Interventional Procedures


Similar to the need for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biopsy capability in a practice that performs breast MRI, the need for tomosynthesis-guided breast biopsies in a practice that uses tomosynthesis is inevitable because there are certain lesions seen only on tomosynthesis that would be impossible to biopsy using two-dimensional (2D) stereotactic guidance. This often leads to subsequent examinations, such as ultrasound and/or MRI, on which the lesion may also not confidently be identified. In addition, some subtle lesions (low-contrast and noncalcified lesions) that can be seen on 2D mammography are problematic to biopsy when using a stereotactic technique. Tomosynthesis-guided biopsies address both of these issues.

Advantages of Tomosynthesis-Guided Biopsy

The tomosynthesis biopsy unit has many advantages over dedicated prone stereotactic biopsy units. Targets visualized by tomosynthesis alone, subtle lesions better visualized with tomosynthesis compared with 2D mammography, or lesions seen only on one mammographic or tomosynthesis view are more readily biopsied under tomosynthesis guidance ( Figs. 14.1 and 14.2 ). In addition, calcifications, architectural distortion, and small mammographic masses not seen on ultrasound may be biopsied with tomosynthesis guidance ( Fig. 14.3 ). Tomosynthesis-guided breast biopsies are cost effective and easily integrated into the daily workflow, and the upright positioning of the currently available unit improves patient access by addressing barriers to prone stereotactic biopsies, such as patient comorbidities and lesion position.

FIG. 14.1, (A) Right 2D MLO and 2D CC views and corresponding MLO and CC tomosynthesis images from a tomosynthesis screening exam in a 47-year-old woman demonstrate architectural distortion (arrows) in the lower-inner right breast visualized on tomosynthesis only. (B) Right 90-degree scout view from the tomosynthesis-guided biopsy shows the area of architectural distortion (arrow) targeted for biopsy. (C) Postprocedure right 90-degree and CC views demonstrate appropriate positioning of the T-shaped clip (arrows) . Pathology revealed a radial scar.

FIG. 14.2, (A) Left two-dimensional MLO and corresponding MLO tomosynthesis from a tomosynthesis screening in a 55-year-old woman demonstrate architectural distortion (straight arrow) in the upper-left breast visualized only on the tomosynthesis MLO view. The patient had a prior benign left breast biopsy (wing clip). (B) Two orthogonal sonographic images demonstrate a 5 × 3-mm hypoechoic lesion (straight arrows) at the 1-o’clock position in the left breast 6 cm from the nipple, thought to correspond to the distortion seen on tomosynthesis. This was biopsied under ultrasound guidance, with pathology revealing stromal fibrosis. (C) Left MLO tomosynthesis view following the biopsy demonstrates that the architectural distortion (straight arrow) is anterior and inferior to the ribbon biopsy clip (curved arrow) , so tomosynthesis-directed biopsy was performed. (D) Left 90-degree scout view from the tomosynthesis-guided biopsy demonstrates the area of architectural distortion (straight arrow) targeted for biopsy. (E) Postprocedure left 90-degree view demonstrates appropriate positioning of the T-shaped clip (straight arrow) inferior to the ribbon clip (curved arrow) placed during the ultrasound-guided biopsy. Pathology revealed a radial scar.

FIG. 14.3, (A) Left mediolateral oblique and CC views from a screening mammogram in a 48-year-old woman demonstrate a new focal asymmetry (arrows) in the posterior left breast. This was not sonographically visible. (B) Left 90-degree scout view from the tomosynthesis-guided biopsy demonstrates the focal asymmetry in the left breast (arrow) . (C) Postprocedure left 90-degree and CC views demonstrate appropriate positioning of the buckle clip. The final pathology revealed a hyalinzied fibroadenoma.

Lesion Visualization

Masses and Architectural Distortion

Tomosynthesis units use high spatial resolution digital receptors, which have better signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios than the old charge-coupled device (CCD) receptors used for currently available prone stereo devices and therefore allow accurate sampling of lesions that are not visible with the CCD detector technology ( Fig. 14.4 ). Furthermore, digital breast tomosynthesis uses the full detector size during the biopsy, as opposed to the prone stereotactic biopsy device in which there is a limited window of imaging due to a smaller compression paddle. The full detector provides a larger field of view and better orientation when targeting, which can be very helpful when performing biopsies of subtle findings. Localization of subtle lesions or one-view only findings is easier with tomosynthesis because their relative location on the orthogonal view may be determined by their depth (slice location) on the view on which they are visualized. In addition, the off-axis imaging pairs used for localization with traditional stereotaxis create a challenge when targeting subtle lesions because these lesions may be seen only on the scout view or one of the two stereotactic pair views. This issue is eliminated with the tomosynthesis scout because targeting is performed directly from the scout image.

FIG. 14.4, (A) Right CC view from a screening mammogram in a 58-year-old woman demonstrates faint calcifications (arrow) in the 12-o’clock position of the right breast initially visualized only on the CC view. (B) Right magnification 90-degree and CC views demonstrate a group of faint amorphous calcifications (arrows) in the 12-o’clock position of the right breast. (C) Right CC scout view from the prone stereotactically guided biopsy. The calcifications were not visualized, and the biopsy was aborted. (D) Right CC scout view from the tomosynthesis-guided biopsy demonstrates the suspicious group of calcifications (arrow) , so the biopsy was performed and the calcifications were retrieved in the specimens. (E) Postprocedure right 90-degree and CC views demonstrate appropriate position of the buckle-shaped clip. The final pathology revealed fibrocystic changes and a fibroadenomatoid nodule.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here