Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Published in 1966, Accidental Death and Disability: The Neglected Disease of Modern Society by the National Academy of Sciences–National Research Council was instrumental in emergency medical service (EMS) maturation in the United States.
There are multiple models for EMS systems, including public and private services, those operating at basic and advanced levels of care, and those including single or multiple tiers of response capability.
There are four levels of prehospital providers recognized nationally—emergency medical responder (EMR), emergency medical technician (EMT), advanced emergency medical technician (AEMT), and paramedic, which is the most advanced level.
The community paramedic provider focusing on population health issues such as access, chronic disease, and decreasing utilization and readmission is now being considered by many communities.
Advances in emergency medical dispatching and positioning resources at locations and during specified times where expected call volumes are prevalent are innovations that are being implemented to decrease response times and improve outcomes.
Regulatory oversight for EMS systems lies at the individual state level, and medical direction for individual public or private services resides at the local level.
Direct medical oversight involves real-time interaction with the prehospital providers via face-to-face or radio communications. Indirect medical oversight involves off-line processes such as protocol development, quality improvement, and education.
Advances in prehospital care of medical patients have included analgesics and anxiolytics that can be administered intranasally, negating intravenous routes, noninvasive measures to support patients in respiratory distress, alternative adjuncts in place of endotracheal intubation for managing airways, and tourniquets for controlling hemorrhage.
More advanced diagnostics (such as 12-lead electrocardiography and use of stroke screens) have assisted in transporting patients to appropriate facilities based on their illness and acuity.
Before the advent of civilian ambulance services, the sick and injured were transported by any means available, including passerby motorists, wagons, farm machinery, delivery carts, buses, and taxicabs. The military was instrumental in developing systems for transporting wounded soldiers off the battlefield. Figure e12.1 depicts the early Larrey ambulance used during the Napoleonic Wars, the Rucker wagon used during the American Civil War, and a modern ambulance in use today. In 1865, the Commercial Hospital in Cincinnati established the first hospital-based ambulance service. Four years later, the first city service began at New York’s Bellevue Hospital.
The beginning of the interstate system of highways in the mid-1950s, excessive speed limits, and poor automobile construction resulted in widespread injuries and deaths across the United States. To address this growing problem, the 1965 President’s Commission on Highway Safety recommended the National Accident Response Program and the results from a national survey by the National Academy of Sciences–National Research Council were used to draft the 1966 white paper entitled Accidental Death and Disability: The Neglected Disease of Modern Society. This document described the hazardous conditions for the provision of emergency care at all levels and outlined the necessary building blocks for future maturation of emergency medical services (EMS). Congressional legislation eventually directed the United States Department of Transportation (DOT)–National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to develop a program for improving emergency medical care.
During the 1960s, emergency cardiac care included field defibrillation programs in Belfast, Northern Ireland, and cardiac arrest research in several cities, including Columbus, Ohio, and Miami, Florida. In 1969, the first National Conference on EMS convened, resulting in the development of a curriculum, certification process, and national registry for the emergency medical technician–ambulance (EMT-A). Interested physicians and nurses soon began providing more advanced educational courses and expanding the scope of practice for EMTs, which led to the paramedic provider.
The EMS Systems Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-154) was passed by Congress and authorized funding that dramatically improved regionalization of EMS systems. In 1984, efforts to improve pediatric emergency care occurred when Congress adopted the Emergency Medical Services for Children (EMS-C) initiative through the Health Services, Preventive Health Services, and Home Community Based Services Act of 1984 (P.L. 98-555). A study by the Institute of Medicine (now the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine [NAS]) released in 1993 promoted the integration of EMS-C not just into existing EMS systems but into comprehensive systems of care provision, including injury prevention, primary and definitive care, and rehabilitation services.
In 1996, NHTSA published Emergency Medical Services Agenda for the Future, which broadly outlined the principles required for future EMS development. All components of an EMS system, both operational and clinical, were identified and discussed. This document has been used by many individuals and organizations as a valuable reference for planning, administration, and forecasting the future of EMS delivery. More than 40 years after the 1966 white paper publication, the NAS released a report on the status of emergency care entitled The Future of Emergency Care in the United States Health System which focused on three separate yet related topics: (1) emergency care: at the breaking point, (2) EMS at the crossroads, and (3) emergency care for children: growing pains. A major focus included the need to strengthen the integration of EMS into the entire health care system because lack of such coordination often results in patients being diverted to inappropriate or distant facilities. The recommendation was to ensure that emergency medical and trauma care is organized into a coordinated, regional system such that patients receive care at the most appropriate facility on the basis of their injury or illness. The concern for inadequate funding for EMS systems operations and disaster response was also addressed. In addition to recommending that Congress develop regionally funded, multiyear demonstration projects that provide seamless systems of care, workforce strengthening, evidence-based practices, and disaster preparedness, the NAS recommended that an advisory committee be created to work with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to improve reimbursement. In 2019, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Innovation Center released a Request for Applications for interested EMS systems to participate in a new initiative called Emergency Triage, Treat, and Transport (ET3) which will investigate reimbursement for alternative transport destinations (primary care physician or urgent care) or to treat on scene by a provider or telehealth connection. Finally, the NAS report recommended that the care of children be integrated into the overall EMS system, with pediatric emergency care training enhanced to maintain defined competencies.
In 2014, plans were initiated to update the 1996 Agenda and in 2019, the EMS Agenda 2050: A People-Centered Vision for the Future of Emergency Medical Services was released. This report describes the future of EMS being people-centered, evidence-based, and functionally a component of the overall health care delivery system. Figure e12.2 lists the six guiding principles included in the Agenda.
In 2019, Pediatric Readiness in Emergency Medical Services Systems was published and cosponsored by the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Emergency Physicians, Emergency Nurses Association, National Association of EMTs, and the National Association of EMS Physicians. This document outlines important recommendations for EMS systems to be pediatric ready, and future efforts will include a national assessment of all EMS agencies nationally.
Multiple EMS system designs exist, all predicated on the type of community served. Whereas this is a local decision, all states incorporate an administrative office that governs or oversees the provision of EMS activities. The role of the state office includes planning, licensing services and providers, and establishing or enforcing the scope and standards of practice. Other functions may include disaster preparedness and response activities, public health initiatives, record keeping, data collection, and auditing or investigating programs or providers. A description of EMS systems for the 200 most populous cities in the United States is periodically published in the Journal of Emergency Medical Services. For simplicity, the following categorization of systems is used: private and public agencies; basic life support (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS) services; and single-tiered, multitiered, and first responder systems.
Where local government has not assumed primary responsibility for EMS services, communities may depend on private providers. Financial responsibility varies but usually depends on federal reimbursement (Medicare or Medicaid) and user fees. A local government subsidy may or may not supplement the operation. If multiple providers are serving one jurisdiction, calls may be allocated by rotation or specified zone coverage. Dispatching varies by system but may be by the provider or by a central agency. Medical direction is often provided by a contracted physician or physician oversight board.
Hospital-based EMS systems are few in number and may be managed by a single hospital or hospital corporation. Not all hospital-based EMS programs are considered private, in that the hospital may be a division under local or state government or operate under a public authority. Financial responsibilities and dispatching are similar to private models outlined previously. An emergency physician from a sponsor or base hospital typically provides medical direction.
A public utility model is a hybrid between private and public design that allows local government to contract with a private or public provider. The service selected, usually through a request for proposal and competitive bidding process, becomes a contracted entity that agrees to provide the specified services (ALS, BLS, or both) and, depending on the arrangement, bills the patient directly or receives uniform reimbursement. A subsidy may or may not be provided by the local jurisdiction, dispatching may be performed by an existing public safety organization or by the parent company, and medical direction is usually performed by a specified individual subject to contractual terms.
When municipal governments were faced with planning and establishing EMS systems, many decided that fire departments would be well-equipped to provide EMS in addition to fire services. Fire stations are strategically located throughout the community and personnel are already used to providing emergency response and public services. Firefighters can be cross-trained as firefighters-paramedics or dedicated to performing either fire or EMS functions separately. Public EMS systems that were not incorporated into fire departments evolved into their own separate entity, referred to as a municipal third-service system . Such agencies are endorsed and supported by local government. Many cities have been successful in combining police, fire, and EMS under a global public safety agency, with all department heads or chiefs reporting to one administrator. Financially, public EMS systems may be supported by a per-capita tax base, which may or may not be supplemented by user fees. Regardless of design, medical oversight for a municipal EMS system may be provided by a physician appointed and contracted by the municipality, a local hospital, an advisory council or medical society, or a medical oversight board.
Basic life support describes the provision of emergency care without the use of advanced therapeutic interventions. Skills include airway management (oral and nasal airways, bag-mask ventilation, extraglottic airways), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), hemorrhage control, fracture and spine immobilization, and childbirth assistance. Defibrillation with an automated external defibrillator (AED) is often included by many BLS systems. Services are provided by emergency medical responders (EMRs) or emergency medical technicians (EMTs), and medical direction may or may not be a requirement depending on individual state regulations. Few urban communities across the United States operate solely at the BLS level. Many rural and some suburban EMS services rely on volunteers who may not wish to become advanced-level providers. Because these services may have low call volumes, it becomes difficult for personnel to maintain advanced skills. Also, such communities may not have access to medical supervision or hospital sponsorship for ALS care.
The effectiveness of ALS for medical and traumatic emergencies is debatable, although systems categorized as ALS offer a more comprehensive level of service by highly educated providers, usually certified at the advanced emergency medical technician (AEMT) or paramedic level. Provider skills include advanced airway interventions, intravenous line placement, medication administration, cardiac monitoring and 12-lead electrocardiographic (ECG) interpretation, and certain invasive procedures.
Most EMS systems in cities operate at this level of care; however, the number of paramedics in any jurisdiction has come under scrutiny, in that cities with more paramedics per capita tend to have lower survival rates. Although this may seem counterintuitive, one explanation might be that the number of patient encounters per paramedic decreases and skill performance degrades when more providers are competing for the same number of experiences.
In a single-tiered system, every response regardless of call type receives the same level of personnel expertise and equipment allocation (all BLS or ALS). Multiple-tiered systems use a combination of ALS and BLS levels, depending on the nature and potential severity of the call. Differences in cost and effectiveness between a mixed ALS-BLS service and an all-ALS service have been debated. A single-tiered ALS response may prove to be cost-effective in specific locales, ensures the capability of providing a consistent advanced level of care to all patients regardless of illness or injury severity, and obviates the potential for undertriage or overtriage by 911 telecommunicators. Alternatively, a multitiered system may meet the needs of individual communities and could be less costly because EMTs are usually compensated less than paramedics. This design also has the potential to preserve ALS resources for higher priority calls.
Regardless of single- or multiple-tier design, EMS systems usually include first responder services as part of their structure. The first responder, usually a police officer or firefighter, is the nontransport BLS or ALS provider who responds to the scene of an emergency to provide initial care before definitive medical care and transportation assets arrive. The first responder quickly assesses the scene and patients, determines whether additional resources are required, initiates patient care, and provides information to responding personnel prior to their arrival.
The design of an EMS system is targeted toward providing quality patient care in the briefest time after unexpected injury or illness. A desirable and cost-effective design might include BLS nontransport first responders with short response times (average 2 to 4 minutes) having the capability of providing early defibrillation and airway support, coupled with ensuing ALS care and transport services.
At the federal level, NHTSA and their partner stakeholders are responsible for developing all education and standards related to providers and their scope of practice. In 2000, the Emergency Medical Services Education Agenda for the Future: A Systems Approach was published and set forth the processes required to improve EMS education delivery. As components of this document, the Core Content (released in 2004) includes all knowledge and skills for EMS practice; the Scope of Practice Model (released in 2007 and revised in 2019) defines the knowledge and skills for the four provider levels; and the Education Standards (released in 2009) outlines objectives, competencies, behaviors, and judgements for developing more broad and flexible curricula. Two additional components included educational program accreditation and a national certification process for providers (both released in 2013). Although the National Association of State EMS Officials (NASEMSO) has been collaborating with multiple stakeholders and federal partner organizations to assist states in implementing this agenda, it is still incumbent on individual state legislation to determine provider levels recognized, initial and continuing medical education requirements at each level, testing, and time intervals for course completion and recertification. Suggested hours of training at each level of provider are listed in Table e12.1 .
Provider Level | Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs Recommended Hours of Training | Skill Set |
---|---|---|
Emergency medical responder (EMR) | Initial: 40 didactic and laboratory hours | Initial scene and patient assessment and stabilization |
Basic airway skills | ||
CPR | ||
Hemorrhage control | ||
Spinal motion restriction | ||
Emergency medical technician (EMT) | Initial: 110 hours that include didactic, laboratory, clinical, and field experience | First responder skills plus: |
|
||
|
||
May assist in some systems, such as use of epinephrine autoinjectors for anaphylaxis and albuterol for wheezing | ||
Advanced emergency medical technician (AEMT) | Initial: 200 to 400 hours that include didactic, laboratory, clinical, and field experience | EMTS skills plus: |
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
May assist in some systems, such as laryngeal mask airway | ||
Paramedic | Initial: 1000 or more hours that include didactic, laboratory, clinical, and field experience | AEMT skills plus: |
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
The EMR, formerly referred to as medical first responder, is typically the first to arrive on the scene of an incident. Initial scene and patient assessment along with limited lifesaving interventions is the primary function. Along with CPR and basic airway management skills, the EMR should be able to control hemorrhage, manually secure an airway, stabilize fractures, perform CPR, and operate an automatic external defibrillator (AED). The EMR also assists the EMT or paramedic with ongoing care following their arrival.
The EMT, formerly referred to as the EMT-Basic, is the minimum level required to staff an ambulance and is commonly used for nonemergency and convalescent transport services or paired with a higher-level provider for ALS care. In addition to the skills of the EMR, the EMT is also involved with triage, more detailed patient assessment, and transportation.
Many but not all states have expanded the EMT scope of practice to include extraglottic airway insertion; use of continuous positive airway pressure; epinephrine administration for anaphylaxis, naloxone, chemical nerve agent antidote autoinjections; and administration of aspirin, nitroglycerin, and albuterol by handheld nebulizer or metered-dose inhaler.
The AEMT, formerly referred to as the EMT-Intermediate, was established to allow a more comprehensive approach to care when paramedic services are unavailable or unobtainable due to a limited workforce. Many states recognize the AEMT certification, but others designate alternative but comparable levels depending on specific skills and procedures. This level is useful for rural systems because it provides some ALS care for less cost and education time. The scope of practice for the AEMT varies across the United States. In addition to all EMT skills, most systems allow the AEMT to establish an intravenous line, to manually defibrillate, and to administer limited medications.
Paramedics are the most advanced prehospital providers. Their scope of practice includes a wide variety of therapeutics and procedures including 12-lead ECG rhythm interpretation, expanded pharmacologic treatments, and advanced airway interventions. Invasive and lifesaving procedures include needle decompression of a tension pneumothorax, needle or surgical cricothyrotomy, and transthoracic cardiac pacing.
Initial training courses for all levels of providers include didactic, clinical, and field education, each escalating in complexity for higher levels of certification and all focusing on technical and professional competencies. Additional coursework programs exist for paramedics that expand the scope of practice, including the flight paramedic for fixed or rotor wing services, the community paramedic who serves in a population health capacity, and the critical care paramedic for high-risk adult and pediatric transfers. With the expansion of EMS technology and management career options, many paramedic educational programs have advanced from 1-year certificate curricula to 2-year associate or 4-year baccalaureate degrees. Since 2018, as a means to ensure quality prehospital education and consistency, any individual applying for national paramedic certification must have graduated from a program accredited by the Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs.
In keeping with the spirit of the EMS Agenda for the Future, which specifically calls for integration of health services and prevention attributes, some systems have implemented programs that engage interprofessional health providers into the existing structures of care. Examples include embedding a nurse triage system at the 911 access level, where low-acuity complaints as determined by evidence-based algorithms are transferred to alternative call centers. Here, nurses determine and arrange appropriate care at a clinic or facility other than an emergency department (ED). Another example that is becoming popular is having prehospital providers, usually at the paramedic level, provide patient evaluation services to pre-identified patients with chronic conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure, and substance abuse. These programs, referred to as community paramedics, mobile integrated health, or advanced practice paramedics , among others, often include interprofessional providers (nurses, social workers, case managers), and are designed to prevent or reduce the need for EMS calls and decrease ED utilization for targeted patients or frequent users.
Before the mid-1960s, few if any regulations governed system design, operations, and equipment. As EMS development progressed, guidelines for emergency vehicle specifications were adopted by the DOT and equipment lists were proposed. Today, collaborative efforts from multiple professional organizations continue to publish documents that recommend design, equipment, and medications for ambulances.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here