Drug-Induced Lung Disease


Etiology

The number of drugs recognized to cause an adverse pulmonary reaction of one kind or another is reported to be more than 600 and continues to rise yearly with the advent of new medications. Pharmacologic groups associated with pulmonary toxicity include chemotherapeutic agents, antimicrobials, antiinflammatory agents, cardiovascular drugs, and illicit drugs. Drug reactions are usually the result of either direct (toxic and idiosyncratic reactions) or indirect effects of the drug. The development of injury can be influenced by the age of the patient, concomitant administration of oxygen, prior radiotherapy, and synergism with other drugs.

Prevalence and Epidemiology

Drug therapy is common and may result in a great variety of adverse effects. In 2006 82% of the US population reported use of at least one prescription medication, over-the-counter medication, or dietary supplement in the previous week, and 29% reported use of five or more of these drugs. Adverse drug events accounted for 1.7% to 2.5% of estimated emergency department (ED) visits for all unintentional injuries, with 27.3% of these ED visits resulting in hospitalization in 2013 and 2014. Individuals aged 65 years or older were twice as likely than younger individuals to develop adverse drug events. The majority of adverse drug effects are dermatologic, gastrointestinal, and neurologic. Respiratory complications are estimated to account for approximately 54,000 adverse drug events in the United States per year or approximately 7.7% of all adverse drug events. Drug reactions are even more common in inpatients. One English study showed that nearly 1 in 7 hospital inpatients experience an adverse drug reaction. Fatal drug reactions occur in 0.1% of medical inpatients and 0.01% of surgical inpatients. The prevalence of drug-induced lung disease varies considerably among different drugs, ranging from approximately 1 in 100,000 treatments for nitrofurantoin to more than 40% in women who receive nitrosourea-based chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer. The estimated prevalence rate of pulmonary reactions for each drug can be found on the Pneumotox website ( http://www.pneumotox.com ).

Clinical Presentation and Pathophysiology

The most common clinical manifestations of patients with pulmonary drug reaction are cough, dyspnea, fatigue, fever, chest pain, and weight loss. Drug-induced lung disease may manifest as an acute, subacute, or chronic process.

Adverse reactions to drugs can be classified into those that may occur in any individual taking the drug and those that occur only in susceptible individuals. Reactions that may occur in anyone taking the drug include drug side effect, defined as undesirable pharmacologic effect at recommended doses; drug interaction, defined as action of a drug on the effectiveness or toxicity of another one; and drug overdose. These drug reactions are predictable and account for at least 80% of adverse drug reactions. Reactions that occur only in susceptible individuals include drug intolerance, defined as a threshold to the normal pharmacologic action of a drug; drug idiosyncrasy, defined as a genetically determined, qualitatively abnormal reaction to a drug related to a metabolic or enzyme deficiency; and drug allergy, defined as an immunologically mediated reaction, characterized by specificity, transferability by antibodies or lymphocytes, and recurrence on reexposure. An example of an allergic respiratory drug reaction is asthma, most commonly caused by aspirin and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Allergic drug reactions, however, account for less than 10% of adverse pulmonary drug reactions. The pathogenesis of most pulmonary drug reactions is unknown.

The histologic findings of pulmonary drug reactions are often nonspecific and mimic those of various acute and chronic lung diseases. The most common histologic patterns are diffuse alveolar damage, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, organizing pneumonia, eosinophilic pneumonia, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and acute or chronic diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, Pulmonary damage caused by intravenous injection of crushed oral tablets leading to Ritalin lung and talcosis are discussed in Chapter 52 . Drug-related constrictive bronchiolitis is discussed in Chapter 59 .

Certain drugs tend to cause a predictable pattern of lung injury ( Table 65.1 ); however, this is not always the case, and patterns of lung injury may overlap ( Fig. 65.1 ).

TABLE 65.1
COMMON DRUGS ASSOCIATED WITH VARIOUS PATTERNS OF LUNG INJURY
Adapted from Rossi SE, Erasmus JJ, McAdams HP, Sporn TA, Goodman P. Pulmonary drug toxicity: radiologic and pathologic manifestations. Radiographics. 2000;20(5):1245–1259.
Pattern of Injury Common Drugs
Diffuse alveolar damage Busulfan, cyclophosphamide, carmustine, bleomycin, paclitaxel, docetaxel, checkpoint inhibitors
Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) Amiodarone, methotrexate, nitrofurantoin, bleomycin, hydrochlorothiazide, carmustine
Organizing pneumonia Amiodarone, acebutolol, minocycline, nitrofurantoin, bleomycin, gold salts, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, penicillamine, phenytoin, carbamazepine, mesalamine, hydralazine, interferon
Eosinophilic pneumonia Amiodarone, bleomycin, nitrofurantoin, phenytoin, β-blockers, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, antidepressants, hydrochlorothiazide, minocycline, sulfonamides, sulfasalazine, mesalamine
Hypersensitivity pneumonitis Methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, mesalamine, fluoxetine, amitriptyline, docetaxel, paclitaxel
Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage Anticoagulants, amphotericin B, amiodarone, cyclophosphamide, carbamazepine, methotrexate, mitomycin, nitrofurantoin, penicillamine, phenytoin, propylthiouracil

Fig. 65.1, Drug-induced lung injury resulting in a combination of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia and hypersensitivity pneumonitis patterns caused by lenalidomide and bortezomib therapy in a patient with relapsed multiple myeloma. Axial CT at the lung bases demonstrates bilateral ground-glass opacities, tiny (<5 mm) centrilobular ground-glass nodules (arrows), and peripheral reticulation and architectural distortion. Cessation of the drugs resulted in marked clinical improvement with resolution of dyspnea.

Choice of Imaging Modality

Thin-section CT more precisely assesses the presence and characterizes the pattern and distribution of parenchymal and airway abnormalities than chest radiography does, and it may demonstrate abnormalities in patients with normal radiographs. Padley and colleagues detected abnormal findings on CT in all 23 patients with drug-induced lung disease compared with 17 patients (74%) on radiography. CT can also be of value in identifying findings suggestive of an alternative diagnosis and in monitoring response to treatment. In some cases the CT findings closely reflect the histologic findings and are highly suggestive of a particular drug-reaction pattern. However, there is considerable overlap between the various patterns on CT. Cleverley and colleagues, in a retrospective study of 20 patients with drug-induced lung disease, found that CT had an accuracy of only 45% in predicting the specific histologic pattern of reaction. In spite of these limitations, thin-section CT is currently the best noninvasive method to assess the presence of drug-induced lung disease and to predict the underlying histologic pattern. Thin-section CT is also of value in monitoring the appearance, progression, and resolution of pulmonary damage in these patients.

Imaging Patterns

Drug-induced lung disease typically manifests in five characteristic patterns in the lung. These are diffuse alveolar damage, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, organizing pneumonia, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and alveolar hemorrhage. The pathophysiology and imaging features of each entity is discussed herein.

Of note, all patterns of chronic interstitial pneumonias have been reported as manifestations of drug reactions; however, desquamative interstitial pneumonia, lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia, and usual interstitial pneumonia are uncommon manifestations of drug-induced lung disease. For example, a fibrotic process that mimics idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, characterized by the presence of usual interstitial pneumonia on surgical lung biopsy, has been well characterized for nitrofurantoin.

Diffuse Alveolar Damage

Diffuse alveolar damage is the histopathologic finding that corresponds to the clinical entity of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Diffuse alveolar damage is one of the most common histologic manifestations of pulmonary drug toxicity and has been observed most commonly as a reaction to chemotherapeutic drugs used in the treatment of malignant neoplasms, particularly busulfan, cyclophosphamide, BCNU, bleomycin, paclitaxel, and docetaxel. Less commonly, it may also be seen in patients receiving amiodarone, aspirin, narcotics, or low-dose cytotoxic agents such as methotrexate. Recently, checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy has been found to cause a generalized pneumonitis that may represent diffuse alveolar damage or nonspecific interstitial pneumonia; the exact histologic pattern of lung injury, however, has not been fully elucidated. Diffuse alveolar damage manifests initially as an acute exudative phase followed by a chronic reparative phase.

The acute phase is characterized by necrosis of type II pneumocytes and alveolar endothelial cells with alveolar and interstitial edema and formation of hyaline membranes. These findings are most prominent in the first week after lung injury. In contrast, the chronic reparative phase is characterized by the proliferation of type II pneumocytes and fibroblasts. In some cases there is progression to end-stage honeycombing. Histologic features seldom allow distinction of drug reaction from other common causes of diffuse alveolar damage. The exception is busulfan, which is typically associated with marked cytologic atypia.

By radiograph and CT, diffuse alveolar damage mimics ARDS resulting from any other cause, demonstrating bilateral ground-glass opacities and areas of consolidation predominantly involving the dependent lung. In the early exudative phase, patchy ground-glass opacities with adjacent areas of lobular sparing are often the predominant finding. The ground-glass opacities rapidly become confluent and may be associated with smooth linear opacities, resulting in a crazy paving pattern, and with dependent areas of consolidation ( Fig. 65.2 ). With further progression of disease the consolidation may predominate. Architectural distortion and traction bronchiectasis are commonly identified in the organizing phase of diffuse alveolar damage. The chronic fibrotic phase may result in extensive reticulation and honeycombing ( Fig. 65.3 ).

Fig. 65.2, Diffuse alveolar damage caused by amiodarone. Axial CT demonstrates extensive bilateral ground-glass opacities and dependent areas of consolidation. Note focal lobular areas of sparing and smooth lines superimposed on the ground-glass opacities, resulting in a crazy paving pattern. The patient presented with progressive shortness of breath and developed respiratory failure.

Fig. 65.3, Progression of diffuse alveolar damage. (A) Coronal CT shows the acute exudative phase of diffuse alveolar damage manifesting as bilateral ground-glass opacities and small pleural effusions extending into the right minor and major fissures. (B) Follow-up CT 1 month later shows the chronic reparative phase of diffuse alveolar damage with fibrotic changes, particularly in the right upper lobe. Notice the lower lung volume, reticulation, architectural distortion, and increased pleural fluid.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here