequent meta-analyses of GWAS have involved international collaborations such as the Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium (MIGen), the Coronary ARtery DIsease Genome-Wide Replication and Meta-Analysis (CARDIoGRAM) consortium, the Coronary Artery Disease Genetics Consortium (C4D), and the combined CARDIoGRAMplusC4D consortium. Together, these large cohorts identified 48 common variants attaining genome-wide significance for association with CAD. Whereas several of these CAD risk loci include genes linked to lipoprotein metabolism, hypertension, and other related pathways, a large proportion lie in gene regions not previously implicated in CAD pathogenesis. As expected for a complex phenotype with a multifactorial origin, most of these common variants have relatively small effect sizes, with only two of the susceptibility loci—the 9p21 locus and the LPA gene (which codes lipoprotein (a))—conferring a greater than 15% risk of CAD.

The previous analyses were restricted to common SNPs (MAF > 0.05) derived from the International HapMap project. A GWAS published in 2015 leveraged more extensive human genetic data from the 1000 Genomes Project including lower frequency and insertion/deletion variants (indels). This GWAS meta-analysis comprised over 185,000 CAD cases and controls and interrogated 6.7 million common variants, as well as 2.7 million low-frequency (MAF = 0.005–0.05) variants. The study confirmed the majority of known CAD susceptibility loci and identified eight novel loci associated with CAD at a genome-wide level of significance, bringing the total number of replicated CAD susceptibility loci to 56 and accounting for approximately 13% of the overall heritability of CAD ( Table 3.2 ). Of note, the eight novel CAD risk loci and all but one of the previously identified loci were represented by risk alleles with MAF greater than 0.5. This suggests that low-frequency variants and insertion/deletion polymorphisms do not contribute significantly to the missing heritability of this complex disease, further supporting the common disease-common variant hypothesis for CAD.

TABLE 3.2
Gene Regions Identified for CAD Using the Genome-Wide Association Approach
Chr Locus Name Lead SNP EAF Risk of CAD (or) ASSOCIATION of Gene Variant with Traditional Risk Factors
1p32 PPAP2B rs17114036 0.92 1.13
1p32 PCSK9 rs11206510 0.85 1.08 LDL
1p13 SORT1 rs7528419 0.79 1.12 LDL, HDL
1q21 IL6R rs4845625 0.45 1.06
1q41 MIA3 rs17465637 0.66 1.08
2p24 APOB rs515135 0.75 1.07 LDL
2p21 ABCG5-ABCG8 rs6544713 0.32 1.05 LDL
2p11 VAMP5-VAMP8-GGCX rs1561198 0.46 1.06
2q22 ZEB2 rs2252641 0.44 1.03
2q33 WDR12 rs6725887 0.11 1.14 LDL
3q22 MRAS rs9818870 0.14 1.07
4q31 EDNRA rs1878406 0.16 1.06
4q32 GUCY1A3 rs7692387 0.81 1.07 BP
4q12 REST-NOA1 rs17087335 0.21 1.06
5q31 SLC22A4-SLC22A5 rs273909 0.12 1.06 LDL
6p21 ANKS1A rs17609940 0.82 1.03
6p24 PHACTR1 rs9369640 0.43 1.14
6p21 KCNK5 rs10947789 0.78 1.05
6q23 TCF21 rs12190287 0.62 1.06
6q25 SLC22A3-LPAL2-LPA rs2048327
rs3789220
0.35
0.02
1.06
1.42
LDL
6q26 PLG rs4252120 0.74 1.03
7p21 HDAC9 rs2023938 0.10 1.06
7q22 7q22 rs10953541 0.78 1.05
7q32 ZC3HC1 rs11556924 0.69 1.08 HDL, BP
7q36 NOS3 rs3918226 0.06 1.14 BP
8p21 LPL rs264 0.85 1.06 HDL, TG
8q24 TRIB1 rs2954029 0.55 1.04 LDL, HDL, TG
9p21 CDKN2BAS1 rs4977574
rs3217992
0.49
0.39
1.21
1.14
9q34 ABO rs579459 0.21 1.08 LDL
10p11 KIAA1462 rs2505083 0.40 1.06
10p11 CXCL12 rs501120
rs2047009
0.81
0.48
1.08
1.06
10q23 LIPA rs11203042
rs1412444
0.45
0.37
1.04
1.07
10q24 CYP17A1-CNNM2-NT5C2 rs12413409 0.89 1.08 BP, BMI
11p15 SWAP70 rs10840293 0.55 1.06
11q22 PDGFD rs974819 0.33 1.07
11q23 ZNF259-APOA5-APOA1 rs964184 0.18 1.05 LDL, HDL, TG
12q24 SH2B3 rs3184504 0.42 1.07 LDL, HDL, BP, BMI
12q21 ATP2B1 rs7136259 0.43 1.04
12q24 KSR2 rs11830157 0.36 1.12
13q12 FLT1 rs9319428 0.31 1.04
13q34 COL4A1-COL4A2 rs4773144
rs9515203
0.43
0.76
1.05
1.07
14q32 HHIPL1 rs2895811 0.41 1.04
15q25 ADAMTS7 rs7173743 0.56 1.08
15q22 SMAD3 rs56062135 0.79 1.07
15q26 MFGE8-ABHD2 rs8042271 0.90 1.10
15q26 FURIN-FES rs17514846 0.44 1.05 BP
17q23 BCAS3 rs7212798 0.15 1.08
17p11 RAI1-PEMT-RASD1 rs12936587 0.61 1.03
17p13 SMG6 rs2281727 0.35 1.05 BMI
17q21 UBE2Z rs15563 0.51 1.04
18q21 PMAIP1-MC4R rs663129 0.26 1.06 HDL, BMI
19p13 LDLR rs1122608 0.77 1.08 LDL
19q13 APOE-APOC1 rs2075650
rs445925
0.13
0.09
1.07
1.09
LDL, HDL, TG, BMI
19q13 ZNF507-LOC400684 rs12976411 0.09 0.67
21q22 KCNE2 rs9982601 0.13 1.12
22q11 POM121L9P-ADORA2A rs180803 0.97 1.20
BMI, Body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CAD, coronary artery disease; CHR, chromosome; EAF, effect allele frequency in those of European ancestry; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL , low-density lipoprotein; OR, odds ratio; TG, triglycerides.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here