Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of Celeste Shelton CGC, PhD, Mark Haupt MD, and Brandon Blobner PhD for critically reviewing of this chapter.
The new paradigm of precision medicine provides a robust framework for understanding pancreatic diseases and leads to new insights into disease mechanisms. This framework has resulted in a series of breakthroughs in clinical and translational sciences. International consensus has now been reached on a new mechanistic definition of chronic pancreatitis (CP) that facilitates precision medicine. An international consensus group also concluded that the traditional definition of, and diagnostic criteria for CP that is based on identifying irreversible fibrosis in the pancreas, precludes the diagnosis of early CP and provides little guidance for targeted treatments. Thus, a new paradigm is required to improve management of pancreatic diseases.
This chapter focuses on genetics as a key component of precision medicine, is predicated on the mechanistic definition of CP, and highlights both Mendelian disorders and complex genetic conditions affecting the pancreas. The rapidly expanding genetic information has been organized into systems and models and linked to clinical management considerations when possible. This chapter will outline current knowledge of many key genes and genetic syndromes that are known to influence human health. When possible, the discussion will go beyond genetics to discuss principles of precision medicine for pancreatic diseases and to guide the clinician in using ge netic data for patients with established, suspected, early, or complex pancreatic diseases.
The traditional (20th century, Western medicine) paradigm was based on the germ theory of disease, where one and only one factor causes a specific disease. A specific disease is defined in the germ theory model using clinicopathologic criteria. A disease may be further classified as a syndrome , consisting of a group of signs and symptoms that typically occur together to characterize and diagnose the disease. Defining a disease as a syndrome does not require knowing or addressing the causes, the mechanism, the natural course, or the effects of interventions.
An international effort to define pancreatitis, and specifically CP, occurred in 3 “Marseille Symposia” between 1963 and 1989. Because pancreatic tissue is challenging to obtain in living patients, a more pragmatic clinical approach was developed in 1984 using imaging criteria as a surrogate of fibrosis, known as the Cambridge Score. CP was defined as “a continuing inflammatory disease of the pancreas, characterized by irreversible morphological change, and typically causing pain and/or permanent loss of function.” Subsequent definitions and diagnostic criteria followed this approach. However, a clinicopathologic approach provides little insight into the underlying mechanism of CP. Thus, after 100 years of research using the “scientific method” as prescribed in the germ theory paradigm (e.g., Koch’s postulates), it was conceded in 1995 that CP “remains an enigmatic process of uncertain pathogenesis, unpredictable clinical course, and unclear treatment.”
The 1996 discovery that a mutation in the cationic trypsinogen gene (PRSS1) caused hereditary pancreatitis (HP), with phenotypes of recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP) and CP that were similar to common pancreatic inflammatory diseases, , introduced the concept of genetics to inflammatory diseases of the pancreas. However, this concept did not fit into the traditional definition of CP nor the diagnostic criteria of demonstrating irreversible fibrosis. The discovery of additional genetic risk variants in other disease-associated genes further challenged the clinicopathologic framework for pancreatic disorders. These facts, plus new observations described later, indicate that the traditional approach to complex disorders like pancreatitis is inadequate.
Health care professionals and patients recognized many of the shortcomings of the traditional approaches to pancreatitis based on tissue fibrosis detected by imaging procedures such as ERCP or CT. First, the time between the onset of symptoms and disease diagnosis is often 5 to 10 years or more. , During this time the patient may suffer from RAP and progressive pain, undergo multiple costly and invasive diagnostic tests, and may seek radical treatments that may not be in their long-term interest. Second, diagnosis of “early” CP is impossible using imaging alone because the sensitive findings for early fibrosis are non-specific for CP. , , Third, the clinical course, including disease trajectory, complications, and outcomes, using clinicopathologic assessments is unpredictable. , Fourth, treatment tends to be symptom-based and not targeted at the underlying problem so that the disease typically continues to progress even while under treatment. , Because CP is a complex disorder affecting multiple pathways, selecting “fibrosis” as the primary biomarker to define the disease and measure progression is problematic. Specifically, imaging features of fibrosis do not correlate well with pain, exocrine pancreatic function, diabetes mellitus, , or disease prognosis , —which are the primary clinical concerns of these patients.
A new paradigm is needed for early diagnosis and ongoing management of syndromes such as pancreatitis that are complex. Complex disorders require that 2 or more independent factors interact to cause a disease while the individual factors are neither necessary nor sufficient to cause disease alone. A precision medicine paradigm is required for complex disorders such as pancreatitis because multiple etiologies result in the same pathology, the same pathology results in variable outcomes, and the treatment effects are unpredictable. Precision medicine for pancreatic diseases focuses on underlying mechanisms rather than case-control associations in populations defined by clinicopathologic criteria, modeling, and simulation of disease rather than pathologic feature classification, and on providing guidance to individuals rather than populations. This approach relies on understanding the biology underlying a disease, requires the use of disease models that incorporate the relevant biological mechanism as well as patient-specific variants, and seeks to predict the effects of multiple variables under multiple conditions rather than the identification of a single causative factor. Although the integration of useful models into relevant models for applying precision medicine to many diseases remains a futuristic concept, precision medicine for pancreatic diseases is now possible.
The pancreas serves as an important use-case for precision medicine because the pancreas is a simple gland affected by only a few environmental and metabolic factors. The pancreas has only 3 types of specialized cells: acinar, duct, and islet. Each cell type has one primary function and the molecular mechanisms are well described. Furthermore, the pancreas is protected from direct contact with most environmental insults because of its retroperitoneal location (somewhat protected from trauma), sphincter-protected duct system (protected from direct contact with the gut luminal environment), and its blood supply (protected from the portal venous blood coming from the intestine). It is also generally protected from most toxic compounds because it does not play a major role in xenobiotic detoxification or clearance of waste products. The lack of strong, independent environmental factors or other agents to directly cause complex inflammatory diseases of the pancreas, such as CP, highlights the importance of other factors such as pathogenic genetic variants and disease modifiers, alone or in combination. Knowledge of the molecular mechanisms, including the proteins, the genes that code for them, and regulatory mechanism(s) within the context of a patient’s existing conditions and environment provides the basis for precision medicine. The importance of genetic testing for multiple genes in idiopathic RAP and CP in adults and children is clinically indicated for diagnosis and management of these disorders. Additional benefit comes with the integration of simple and complex genetic findings with clinical symptoms, biomarkers, and progressive stages into clinical practice using new tools and approaches. Precision medicine also goes beyond genetics to consider the individual’s exposure to the environment (internal and external) and lifestyle. , It endeavors to redefine our understanding of disease onset and progression, treatment response, and health outcomes through the more precise measurement of potential contributors. , Although there remains a number of hurdles to widespread adoption and utilization of precision medicine for most diseases, the new mechanistic definition of CP and associated models now makes precision medicine possible for inflammatory diseases of the pancreas.
Some remaining challenges include the large number of genetic variants to be considered, including disease modifiers, and the expertise of genetic laboratory directors who generate clinical reports for complex non-Mendelian and non-cancerous conditions and who are trained in anatomical or laboratory pathology or Mendelian genetics rather than patient care. Because most patients with RAP and/or early CP patients do not have a single etiology, a strong family history, distinguishing familial features, or pathology, the traditional context for defining and diagnosing the disorder, or for providing guidance in clinical management is lacking. New integrative approaches and useful tools are needed to benefit more fully from the new opportunities of precision medicine.
Precision medicine . Also called personalized or individualized medicine, it is defined here as the discipline of deciphering the origin of disorders that lead to a disease and using targeted therapies to minimize dysfunction and maximize health. For complex diseases, a disorder is defined as the disruption of the regular or normal functions, whereas a disease is a pathologic condition that impairs normal function of an organ or system and is typically manifested by distinguishing signs and symptoms. Acquired diseases of the pancreas indicates that the organ, or system, functions sufficiently for a period without disease despite the underlying disorder. However, the existence of pathogenic germline mutations within specific susceptibility or modifier genes or regulatory regions indicates the existence, since conception, of an underlying functional disorder within specific biological systems that are required to respond appropriately under specific conditions. Under some circumstances, such as injury or stress that pushes a system beyond a tolerated threshold, the cell or gland can no longer compensate for the disorder leading to pathologic consequences. The pathologic consequences of the combination of pathogenic genetic variants, metabolic conditions, environmental stressors, or injuries initiates and drives the pathogenic process to disease . Thus, in the absence of disease the pathogenic genetic variants represent risk , whereas in the presence of disease pathogenic genetic variants help define the disease mechanism .
Inflammatory diseases of the pancreas . The majority of clinically significant pancreatic disorders are complex inflammatory conditions classified as acute pancreatitis (AP), , RAP, , and CP. , , In addition, there are rare Mendelian syndromes that affect the pancreas in different ways (e.g., exocrine pancreatic insufficiency [EPI]), but the stages and management of these genetic disorders generally follow the approach to the more common pancreatic disorders.
Acute pancreatitis . AP represents an event triggered by sudden pancreatic injury that is followed by sequential inflammatory responses (see Chapter 58 ). RAP has been defined as a syndrome of multiple distinct acute inflammatory responses originating within the pancreas in individuals with genetic, environmental, traumatic, morphologic, metabolic, biologic, and/or other risk factors who experienced 2 or more episodes of documented AP, separated by at least 3 months.
Chronic pancreatitis . CP is a process with persistent and progressive pathologic stages that usually begins as AP or RAP and ends with immune system-mediated destruction of the pancreas and widespread glandular fibrosis and atrophy (see Chapter 59 ). , , The new mechanistic definition of CP includes the previously well-described characteristics of established and advanced CP including, “pancreatic atrophy, fibrosis, pain syndromes, duct distortion and strictures, calcifications, pancreatic exocrine dysfunction, pancreatic endocrine dysfunction, and dysplasia.” In addition, the essence of CP is defined for the first time as “a pathologic fibro-inflammatory syndrome of the pancreas in individuals with genetic, environmental, and/or other risk factors who develop persistent pathologic responses to parenchymal injury or stress.” This definition is linked to a progressive model ( Fig. 57.1 ) that covers a patient’s lifetime. The definition also links CP specifically to variations in the normal injury → inflammation → resolution → regeneration sequence of the acinar or duct cells to injury or stressors, providing specificity as to the disorders of RAP and leading to CP. The new definition is linked with a progressive model that includes AP as the sentinel acute pancreatitis event (SAPE) , and RAP as an important proximal risk factor for progressing to CP. The progressive model also anticipates Early CP, which cannot be diagnosed by traditional definitions of CP. , Thus, the processes leading to CP can potentially be detected early in patients with RAP and/or Early CP before the common features of well-established and advanced CP emerge and when earlier management is most likely to be effective. The new definitions of RAP and CP are not mutually exclusive, and both syndromes can be present at the same time.
Hereditary pancreatitis . HP refers to RAP or CP in an individual from a family in which the pancreatitis phenotype appears to be inherited through a disease-causing gene mutation expressed in an autosomal dominant pattern. , Individuals with pancreatitis who carry a gene mutation that causes autosomal dominant pancreatitis (e.g., PRSS1 p.N29I, p.R122H) but who do not have a clear family history also have HP.
Familial pancreatitis . This term refers to pancreatitis from any cause that occurs in a family with an incidence that is greater than would be expected by chance alone, given the size of the family and incidence of pancreatitis within a defined population. Familial pancreatitis may or may not be caused by a genetic defect.
Tropical pancreatitis (TP) . TP was previously defined as a form of early age–onset, nonalcoholic CP occurring in tropical regions that is often clustered among family members and that may have a complex genetic basis. , With growing knowledge of complex genetics, the term “tropical pancreatitis” may become obsolete.
Mendelian syndromes involving the pancreas . These diseases are pancreatic disorders following classic Mendelian inheritance patterns, which are recognized as autosomal dominant (e.g., HP; see earlier) or autosomal recessive (e.g., CF) genetic disorders. They often effect multiple organs outside the pancreas as illustrated by CF, Shwachman-Diamond syndrome (SDS), Johanson-Blizzard syndrome, and others. Pearson marrow-pancreas syndrome is a rare mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) breakage syndrome with exocrine pancreatic dysfunction and maternal inheritance.
Complex pancreatic disorders. These are pancreatic diseases that do not follow Mendelian patterns of single-gene genetics. Most cases of CP are complex genetic disorders. Complex pancreatic disorders, by definition, are established when multiple factors must occur together for the phenotype to be expressed, and may involve 2 or more genes (polygenic disorders), gene-environment interactions, or a combination of factors. Complex genetic disorders differ from additive genetic effects in which the genetic effects at 2 separate loci are equal to the sum of their individual effects. In polygenic disorders, the pathogenic alleles from more than 1 gene cause a disease in a symbiotic fashion when neither of the mutant genes alone is disease causing. Modifier genes are not disease causing; instead, they alter a particular aspect of the disease process or confer unique phenotypic features to a genetic disorder.
Fig. 57.1 shows a progressive model of CP that organizes genetic and environmental risks and modifying factors, clinical features, biomarkers, and complications in response to dysfunction of the injury → inflammation → resolution → regeneration sequence. Some patients develop evidence of CP without going through all of the steps, but the model still allows for the complex risk profile and probabilities of progression to be calculated in most patients. The model is agnostic to the mechanism of injury or progression through the various stages as long as it includes significant injury and/or stress, and inflammation. The later complications of fibrosis, pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, various chronic pain syndromes, and cancer risk are not surrogates of each other, but represent disease features of different cell types or systems linked to the pancreas.
There are many independent and combined risk factors for CP, which become pathogenic once the inflammatory process has been initiated (see Fig. 57.1 , Stage A). TIGAR-O is an acronym for classes of etiological factors including Toxic-metabolic, Idiopathic, Genetic, Autoimmune, Recurrent acute or severe AP, and Obstructive causes. An updated TIGAR-O list ( Box 57.1 ) organizes the major etiological factors found in an individual recognizing that most patients have multiple risk factors. The TIGAR-O approach is also integrated into the M-ANNHEIM classification system using a modified acronym.
Alcohol-associated
1-2 drinks/day (low risk)
3-4 drinks/day (intermediate risk)
5 or more drinks/day (high risk)
>occasional—high risk for progression
Tobacco smoking
Past smoker (intermediate risk)
Current smoker (high risk for susceptibility and progression)
Hypercalcemia
Hyperparathyroidism
Other NOS
Hypertriglyceridemia
Clinical diagnosis—sporadic or genetics unknown (see below)
Chronic renal failure
Medications (see Box 57.2 and Chapters 58 and 59 Chapter 58Chapter 59)
Toxins
Oxidative stress-generating
Organotin compounds (e.g., DBTC)
Other, NOS
Other
Post-irradiation
Other, NOS
Early onset (<35 years of age)
Late onset (≥35 years of age)
Tropical (obsolete)
Tropical calcific pancreatitis
Fibrocalculous pancreatic diabetes
Other, NOS
Suspected (No or limited genotyping available)
Autosomal dominant (Mendelian inheritance)
PRSS1 mutations (Hereditary Pancreatitis)
Carboxyl ester lipase (CEL)— MODY 8 phenotype
Other, NOS
Autosomal recessive (Mendelian inheritance)
CFTR, 2 severe variants in trans (cystic fibrosis)
CFTR, <2 severe variants in trans (CFTR-RD)
SPINK1 2 pathogenic variants in trans
Other, NOS
Complex genetics—any disease mechanism not included above:
with pathogenic calcium-sensing receptor (CASR) variants
with pathogenic CEL variants (non-MODY 8)
with pathogenic CFTR variants
with pathogenic CTRC variants
with pathogenic SPNK1 variants
Other, NOS
Modifier Genes (pathogenic-linked variants)
CLDN2
SLC26A9
GGT1
ABO —B blood type
Celiac disease-associated pathogenic variant
Other, NOS
Hypertriglyceridemia syndromes (pathogenic-linked variants)
LPL —lipoprotein lipase deficiency
APOC2 —Apolipoprotein C-II deficiency
Other familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS)
Multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome (MCS)
Other, NOS
Rare, non-neoplastic pancreatic genetic variant-associated syndromes
Shwachman-Diamond syndrome
Johanson-Blizzard syndrome
Mitochondrial, including Pearson marrow-pancreas syndrome
Other, NOS
Isolated autoimmune chronic pancreatitis
AIP Type I (isolated to pancreas)
AIP Type II
Immune system disorders associated with pancreatitis
IgG4-related disease (including AIP Type I).
Crohn disease–associated pancreatitis
Ulcerativec–associated pancreatitis
Recurrent acute pancreatitis
Post-necrotic (severe acute pancreatitis)
Injury subtypes
Biliary pancreatitis
Traumatic— with pancreatic necrosis
Ischemic or perioperative
Vascular diseases
Undetermined, or NOS
Pancreas divisum
Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction or stricture
Main duct pancreatic stones
Widespread pancreatic calcifications
Localized mass (excluding desmoplastic reactions)
Duct strictures—including traumatic without pancreatic necrosis
Preampullary duodenal wall cysts
Other, NOS
Alcohol use and smoking are important qualitative and quantitative risk factors for AP, RAP, and CP in adults. Alcohol and smoking use alone are not sufficient to cause RAP or CP, but they significantly increase risk of disease severity and progression in the context of pancreatitis—both at the time of symptom onset or diagnosis, and going forward from that point in time. Alcohol can be modeled as subjects having or not having alcoholism, by drinks per day/drinking days per week, by a 3-point scale (<2 drinks/day, 2 to 5 drinks/day, or >5 drinks/day), or by other standardized scales, and modeled over a lifetime. , Smoking can be classified as never (smoked <100 cigarettes in a lifetime) or ever (smoked >100 cigarettes), and past or current smokers, and quantified by packs per day and pack-years of smoking. , Use of this approach in the North American Pancreatitis Study II (NAPS2) demonstrated that the risk of CP occurs only at or above the threshold of 5 alcoholic drinks per day and that smoking is associated with risk of CP in a dose-dependent fashion that is independent of alcohol use. Thus, the effects of alcohol and smoking are additive and/or multiplicative. The effect of alcohol and smoking differs between men and women, and between people of European and African ancestries. , Furthermore, the quantification and timing of exposure allows for the effects of modifier genes on risk of CP in alcohol drinkers and smokers to be calculated. ,
The SAPE model of CP was designed to organize pathogenic factors leading to CP with the recognition that CP is an acquired disease, that asymptomatic subjects harbor various risks for CP for years, that an “event” is needed to initiate the pathologic process, and that clinically recognized AP is typically the most conspicuous event. The term “sentinel” refers to the physician’s role in anticipating future pathologic damage that may require immediate actions to avoid. The consequence of the “event” is activation of the immune system, with attraction of monocytes (which become resident macrophages), activation of stellate cells (which are responsible for fibrosis), and epigenetic or adaptive changes that increase the sensitivity of the pancreas to RAP and drive the pathologic processes resulting in the characteristic findings of CP. The SAPE model was proposed as an alternative to the necrosis-fibrosis model of CP, because most patients with CP never had AP with significant pancreatic necrosis. Furthermore, the mechanism of disease in HP , was incompatible with the protein-plug/lithiasis model of CP. The SAPE model therefore acts as a framework to analyze the effects of multiple etiologies and progressive stages of RAP and CP, as well as investigating differences in pathogenic factors between patients with CP who do or do not have a history of AP.
Multiple cohort studies demonstrate that the SAPE model is applicable to the majority of CP patients. The risk of progression from AP to CP is further defined by environmental and genetic factors. , Thus, the SAPE model serves an important role within the progressive model to organize the timing and nature of pancreatitis within the context of pancreatic diseases.
Although physicians typically view the exocrine pancreas as a unit, the etiology and mechanism of pancreatitis generally begins within either the acinar cell or duct. The distinction is important for targeting treatments and developing management plans.
The acinar and duct cells are organized in functional units called acini (the plural of acinus) (see Chapter 55 ). A simplified model of the acinus and duct is given in Fig. 57.2 . An acinus (top) is a local organization of acinar cells with the apical membrane facing the lumen at the most upstream part of the pancreatic duct. The duct (bottom) is an organization of duct cells to form a tube that extends from the center of each acini to the lumen of the duodenum. The nerves, blood vessels, islets, immune cells, and supportive tissue, which are important for various aspects of complex pancreatic disease, are not shown here because the initiation of AP originates within the context of Fig. 57.2 . Many of these factors affecting the acinar cell or duct interact with each other as a complex, disease susceptibility mechanism with different combinations of risk factors in different subjects.
The acinar cells make up the bulk of the parenchymal mass and are responsible for most of the inflammatory diseases of the pancreas, either directly or indirectly, as their products are the primary contributor to duct content. The principle function of the pancreatic acinar cell is to synthesize and secrete pancreatic digestive enzymes (see Chapter 56 ). The process includes the synthesis of a range of pancreatic pro-enzyme proteins (zymogens) in the rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER), transportation of the properly folded proteins to the Golgi apparatus for sorting and packaging in zymogen vesicles, vesicular trafficking of the zymogens to the apex, and apical secretion of the zymogens into the pancreatic ducts ( Fig. 57.3 ). The process requires large amounts of energy for protein synthesis and transport of ions, such as calcium, from one compartment to another.
The maintenance of low calcium concentrations within the acinar cells is critical to protecting them from premature trypsinogen activation. Acinar cell calcium can rise through neurohormonal hyperstimulation , ; high extracellular calcium concentrations ; bile acid reflux, which opens apical membrane calcium pathways , ; prolonged, high-dose alcohol consumption, which lowers the threshold for stimulation-induced AP ; mitochondrial damage ; and other factors that regulate intracellular calcium. Any process that increases acinar cell calcium will predispose to AP through a calcium-dependent trypsinogen activation and stabilization mechanism.
Acute and CP can be triggered and driven from within the acinar cell by several mechanisms. Trypsin is a key to triggering AP. Trypsin is the master digestive enzyme because it activates itself and all the other zymogens to their active form (see Chapter 56 ). Activation of digestive enzymes within the pancreas leads to autodigestion, the release of immune activating molecules, and direct cross-activation of components of the immune system further amplifying the immune response to injury. , The importance of trypsin in AP is illustrated by genetically engineered trypsin “knockout” mice that are resistant to experimental AP. Thus, minimizing generation of uncontrolled trypsin activity within the pancreas is critical to protecting the patient from AP.
Acinar cells synthesize trypsin as the pro-enzyme trypsinogen, a zymogen that normally remains inactive until it reaches the duodenum and is activated by the duodenal enzyme enterokinase. Cationic trypsinogen ( PRSS1 ) is the major form of trypsinogen (≈65%) followed by anionic trypsinogen ( PRSS2, ≈30%) and mesotrypsin ( PRSS3, ≈5%).
The trypsinogen molecule has 2 globular domains linked by a single connecting chain ( Fig. 57.4 ). Activation of trypsinogen normally occurs when enterokinase or trypsin cleave an 8 amino acid peptide, the trypsinogen activation peptide (not shown), from trypsinogen to form trypsin.
Trypsinogen also has 2 sites that allow it to be digested by proteolytic enzymes. Trypsin can be digested by cleavage at the Arg122-Val123 peptide bond by another trypsin molecule or at the Leu81-Glu82 peptide bond by another digestive enzyme, chymotrypsin C (CTRC). ,
The trypsinogen molecule also has 2 calcium binding pockets that determine if the trypsinogen molecule will be activated by trypsin (in high calcium concentrations) or destroyed by trypsin (in low calcium concentrations). Thus, local calcium concentrations serve as a critical switch between trypsin activation and inactivation.
Trypsinogen can be prematurely activated to trypsin by autoactivation (facilitated by elevated calcium and lower cell pH), by another trypsin, by other enzymes in other cellular compartments (e.g., lysosomes), and/or other mechanisms. Furthermore, multiple mechanisms of controlling trypsin activity in the wrong place at the wrong time have been deduced based on studies of humans with idiopathic RAP, cell biology studies, animal models, and in vitro experiments.
A variety of genetic variants within genes expressed by the pancreatic acinar cell increase the risk of pancreatitis through inadequate protection from injury by trypsin. , AP is the first warning signal of RAP (i.e., SAPE) in the progressive model. Most of the genetic variants associated with AP are related to the trypsin-dependent pathway (see Fig. 57.3 ). It follows that genetic factors that predispose to AP also predispose the subject to RAP and CP. However, other risk factors from within the acinar cell can cause CP through pathways that are often independent of the trypsin-dependent pancreatitis pathway (discussed later).
PRSS1: Cationic trypsinogen genetic variants. Gain-of-function mutations in the cationic trypsinogen gene have been found to cause HP. Two well described variants, PRSS1, p.N29I and p.R122H, cause autosomal dominant HP (discussed later). A third variant, p.A16V, has a similar but weaker pancreatitis susceptibility risk. , The locations of the p. R122H and p. N29I mutations are shown in relationship to the active site in Fig. 57.4 and in a trypsin pathogenesis model in Fig. 57.3 . The gain-of-function mutations are located in regions associated with calcium-dependent trypsin regulation and may facilitate trypsinogen activation or retarding trypsinogen inactivation independent of calcium concentrations. Gain-of-function mutations often result in an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern; only one of the 2 trypsinogen alleles must code for a super-functional trypsin in order to cause pancreatitis, thus manifesting the phenotype.
Two additional lines of genetic evidence illustrate the importance of trypsin in the development of RAP and CP. First, duplication of the PRSS1 locus results in copy number variants that also predispose to HP through a dose effect. , Secondly, a non-coding promoter region variant in the PRSS1-PRSS2 locus diminishes trypsinogen expression, and is protective from RAP and CP from a variety of etiologies that are linked to trypsin, including alcoholic RAP and CP. , A summary of genetic variants in PRSS1 and classification of their pathogenicity is maintained at www.pancreasgenetics.org .
PRSS2: Anionic trypsinogen genetic variants . Anionic trypsinogen ( PRSS2 ) is a form of pancreatic trypsinogen that is usually expressed at about half the amount as cationic trypsinogen, although this ratio may change in some cases. To date, no gain-of-function mutations have been identified. However, a loss-of-function mutation, PRSS2 p.G191R, is associated with protection from pancreatitis. , The mutation introduces an arginine (R) into a surface loop of PRSS2 , making it a target for immediate trypsin-mediated degradation. Susceptibility to the destruction of PRSS2 even in high calcium concentrations, which protects the natural autolysis site, likely reduces total trypsin levels and is therefore protective.
SPINK1: Pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor gene mutations . Pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor (pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor ( PSTI or serine protease inhibitor, Kazal type 1 [ SPINK1 ]) is a 56–amino acid peptide that is a suicide inhibitor of trypsin, which irreversibly blocks the active site (see Fig. 57.4 ). SPINK1, synthesized by pancreatic acinar cells along with trypsinogen, co-localizes with trypsinogen in zymogen granules. Within the pancreas, SPINK1 serves as one of the most important lines of defense against prematurely activated trypsinogen. ,
SPINK1 expression is independent of trypsinogen expression. SPINK1 is an acute-phase reactant, and serum concentrations markedly rise with systemic inflammation. , Under normal conditions in the pancreas, trypsinogen expression levels are among the highest of all genes in the pancreas, whereas SPINK1 levels are very low, resulting in a very limited inhibitory potential. With pancreatic inflammation the expression of SPINK1 is dramatically increased to several times higher than trypsinogen, potentially resulting in marked reduction in free trypsin activity .
The SPINK1 p.N34S variant is present in 1% to 4% of most populations throughout the world. , The variant results in loss of SPINK1 function. The p.N34S amino acid substitution itself is benign, but marks a complex haplotype that interferes with gene expression. Several other variants of the SPINK1 gene also have been described. For instance, the SPINK1 IVS3 + 2T greater than C pathogenic variant causes exon skipping and is most commonly found in individuals of Asian ancestry.
SPINK1 variants are common in early-onset RAP and CP in children, , in familial pancreatitis, TP, and alcoholic CP, , and is often a feature of polygenic pancreatitis–associated genotype. , Thus, pathogenic SPINK1 variants may be relevant to any etiology of pancreatitis that goes through a trypsin-dependent pancreatitis pathway. This hypothesis was tested using multiple meta-analyses on SPINK1 variant frequencies in subjects classified by different proximal etiologic risk. The strongest effect of SPINK1 p.N34S was in pancreatitis etiologies that were linked (high odds ratio, or OR) with the trypsin-dependent pathway (idiopathic CP [OR 15] and tropical CP [OR 19]), with weaker effects in other etiologies (e.g., alcohol-associated pancreatitis [OR 5]). Mutant SPINK1 will therefore fail to prevent trypsin-associated recurrent pancreatic injury. Thus, SPINK1 mutations in an unaffected individual are of minimal importance, whereas the effect of a SPINK1 mutation in a subject with RAP, and especially when associated with PRSS1 or CFTR mutations, is very important.
There is debate whether SPINK1 is a CP susceptibility gene or modifier gene, because SPINK1 variants are relatively common and become pathogenic in the context of other trypsin-activating genetic variants. However, some individuals have homozygous or compound heterozygous pathogenic SPINK1 genotypes without other obvious pathogenic factors. In these cases, the effects of compound pathogenic SPINK1 variants appear to be causative (see Isolated Enzyme and Other Digestive Enzyme-Associated Defects). A summary of genetic variants in SPINK1 and evidence of their pathogenicity is maintained at www.pancreasgenetics.org .
CTRC: Chymotrypsinogen C variants . CTRC is a calcium-dependent serine protease that is synthesized along with other zymogens in the pancreatic acinar cell. Functional studies on CTRC , , demonstrate that CTRC serves a major role in trypsin degradation and that loss-of-function mutations in CTRC disrupt this mechanism. Rosendahl and colleagues conducted a candidate gene analysis of the CTRC gene and identified multiple, rare, loss-of-function mutations that were more common in patients with CP than controls. Importantly they demonstrated that CTRC variants p.R29Q, p.G214R, and p.S239C impaired function. These variants are rare and seldom seen in clinical settings.
The first genome-wide association study (GWAS) on pancreatitis identified a strong association between the CTRC gene locus and pancreatitis. The effect was not within the CTRC protein itself, although the complex haplotype included a p.G60G synonymous variant in the coding region. Although the pathogenic c.180C greater than T (p.G60G) allele is common in the general population (∼11% of alleles), it was significantly associated with concurrent pathogenic CFTR variants or SPINK1 p.N34S (combined 22.9% vs. 16.1% [10.2% with no alcoholism], OR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.26 to 2.94, P = 0.0023) and with alcoholic vs. non-alcoholic CP etiologies (20.8% vs. 12.4%, OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.30 to 2.79, P = 0.0009). A very high prevalence of CTRC p.G60G variants is also seen in CP patients from Poland, France, and India. These findings suggest that the high-risk complex haplotype interferes with the normal and important role of CTRC in degrading intrapancreatic trypsin, possibly by altering gene expression.
The effect of the CTRC p.G60G haplotype in alcoholic pancreatitis was especially important. Alcohol and smoking generally occurred together, but the frequency of CTRC c.180T (p.G60G) in CP, but not RAP, was higher among never drinkers–ever smokers (22.2%) than ever drinkers–never smokers (10.8%), suggesting that smoking rather than alcohol may be the driving factor in this association.
The trypsin-dependent pancreatitis pathway also affects children. Analysis on the high-risk CTRC p.G60G haplotype in a Polish pediatric population revealed a very high prevalence and effect size with a minor allele frequency (MAF) of 32% (vs. 10% in controls) and an OR of 23 ( P < 0.001). The effect in other populations requires further analysis. A summary of genetic variants in CTRC and evidence of their pathogenicity is maintained at www.pancreasgenetics.org .
DNA sequencing of pancreatic digestive enzymes identified a number of genetic variants that caused nonsynonymous mutations in proteins. Further study of their relative frequency in case and control populations along with functional studies in cell lines revealed that when the amino acid substitution causes the protein to misfold and increase RER stress, the variants were pathogenic. The state of cell activation, level of gene expression, degree of misfolding, and propensity to aggregate within the RER all influence activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR).
Protein synthesis is one of the highest resource-using processes of cells, and especially in protein secreting cells. Eukaryotic cells require a huge, complex, and highly regulated system to monitor protein synthesis, increasing or decreasing global protein synthesis based on availability of required nutrients and cell stress. Special proteins called chaperones ensure that newly synthesized proteins fold properly, do not aggregate, and go to the right subcellular compartment. Chaperones were first identified as “heat-shock proteins” because they were markedly up regulated after thermal stress, which denatures proteins and triggers synthesis of more protein-folding support molecules. Complex protein degradation systems are also maintained including the ubiquination-proteosome system that degrades specific misfolded proteins, and the autophagy system that degrades larger protein aggregates and cellular debris. Conditions that increase the amount of unfolded proteins in the RER trigger the UPR that consists of a coordinated translational and transcriptional program aimed at decreasing protein synthesis rates, increasing heat-shock proteins synthesis, and priming the cell for autophagy and apoptosis. A similar process exists in the mitochondria. Recent work on the pancreatic acinar cell demonstrates that unregulated trypsin activity (from a Spink3 knock-out mouse ), a strong UPR response, dysfunction in the autophagy pathway, and/or acinar cell mitochondrial dysfunction all contribute to impaired autophagy and are major contributors to the pathogenesis of AP and CP for multiple proximal etiologies. , However, the translation between experimental models and human diseases requires additional studies.
Misfolded digestive enzymes: PRSS1, carboxypeptidase A1, CTRC, PNLIP. The acinar cell is primarily a protein-synthesizing cell, and the primary proteins are zymogens. A growing number of cases are being reported where misfolding of new proteins appears to be the primary mechanism of disease. This includes rare mutations in trypsinogen ( PRSS1 ), carboxypeptidase A1, , CTRC, pancreatic triglyceride lipase ( PNLIP ), and others. , These pathogenic variants require DNA sequencing to detect and functional studies to characterize because many of the in silico severity molecules are inaccurate for detecting this specific type of dysfunction. It may also be possible to identify these disorders early in the course of CP and repurpose drugs developed for other diseases caused by unfolded proteins to help manage these diseases.
CEL: Carboxyl ester lipase variants and CEL-CELP fusion proteins. CEL is a digestive enzyme that causes pancreatic pathology through several complex processes related to its unique structure and adjacent pseudogene (CELP) . Two Norwegian kindreds with diabetes mellitus and exocrine pancreas dysfunction were found to have mutations in exon 11 of the CEL gene. Exon 11 encodes a variable number of tandem repeats in the carboxyl terminus of human CEL. Both kindreds had autosomal dominant diabetes mellitus, typically diagnosed before the age of 40 years. All mutation carriers had low fecal elastase levels, and all 10 subjects tested had a low coefficient of fat absorption and decreased fat-soluble vitamin levels. None of the family members had a history of AP. One family member had an atrophic and fibrotic pancreas at autopsy and histology revealed pronounced fibrosis and mucinous metaplasia. A second study using MRI showed that affected children demonstrated evidence of lipomatosis of the pancreas well before the usual age when diabetes presented in relatives. Thus, the CEL genetic variants cause CP. Studies in tissue culture suggest that the CEL variants form intracellular aggregates that trigger a maladaptive UPR leading to apoptotic cell death as the pathophysiology underlying the development of CP. ,
About 1% of adults have a recombined allele of CEL and its pseudogene, CELP . The hybrid gene encodes a predicted chimeric protein of the proximal region of CEL and the distal end of CELP including the variable number of tandem repeat region of CELP . The hybrid allele is more than 5-fold enriched in a population of Northern Europeans with idiopathic CP indicating it is a genetic risk variant for CP. The recombined allele was not present in 3 Asian populations.
Shwachman-Diamond syndrome gene mutations (SBDS). SDS is an autosomal recessive, multisystem Mendelian disorder characterized by EPI rather than pancreatitis, cyclic neutropenia, bone malformation, and other features. , A previously uncharacterized causative gene was discovered and named the Shwachman-Bodian-Diamond syndrome gene ( SBDS ). The gene product participates in ribosome maturation, a process critical to many cell types. In addition, mutations in other genes such as DNAJC21 , SRP54, EFL1 , and others appear to cause a similar syndrome. The molecular mechanism of disease and clinical syndrome will be discussed later.
Johanson-Blizzard syndrome (UBR1). Johanson-Blizzard syndrome is an autosomal recessive, multisystem Mendelian characterized by pancreatic exocrine destruction beginning in utero, although milder cases may present later in life. , Johanson-Blizzard syndrome is caused by mutations in UBR1 , which encodes one of the E3 ubiquitin ligases that is normally involved in removing and degrading various cytosolic digestive enzymes from the cell through the proteasome, a system that is critical to intracellular amino acid generation. The clinical spectrum of Johanson-Blizzard syndrome is further described later.
The pancreatic duct system serves 2 important functions. First, it connects every acinus to the duodenum for delivery of pancreatic digestive enzymes. Secondly, it generates large volumes of sodium bicarbonate to neutralize gastric hydrochloric acid. The alkaline pancreatic juice also protects the pancreas from premature activation of pancreatic digestive enzymes, and likely other protective functions.
There are 2 general pathologic conditions that link the duct to pancreatitis (see Fig. 57.2 ). The first is failure of the duct cells to generate sufficient bicarbonate-rich fluid on demand. The second is duct obstruction (see Fig. 57.2 and Box 57.1 ). Reduction in flow can therefore be caused by low head pressure, high distal resistance, or a combination of both.
The principal function of the proximal (upstream) duct cells is to secrete a bicarbonate-rich fluid to flush the zymogens out of the pancreas and into the duodenum. The bicarbonate-rich fluid serves 2 critical functions. First, pancreatic sodium bicarbonate secretion buffers the acid secretion from the stomach as it enters the duodenum. A feedback mechanism involving release of the duodenal hormone secretin perfectly matches bicarbonate secretion with the hydrochloric acid secretion of the stomach (see Chapters 4 and 56 ). Secondly, the sodium bicarbonate in the ducts maintains an alkaline pH which helps keep trypsinogen in an inactive confirmation. Duct cell bicarbonate secretion appears to be further regulated by protease activated receptors on the duct cell as well as calcium sensors and other receptors linked to injury and inflammation.
The process of bicarbonate secretion includes the energy-dependent transport of anions (chloride and/or bicarbonate) across the basolateral membrane of the duct cell to the apical membrane and then secreted into the duct ( Fig. 57.5 ). Secretion occurs because the addition of anions to the duct lumen increases the negative electrical potential in the duct to attract positively charged sodium ions into the lumen between the duct cells. The addition of sodium and chloride/bicarbonate increases solute concentration and osmotic pressure and draws water into the duct as well. The duct is a cul-de-sac , and with increasing hydrostatic pressure the solution is forced out of the acinus, ducts, and pancreas and into the duodenum.
AP and CP can be triggered when the duct flushing mechanism fails, trypsin is generated, other zymogens are activated, and ensuing injury begins. The best-known example of this failure is obstruction of the pancreatic duct with a gallstone causing biliary AP. In addition to obstruction, the pancreas becomes susceptible to AP with diminished secretion that occurs with mutations in CFTR or failure to activate CFTR and flush the duct when conditions favoring trypsin activation are present. Environmental factors such as cigarette smoking also diminish duct cell function and reduce fluid secretion, in part by causing internalization of CFTR. , Cigarette smoking and other environmental factors may also cause mucin accumulation or protein plugging. , Taken together, disorders of the duct produce a “plumbing” problem, and require different management strategies from acinar cell-associated mechanisms.
The CFTR gene is the most important molecule for regulating pancreatic duct cell function. Loss of functional CFTR molecules from biallelic severe pathogenic genetic mutations results in CF, which is the only known major, Mendelian (autosomal recessive) genetic disorder of the duct cells. The human proximal (upstream) pancreatic duct cells use CFTR to secret bicarbonate, and there is no alternative—so loss of CFTR results in damage to the pancreas that correlates directly with genotype. The pancreas is also the first organ to fail in CF patients, and the early CP with pseudocyst and fibrosis resulted in the name “cystic fibrosis of the pancreas,” now simply referred to as CF. Milder mutations, and complex genotypes that include mutations in CFTR cause CF-like diseases limited to one or more organs and are called CFTR-related disorders, or CFTR-RD.
The CFTR molecule forms a regulated ion channel expressed on epithelial cells in the respiratory system, sweat glands, digestive tract mucosa, biliary epithelium, pancreatic duct cells, and other locations. The primary anions conducted through CFTR under physiologic conditions are chloride and, under some conditions, bicarbonate. The CFTR gene contains 24 exons and 3 splice variants that code for a single protein of 1480 amino acids. The CFTR molecule has 12 membrane-spanning domains, 2 nucleotide-binding domains (NBD1 and NBD2), and a regulatory domain (R domain) with multiple phosphorylation sites ( Fig. 57.6 ). Genetic variants causing amino acid substitutions within the various domains determine different types of dysfunction, which are further divided into different classes (later).
CFTR-mediated pancreatic fluid secretion is stimulated when the duct cell is activated by secretin or vasoactive intestinal peptide acting on basolateral receptors that increase intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (see Chapter 56 ). The cyclic adenosine monophosphate activates protein kinase A–mediated phosphorylation of various sites in the R domain, followed by increased anion conductance (e.g., chloride, bicarbonate) through the CFTR channel. Duct cell stimulation by cholinergic agents or other agonists that increase intracellular calcium also potentiate anion secretion.
CFTR genetic variant classes. CFTR genetics plays a major role in disorders of CFTR function, with clinical disease features reflecting the effect of other factors such as sex, modifier genes, environmental factors, metabolic states, lifestyles, and comorbidities. Although about 2000 CFTR variants are known ( www.cftr2.org ) less than 100 comprise the vast majority of clinical cases of CF or CFTR-RD. In populations with a Northern European ancestry only about 20 variants have a MAF above 0.1% and with only p.F508del, p.G551D, p.W1282X, and p.N1303K having a MAF greater than 1%. Other populations have much lower allele prevalences for the top variants seen in CF patients including the USA where MAF in the ExAC and TOPMED databases have the variant associated with p.F508del (rs113993960) at 0.004 to 0.007, pG542X (rs113993959) at 0.0003 to 0.0004, pG551D (rs75527207) at 0.0001 to 0.0003, p.W1282X (rs77010898) at 0.0003 to 0.0004, p.N1303K (rs80034486) at 0.001 to 0.002, p.R5553X (rs74597325) at 0.0001, and p.R117H (rs78655421) at 0.0015 to 0.0016 (with variable severity depending on linkage with the 5T allele). CFTR variants are classified according to impact on the patient phenotype as severe, mild-variable, borderline, or benign. CFTR variants are also organized into 1 of 5 mechanistic classes according to their effect on protein production, stability, and channel function ( Table 57.1 ). Class I variants include premature stop codons that result in a truncated, nonfunctional protein. Class II variants cause defective processing, including p.F508del, due to protein misfolding or other features. Class III variants alter CFTR channel regulation and are considered gating mutations, as the channel fails to open or stay open. Class IV variants affect CFTR channel conductance so that the ion flux through the channel occurs, but at a significantly reduced level. Class V variants alter the amount of functional CFTR on the cell surface due to exon skipping (e.g., the IVS8-T5 allele causing a high rate of exon skipping) or causing decreased stability. Class I-III are functionally severe, and no or minimal functional CFTR protein reaches the cell surface. Class IV and V are functionally mild-variable and borderline because CFTR protein reaches the plasma membrane but does not function adequately. A Class VI category has been proposed that represents rapid molecule turnover at the cell membrane and Class VII for variants that impact generation of mRNA. The organization of the functional classes along the protein synthesis and processing pathway is highlighted in Fig. 57.3 (bottom row) .
Class | Mutation (Examples) | Defect (% of normal) | Pancreatic Dysfunction | Therapy/Approved |
---|---|---|---|---|
I | W1282X G542X R553X R1162X |
Synthesis | Severe | Readthrough |
II | F508del A561E N1303K G85E |
Maturation 0.5% 0.0% 0.2% 0.5% |
Severe | Correctors (+) Yes (with potentiator) |
II | G551D S549R S549N G1244E G1349D |
Activation 3.2% |
Severe | Potentiators Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes |
IV | R117H R334W R347H R347P A455E |
Conductance 20.0% 3.9% 1.0% 5.6% |
Mild | Potentiators Yes Yes Yes |
V | A455G 3849+10kbC >T 2789+5G >A 621+3A >G 711+3A >G |
Abundance | Mild | Potentiators Yes Yes |
VI | A455G 3849+10kbC >T 2789+5G >A 621+3A >G 711+3A >G |
Stability | Mild | Stabilizers |
VII | Del2,3(21kb) 1717-1G>A 1898+1G >A |
No Protein | Severe | Unrescuable |
CFTR genotypes. The genotype is a combination of the 2 alleles at the CFTR locus that define the overall function of CFTR in cells, with one allele being inherited from the father and the other from the mother. CFTR variants can be on one or both alleles, and functionally severe variants must be on both alleles to cause CF. If a severe variant is on one allele, then the person is typically asymptomatic and considered a carrier—even though cellular CFTR function is reduced approximately 50%. If a person has 3 or more CFTR gene variants, then at least 2 of them must be on the same allele (known as complex alleles). Variants that are on the same allele are said to be in cis, whereas those on opposite alleles are in trans. If there are multiple pathogenic CFTR variants that are all in cis, then the person is a CFTR variant carrier and will be asymptomatic unless there are unidentified variants on the trans allele (e.g., Class VII) or if they have a complex disorder involving other genes and environmental factors.
CFTR functional phenotypes. Many of the organs that are affected in patients with CF have alternative pathways and protective mechanisms that minimize the impact of complete loss of CFTR function. The pancreas and sweat gland are 2 exceptions, where there is good genotype-phenotype correlation. Because complete loss of one CFTR copy has no phenotype, the relative severity of bi-allelic pathogenic CFTR variants is defined by the least severe variant. Thus, a person with 2 severe CFTR genotypes will likely have classic, early-onset CF with pancreatic insufficiency (PI), whereas a person with one severe and one mild-variable CFTR genotype may have a milder form of CF, later age on onset, and pancreatic sufficiency (PS). However, the pancreas is not easily studied, and therefore testing CFTR function in an individual is typically done by sweat chloride testing.
Measures of variant CFTR function. Of the approximately 2000 CFTR variants, a clear majority are tentatively classified as severe, mild-variable, borderline, or benign based on the patient phenotype when the unclassified variant is in trans with a known, severe variant. The most accurate measure of CFTR protein function is to perform site-directed mutagenesis and test the permeability and conductance characteristics of the mutant CFTR in an optimized cell system under a variety of experimental conditions. , This information provides direct functional insight into the effect of protein sequence-altering variants. The sum of the most damaging variants on each allele (in trans) should hypothetically predict the severity of disease in the patient. Although this approach is a useful approximation, many other factors contribute to function including other pathogenic variants in complex haplotypes, the mechanistic role of CFTR and other molecules within various organs, modifying factors, epigenetics, environmental factors, and so on. Thus, even within patients with similar or identical genotypes, such as identical twins, there may be a wide spectrum of phenotypic features or severity. Furthermore, because the clinical spectrum of symptoms in patients with CF overlaps other non-CF diseases, a diagnosis of CF or CFTR-RD requires not only the clinical setting, the family history, and/or the CFTR genotype, but also testing of CFTR function in the patient.
Bicarbonate defective CFTR variants. Phenotyping diseases by focusing on one organ may lead to classifying variants as benign, whereas they are strongly associated with disease in other organs. Such is the case of a class of CFTR variants that are associated with pancreatitis but classified as benign by investigators seeing patients referred for lung disease. Epithelial cells have an internal chloride concentration monitoring receptor called WNK1 that regulates the activity of multiple ion channels, transporters, and pumps. WNK1 directly regulates CFTR, dynamically changing the permeability and conductance characteristics from a chloride-type channel to a bicarbonate-type channel. LaRusch and colleagues demonstrated the critical role of CFTR-dependent bicarbonate secretion in the human pancreas based on this paradigm and previous mathematical modeling. They screened 984 well-phenotyped pancreatitis cases from the NAPS2 study for candidate mutations in CFTR with bicarbonate-defective conductance (CFTR-BD) from among 81 previously described CFTR variants in pancreatitis patients. Nine variants (CFTR p.R74Q, p.R75Q, p.R117H, p.R170H, p.L967S, p.L997F, p.D1152H, p.S1235R, and p.D1270N) not associated with typical CF were associated with pancreatitis (OR 1.5, P = 0.002). The variants were cloned and tested for chloride and bicarbonate conductance in EK 293T cells, and although chloride was normal, bicarbonate permeability and conductance were significantly diminished in the presence of WNK1. A 3-dimensional model suggests that defective bicarbonate conductance may be caused by at least 4 mechanisms ( Fig. 57.7 ). Molecular dynamics simulations suggest physical restriction of the CFTR channel and altered dynamic channel regulation. Because several other organs use CFTR to secrete bicarbonate, the NAPS2 cohort was further evaluated for chronic sinusitis (because bicarbonate is needed for mucus hydration), and male infertility because bicarbonate is necessary for vas deference development (avoiding congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens; CBAVD) and sperm survival. CFTR-BD variants significantly increased risk for rhinosinusitis (OR 2.3, P < 0.005) and male infertility (OR 395, P < 0.0001). Furthermore, heterozygous CFTR-BD variants plus SPINK1 p.N34S variant genotypes were strongly associated with pancreatitis without the sinus or infertility effects. ,
Sweat chloride testing. Sweat chloride testing remains the most reliable, standardized, and widely available functional test of CFTR function, because normal sweat gland function is directly dependent on CFTR function and because most of the other glands and organs linked to the morbidity of CF disease are relatively inaccessible. The sweat gland is composed of a secretory coil (eccrine gland) that generates an isotonic salt solution and a sweat duct connecting the gland to the skin surface. CFTR and epithelial sodium channels (ENaC) are expressed in both the eccrine gland and especially the duct, where they absorb chloride and sodium resulting in a hypotonic (low sodium and chloride concentrations) solution (sweat) that evaporates to provide body cooling, without the loss of electrolytes. Normally, the concentration of chloride in sweat is less than 20 mmol/L, but levels increase with increasing rates of secretion and can reach nearly 60 mmol/L in some people.
In CF, the concentrations of chloride are 3 to 5 times higher than normal, with resting concentrations above 60 mmol/L and stimulated chloride levels approaching 120 mmol/L. Subjects who are heterozygous for severe, CF-causing mutations typically have nearly normal sweat chloride testing. Of note, extensive genetic testing of some patients with clinical CF and with a very abnormal sweat chloride test have only one identifiable pathogenic CFTR variant (i.e., they appear to be heterozygous), suggesting that other important factors that strongly affect CFTR function are yet to be identified. Current clinical guidelines for the diagnosis of CF include a sweat chloride of ≥60 mmol/L as well as clinical features consistent with CF (including positive newborn screening, NBS) and/or a positive family history. Patients with features of CF and an intermediate sweat chloride test results of 30 to 59 mmol/L may still have CF. Patients with CFTR variants that only affect bicarbonate conductance may be missed by sweat chloride testing.
Sweat chloride testing may also be important in the evaluation of symptomatic patients who may have undiagnosed CF or CFTR-RD. CFTR-RD includes RAP and CP, CBAVD, disseminated bronchiectasis, and sclerosing cholangitis, alone or in combination with other features. When a patient with unexplained RAP and/or early CP are found to have likely pathogenic CFTR variants, the clinically validated functional test to determine if they have CF or CFTR-RD is the sweat chloride test. The importance of diagnosing CF or CFTR-RD is highlighted by the availably of new therapies that specifically target CFTR function (later). Although secretin-stimulated pancreatic function testing also measures CFTR function, the interpretation of the results is confounded by the diminished bicarbonate concentrations in pancreatic juice in progressive pancreatic disease and by environmental factors such as smoking.
The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Clinical Care Guidelines suggests further evaluation of intermediate sweat chloride levels as outlined in Fig. 57.8 . The algorithm begins with “clinical presentation of CF,” which may include patients with elevated immunoreactive trypsinogen levels during NBS in the USA, but who have intermediate sweat chloride test results. This approach may also be useful with CFTR-RD affecting only the pancreas, but the utility of this approach in an adult RAP or CP population has not yet been reported.
Newborn CF screening—CRMS/CFSPID. The vast majority of infants with NBS and an intermediate sweat chloride test result remained disease free for an indeterminate time. These infants have therefore been classified as CF transmembrane conductance regulator-related metabolic syndrome in the USA (the “metabolic syndrome” reflected a billing code issue rather than any metabolic feature) and CF screen positive, inconclusive diagnosis (CFSPID) in other countries. A new unified definition by a US/European consensus group defines CRMS/CFSPID as a feature in an infant who has a positive NBS test for CF and either (a) a sweat chloride less than 30 mmol/L and 2 CFTR mutations, at least 1 of which has unclear phenotypic consequences, or (b) an intermediate sweat chloride value (30 to 59 mmol/L) and 1 or 0 CF-causing mutations. The CF-causing mutations are generally defined in the CFTR2 database ( www.cftr2.org ) with others variants classified as mutations of varying clinical consequence (MVCC, e.g., Class IV or Class V), non CF-causing mutation when the mutation in trans with another CF-causing mutation will not result in CF (which does not exclude the possibility that the mutation may contribute to CF-like clinical characteristics resembling mild CF or CFTR-RD), variants of unknown significance, or benign. Genetic counseling and follow-up clinical evaluations by qualified physicians and further testing is recommended.
CFTR disease mechanism. The medical approach to CF is presented later whereas the mechanism of CFTR in disease is discussed here. Severe mutations in both CFTR alleles leading to total or near-total loss of CFTR function results in CF. The molecular consequences of CF include inability to adequately hydrate mucus and other macromolecules, leading to accumulation of viscid material and inspissated glands. This condition results in progressive organ destruction of the pancreas and respiratory system, and dysfunction of the liver, intestine, sweat glands, and other sites where epithelial cell secretion plays an important physiologic role. As noted earlier, the pancreas incurs a double risk because most of its proteins are zymogens and trypsin activation will lead to recurrent injury and eventually destruction of the pancreas through progressive fibrosis. Trypsin-mediated injury and destruction of the pancreas in children with CF is consistent with this model because the pancreatic pathology in CF is pseudocyst formation and fibrosis rather than atrophy alone (as expected with duct obstruction). It appears that pancreatic gland injury in CF children roughly parallels the expression of trypsinogen in the developing acinar cells, which begins at 16 weeks gestation and gradually increases in concentration until birth and through the first 6 months of life when levels markedly rise. , The resulting histology has many of the features of end-stage CP that develops in children and adults, but also has striking expanded ducts that appear as multiple protein-filled cysts ( Fig. 57.9 ).
The overall clinical picture in an individual with pathogenic CFTR variants depends on the nature of the combined CFTR mutations, the genetic background in which the defective genes operates (e.g., modifier genes), and environmental factors. , , About 70 to 90% of non-Hispanic white patients with CF have p.F508del. Distinct mutations are common to other ethnic and ancestral groups, including 3120 + 1G greater than A which is the second most frequent CF allele in African Americans (9.5 to 12.3%), the p.R334W mutation which is common in Hispanics, and the p.W1282X in Ashkenazi Jews (∼45%). , ,
Patients with 2 CFTR severe mutations in trans typically develop classic features of CF, with elevated chloride levels in sweat glands, PI, recurrent and chronic pulmonary infections, and CBAVD in males. Complicating manifestations of severe CF can also include meconium ileus, distal intestinal obstruction syndrome (DIOS), gallbladder dysfunction, liver cirrhosis, and other GI problems.
Patients with one severe CFTR mutation (Class I-III, e.g., p.F508del) and one mild-variable CFTR mutation (Class IV or V, e.g., p. R117H or p. R334W ) typically have CF with PS CF due to incomplete loss of CFTR function, partially reduced chloride and/or bicarbonate conductance, and subsequent residual duct cell function, resulting in acinar cell survival. , This residual pancreatic parenchyma with abnormal CFTR function leaves a PS-CF patient at high risk for AP and RAP, with an incidence of 22%. These patients are more likely to have only a subset of organs expressing CFTR affected and presenting symptoms may occur later in life (teens or 20s).
Environment and modifier gene variants. Many of the features of CF cannot be explained by variations in CFTR sequence. Instead, these features are caused by specific environmental factors or modifier genes. , Environmental factors, such as bacterial colonization of the respiratory system, tobacco smoke, poor nutritional status, and environmental allergens contribute to the severity of lung disease. The other major factors are modifier genes that strongly contribute to the wide range of clinical features in patients with apparently identical CFTR genotypes. , ,
In 1998 2 groups , demonstrated that pathogenic CFTR variants were also very common in idiopathic and alcoholic CP, suggesting that CFTR mutations may be part of a more complex trait. , Because heterozygous pathogenic CFTR variants are common in populations with European ancestry, and because the parents of CF children (obligate CFTR mutation carriers without CF) do not appear to have an increased incidence of AP or CP compared with the normal population, it is likely that a second factor that specifically targets the pancreas is required. , In early-onset idiopathic pancreatitis, this second factor may be a genetic variant in SPINK1 , CTRC , or CASR , an anatomical factor like pancreatic divisum, an environmental factor, or other mechanism. , , , Although high-quality treatment trials for these patients are still needed, the problem is one of “plumbing” and methods to restore lost CFTR function and/or reduce resistance to pancreatic juice flow should be considered.
Calcium plays multiple roles in pancreatic physiology and pathophysiology. On one hand the regulation of intra-acinar cell calcium is critical for the prevention of pancreatic injury, , whereas increasing concentrations of calcium in the pancreatic duct increases the risk of sustained trypsin activation and precipitation as calcium-containing stones. The calcium-sensing receptor gene (CASR) is a membrane-bound member of the G-protein–coupled receptor superfamily. CaSR plays an important role in calcium homeostasis, as is reflected in its expression by cells of the parathyroid gland and renal tubules that are involved in the calcium homeostasis. CaSR has been identified in human pancreatic acinar and ductal cells, as well as in various non-exocrine tissues, although its functional significance in the pancreas has not yet been determined. A possible role of the CaSR in the pancreatic duct is plausible by extension of duodenal physiology, noting that CaSR is coexpressed with CFTR in bicarbonate-secreting epithelial cells. CaSR activation dose-dependently raises intracellular calcium levels which causes calcium-dependent CFTR bicarbonate secretion as well as modulating other molecules involved in the process. More than 170 functional mutations (activating and inactivating) have been described in the CASR related to familial hypocalcuric hypercalcemia, neonatal severe primary hyperparathyroidism, autosomal dominant hypocalcemia, and related hypercalcemic or hypocalcemic disorders. The common CASR variants p.R990G, p.A986S, and p.Q1011E are strongly associated with urolithiasis and hypercalcuria in various populations.
In 2003 Felderbauer investigated a kindred with familial pancreatitis and the SPINK1 p.N34S variant. However, only 2 of these family members had CP, and both were found to have a novel CASR c.518T>C mutation that was linked to hypercalcemia. An association between additional CASR variants, with or without SPINK1 mutations, was subsequently identified in patients in India with TP, as well as in the USA in sporadic and alcoholic CP in which the CASR p.R990G (rs1042636) variant doubles and triples the relative risk, respectively (the rs number is given because the amino acid number may change based on the CASR transcript used). Multiple rare CASR variants were also identified in a French cohort and the p.A986S variant (rs1801725) in multiple Chinese pancreatitis patients. CASR p.Q1011E (rs1801726) is also widely studied, but a clear role in pancreatic disease has not been established. The finding of different CASR polymorphisms in different populations is intriguing, but it appears that the presumed mild hypercalcemia is a cofactor for pancreatitis rather than an independent risk factor, as seen in animal models of hypercalcemia, , or as part of complex functional genotypes with SPINK1 or CFTR or other factors. CASR variants that reduce CaSR function may also contribute to pancreatic disease because CaSR also serves as an amino acid receptor in the duodenum, linking luminal nutrients with release of cholecystokinin that subsequently stimulates pancreatic enzyme secretion.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here