Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) are prevalent in disenfranchised populations, including substance users, men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM), sex workers, ethnic minorities, and the seriously mentally ill, who all have particular difficulty advocating for and accessing adequate care. Not only is HIV infection more prevalent among the mentally ill, but psychiatric illnesses are more prevalent in those who are HIV-positive. Patients with personality disorders are also over-represented in the HIV-positive population, likely because certain traits (e.g., impulsivity, reckless disregard for safety, affective instability, or chronic feelings of emptiness) can predispose persons to risky behavior and to HIV infection.
As recently as the 1990s, HIV infection was a terminal illness. However, the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has made HIV a manageable, chronic illness for many, although sometimes associated with a high medication side-effect burden. A new cohort of aging patients with HIV infection, a range of cognitive difficulties, and chronic diseases not necessarily related to HIV itself, is emerging, despite (or because of) improved overall survival. Despite much progress, complacency, stigma, secrecy, and shame continue to interfere with HIV detection. Culture, lifestyle, and socioeconomic barriers to prevention and to appropriate HIV care persist.
HIV is a blood-borne, sexually transmitted retrovirus that contains RNA as its genetic material and the enzyme reverse transcriptase, which facilitates the (reverse) transcription of RNA to double-stranded DNA in infected human cells. This virion-derived DNA moves to the host cell nucleus, where it randomly integrates into host chromosomes, catalyzed by the virion-encoded enzyme, integrase. Once within the host chromosome, the pro-viral DNA can remain inactive (latent), or it can express a range of genetic activity, including functional virus production. Such now-functional viruses can go on to infect other cells, preferentially the CD4 subpopulation of T-lymphocytes, thereby causing severe (primarily cell-mediated) immune dysfunction for which the virus and the resulting syndrome were named. Immunodeficiency, a predilection for certain opportunistic infections, and AIDS-defining conditions correlate with a decline in CD4 lymphocyte count ( Table 30-1 ). This infection cycle repeats billions of times, the host mounts an immune response, and a set point (or dynamic equilibrium) is eventually reached. The set point varies from person to person, and it has been found to be of prognostic significance. Notably, the virus also invades the central nervous system (CNS) early, possibly within hours to days of the initial infection.
CD4 CELL COUNT (CELLS/mm 3 ) | CONDITION |
---|---|
200–500 | Thrush |
Kaposi's sarcoma | |
Tuberculosis reactivation | |
Herpes zoster | |
Herpes simplex | |
Bacterial sinusitis/pneumonia | |
100–200 | Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia |
50–100 | Systemic fungal infections |
Primary tuberculosis | |
Cerebral toxoplasmosis | |
Progressive multi-focal leukoencephalopathy | |
Peripheral neuropathy | |
Cervical carcinoma | |
0–50 | Cytomegalovirus disease |
Disseminated Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex | |
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | |
Central nervous system lymphoma | |
HIV-associated dementia |
Although the science behind HIV infection and its treatment is changing at a rapid pace, the general tenets of this chapter should provide a consistent framework for the safe and comprehensive psychiatric evaluation and care of adults at risk for, or infected with, HIV/AIDS. Four general questions help set the context for such an evaluation: At what stage of HIV infection is the patient in terms of symptomatic disease and CD4 lymphocyte count? Is there evidence of HIV-associated CNS infection? Does the patient have a pre-morbid psychiatric history? How did the patient become infected with HIV? The important implications of the first three questions might seem more obvious and should be clear by the completion of the chapter. The fourth question is often a highly personal story, one that reveals the patient as a person. The answer to this question foreshadows how the patient will relate to illness and to medical care. This knowledge informs not only the psychiatrist's evaluation but also the patient's individualized treatment and management plans.
Despite the existence of effective therapies, HIV/AIDS remains a terminal illness in much of the world; it cuts across all ages and socioeconomic groups, each with specific characteristics and considerations. The reported global prevalence of HIV has increased from 33.3 million in 2010 to 36.7 million in 2015. Women make up half of the infected adults worldwide, and roughly 1.8 million children younger than 15 years are infected.
There has been a gradual decrease in the incidence of new infections since a peak in 1998, with a 2015 incidence of roughly 2.1 million, with 150,000 of those new cases diagnosed in children younger than 15 years. This incidence is only partially offset by the (declining) total number of AIDS deaths (1.1 million in 2015), which means the number of persons living with HIV will continue to rise, although the prevalence (measured over a growing global population) has stabilized. Eastern and Southern Africa remains the most heavily infected region, accounting for 52% of all people living with HIV, for 43% of all AIDS deaths, and for 46% of all new cases in 2015. Nonetheless, these percentages have declined dramatically since the 1990s.
In the United States, among the most heavily infected industrialized nations, more than 1.2 million people are infected with the virus, of whom over 150,000 (13%) are unaware of their status. The incidence of new infections is stable in the United States at about 50,000 per year. The advent of HAART in 1996 has decreased the incidence of AIDS onset and AIDS-related deaths, so more people in the United States are living with HIV infection than ever before.
HIV is an example of a concentrated epidemic, as the risk for contracting HIV is not evenly distributed across the population. A disproportionate number of the newly infected in the United States are ethnic and racial minorities (primarily Black and Hispanic; less so Asian and Pacific Islanders), and heterosexual women. However, outbreaks of other sexually transmitted illnesses (STIs) in gay men raise the specter of a possible HIV resurgence in this population and suggest that the success of HAART may have led to complacency and the resumption of unsafe sexual practices in MSM, to some degree fueled by the recreational use of methamphetamine (crystal meth). Indeed, in 2011, the majority of new HIV diagnoses in the United States were among MSM (in all but one state), and the incidence among this group increased by 12% from 2008 to 2010. Furthermore, unprotected anal sex at least once in the past 12 months increased from 48% in 2005 to 57% in 2011. Up to 30% of patients with HIV disease are also infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). These co-infected patients are rather different from HIV mono-infected patients with regard to risk factors and psychiatric illnesses; most patients have acquired HCV from injection drug use, which is the main mode of transmission for HCV.
Early treatment is now the gold standard in patients with HIV. ART initiation at the time of diagnosis, regardless of CD4 count, is recommended to reduce clinically relevant morbidity and mortality related to, and unrelated to, HIV/AIDS. In a large multi-site, multi-continent study known as the “START study,” early treatment was shown to significantly reduce the risk of serious AIDS-related events, serious non-AIDS-related events, or death from any cause, compared with a deferred-treatment initiation arm, in which subjects were not treated until the CD4 count dropped below 350. Since 2012, the United States Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) guidelines have recommended immediate ART initiation; with publication of the START study, the WHO has adopted the recommendation of ART for all as well.
Goals of antiretroviral therapy are to achieve sustained virologic suppression of HIV, recover immune function (for which the surrogate marker is CD4 T lymphocyte cell numbers), and thereby reduce HIV-associated morbidity and mortality and reduce community transmission of HIV. There are currently six FDA-approved classes of antiretroviral medications: nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs); non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs); protease inhibitors (PIs); integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs); entry inhibitors; and fusion inhibitors. As described earlier, the complex process leading to successful viral replication and propagation involves several steps. Drugs target various stages of the HIV replication cycle: in the first four classes mentioned, they interfere with viral replication inside infected host cells; the latter two classes prevent viral entry into the host cell. Antiretroviral medications are used in combinations, typically three agents from more than one class. Single-drug therapy is ineffective because of the rapid development of resistance to that agent and in turn, to an entire class of medications. Similarly, incomplete adherence to a multi-drug combination regimen allows HIV-1 to continue replicating, again allowing for mutation to occur and class-wide resistance to develop, thus limiting the prospects for further effective treatment. Therefore, the impression of importance of adherence to medications and engagement of patients in therapy is critical for treatment success.
The United States DHHS provides recommendations for the treatment-naive patient, of which first-line consists of two NRTIs plus either an INSTI or ritonavir-boosted PI. Of these, there are currently three one-pill once-daily options; several studies and a meta-analysis have shown better adherence in populations receiving once-daily regimens ( Table 30-2 ).
INSTI-Based Regimens | DTG/ABC/3TC a,d |
DTG/TDF/FTC | |
EVG/c/TAF/FTC b,d | |
EVG/c/TDF/FTC c,d | |
RAL/TDF/FTC | |
PI-Based Regimens | DRV/r + TDF/FTC |
a Only for patients who are HLA-B*5701-negative.
b Only for patients with estimated CrCl ≥30.
Nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) are nucleoside analogs that inhibit the action of the enzyme reverse transcriptase which thereby slows or prevents viral replication. This class forms the backbone of most current combination regimens. While older NRTIs were associated with challenging pharmacokinetics requiring multiple daily doses, drug interactions, and complications, such as pancreatitis and bone marrow toxicity, or disfiguring lipodystrophy, newer drugs are better tolerated and easier to take. Currently, the two most commonly used NRTI combinations are: tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) with emtricitabine (FTC); and abacavir (ABC) with lamivudine (3TC). In 2015, tenofovir alafenamide, an oral prodrug of tenofovir, was approved by the United States FDA as a safer alternative to TDF, featuring less potential for adverse kidney and bone effects compared with TDF.
As with the NRTIs, the NNRTIs also interfere with reverse transcriptase. The NNRTIs are potent agents and have been shown to be active against viral strains of HIV that are resistant to NRTIs and sometimes PIs. However, if NNRTIs are used alone or with a single NRTI, resistance develops quickly, and it usually generalizes to the whole class (i.e., to all the NNRTIs). Drug interactions with other drugs can occur because of their metabolism by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) hepatic isoenzyme system. Efavirenz is an NNRTI noteworthy for its greater potential for neuropsychiatric side effects (e.g., somnolence, agitation, insomnia, abnormal or vivid dreams, impaired concentration and attention, psychosis, and suicidality). Such side effects are thought to be related to plasma level and are pharmacogenetically predisposed. Importantly, the risk of suicidal ideation or attempted or completed suicide may be up to twice as high for patients taking an efavirenz-containing regimen compared with efavirenz-free regimens. The NNRTIs as a class can also cause a rash early on; it is thought to be more common and severe (including onset of Stevens–Johnson syndrome) with nevirapine, which is less commonly used in the United States but still is a component of regimens in developing countries.
Protease inhibitors (PIs) are another potent class of medications, and unlike NNRTIs have a higher barrier to resistance. The initiation of 3-drug therapy (NRTI backbone and either NNRTI or PI agents) heralded the “highly active” antiretroviral therapy or HAART era. For the first time, HIV RNA was suppressed below the limit of detection, immune recovery occurred, and patients' survival increased dramatically.
PIs interfere with viral replication, maturation, and new infection of cells by inhibiting the enzymatic cleavage of necessary viral protein precursors. The PIs have undergone significant drug development and have matured from being handfuls of pills multiple times per day with prominent side effects to well-tolerated minimal once-daily regimens. PIs are metabolized by CYP enzymes, leading to the most significant drug interactions among antiretroviral agents. PIs can cause gastrointestinal (GI) side effects and liver transaminase elevations. In addition, PIs can worsen or cause diabetes, insulin resistance, lipodystrophy, and hyperlipidemia.
Integrase is the viral enzyme that catalyzes the integration of virally derived DNA into the host cell DNA in the nucleus, forming a provirus that can be activated to produce viral proteins. The initiation of integrase inhibitors in 2007 brought the first new class of medications in two decades, which was found to be an incredibly effective and well-tolerated class. A trial with treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients demonstrated more-rapid decline in viral load (as compared with efavirenz) key data, which helped to make integrase inhibitors, initially used for multi-drug-resistant HIV, a key component of first-line regimens for treatment-naive individuals.
Moving away from the replication cycle, the next two classes of agents prevent viral entry into the host cell. In order for the HIV virion to enter the CD4 cell, it must bind to the cell at two binding sites. Viral protein gp120 forms a complex with the CD4 receptor exposing CD4 cell co-receptors, either CCR5, CXCR4, or both. The virus can use either co-receptor to bind to gp120 to enter into the host cell, but some strains of virus are predisposed to CCR5, and others to CXCR4. Maraviroc selectively targets CCR5 and blocks the binding of HIV to CCR5 co-receptors in CCR5-tropic (R5 virus) HIV-1 infection. Hence, if the virus is able to use CXCR4 as a co-receptor instead, maraviroc is not effective. Therefore, prior to the use of maraviroc, viral tropism testing must be performed to determine if it is a solely CCR5 tropic virus. Though well-tolerated, this tropism makes maraviroc a limited option.
Enfuvirtide interferes with viral fusion to the host cell membrane by inhibiting the necessary conformational change in a particular viral envelope protein (gp41) that would allow viral entry into a host cell. Administered subcutaneously, enfuvirtide requires twice-daily injections. It is commonly associated with injection-site reactions, an increased incidence of bacterial pneumonia, and rare hypersensitivity reactions. The drug is now rarely used for treatment-experienced patients who develop viral replication despite continuous antiretroviral therapy.
Within days of the initial infection, the virus is transported to the brain by monocytes that then differentiate into macrophages. These infected but not dead macrophages may be activated randomly, leading over time to excessive secretion of normal inflammatory substances and cell death without neuronal infection. That is, HIV infection causes neuronal destruction without infecting neurons. The CNS appears to be an independent reservoir of HIV replication; CSF viral load does not consistently correlate with plasma levels. HIV in the CNS might also have different characteristics, such as mutations with increased viral resistance or neurotoxicity, than those of the peripherally observed virus. Current antiretrovirals have variable blood–brain barrier penetrance, they may be less potent inhibitors of viral replication within the CNS, and some are themselves neurotoxic. The optimal antiretroviral drug regimen to combat HIV in the brain remains to be determined, but peripheral suppression of viral replication will need to be coupled with neuroprotection. New therapies might target regulatory human genes involved in viral replication, the identification and exploitation of brain HIV-inhibitory factors, and the enhancement of intrinsic brain defenses that favor neuroprotective, as opposed to neurotoxic, responses to the virus.
HIV has a predilection for subcortical structures, such as the hippocampus and basal ganglia, with lower concentrations in the cerebellum and mid-frontal cortices. This distribution, further differentiation of viral burden within particular basal ganglia regions, and concomitant structural changes in the brain (including ventricular enlargement, hippocampal atrophy, decreased basal ganglia volume, and white matter lesions), might explain the more characteristic cognitive and behavioral impairments associated with HIV infection of the CNS, as well as the sensitivity of patients with HIV to the extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) of certain psychiatric medications. These types of lesions in the base of the skull are better visualized by brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) than by computed tomography (CT) scanning.
When evaluating neurocognitive impairment in the HIV-positive patient, HIV infection of the CNS should always be a diagnosis of exclusion, made only after a thorough investigation of other possible etiologies for neurocognitive impairment, especially if symptoms are new or of acute onset. Opportunistic infection, neoplasm, other systemic illness, medication side effects, drug–drug interactions, use of recreational drugs, withdrawal syndromes, and metabolic and nutritional derangements should be considered. Primary psychiatric disease should be at the bottom of the list, especially if there is not a significant pre-infection history.
Although neuropsychologic testing might not be specific, it helps to localize and quantify impairments. Recommended neuropsychological tests include an HIV-specific test battery based on measures found by the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) and the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study to be sensitive to HIV-related cognitive deficits. These measures include Trail Making A and B, WAIS-R (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised) digit span and digit symbol, grooved pegboard, finger tapping, Stroop color and word test, FAS test of verbal fluency, Odd Man Out test, and computer-based measures of complex reaction time. Other measures are added as clinically indicated. Test battery times less than 60 minutes are less likely to produce patient fatigue, which confounds test interpretation and creates significant patient frustration or humiliation. Despite these recommendations, there is no ideal test, and it is important to keep in mind that mild deficits on testing can have significant functional consequences.
HAND encompasses three conditions, including HIV-associated dementia (HAD), HIV-associated mild neurocognitive disorder (MND), and asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment (ANI). HAND presents with executive dysfunction, memory impairment, attention deficits, and poor impulse control, and can be associated with motor dysfunction including bradykinesia, loss of coordination and gait imbalance. These conditions are all diagnosed using neuropsychological testing and functional status assessments, and are thought to affect 15% to 55% of HIV-positive individuals.
HIV-associated dementia (HAD), a subcortical dementia similar to that seen in Huntington's disease, is severe enough to cause functional impairment and marked impairment (>2 standard deviations, SDs, below demographically corrected norms) in at least two cognitive domains. HAD is an AIDS-defining condition with a prevalence in the United States of 21% to 25% before the advent of HAART; since then, it has decreased to less than 5%. Associated with reduced white-matter volume, atrophy of the basal ganglia (reduced gray matter volume), and cell death, HAD is characterized by slowed information processing, deficits in attention and memory, and impairments in abstraction and fine motor skills. Though the prevalence has decreased dramatically, HAD is now seen in patients with less severe immunosuppression and less evidence of structural brain changes, such as HIV encephalitis, as compared with 20 years ago.
Mild neurocognitive disorder (MND) is thought to affect 20% of HIV-positive patients. By definition, MND involves mild to moderate cognitive impairment (1 SD), in at least two cognitive domains, that at least mildly interferes with daily activities. For patients in cognitively taxing jobs, however, even “mild” problems may be significant enough to interfere with, and to preclude, continued employment.
By definition, ANI, which may affect up to 30% of patients with HIV infection and accounts for 70% of all HAND, also involves mild to moderate cognitive impairment (1 SD) in at least two cognitive domains but without obvious impairment in daily function. It is extremely difficult to make the judgment that there are no obvious functional impairments without extensive third-person observation. ANI is a significant risk factor for progression to more severe forms of HAND, conveying a two- to six-fold increased risk.
Ongoing HIV replication in the brain can persist even in the setting of systemic viral suppression. Early HIV infection of the CNS and persistent CNS HIV infection and inflammation probably contribute to the development of HAND, and it may be that neuronal dysfunction, rather than cell death, is the mediator. Chronic macrophage/microglial activation and associated oxidative stress, viral persistence in the CNS, and HAART-related toxicity may also play a role. Markers that remain strongly correlated with the development of HAND include CD4 + T cell count nadir and a history of clinically defined AIDS. Other risk factors for the development of HAND include older age, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, tobacco and other substance use, and HCV co-infection. Cognitive reserve is also important—those with a higher education level may be less likely to develop HAND.
There remains no definitive treatment for HAND. Formerly, there was hope that early treatment with HAART would prevent the onset of HAND, but the recent START trial failed to show a major effect of early HAART treatment. For patients not currently on HAART, initiation of medication can lead to dramatic improvements in a subset, but many patients on HAART will still develop HAND over time. However, maintenance on HAART conveys a much lower risk of progression of HAND, assuming viral load remains suppressed. Recently, a few small studies have suggested that the addition of maraviroc to an existing effective combination regimen may be associated with improved cognition in individuals with baseline impairment. Importantly, the CNS penetration-effectiveness (CPE) of an antiretroviral medication into the CNS is not correlated with improvement in HAND. In fact, a large cohort study of over 50,000 patients found that those receiving a regimen with high CPE were 74% more likely to develop HAD compared to a regimen with low CPE.
As many as 5% to 10% of patients on HAART may experience a phenomenon in which there is a discordant elevation of HIV RNA in the CSF despite relatively intact immune function correlates with incident neuropsychiatric symptoms. This phenomenon is known as CSF viral escape. Patients present acutely to subacutely, with symptoms of encephalitis, myelitis, or meningitis, and may experience psychiatric symptoms including depressive features. The CSF usually demonstrates a lymphocyte-predominant pleocytosis and mild to moderately elevated protein, while MRI often shows bilateral, confluent white matter hyperintensities. CSF viral escape is thought to be influenced by either independent development of viral resistance in the CSF and/or inadequate CNS penetration of HAART.
Psychiatric symptoms are common in the HIV-infected population and can reach a level of severity to meet criteria for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders , 5th edition (DSM-5) disorders. Or, as with neurocognitive impairments, psychiatric symptoms may be sub-syndromal; underlying causes should be identified and reversed when possible, although it might still be necessary to treat the psychiatric symptoms ( Table 30-3 ).
Psychiatric disorders
Psychoactive substance intoxication or withdrawal
Primary HIV-associated syndromes
Seroconversion illness
HIV CNS infection
HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND)
CNS opportunistic infections
Fungi: Cryptococcus neoformans, Coccidioides immitis, Candida albicans, Histoplasma capsulatum, Aspergillus fumigatus , and mucormycosis
Protozoa/parasites: Toxoplasma gondii and amebas
Viruses: CJ virus (progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, PML), CMV, adenovirus type 2, herpes simplex virus, and varicella zoster virus
Bacteria: Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare, M. tuberculosis, Listeria monocytogenes , Gram-negative organisms, Treponema pallidum , and Nocardia asteroides
Other neurotropic infective agent
Hepatitis C virus
Neoplasms
Primary CNS non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
Metastatic Kaposi's sarcoma (rare)
Burkitt's lymphoma
Medication side effects
Endocrinopathies and nutrient deficiencies
Addison's disease (CMV, Cryptococcus , HIV-1, and ketoconazole)
Hypothyroidism
Vitamins A, B 6 , B 12 , and E deficiencies
Hypogonadism
Anemia
Metabolic abnormalities: hypoxia; hepatic, renal, pulmonary, adrenal, and pancreatic insufficiency; hypomagnesemia; hypocalcemia; water intoxication, dehydration; hypernatremia; hyponatremia; alkalosis; and acidosis
Hypotension
Complex partial seizures
Head trauma
Non-HIV-related conditions
CJ, Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease; CMV, cytomegalovirus; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.
Differential diagnosis should always begin with mental disorder due to another medical condition. HIV CNS infection and HAND should be considered, along with opportunistic infections and neoplasms. Other considerations include side effects of medications; drug–drug interactions, such as herbal and OTC preparations; alcohol and recreational drugs; substance intoxication or withdrawal. Nutritional effects include nutritional deficits, such as thiamine, folate, zinc, cobalamin (vitamin B 12 ), and pyridoxine (vitamin B 6 ); poor intake resulting from medication or disease-induced nausea, painful oral lesions; poor absorption; abnormal losses, such as from gastritis, diarrhea, vomiting, or nephropathy; or increased demand resulting from hypermetabolic state due to infection, stress, or neoplasm. Metabolic derangements (e.g., electrolyte abnormalities), renal or hepatic dysfunction, and endocrinopathies (e.g., glucose intolerance, hyperadrenalism, hypocalcemia, or thyroid dysfunction) can also cause psychiatric symptoms.
Delirium is a common neuropsychiatric complication in hospitalized patients with AIDS, and it may be a predictor of significantly decreased survival. In patients with asymptomatic HIV infection or CD4 lymphocyte counts greater than 500/µL, it is rare for an HIV-related condition to cause delirium; substance intoxication or withdrawal is a more likely cause. This includes drugs (such as steroids) used as alternative HIV therapies.
Among patients with symptomatic HIV infection or a CD4 lymphocyte count <500/µL, HIV-related conditions and iatrogenic causes ( Table 30-3 ) should be high on the differential diagnosis for delirium and should be at the top of the list for patients at advanced stages of AIDS or when the CD4 lymphocyte count falls below 100/µL. There should be a continued high index of suspicion for substance intoxication and withdrawal. Seizure disorder should also be in the differential diagnosis because HIV-infected patients are at increased risk for new-onset seizures, especially partial complex seizures.
A sudden change in mental status is not characteristic of HAD alone. Patients with advanced HAD experience symptomatic worsening with mild states of delirium during the late afternoon when they are increasingly fatigued or during the night (i.e., sundowning).
The primary goal in the management of delirium is the identification and treatment of causative factors. The need for laboratory tests, including brain imaging, electroencephalogram (EEG), CSF examination, and blood tests, must be guided by history and clinical examination. If delirium is a treatment-emergent adverse effect, the suspected medication should be discontinued or an alternative agent substituted.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here