Pectoralis Major Musculocutaneous Flaps in Head and Neck Surgery


Introduction

Regional flaps play an important role in reconstructive surgery of the head and neck. Introduced in 1979, the pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap was an important improvement over the deltopectoral flap and multistage tissue transfers that had dominated the reconstruction attempts previously. This flap allowed effective and more reliable single-stage tissue transfer for reconstruction of complex defects of the neck and face, upper aerodigestive tract, and skull base. This development enhanced resection capability and enabled patients with cancer of the head and neck to receive timely adjuvant radiation therapy, facilitating surgical treatment combined with curative intent. However, with advances in microvascular tissue transfer, the pectoralis major flap has been relegated to a secondary role in reconstruction. Nevertheless, the pectoralis major flap remains an important reconstructive option for certain indications.

Key Operative Learning Points

  • 1.

    The role of the pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap in contemporary head and neck reconstruction lies in the salvage of patients who are not candidates for free flaps or for coverage of the neck when a free flap is deemed unwarranted.

  • 2.

    The flap is based on the pectoral branch of the thoracoacromial trunk. The trunk originates from the subclavian vessels and emerges at the point projected on the skin just medial to the deltopectoral triangle bordered by the deltoid, pectoralis major, and clavicle (also known as the Mohrenheim fossa). The pectoral branch runs along a line drawn from that projected point to the xiphoid process ( Fig. 170.1A ). The pedicle runs on the undersurface of the pectoralis major muscle ( Fig. 170.2B ) in the clavipectoral fascia and must be visualized and protected during dissection.

    Fig. 170.1, A 68-year-old man with a history of carcinoma of the tonsil treated with chemoradiation developed exposure of the cervical spinal hardware through the posterior pharyngeal and cervical esophageal wall.

    Fig. 170.2, Salvage laryngectomy with neck dissection for chemoradiation failure of squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx. Postoperatively the patient developed a pharyngeal leak. A pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap is used for reconstructive salvage. A, Beveling out dissection of the small paddle maximizes its viability. B, The entire muscle is used to ensure coverage of both the pharynx and neck. C, The radiated neck and skin of the upper chest are completely divided to prevent compression of the flap pedicle and exposed muscle surface if grafted with a sheet split-thickness skin graft.

  • 3.

    Dissection of the flap should be performed with minimal muscle bulk ( Fig. 170.3 ) and, when necessary, comprising the entire muscle. Complete denervation of the muscle included in the flap is important to prevent subsequent animation of the flap and to promote atrophy.

    Fig. 170.3, A pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap dissection in a female patient in the setting of surgical salvage. The skin paddle is harvested from the inframammary fold on the narrow denervated strip of muscle.

  • 4.

    The skin paddle is often designed on the inferior border of the muscle or inframammary fold in women (see Fig. 170.3 ); its perimeter can be used as the exposure for flap dissection (see Fig. 170.1A ). Distal location of the skin paddle improves the arc of rotation.

  • 5.

    A minimal-access dissection of the flap through the perimeter of the skin paddle is best performed with the use of lighted retractors. Complete hemostasis and secure ligation of the deltoid and acromial branches of the thoracoacromial trunk are the key. A laparoscopic harmonic scalpel is an excellent adjunct in this dissection (see Fig. 170.1C ).

Preoperative Period

History

  • 1.

    Previous procedures that may have compromised the anatomic integrity of the pectoralis major flap (subpectoral pacemaker placement or any operation in the area of the pedicle) and congenital absence of the pectoralis major muscle (e.g., Poland syndrome) will preclude its use as a reconstructive option.

  • 2.

    Paralysis of the ipsilateral latissimus dorsi muscle will result in shoulder impairment.

  • 3.

    All medical comorbidities—including those that relate to mortality risk (e.g., respiratory and cardiac disease, alcoholism) and those related to wound healing (e.g., diabetes, nutritional status, smoking, thyroid dysfunction)—should be assessed and mitigated preoperatively if possible.

Physical Examination

  • 1.

    The functional and anatomic integrity of the pectoralis major flap and the ipsilateral latissimus dorsi muscle must be evaluated.

  • 2.

    The amount of subcutaneous adipose/breast tissue overlying the muscle should be examined in order to determine whether the flap should be harvested as a myocutaneous or myofascial flap.

Imaging

  • 1.

    Imaging is typically unwarranted for flap evaluation but if necessary the authors favor a surgeon-performed duplex ultrasound evaluation as the most versatile form of imaging.

Indications

  • 1.

    Infection or radiation-related carotid artery exposure or blowout

  • 2.

    Complications of carotid endarterectomy or stenting

  • 3.

    Cervical skin defects with vascular exposure following neck dissection, pharyngeal or esophageal fistula, and/or failed free flaps

  • 4.

    Reconstruction of the upper aerodigestive tract in patients with vessel-depleted, multiply operated necks

  • 5.

    Medical comorbidities or poor physical status, precluding microvascular tissue transfer

Contraindications

  • 1.

    Anatomic compromise of the pectoralis major muscle and/or its blood supply is an absolute contraindication.

  • 2.

    In the case of the nonfunctional latissimus dorsi muscle, shoulder dysfunction should be balanced against a critical defect.

  • 3.

    Cosmetic concerns in women and deformity in men should be taken into consideration and discussed preoperatively.

  • 4.

    Insufficient arc of rotation and/or size of flap to cover defect. This can be determined at the time of flap design if not before.

Preoperative Preparation

  • 1.

    Negative margins after excision of the tumor

  • 2.

    Uninfected wound

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here