Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Radiographic examination
AP
Lateral views
Computed tomography (CT)
Axial
Reformatted images
Coronal
Sagittal
3-D
Anatomy
Biomechanics
Denis three-column concept
Forces of injury
Flexion
Extension
Compression
Distraction
Shearing
Rotation
Fracture
Vertebral body
Anterior wedged compression
Burst
Chance (seat-belt)
Flexion-distraction
Extension
Vertebral appendage
Transverse process
Spinous process
Fracture-dislocation
Shearing
Flexion-distraction
Definition
Multiple spinal fractures at discontiguous levels
Incidence dependent on means of examination
Radiography 5% to 7%
CT 15% to 20%
MRI up to 50%
Patterns of primary and secondary injuries
Upper cervical spine and lower cervical spine
Lower cervical spine and lumbar spine
Thoracolumbar junction and lower lumbar spine
Mid-thoracic spine and cervical and/or lumbar spine
Importance of imaging entire spine
Osteoporosis
Dowager’s hump
Codfish vertebra deformity
Acute fractures
Pathologic fractures
Differentiate from osteoporotic fractures
Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH)
Ankylosing spondylitis
SCIWORA (spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality)
Anterior wedged compression fractures
Flexion-distraction and Chance (seat-belt) fractures
Apophyseal ring avulsions
Spinal radiographic examination obtained for significant trauma and not CT
CT is more sensitive than radiography in disclosure of fractures.
Radiographs fail to disclose 10% to 20% of fractures shown on CT.
Second-level injury in multilevel spinal injuries
Must obtain CT of the remainder of spine once a significant spinal fracture is found
Subtle widening of disc space in distraction or hyperextension injuries is overlooked.
Need to examine interspaces closely and compare with adjacent interspaces to avoid oversights
Transverse process fractures
In most cases just failed to look specifically at transverse processes for fractures
Make it a point to examine transverse processes specifically in every case.
Obvious | Look for |
---|---|
Anterior wedged compression fracture | R/O burst fracture |
Fragment of vertebral body into spinal canal | |
Wide interspinous distance | |
Sagittal fracture vertebral body | |
R/O flexion-distraction fracture | |
Horizontal fracture of posterior elements | |
Separation of spinous processes | |
Fracture of one vertebra | Similar fracture of contiguous vertebrae |
Second-level discontiguous fracture | |
Vertebral body fracture in elderly | R/O metastatic disease |
Destruction of cortex | |
Pedicle sign | |
Paraspinous soft tissue mass |
If presented with radiographs of spine
Determine nature of injuring forces; if sustained significant injury, CT examination is required.
Re-evaluate radiographic examination looking for evidence of subtle fx.
If any question concerning above, obtain CT examination of spine.
If presented with CT examination
If sustained neurologic injury, obtain MRI.
If no visible fracture or dislocation but has significant pain or inability to bear weight, obtain MRI.
Obtain MRI to disclose occult fx.
Radiographic examination
AP
Lateral views
Computed tomography (CT)
Axial
Reformatted images
Coronal
Sagittal
3-D
In the setting of blunt trauma with suspected thoracolumbar spine injury, CT is recommended by the American College of Radiology (ACR) as part of the initial trauma workup in adults.
Clinical criteria that warrant thoracolumbar spine imaging include the following 1 :
Back pain or midline tenderness
Local signs of thoracolumbar injury
Abnormal neurological signs
Cervical spine fracture or known cervical injury
GCS <15
Major distracting fracture
ETOH/drug intoxication
Rigid spine disease
In general, the thoracolumbar spine imaging with dedicated sagittal and coronal reformats of the spine can be provided from the CT chest, abdomen, and pelvis without need for additional dedicated spine CT imaging. In children <14 years CT of the thoracolumbar spine may be considered if there is a high clinical suspicion for injury, and either x-rays or CT may be indicated if a known cervical spine fracture is present. MR is clearly indicated for patients with neurologic abnormalities and may be required for evaluation of the discoligamentous complex.
Radiography was long the mainstay of imaging the potentially injured spine but has now, in large measure, been replaced by CT. Still many radiographic examinations of the thoracolumbar spine are obtained in order to “clear” the spine in patients who are thought to have little chance of a spinal fracture, in the opinion of the examining physician on the basis of the patient’s history and physical examination. AP and lateral views of the thoracolumbar spine are sufficient for this purpose ( Fig. 7-1 ). However, if there is any question of an abnormality, a CT examination is required for proper evaluation.
The examples shown of normal AP and lateral radiographs of the thoracic and lumbar spines were obtained under ideal conditions on patients without a history of trauma. The spinal radiographs of those who have sustained significant trauma are often less satisfactory due to limitations of positioning and patient motion. The spine is much better seen on CT.
CT. Multidetector CT (MDCT) with routine, excellent, immediately available image reconstructions in both the coronal and sagittal planes is now the mainstay of imaging spinal trauma. CT has proven to be much more sensitive than radiography in the detection of spinal injuries; CT reveals fractures that are not apparent on radiographs and significantly more fractures in patients with fractures shown by radiography.
Thin section axial slices are obtained, and images are reconstructed in the coronal and sagittal planes. The thoracic and lumbar spine must be examined in its entirety. Once a significant fracture or dislocation of the spine has been identified, it is important to examine the remainder of the spine to exclude the presence of other spinal injuries. CT of the entire spine is performed to clear the spine in obtunded patients.
Axial, sagittal, and coronal noncontrast images in bone algorithm
Axial and sagittal images in a soft tissue algorithm
Having a well-defined and consistent search pattern for thoracolumbar spine evaluation will allow for rapid identification and classification of spinal injuries. While the pattern of search varies among readers, the following minimum elements should be included.
Right lateral facet alignment and facet fractures ( Fig. 7-3 A )
Anterior spinal line and vertebral body heights ( Fig. 7-3 B )
Posterior spinal line ( Fig. 7-3 B )
Spinolaminar line ( Fig. 7-3 B)
Interspinous distances and posterior spinous processes ( Fig. 7-3 B )
Left lateral facet alignment and facet fractures ( Fig. 7-3 A, B )
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here