Complex patient subgroups


Complex patient subgroups that will be discussed in this chapter include:

  • TAVR patients

  • Cardiogenic shock patients

TAVR patients

CTO Manual Online case: 113

PCI Manual Online case: 62

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is increasingly being performed for symptomatic aortic stenosis patients, even those at low surgical risk. Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is often required in TAVR patients and carries unique challenges, such as coronary artery engagement, especially in patients with self-expanding valves, which extend above the coronary ostia .

Planning

Given frequent difficulty in engaging the coronary arteries in TAVR patients, preprocedural CT angiography can be performed to help understand the three-dimensional geometric interaction among the valve prosthesis, the aortic root, and the coronary ostia to help predict and prepare for potential challenges of coronary reaccess ( Fig. 24.1 ) .

Figure 24.1, Coronary reaccess after TAVR. Summary of factors impacting coronary access and imaging evaluation after TAVR. MDCT, multidetector computed tomography; TAVR, transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

However, use of CT angiography in prior TAVR patients has several limitations :

  • 1.

    CT cannot be performed in urgent or emergent situations, such as in patients with an acute coronary syndrome requiring urgent coronary angiography and PCI.

  • 2.

    CT angiography requires contrast administration that increases the risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury after additional contrast administration during cardiac catheterization.

  • 3.

    Motion artifact and image quality may limit the ability to visualize leaflet orientation of the transcatheter valve relative to the coronary ostia, making it difficult to determine whether the commissural post may impede the ability to reaccess the coronary arteries.

Monitoring

Monitoring is performed as described in Chapter 2: Monitoring .

Medications

Medication administration is performed as described in Chapter 3: Medications .

Access

Given frequent challenges associated with engagement in prior TAVR patients, femoral access may be preferred.

Engagement

Coronary engagement should be performed with extreme care aiming for coaxial positioning, and avoiding deep coronary artery intubation .

Evolut-PRO CoreValve

Engagement depending on depth of valve implantation

If the Evolut-PRO CoreValve is positioned optimally (skirt below coronary ostia), it is feasible to engage the coronary artery in a coaxial manner, assuming the native aortic valve leaflets will not interfere with the path to the coronary ostium ( Fig. 24.2 , panel A).

Figure 24.2, Self-expanding valve and coronary access depending on level of implantation across the annulus. Red dot represents the location of the coronary ostium in relation to the valve frame, and the red line represents the annular plane. The red x’s depict the closest diamonds that can be used to access the coronary ostium. An optimally positioned Evolut-R (Medtronic, Galway, Ireland) (A) would make coronary access potentially easier than one with a higher implant (B).

If the valve is deployed high ( Fig. 24.2 , panel B) coronary obstruction would not occur due to the narrow waist of the valve and sufficient sinus of Valsalva width . However, selective coronary angiography would be difficult in this scenario and would have to occur from a diamond above the ostium, given that the supra-annular valve and its covered segment (e.g., sealing skirt) would be above the level of the ostium. A straighter catheter with a short tip, such as a Judkins right (JR) 4, could be used in this scenario, even for left main artery engagement .

Engagement depending on the position of the transcatheter valve commissures in relation to those of the native aortic valve

The circumferential sealing skirt of the Evolut-PRO CoreValve is 13 mm in height (14 mm in the 34-mm Evolut-R), however it rises up to 26 mm at the commissural insertion point ( Fig. 24.3 ). If a commissure ends up being positioned directly in front of the coronary ostium coaxial engagement of the coronary ostia would be challenging, if not impossible . Engagement also depends on the width of the sinus of Valsalva that determines the space between the valve frame and the coronary ostia; the wider the sinus the more room there is to manipulate a catheter toward the coronary ostia. A narrow sinus would require a very acute angle for the catheter to be pointing toward the ostia for a nonselective coronary angiogram. If selective engagement is required, a coronary wire would have to be manipulated into the coronary artery, and the guide, or a guide catheter extension, would then have to be railed into the ostium. This represents the most difficult scenario: a valve commissure overlying a low coronary ostium in a patient with a narrow sinus of Valsalva. The aforementioned description does not account for the native aortic leaflet height and severity of calcification facing the left and right sinuses. A tall and bulky leaflet may extend beyond the 13- or 14-mm sealing skirt of the repositionable Evolut-PRO self-expanding valve and would likely further add to the challenge of coronary reaccess .

Figure 24.3, Self-expanding valve and coronary access if ostia line up with commissural post. Red line represents the annular plane. The three red dots depict coronary ostia heights of approximately 10, 14, and 18 mm above the annular plane, respectively. The red x’s depict the closest diamonds that can be used to access the coronaries. The commissural post of an Evolut-R (Medtronic, Galway, Ireland) is 26 mm in height (panel A). Depending on the height of coronary ostia, a different catheter and approach is necessary for coronary reaccess, when the ostium faces the side of the commissural post (panel B).

Catheter selection

Left coronary artery : Smaller catheters, such as a JL3.5 or JL3, are frequently used to engage the left main. On the contrary, engagement of the RCA can usually be managed with a JR4 catheter. There are reports of XB guide catheter kinking and entrapment through the valve diamonds ( Fig. 24.4 ) . The following measures may minimize the risk of catheter entrapment:

  • 1.

    Crossing the stent frame perpendicularly through a diamond at the same level with the coronary ostium.

  • 2.

    Using catheters with favorable geometry (e.g., left Judkins for left and right Amplatz for the right coronary artery).

  • 3.

    Using a balloon and/or a guidewire to back the catheter out of the coronary ostium.

Figure 24.4, Guide catheter entrapment. (A) Left coronary angiography showing total occlusion of the distal left anterior descending artery ( arrow ). (B) Left coronary angiography postpercutaneous coronary intervention and drug-eluting stent deployment ( arrow ). (C and D) Dissection of the left main and left anterior descending coronary arteries. (E) ( a ) Interrupted line showing guide catheter engagement into the left coronary ostium at an acute angle with the vertical axis of the stent frame. ( b ) Interrupted line showing crossing of the stent frame at a perpendicular angle. (F) Ex vivo simulation using an extra back-up 3.5 guide catheter, showing catheter entrapment within the stent frame when crossed at an acute angle.

Right coronary artery : JR4 or Ikari Right catheters are usually used. A JR4.5, JR5, or Amplatz right (AR) 2 catheter may be preferable if the sinus width is large, creating a larger distance from the valve frame to the ostium .

Sapien 3

Coronary engagement is often easier in patients who have a Sapien valve compared with a self-expanding valve.

Engagement depending on depth of valve implantation ( Fig. 24.5 )

Figure 24.5, Balloon-expandable valve and coronary ostia based on depth of implant. Red dots represent the different locations of the coronary ostium in relation to the valve frame of a 29 mm Sapien 3 valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California), and the red line represents the annular plane. An optimally positioned Sapien 3 valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) (panel A) would make coronary access potentially easier than one with a higher implant (panel B), where the coronary ostium will be located below the seal skirt. Tall native leaflet or bulky calcium at the leaflet tip may further increase difficulty of coronary access in a high valve implant.

Angiography

Coronary angiography is performed as described in Chapter 6: Coronary Angiography .

Selecting target lesion(s)

Performing PCI in patients with severe aortic stenosis who require TAVR remains controversial, as it carries increased risk, but could potentially decrease the risk of complications during TAVR. PCI performed at the same time as TAVR is logistically convenient, however it increases complexity and contrast use. Deferring PCI until after TAVR allows better assessment of symptoms caused by coronary artery disease (as compared with symptoms caused by aortic stenosis), but coronary artery engagement can be challenging, as described in Section 24.1.5 .

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here